Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

HP to Heavily Support and Invest in .Net 218

Dr.Stress writes: "CNet is reporting 'Hewlett-Packard and Microsoft plan to invest $50 million in a joint effort to sell corporate customers on the software giant's .Net Web services efforts....HP plans to devote 3,000 consultants from its HP Services unit to the effort and also train 5,000 people in its sales and support staff.' Microsoft will provide additional installation support, and the companies will jointly market .Net services. This was announced previously, but this article contains a few more details. Frankly, as an HP employee, I am alarmed at all this closeness with Microsoft lately (this, plus the media center PCs....what's next??)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HP to Heavily Support and Invest in .Net

Comments Filter:
  • by heffrey ( 229704 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:32AM (#4317987)
    grammar seems a bit poor in the title....
  • by FyRE666 ( 263011 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:36AM (#4317993) Homepage
    I am alarmed at all this closeness with Microsoft lately (this, plus the media center PCs....what's next??)

    Well if memory serves, MS will use HP for as long as it takes to get its own team together, then screw them over. Of course, MS may really value the partnership, and have absolutely no ulterior motiv...... sorry, I'm laughing too hard to finish!!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:45AM (#4318020)
    "I will be nice when I can develop things.."

    why are you a bastard now?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @06:50AM (#4318026)
    yohoo (yöhôô)
    interj., &n., &v.
    An exclamation of incorrectness - esp. when claiming first post.
  • by croanon ( 567416 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @07:03AM (#4318049)
    By posting such unrelated and stupid message to this topic.\n
  • by RobotRunAmok ( 595286 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @07:10AM (#4318057)
    Geeks have been traditionally forgiving of split-infinitives. Lexicographers and sociologists believe this dates from Kirk's voice-over "To Boldly Go..." in the original Star Trek series.
  • by Lol the unbeliever ( 311135 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @08:01AM (#4318174)
    What's next you ask ?

    I do not know. I do have a collection of "Digital - Microsoft alliance" t-shirts from when DEC still existed.

    Embrace and Extend.
  • by supabeast! ( 84658 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:09AM (#4318490)
    We are supporting Microsoft! We are supporting Linux! We are going to move forward with HP-UX and Tru-64! Compaq hardware will keep on truckin! We love AMD and Hammer! We love intel and Itanium!

    We will say anything to try and keep our stockholders from noticing that we made a former Lucent exec our CEO and are letting her run one of the most wacked-out mergers ever seen!
  • by ch-chuck ( 9622 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:26AM (#4318580) Homepage
    Damn straight, it's our duty to boldly split infinities wherever they occur. Grammar should describe language, not dictate it. For example, I think prepositions are a good thing to end a sentence with. And often start sentences with a conjunction. Never put statements in the positive form. Verbs don't have to agree with their subjects. A writer may shift your point of view. Writing carefully, dangling participles may be used.
  • by banzai51 ( 140396 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:43AM (#4318731) Journal

    Frankly, as an HP employee, I am alarmed at all this closeness with Microsoft lately (this, plus the media center PCs....what's next??).


    Ohhhh, poor baby. Would you like your bottle? The trials and trubulations of a for profit company doing business with another for profit company to, can you believe the evil, sell goods and services for profit!!!! What is the world comming to? God forbid your company work with an OS that reaches over 90% of the PCs out there. The horror of having to consider the end user!
  • by small_dick ( 127697 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @09:57AM (#4318844)
    Linux Expo, 2002; refering to the HP/Compaq merger:

    "...it's like watching two slow-moving garbage trucks in a head-on collision..."
  • by intermodal ( 534361 ) on Tuesday September 24, 2002 @10:40AM (#4319147) Homepage Journal
    Looks like Compaq's hiding their shady business behind the HP name again...

    Step 1: Control HP
    Step 2: Publicly announce evil plans under HP's name
    Step 3: Profit????
  • by dpt ( 165990 ) on Wednesday September 25, 2002 @12:02AM (#4325067) Journal
    ... and for that matter, why I need "web services?"

    So that you can make your broadband connection perform like a dialup, as SOAP is an XML protocol.

    Just imagine, instead of sending your images/mp3s/whatever as a stream of bytes, you can send something like:

    <int> 56 </int> <int> 42 </int> <int> 35 </int> ... [etc]

    What a fucking breakthough! What insight! And, as an added bonus, you get the overhead of creating the XML at the sender, and parsing it at the receiver. Huzzah! The brilliance knows no bounds!

    Yes, I know about the "array of bytes" type, but this is just laughable. You now have all the endian/packing problems of sockets, so if you use this type, SOAP has gained you exactly nothing and you might as well have used raw sockets. And I'm not even going to *ask* what happens if you want to send an array of floats efficiently ...

    It's no suprise that SOAP is from the same geniuses that brought you the joke that was DCOM (which has been swept under the carpet I notice). Perhaps I should send these people some of the standard distributed computing texts for xmas, it's clear they don't have clue one about the topic.

    --
    Disagree? Reply, don't mod. Read the moderator guidelines!

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...