Economic Predictions Using Web Usage Data 149
Makarand writes "The Chicago Tribune has an article on the claims of ComScore Networks Inc., that it can predict major economic
trends by tracking the online activity of 1.5 Million people.
The company gains access to people's Internet travelogues by giving
them free security software and programs that speed up their connections. Economists say that
the company's models need to be tested over several years
before they can be considered accurate."
Irony? (Score:5, Funny)
P.
Re:Sound like spyware to me. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Spyware (Score:5, Funny)
-Mark
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
ComScore announces their predictions for this year based on web activity. You should take all of your money out of large cap stocks and invest heavily into p0rn!
Economic Predictions Using Slashdot +5 Rated Posts (Score:2, Funny)
and how does... (Score:2, Funny)
I guess you could predicate higher economical activity followed by a brief period of laxed activity, cycling every 20 minutes between 10pm and 1 am...
So how is this useful again?
My economy prediction (Score:5, Funny)
analyzing porn viewing... (Score:5, Funny)
Teen porn would indicate a desire to return back to school for more education. This can be used to indicate a slowing in the job market or radical changes in job skills being required.
Lesbian porn indicates a desire for more social time, expanding ones horizons, and generally a good economy, since everyone is getting more then enough of the good stuff.
Hardcore porn would indicate a slowing economy, since you are just pounding away at the task at hand.
Gay porn would indicate a resession, since that is most likely when you are taking it in the ass at work, so why not see how the professionals do it.
Hope this helps with future economical models based off of the viewing habbits of porn.
Re:Spyware (Score:5, Funny)
Consider the source of the data (Score:3, Funny)
Not exactly a random distribution of the populous, is it?
They are already restricting the data this software collects, as its source of data pertains to a specific sample base:
1, (PC) Computer owners
2, Home Users
3, The type of fool that downloads something willy nilly on their computer.
Given this conditions, the survey base could not really exceed 50% of the range of population. Therefore can really only be 50% accurate.
(yes I pulled the 50% out my head, based on my survey of my coworkers).
Re:security company? (Score:2, Funny)
(Look at it like this: If hackers cannot break *out* of their own system, how can they ever break *into* another system? This is providing maximum security at a minimum price to legal users, because if you are a legal user ["l-user"], you don't want to break the system anyway.)
This company takes the concept one step further: It offers Internet security by checking people's history files for illegal and objectionable sites. This will bring those sites down because they won't have any customers any more (how's Debian going to solve *that* problem, hmm?). If you recommend products like the above, you're not going to do any good, just harm, because modern security products like this company's usually only run on Microsoft computers. (Open source is not likely to get professional security soon-- proof: currently there are NO open-source projects working on a free implementation of Palladium!)