Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck

235,000 Software Engineers Can't Be Wrong, Right? 980

jgeelan writes "The Boston Globe has carried a report on how 235,000 engineers and computer scientistsl are calling on Congress to study the impact of the country's H1-B visa program, the recession, and the outsourcing of jobs overseas on the unemployment rate of engineers and other information technology professionals. It's an issue that's bubbling on discussion sites all over America too, though in one case developers (Java developers in this instance) seem completely unable to agree on whether H1-B is really a contributing factor or not."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

235,000 Software Engineers Can't Be Wrong, Right?

Comments Filter:
  • hold on a second (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lord Omlette ( 124579 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @05:20PM (#3954105) Homepage
    235,000 software engineers got together and slashdot didn't cover it? Who dropped the fucking ball here?!

    IEEE-USA? Well bully for them! Did all 235,000 members send in their support or did a majority vote on this or did the publicity arm send this out on behalf of those people who are members?
  • by Milo Fungus ( 232863 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @05:21PM (#3954106)
    Didn't Richard Stallman say that something like this would happen to the programming market as a result of free software taking over the world? What role has GNU/Linux played in this change?
  • by ilsie ( 227381 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @05:24PM (#3954143)
    Last week's paper version of EETimes had an article about the fact that 60% of EE/CompE/CS undergrads in the US today either flunk out or quit, which is a large reason that many companies are "outsourcing" to engineers coming from different countries these days. This is obviously a Catch-22 type situation, because within a university, the engineering college gets less of the yearly budget/alumni funds due to less engineering graduates, which possibly could have the effect of causing prospective college students to not want to attend that engineering college.
  • by Robber Baron ( 112304 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @05:25PM (#3954153) Homepage
    Sheesh! Any economist will tell you that frictional unemployment is 6%! What that means is if you have 100 workers and 100 jobs, at any given moment 6 of them will be unemployed (going to school, bumming around Europe, dropping a kid, "finding themselves", or just jerking off). Anything less than 6% indicates a shortage of workers!
  • by ronfar ( 52216 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @05:53PM (#3954405) Journal
    Foreigners have made considerable contributions to technology in the US. The Manhattan project team had large numbers of refugees in it. Important parts of the team that put man on the moon came from the German rocket program. Andy Grove and a number of other high tech pioneers came from outside the US. Bringing in foreigners is smart.
    This is true, I'm completely in favor of allowing in new immigrants. However, H1Bs are not immigrants. H1Bs are sojourners, as you will find out when your H1B period ends.

    The correct way to handle H1B visas is to make them into real greencards and eliminate them as sojourner visas. Hey, I don't want my cousin-in-law to be forced to go back to Thailand when her H1B visa ends.

    Your other quote just points out another problem with the H1B process:

    Finally, the US government even makes a profit on H1B processing. To get an H1B processed costs $1125. I've heard that the average processing time is in the order of fractions of an hour.
    This will actually distort the process, since government officials tend not to want to eliminate revenue whatever the source. (However, I wouldn't object to it as much if H1Bs were brought in as real immigrants and not sojourners.)

    One last thing, your quote:

    There are, of course, abuses, as there is in any scheme, but overall the program is a good idea.
    We shouldn't just accept abuses, we should take care of them however we can. One way would be to fast track H1Bs to real greencards. In this way, we would eliminate certain deficiencies in the program that allow for abuses.
  • I'm sorry but you're over generalising...

    I'm a belgian currently working for a company based in california.
    This company employed a dozen or so americans who, during the .com "era" acted like prima donas and massively left for higher salaries.
    The company now employs 7 people: 5 belgian, 1 french and 1 canadian. We're getting paid salaries from 40 to 75K per month (depending on the person). I don't call that slavery and I must say these salaries range from nice to very good according to our standards

    I admit that the situation I'm living is better than what it could be for people in asian countries but face it, the problem originally comes from the americans, not from the foreigners. It's all about value. Sure the asians are cheaper than the americans (or europeans for that matter), but can you easily communicate with them? Do you know if they'll do the work the way you expect them to? That's a compromise. Overall it's best to have the team where you are. In our case, the boss moves regularly to belgium to talk about the project. If the americans originally hadn't acted the way they did and did not (even now) ask ludicrous salaries, the company would still be employing a majority of americans...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 25, 2002 @06:05PM (#3954496)
    I tried to get riled over this, but I just couldn't.

