1397337
story
filrock writes
"It looks like we'll have a little breathing room before the CBDTPA/SSSCA becomes law. Senator Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is against the bill. Read the article on Wired. Good to see someone in the Senate with some common sense."
Common Sense? (Score:1)
Re:Commerce Clause (Score:2)
Damnit (Score:1)
New and Improved (Score:3, Funny)
What does he want? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What does he want? (Score:2)
Re:What does he want? (Score:2)
Nope! They're un-American! Hyuk, hyuk, hyuk...
Don't let your guard down (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Don't let your guard down (Score:5, Informative)
And don't forget that this thing could still find its way into another bill as an amendment. That's how the CDA was passed, as an emendment to the 1996 telecom act.
OT: If one of the admins is reading this, could you go in and delete or modify the post that screwed up the page formatting?
Re:Don't let your guard down (Score:2)
Yeah, it may be sneaky and underhanded to attach a bill to another one to get it passed, but it happens all the time. This is done in precisely this situation, when the bill would be dead otherwise. This often happens with budget bills because the president is often under pressure to just sign them in order to keep the government running, so someone will load them up with junk that wouldn't otherwise get passed.
We'd better be vigilant, or this could happen here.
Re:Don't let your guard down (Score:2)
I could have sworn I came across a comment by Hollings along the lines of, "I can't believe that some teens in a basement somewhere couldn't pull it [SSSCA tech] off." But I'm having the damndest time finding the link. Have I just been hitting the magic mushrooms a little hard lately or does someone else know what I'm talking about?
Re:Don't let your guard down (Score:2)
Heres what we need to do folks (Score:5, Insightful)
We can raise the money online, through rallies, etc etc
We can get this money. It takes a group to colllect the money, a banner for hundreds or thousands of sites to post all over the web linking to this, and just hang the banner on your site. And of course IRL donations
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
its a lot of work, I was actualy looking into it then I found the digital consumer organization.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
I'm sure some people here have the means to start a non profit.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
Such a group exists-- the EFF.
However, in this case, a better effort might be waged by donating that $10 to your senators along with a letter...
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
The problem is that the Campaign Finance Reform law that just got passed banned issue-based political ads by non-candidates, IIRC.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
It doesn't go into effect until November, conveniently just after this year's elections.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
Also, that provision will be ruled unconstitutional anyway...
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:4, Interesting)
A 30-second midday ad on a nationwide cable network in about 60 million homes runs only a few thousand dollars. Probably be seen in an average of 4 million homes, roughly.
Just a thought.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:3, Funny)
Are you kidding me?? Hell, I might pony up a few grand just to tell a bunch of people to kiss my ass on national TV. Well, as many as I could cram into 30 seconds, anyway.
Re:Heres what we need to do folks (Score:2)
The numbers are authentic. You are mistakenly assuming that all cable stations have the same ratings, which they don't.
Good, but not the end of things (Score:3, Interesting)
Jouster
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:4, Informative)
Slacker
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:2, Insightful)
Except that the vast majority of the sponsors of this bill are Democrats. As were the big cheeses behind the DMCA.
I understand why you think that Republicans are evil incarnate. I can't understand why you apparently don't feel the same way about Democrats.
Democrats are evil too (Score:2)
Bush and his friends dont really know how to handle technology at all, then you have the democrats who understand the technology but want to control it like China.
Both sides are wrong, we dont really have a side which understands the technology yet understands our rights. We need a new party in government.
Re:Democrats are evil too (Score:2)
Re:Democrats are evil too (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:2)
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:2)
Second, maybe you should do a little research before you make accusations. This list [opensecrets.org] of the top 20 industries that contributed to Hastert doesn't even include the entertainment industry. Compare that to the contributor list [opensecrets.org] of the CBDTPA's author, Sen Hollings (D-SC), which lists TV/Movies/Music as the 2nd highest.
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:2, Informative)
But, yeah, he's linked to the entertainment industry. They're his #8 contributor, as can be seen here [opensecrets.org]
He's, in fact, the third-highest reciever of media contributions in the Senate (TV/Movies/Music #3.)
