Remotely Counting Machines Behind A NAT Box 618
Overtone writes "Steve Bellovin of AT&T Labs Research has published a paper showing how to remotely count the number of machines hiding behind a NAT box (in IMW 2002, the
Second Internet Measurement Workshop). Your friendly DSL or cable broadband provider could implement this technique to enforce their single-machine license clause. Bellovin explains how to change the NAT software to defeat the measurement scheme, but the fix is complicated and unlikely to appear in commercial home gateways anytime soon."
Top 5 ways to count # of machines behind a NAT box (Score:4, Funny)
5 -- Via the traditional finger point, coupled with the ever-popular audible counter increment
4 -- Thermal image detection scan
3 -- Utilize the same finger pointing mentioned in 5, but avoid the audible count as an enhanced privacy measure
2 -- Avoid counting and caring about counting altogether; continue browsing Slashdot
1 -- Call the dude with the NAT box and ask him!
Free tech news & blogging for life -- *nix.org [starnix.org]
What about NAT behind NAT? (Score:5, Funny)
jerk (Score:2, Funny)
Thanks a lot Steve you PRICK!
No way! (Score:4, Funny)
Crap! Now I have to worry about my internet conn
Re:Not where I'm from (Score:2, Funny)
research.att.com Slashdotted? Give me a break. (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe someone can fill us in.
All my machines are single (Score:1, Funny)
FreeBSD (Score:5, Funny)
Recent versions of OpenBSD and some versions of FreeBSD use a pseudo-random number generator for the IPid field.
So my FreeBSD will look like thousands of PCs? LOL, that sure would piss the cable company off.
Re:what if they are chained? (Score:5, Funny)
You mean there are some that aren't?
Quick! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What about NAT behind NAT? (Score:5, Funny)
"No, no, not 'Anti-NAT," that's my Aunt Natalie!"
Re:Not where I'm from (Score:5, Funny)
Re:jerk (Score:2, Funny)
And if you ever do anything like this again, you will get another Slashdotting!
AT&T can't stand slashdotting? (Score:5, Funny)
AT&T lets you connect five (Score:4, Funny)
I'm thinking that even for Slashdot readers, five computers in the house with broadband internet will be sufficient.
Read it here: [att.com]
Connect Multiple Computers to the AT&T Broadband Internet Service
Attention Customer: (Score:5, Funny)
Our expert system has detected that you are sharing a single connection with 4,179 computers.
Lets be real for a moment... (Score:5, Funny)
And now suddenly they're counting machines behind it?
This is sounding like fantasy and science fiction to me.
Re:Not where I'm from (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Not where I'm from (Score:1, Funny)
Technical hypothesis, you are schizophrenic and you are blaming imaginary people for own fuck ups.
Re:trying to crack down on reselling (Score:4, Funny)
Well, the cable company is after me, and I can't understand why.
I picked up a used VAX-11/780 a while back (had the word 'dagobah' scrawled inside the door, never figured out what that was about), and have a couple dozen friends and neighbors hooking up to it via a combinaton of Wyse-50 serial terminals and NDS dedicated X terminals. The terminals are "dumb" and can't do any local processing. All the compute resources are on the VAX, there are no NAT services running, and only one IP address is being consumed. So the connection isn't being shared.
Still, the cableco is giving me static about connection sharing, saying it's tantamount to running NAT. I countered by saying that running NAT is tantamount to running a large multi-user machine. But their lawyers are better dressed than mine, and are threating criminal cable fraud charges. I have no idea how it will turn out. If they decide to go to the mat, it'll be interesting to watch the local constabulary confiscate the VAX for forensic examination.
Schwab
P.S: Anyone know how to compile Quake2 for this thing? It keeps crapping out on the CPU_ARCH #define with the message, "Carmack hits you with a cluestick --more--".
P.P.S: :-)
Re:Not where I'm from (Score:2, Funny)
But they do recommend you to use a firewall.
The firewall i'm using is running linux with an iptables based firewall.
Behind it are 8 computers.
So, it's not a router but a firewall.
Re: Liberty City or Vice City (Score:1, Funny)