    If a company is determined to pay the lowest wages, then it doesn't it matter to me whether they get a visa worker or a code monkey right out of college. Either way, they're not going to pay what I expect, so no one is taking a job from me.

    If a bright visa worker shows up (and shows me up) that means that I've been slacking off. The way to fix that problem is to be better than others, not to deny them visas.

    OK, so here's a potential problem:
    Entry level pay positions are going to experienced visa engineers instead of local entry level skills folks. This makes "breaking in" to tech work tougher, and folks just out of school can't get their foot in the door.

    So is it a real problem? I dunno. As far as competition between visa workers and experienced workers goes, the answer seems simple. Sharpen your skills or lower your price. No need to put a quota on competition.
  • by Alioth ( 221270 ) <no@spam> on Thursday July 25, 2002 @06:09PM (#3954536) Journal
    There's too many myths about H1-B. Being a former H1-B (and prior to that, L1) worker, I've seen it for myself. I've now moved back home instead of doing the green card thing because (a) the INS dehumanization process is too humiliating, and living in the United States is just not worth going through that bullshit, and (b) the Isle of Man is just much nicer than Houston :-) and (c) the quality of life is much better for workers here - 4 weeks vacation when you're hired and a 37 hour work week instead of ungodly hours and 2 weeks vacation if you're lucky.

    Myths:

    • H1-B workers are paid less than U.S. workers. This is in fact illegal. I was actually paid more than my co-workers. Also the company had to go through the expense of the H1 process, which is bureaucratic, officious and generally a pain in the arse.
    • H1-B workers are hired in preference to U.S. workers. I never did see any evidence of this. U.S. workers who got let go (I was in the U.S. during the boom years) were let go because they didn't make the grade - simple as that.
    • H1-B workers are now being hired in preference to U.S. workers. According to other posters, most job ads now are specifying U.S. citizens or permanent residents only. H1-B workers are locked out of these jobs.

    It seems that the article is more sour grapes than anything else. Don't get me wrong - I don't dislike the United States, but I feel it's a better place to go on vacation than to actually live. Especially with the post-9/11 restrictions on the freedoms that actually made the country attractive in the first place.

  • Wrong (Score:2, Interesting)

    by leabre ( 304234 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @06:55PM (#3954825)
    The last two companies I worked for hired foreign workers for programming positions. I don't know what they were paid. I don't care. I will say this, some of the brightest programmers and other IT technical people I've ever met (and certainly worked with) were Russian, Indian, Persian, or German (mostly Indian and Russian, tho).

    They work harder and find few excuses and are so detail oriented that when compared with the other American workers there, put the Americans to shame. I, am American. I even found myself lazy compared to them.

    The company only required 35 hours a week (my salary was $72 -- I was R&D). We had two hour lunches. They didn't hardly care much about being in-tune with their work, as I on the other hand, devoted my life to squeezing every last bit of performance out of whatever I could and reading trade magazines and buying every book on the shelf about programming out of my pocket. I game my all, but not all my hours.

    They, gave all their hours (when not required to) and often did exemplary work in their projects. I must say, I see no harm in foreign workers. Americans (as I've seen but I haven't seen them all) are simply lazy when compared to them. Again, based on what I've seen which is by no means exhaustive. I'm proud to have met those people and watched 1 Indian and 1 Russian become and American citizen as a result of corporate sponsorship.

    Thanks,
    Me
  • Observations on H1Bs (Score:2, Interesting)

    by aloha ( 551511 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @07:08PM (#3954904)
    The layoffs are not done on basis of citizenship. Its on qualification, performance and dedication.
    When I was doing my Masters from Purdue, most of Masters students in Electrical and Computer Sciences were non Americans. I used to TA a undergrad class and have never found a foreign student get bad grades. Maybe its that they cant lose their scholarships that makes them work hard. But either way, they come out of school learning quite a lot.
    At work, I have seen many H1B workers work very hard. Maybe because they usually dont have a very firm financial base here or maybe they dont have much social ties and spend all their time at work. They eventually do a better job, aquire good skills and climb the company ladder. So employers do like them.
    As for low pay, in the good old days of economic boom, I haven't seen H1Bs being paid less than their peers. I have seen them rise in the company hierarchy and do well. But now that the economy is turning bad, many employers not hiring H1Bs. I have seen people forced to work on salaries which don't compensate their skills. Because they if they dont have a job, they have to leave in 14 days. For most of them with kids at school and property, it is a very tough situation. So they take paycuts. Everyone is getting hit hard, but they are getting a bigger share of it.
    So perhaps its not fair to blame them. Maybe we should take a leaf from their book and try to inculcate these qualities so that our managers dont find us dispensable.
  • by homer_ca ( 144738 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @08:09PM (#3955270)
    You're absolutely right. H1B's are manipulating the market to depress salaries. The truly free market solution would be to give these foreign workers green cards and let them compete for jobs on equal terms with US citizens. It's not about immigrant bashing. In fact many H1B opponents support green cards as an alternative.
  • by Scot Seese ( 137975 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @10:01PM (#3955710)