Re:Good, but not the end of things (Score:2)
Getting closer, but still no cigar.
Dick Gephardt is the Minority Leader of the House. Yes, he is a Democrat.
Tom Daschle is the Senate Majority Leader and, of course, he is also a Democrat.
More common sense needed... (Score:5, Informative)
This is all about the RIAA wanting to put indepent people out of business...period. They want to control every outlet that consumers have to get content.... and it is disturbing. People need to get their haeads out of their asses and stop this. Call your Senator daily....write letters....send email... and spread the work. We shoudn't have to deal with this "everything in the world must be copy protected crap."
Re:More common sense needed... (Score:2)
Re:More common sense needed... (Score:2)
Metal Gear Solid 2.... (Score:2)
The way you describe the situation sounds alot like the storyline you get at the end of the game... I guess our political problems are so bad that people in a country on the other side of the planet are making videogames base on it.
Re:More common sense needed... (Score:2)
They aren't trying to charge "internet radio stations" a dime. They are just trying to overcharge people who broadcast their (RIAA's) stuff. If you are not engaging in promoting RIAA products, you don't pay RIAA anything.
That's why I don't give a flying fuck what happens to the broadcasters that are whining about this: because they're just working for the RIAA anyway.
If you're actually doing a worthwhile broadcast, then you already have your neighborhood underground metal band's free permission (or at worst an incredibly cheap license) to broadcast their music (or you're broadcasting your own content) so this doesn't affect you.
It is a complete non-issue for everyone except RIAA tools.
Whoa... nice idea! (Score:2)
For them to do the same thing to Internet radio suggests they might be borrowing pages from the Scientology PR department's playbook.
:) Anybody have some good ideas about how we could engineer a conflict between the RIAA/MPAA and the CoS? We could rid ourselves of some of the worst organizations around if we could get them to destroy each other!
That would be cool. Maybe then the CoS would go after the RIAA for "borrowing" from their playbook! We already know how touchy they are about their various documents
What are his motives? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2)
OK, we've got a reprieve. Now USE THE DAMN TIME WISELY!!!!
Re:What are his motives? (Score:5, Insightful)
Leahy is an oddity in Congress. He's someone who seems to have his principles and sticks to them. He really seems to understand that there's such a thing as the First Amendment.
I wonder if there's a chance that Slashdot could do an interview with him. I'd like to see that happen.
Flag-burning (Score:2)
Re:What are his motives? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2, Interesting)
Makes me proud of my Vermont heritage. Remember The other senator [senate.gov] from Vermont caused a pretty big stir when he stuck to his principles [senate.gov] as well.
Leahy is one of the few politicians who can give politics a good name. In high school, he came to speak to our black history class (mind you, a class of 15 people, not the whole school, not an assembly) and discussed racism and politics. From that time on, I have had immense respect for him, while his policies [senate.gov] and actions such as this only deepen it.
-Ted
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2)
How am I supposed to set up an interview with him on Slashdot? Don't get me wrong, I'd like to do that, but that's something the admins will have to do.
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2)
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What are his motives? (Score:2)
CFR bill that tramples the First Amendment
Okay, I haven't read the text of that law (no longer a bill, btw); I only know what pundits on TV say, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
In all the discussion and debate about this law, I was surprised that no one ever mentioned Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC [cornell.edu]. Maybe it's totally inapplicable (IANAL, so I wouldn't know), but it seems relevant to me. At the time, the press was constantly parroting a line from Justice Stevens' concurring opinion [cornell.edu]: Money is property; it is not speech.
The only part of this new law that raises constitutional questions are those about the "blackout period" on TV ads. Maybe those will get struck down as unconstitutional, but the Court tends to be very precise about that sort of stuff. They'd cut out that one piece, and leave the rest of the law intact.
That wont work (Score:3, Insightful)
I think it would. (Score:2)
Enron isn't really relevant to the lives of most voters -- or at least they don't think it's relevant, which amounts to the same thing for political purposes. The collapse of Enron really has no effect on the life of the average American.
