Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

HP to Heavily Support and Invest in .Net 218

Dr.Stress writes: "CNet is reporting 'Hewlett-Packard and Microsoft plan to invest $50 million in a joint effort to sell corporate customers on the software giant's .Net Web services efforts....HP plans to devote 3,000 consultants from its HP Services unit to the effort and also train 5,000 people in its sales and support staff.' Microsoft will provide additional installation support, and the companies will jointly market .Net services. This was announced previously, but this article contains a few more details. Frankly, as an HP employee, I am alarmed at all this closeness with Microsoft lately (this, plus the media center PCs....what's next??)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HP to Heavily Support and Invest in .Net

Comments Filter:
  • Bruce Perens (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Bartmoss ( 16109 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:39AM (#4318002) Homepage Journal
    No wonder they got rid of Bruce Perens...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:39AM (#4318003)
    Look, I worked at HP during the early and mid 90's. Let me tell you, cozying up to Microsoft is nothing new. Investing in Microsoft has been the stealth initiative of MANY of the ladder-climbers at HP. During my stay at HP, Rick Beluzzo was the big Microsoft pusher (ask me if I'm surprised he ended up WORKING for Microsoft in the end).

    HP's downward slide didn't start with Carly, nor did it start with the merger--it started a LONG time ago, when the upper eschelons were taken over by MBA-types who thought that, instead of HP innovating, it would be MUCH easier to cozy up to the dominant monopoly.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:41AM (#4318008)
    This sounds just like another brilliant move by Carly Fiorina, after shutting down entire HP divisions (lab instruments and calculators among others).
    However, history teaches that too close an alliance with MS bear a bitter fruit (think IBM)

    I wonder what *we* could do against these corporate greedy b*startds...
  • IBM (Score:3, Interesting)

    by e8johan ( 605347 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:49AM (#4318025) Homepage Journal
    It seems like this is a part of HP's plan to 'do an IBM', i.e. become a provider of complete solutions (HW+SW+Consulting). They've got the HW and consulting, but still need a big SW platform to sell and promote.
    As for scaryness, yes it is a threat to the freedom online. We have to hope that Liberty Alliance will succeed and that average Joe will become aware of the lack of integrity this type of solutions can result in.
  • Let's see.... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Dredd13 ( 14750 ) <dredd@megacity.org> on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @07:09AM (#4318055) Homepage
    .... toss Perens, cozy up to Microsoft ...

    Anyone want to place bets on how long before HP "decides that supporting Linux is just too costly" and bails on the platform entirely?

    Wouldn't surprise me if part of this MS/HP deal was MSFT saying "before we'll consummate this, in a few months, you've got to get rid of that thorn in our side Perens. We can't have him out there publicly lambasting us, as an employee of your company, if we're going to do business with you."

  • by haplo21112 ( 184264 ) <haplo@epithnaFREEBSD.com minus bsd> on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @08:29AM (#4318260) Homepage
    If HP is coxying up with Microsoft like this, it explains why HP let go one of the most outspoken MS detractors.
  • by tmark ( 230091 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:01AM (#4318439)
    I feel really bad for Carly Fiorona. She may actually believe that she is digging a foundation for her company. . .

    Why feel sorry for an intellegent (and highly compensated) person who should know better ? Why not feel sorry instead for the misguided Compaq/HP foot soldiers and shareholders who are going to be screwed over by her bunglings ?
  • Lately? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:18AM (#4318543)
    Dr. Stress wrote: Frankly, as an HP employee, I am alarmed at all this closeness with Microsoft lately...

    Lately? Heh. H-P got in bed with Microsoft long ago, at one point all but abandoning their Unix efforts and customers. I've always preferred Sun over H-P anyway, but felt that H-P would be waiting in the wings should I ever become sufficiently dissatisfied with Sun that I felt a change was necessary. But H-P's getting in bed with M$ originally, and their increasing support of All Things M$ since, completely removed them from consideration for me. Now my backup plan is some flavour of Linux on (probably) Dell hardware, should it ever become necessary.

    Quite bluntly: I don't trust H-P to maintain any kind of commitment to anything not M$-centric.

    Such a shame, what's happened to H-P :(. Once known for some of the best, most rock-solid scientific measurement and test equipment that could be had, and arguably the best calculators on the market. Now look what they've become: little more than Yet Another M$-Windoze-Me-Too PeeCee company.

  • by gi-tux ( 309771 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:46AM (#4318763) Homepage
    Three or four years ago, I had people from HP calling me asking me when I would be moving my systems from HP-UX to NT. When I laughed and told them that we were moving from MS platforms to Unix (tm) and unix-like systems, the people on the other end acted amazed that anyone would still be moving stuff to Unix (tm).

    Doesn't really suprise me that after the Compaq merger, they are even more in bed with MS. After all wasn't it Compaq that basically killed the Alpha?

  • Take a pill... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jmcnamera ( 519408 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:50AM (#4318801) Homepage
    Folks, calm down about this.

    HP also signed a deal like this with BEA and people didn't go ballistic. HP signs many deals and they want to be big in services and this and the BEA deal is how you get big in services.

    You should be careful about reading corporate press releases, they rarely are in context.
  • Deceitful (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Baki ( 72515 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @10:07AM (#4318917)
    The article states:

    While acknowledging that .Net is still in its early stages, HP Services chief Ann Livermore said now is the time to start selling companies on the idea of using Web services to automate their businesses.

    This suggests that web services == .net, which is nonsense. One of the selling points of web services allegedly is that it is platform independant and portable, not depending on a single technology such as .net.

    Deceitful strategy, first they try to sell web services because of said platform independance, then the next step is to suggest that you need .net to build web services, leading to vendor lock in.

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...