    My fiance' moved to the US from Sweden about five months ago. With a Masters' degree from one of Europe's most prestigious CompSci/Engineering universities, a Sun java certification, and several years' proven experience with some of Europe's largest IT consulting firms doing SQL programming, PHP/ASP scripting, Java & Linux development - We had one hell of a time finding an employer in the US to sponsor her.

    Nearly all of the firms with listings in our area flatly stated that they would not sponsor. Most of them print this in their ads. The reasons are simple:

    1. $1,000 sponsorship fee, paid to US Government
    2. $1,000 15-day H1B premium processing fee, payable by employee. If you don't chose this option, paperwork takes 3-5 months.
    3. $130 filing fee.
    4. An absolute blizzard of paperwork. We were unable to find an immigration attorney in our city that even understood the process. (South Bend, Indiana) - We ended up retaining a high-caliber immigration specialist from Houston TX. Their fee? $1,750.

    It's safe to say that none but the Fortune 1000 are willing to tackle the expense or have the expertise in handling the daunting forms.

    We finally found a local company willing to sponsor her, a local health care facility. They were very excited to get her, offered to hire her on the spot and reimbursed half her expenses. Why? *drumroll* - The position went unfilled for nearly five months as they were unable to find a qualified person locally.

    She is most certainly not being taken advantage of, having been offered a salary very much in line with her duties and educational background.

    Say what you will about the H1-B, but we can certainly tell you - It's alot harder to get sponsored than you think.

  • by antirename ( 556799 ) on Thursday July 25, 2002 @10:05PM (#3955727)
    I would have to agree here. I walked out of an interview with Lucent a few years ago... their offer was "work as temp with no health insurance and crappy pay until it's profitable for us to put you on salary and work you 80 hours a week, then you get to be a "team player!". The guy actually looked shocked when I told him I didn't think I was interested. First and only time I had to interview with various "team players" in a department who yelled at me on the interview. Maybe it was supposed to be a stress test. Their bathroom security was interesting too... They way I see it, if a company is interviewing they should be trying to attract employees as much as the employee is trying to impress them. That heavy handed attitude on an interview is a serious negative. Now I'm really glad I didn't work for them, because they're still trying to find people to lay off. But I'll bet you that they still have the security guards at the bathrooms.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 25, 2002 @10:31PM (#3955790)
    Maybe we should hire overseas CEO'S and managers to flood the market with those folks and pay them a middle income wage instead of 6 figures a year.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 25, 2002 @11:57PM (#3956146)
    You hit it right on the head. In the past I thought it best to do away with H1B. Now I say increase the number. At least the H1B folks are ON AMERICAN SOIL. Guess what happens if you cut them off... That's right, companies will ship the work directly to India.

    I own a small consulting firm and this is what I see happening even with H1Bs. More and more work is going off shore. $25-$50/hr is a steal. I've even heard of rates less than that. I can't staff a project with those numbers and American workers H1B or not.

  • by Preposterous Coward ( 211739 ) on Friday July 26, 2002 @01:12AM (#3956391)
    The government has one purpose, and that's to serve the people it represents. If it allows companies to hire foreign workers at the expense of American citizens, that's a problem.

    Right, and the people it represents include business owners, managers, shareholders, and consumers in addition to employees. If Sun can hire an immigrant engineer for half the price of an equally qualified American -- or someone who will do twice as much at the same price -- as a Sun customer I would be happy to benefit from that. (Note that the H1B program is actually supposed to require comparable pay, though from what I can tell that's routinely flouted.)