The CBDTPA, on the other hand, has the potential to directly affect the lives of anyone who buys a new VCR, computer, TV, MP3 player, car stereo, etc, etc. -- basically damn near everyone.
If it comes down to an Enron strategy for the Democrats versus a CBDTPA strategy for the Republicans, the Republicans have the advantage. And since there's no third party that's even close to winning a single Senate seat, I doubt that anyone would be pulling their punches.
TheFrood
Re:I think it would. (Score:3, Insightful)
That's going to vary by geography. The Enron debacle has created a major mess here in Oregon, where PGE (an Enron company) increased our rates 30% just prior to the colapse (coincidence?) and thousands of people lost their retirement savings. That and the rotten economy (8% unemployment, lots of empty store fronts) are going to hurt Sen. Gordon Smith's (R-OR) chances in November.
Your average voter in, say, Kansas probably won't care about Enron either way. It's just too complicated.
Similarly, the Republicans will be nuts to play the CBDTPA card; unless El Rushbo picks his words very carefully, most GOP faithful won't have the first damn clue what the hell CBDTPA even does. They (like most Democrat faithful) might assume that it's there to make cable TV cheaper or to put criminals out of work. Some of 'em might even say it's no big deal, since everyone uses Windows anyway.
Enron's VERY relevent... (Score:2)
Electric companies.
Gas companies.
Telecom companies.
Heck, they even were arranging deals with at least one of the big-4 media producers.
Don't be at all surprised if the collapse of Enron impacts your rates on a few things.
Theres an important balance (Score:2)
Then on the right wing you have the certain values which they will go to war over (fight against communism) kill over, die over, and this side has a more survival of the fittest attitude, more individualist, anti government.
You see, if we go to either extreme it could be bad, too much equality and government well, that would become socialism, and theres nothing wrong with socialism for an advanced society, but in a society which is not ready for it, socialism can be abused. Socialism can only be successful in a very high tech and highly educated society. Such as an information society, and our technology if you havent noticed is leading us slowly toward socialism, bringing everyone together, making everyone share, and act more as a group.
Currently, however, because we dont have unlimited food, water, resources etc (even if we will soon) its still survival of the fittest through competition. The point is, until we have unlimited resources, competition and individualism is the only way to figure out who gets what, and how much they get.
When the time comes when our technology makes it so everyone can live like a king, eventually we will become socialism, simply because it wont make as much sense anymore to fight over resources.
Think of it in terms of computer technology, we can fight it with DMCA and other laws to block peer to peer and keep people from sharing, we can outlaw open source to keep people competiting with each other instead of working as a team, but it literally makes no sense to do this, if this is where the technology leads.
Technology leads to socialism, capitalism eventually becomes socialism, right now we are at the crossroads, people arent going to compete when everyone via socialism can have everything they need.
After the election... (Score:3, Insightful)
If it comes up next year, it will be after the midterm election. Congressmen are a bit more easily swayed by grass-roots campaigns before the election.
What this means is that we really need to spend the time getting [digitalconsumer.org] organized and involved [eff.org].
we need advertising. (Score:2)
why wont intel and others help pay for these ads?
Thank you Senator Leahy (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Thank you Senator Leahy (Score:3, Funny)
I live (and vote) in Vermont... (Score:2)
There's more at stake here than just our computers. This is way more important than just "News for Nerds."
Interesting... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hm mod this guy up! (Score:2)
Exactly right. Didn't the DMCA pass by voice vote, in the dead of night?
And Bono too (Score:3, Insightful)
Didn't the DMCA pass by voice vote, in the dead of night?
Yes, along with the Mickey Mouse Monopoly Extension Act [wikipedia.com].
Republicans can use this as ammunition (Score:2, Interesting)
IMHO, the U.S. needs one of those hidden reset buttons to set everything back to factory (i.e., founders') defaults. We are truly FUBAR.
Re:Republicans can use this as ammunition (Score:2)
Fight it at the constituency... (Score:5, Funny)
Buuuuut...
Most of the population 'hates' pr0n, especially the Southern Baptist Convention and their ilk.
