DOD vs. 802.11b 352
goombah99 writes "The NY times (reg required) reports that "The Defense Department, arguing that an increasingly popular form of wireless Internet access could interfere with military radar, is seeking new limits on the technology". It would seem they have a good point; radar is an essential for both defense and civilian aviation as well as ship navigation in tight quarters. Critics of the restrictions contend technology can limit the interference, but what proof is there to these assertions? Sure we all want wireless internet but maybe there should be more careful review of its consequences."
Ok Ok - This is obvious .... (Score:3, Funny)
Why not just use cell towers for radar? (Score:5, Funny)
GF
I can see the military's point (Score:3, Funny)
Interference? (Score:5, Funny)
And if these technologies do jam radars, is there an application in the field of speeding ticket avoidance?
Priorities (Score:3, Funny)
Suggestion for Saddam (Score:3, Funny)
I can hear it now... (Score:2, Funny)
It, uh, appears that the whole misunderstanding was caused by a Wi-Fi access point in a Starbucks in Schenectady sir that confused General Ripper's signal corps.
In a war room near you... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I can hear it now... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Other problems as well (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Interference? (Score:3, Funny)
... meaning that you'd better have a fast vehicle if you go wardriving near any military installation because you might just end up with a HARM missile chasing your SUV down the interstate. Although if you're in a suicidal mood, you could ping something from your car and mock the HARM missile as it locks onto the emitter, which shut down after sending the echo-request packet, causing the missile to loose lock, after a bit your wifi card sends out another icmp-request packet, causing the HARM missile to momentarily re-aquire a lock onto you again, etcetera.
Can you imagine some poor pilot having to report to his CO why his HARM missile is continously losing lock in the middle of NYC?
Re:I can hear it now... (Score:4, Funny)
make them stop! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:FCC should take care of this (Score:5, Funny)
The military version of the FCC stamp reads "This device must accept all interference, and is permitted to fire missiles back."
Oh, great... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Priorities (Score:3, Funny)
Just wait till the gov't finds out that the microwaves in our house transmit at similar frequencies to those that my WiFi card emits, except they do it at 700W.
Maybe we shouldn't build our radar systems in the public spectrum.
1. Buy microwave
2. Remove shielding
3. Sell "radar jammer"
4 ?? Proft.
One thing to keep in mind (Score:2, Funny)