    And actually, if I really wanted to be cynical, I'd repeat something my high-school U.S. history teacher once said: government has a single purpose, and that single purpose is to perpetuate its own existence (on an individual level, to get re-elected).

  • by kisak ( 524062 ) on Friday July 26, 2002 @08:47AM (#3957397) Homepage Journal
    But how about the obvious question: "What if it's NOT really them or us"?

    I think this is a very valuable point. There seems to be an underlying assumption in this whole discussion that is very questionable. The assumption that there is only a fixed amount of jobs available at any given point. This belief is often connected to the belief there is a certain amount of work that needs to be finished at any given period.

    If one thinks about it, both are not correct.

    First, there is always more work to be done. We all do are small part in whatever role we have, but if we do more each day it does not generally mean that there will be less for other to do that day. It can mean that others can try to slack more, but it equally often leads to pressure/inspiration for others to do more themselves. It can lead to the company needing fewer employees, but those employees with extra inspiration and work energy often give better profits for the company and then again the wish for more employees to help in the companies growth. A good example is the way technology has made us more effective. The related myth that computers/machine will make people jobless is easily disproved by pointing out how many more (in percentage/total numbers) have a productive and interesting job today than 100 years ago.

    Similarly, the number of jobs available is not a fixed number but is always updated together with the companies perception of opportunities available and current economy. In this particular example, if there are skilled Indians available who ask for less pay, some companies will use the opportunity to hire, even if they would not hire if these job seekers where not there in the first place. One could say, their presence in the market created new jobs not there before, since not only did they get a job themselves, but they spend their money in the local shop and pay their taxes too. And if the company did a good analysis of the value of these extra people, the company becomes more productive and pay more taxes/can hire more people too etc. etc. (By the way, I am not saying that these Indians should only be allowed to get under-payed jobs. This is not what a open society is about. Discrimination is hard to prevent, but that doesn't mean that one should allow it, and I do not think it is good for the economy or make more jobs for the non-discriminated.)

    And, lets not forget, I am sure that among some of those 40,000 or whatever the number is, are a few entrepreneurs who helps create new companies, new markets, new products and be a great benefit to the countries economy.

  • by Stu Charlton ( 1311 ) on Friday July 26, 2002 @11:26AM (#3958569) Homepage
    "I have not met too many people who I think are good at both. There is only so much CPU power to go around in the head."

    While I agree there aren't too many that are good at both, that doesn't mean that one shouldn't aspire to it. :)
  • by Ex-MislTech ( 557759 ) on Friday July 26, 2002 @09:28PM (#3962492)
    A UC Davis professor went screaming into congress
    over his findings that approx. 22 million was
    paid by Sun, Micro$oft, Ci$co, Or-suckle and
    several other to "Fluff" the numbers of IT
    workers needed .

    This came to a vote before congress, the Dem's
    and the Repub's all voted for the bill .

    In fact the bill to double the H1-b's per year
    was voted 98-1, one of the most unanimous votes
    in the history of our county, only a handful
    of other issues like declaring WWII got so
    high a percentage .

    As to the foreign workers who want to come here
    and work and send as much home as they can, I
    have but one questions for you ???

    How are americans treated in your country that
    visit, that flirt with your women, that want
    to buy things, and setup businesses and take
    jobs and sales from companies there ???

    In some it is not allowed at all, period .

    Are they shown any animosity, any prejudice,
    are they EVER treated poorly ???

    Nary an unkind word eh ???

    The US economy is in decline, if the vast
    majority of technical labor drops to less
    than what Union fork lift drivers make ,
    what's the point . Tech jobs will become
    crap jobs, no one will want them, and
    bankrupties will drive the country into a
    self fulfilling spiral all for a few Execs
    that like to do things like PUMP and DUMP
    on their stock options and lie on their SEC
    filings .

    As to how we ended up this way, the corrupt
    blood sucking politician/lawyers that have
    not a care for their constituients .

    In a democracy it is supposed to be by the ppl
    for the ppl, not what we have at present .

    I really doubt the "US" programmers or their
    parents would be pleased to find out that
    their Congressman voted to put their children
    out of work .

    When you have ppl in charge that are EASILY
    bought off, and are hand picked by party
    members for the fine thread count of their
    marionette strings for using them like cash
    dancing puppets, what do you expect ??

    Ex-MislTech
    IT worker In Guantanamo Bay !

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...