Too fight the CBDTPA, we should mount a campaign against it claiming that it protects the illicit profits of pornographers, after all, what is most traded on the Gnutella network?
This really wasn't the point (Score:3, Insightful)
Yet another way to see it.... (Score:2)
The 'less radical' alternative they may pass later will almost certainly be worse than this bill.
We could have a Republican Senate next year.... (Score:3, Interesting)
As a libertarian I really don't take a partisan view of such things--I view the Republicans and Democrats like the Bloods and the Crips, or the Corleone and Tattaglia families. I am pretty sure, however, that the DMCA passed the Senate (and House) while they were both controlled by Republicans, with Hatch then in the position that Leahy has now. Of course it was signed into law by Clinton, a Democrat. See my point about the Bloods and the Crips...?
Re:We could have a Republican Senate next year.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Rather nice that no matter who ends up in the control position, they don't trust the entertainment industry (they'll take the money, but it doesn't guarantee 'results', evidently)
Re:We could have a Republican Senate next year.... (Score:2)
Not happy about how the DMCA is being used eh? WTF. He supports Napster yet drafts a bill that destroys any chance of a service like napster ever being used. I think Sen. Hatch has pulled of a nice spin campaign to sway voters. SOmethign like this:
Its time to act. We need to collect money for ads (Score:3, Insightful)
We use this money to create ads, the ads will tell the public whats going on, how they wont have freedom on their computer anymore. Put the ads on MTV, and on shows college kids watch, let them start a real grassroots movement.
We just need to get the word out.
Re:Its time to act. We need to collect money for a (Score:2)
The music and entertainment industry can clearly outspend us on this issue.
If we are going to collect millions of dollars, I would rather see this money go to the Electronic Freedom Foundation [eff.org]
We don't have to wait for anyone to setup donations. You can donate/join the EFF right now. [eff.org]
we need ads to counter ads from the RIAA (Score:2)
Just like the "Dont do drugs or support terrorism "commercials.
Sure we should support eff, but we still need to advertise.
Re:Its time to act. We need to collect money for a (Score:2)
Meanwhile, the Congress has just passed Campaign Finance Reform that the president has promised to sign. It'll take effect right after the 2002 November elections, before the CBDTPA/SSSCA will come up again.
CFR will make it illegal to run issue ads 60 days before election day. Somehow, we're all worked up about the CBDTPA, but when Congress attempts to rewrite the Constitution and curtail free speech right, it gets ignored here. In the post CFR world, grassroots movements are going to have to organize differently than sending your 5$ in the the EFF or other organization that you'll hope will run issue ads to get the word out.
I applaud Leahy for opposing the CBDTPA, but he's a supporter of CFR in it's present form [truthout.com]. I give him a failing grade for protecting our basic rights, but he's in good company with practically the whole Democratic Party, John "Keating 5, stop me before I sell out again" McCain and George W. Bush.
Leahy waiting for more Money? (Score:2, Troll)
stop bitching here -- bitch where it matters! (Score:5, Informative)
So, in addition to posting here -- post here too!!
Comment form for the Judiciary Committee [senate.gov]
HEY!! (Score:5, Insightful)
Could it be that the government is working???
Could it be that those who govern are actually listening to the people they took an oath to represent????
<sarcasm>I'm... I'm.... I'm shocked!! </sarcasm>
This could very well be a good example of just how effective the citizens' voice can be in shaping the future of the nation and its laws. Don't forget the other two branches of government, either.
Just a small observation.
Re:HEY!! (Score:4, Interesting)
good cop/bad cop (Score:2, Interesting)
Now that the money's been shaken loose, lets look at reality. This could cost us votes. Many seats will be won or lost by slim margins. Can't pass this bill this year. Or let the debates continue closer to the election, some sheep may actually have memories...
Did we get the headlines/attention/money we needed from Hollywood? From Sony? From Disney?
OK, now lets bury this sucker. We'll bring it up next year. Not an election year. We can pass a modified version then. Shake more money loose. Fill the coffers with honoraria. And shift donations to slush fund/campaign workers cash payment fund.
This is Congress.
They knew exactly when they would introduce this bill. Exactly when they would have hearings on this bill. Exactly when they would get the money. Exactly when they would kill this bill for this election cycle. And already have a target for re-introduction next year, so they can insure that money tree will grow new greens.
Seventy year old senile old men couldn't give a rat's petuty about low level controls on hard drives. They just wanna shake that money tree. And wield the power. Be it in congress, or on the local co-op board. That's all they have left. They can't chase interns around the chambers any more. Bad publicity is detrimental to their re-election efforts.
A letter to Feinstein (Score:4, Interesting)
---------
Dear Mrs. Feinstein,
I'm just writing to let you know that I will not be voting for you in the next election. I've been a Californian all my life, and have always voted on Democratic party lines. However, due to your shamefull sponsorship of the so called "Digital Television Promotion Act" which is a direct attack on not only the technological innovation which makes the state you represent great, but also attack on the lives and careers of millions of the citizens you represent, I will never again vote for you.
Looking at the giant campaign contributions you have received from media groups, I somehow doubt that your decision was actually based on considering the pros and cons of the bill. In the unlikely event that you are actually interested in facts on the situation, I beg you to do a little research into the repeating, inevitable reaction that media groups have shown throughout this century to new technologies, from VCRs and digital audio all the way back to the original record players, change threatens the pocketbooks of these industries, and they fight with all their power against these ultimately unstoppable trends. The sad thing is that in almost every case these dinosaurs ultimately benefit from these trends in reaching broader audiences with more interesting products.
Are you blind to the fact that this last cycle was fought just 20 years ago, and that expensive Senators such as yourself rallied along side the movie industry to fight off the horror of the VCR, which (they claimed) would bring an end to American culture in waves of piracy? Instead, now billions of dollars each year are added to the banks of these same media companies because of that innovaction which they fought blindly to stop. What happened to that world where every living room was to feature a "copying device" (VCR) which would drain the entertainment industry dry? Today, the cast is the same, the script is the same, but the new terror is the threat of that den of piracy known as the Internet.
Looking back, you may see your own reflection in the voices of senators from 20, 50 or even 80 years ago, who having found themselves solidly in the pockets of these frightened elephants proclaimed that no effort should be spared to protect these monied interests from the horrors of change. Have some shame and reconsider your foolish stand with them, so that they will again wake up and take advantage of this new medium instead of fighting it. In any case, you have lost my vote, and it will be a happy day for me when you are out of office.
Sincerely,
Consider This FUD!!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not common sense (Score:2)
economically incorrect (Score:2)
Hollywood thinks they can make a ton of $ by making a multimedia machine, but they have all failed in the marketplace. (CDi and DivX) People don't want stripped computers and restricted players. They want the 'real thing.'
So now they are trying to force us to buy their multimedia player machines via force of law. The computer hardware industry picks up the tab for the funky hardware, and Hollywood gets the profet of selling the restricted media.
Well, there is one thing wrong with that plan. The computer hardware industry is in trouble; why buy a 1.5 ghz machine when a 350mhz machine can run word and play mp3s? The comp hardware industry is having trouble selling superior hardware right now; it certainly can't sell 'restricted' hardware! IOW, the industry can't get people to buy better hardware, they dont have a chance of getting people to buy inferior hardware. They simply won't buy; they will keep playing mp3s and typing in word on their perfectly fine 650mhz or 350mhz or whatever. It whether the protections are effective or a pain in the neck isn't really important. What is important is that people don't like things that are 'restricted,'that normal people ask the local nerd what computers to get and that right now nobody feels like they MUST get a new computer.
If the US public is forced to either buy 'restricted' computers or none at all, it will be none at all for several years. This could quite easily bury the computer hardware industry in the US, which in tern hurts the software industry.
So exactly what political party wants to pass the bill that destroys our tech economy?
More info on Leahy's stance on DRM, etc. (Score:2, Informative)
Talks at the end that the gov't is "ready to help move these private sector discussions to a timely conclusion." Since that Zinni guy's not doing anything, think they'll send him in?
dmca (Score:2)
Extortion. (Score:2)
"Leahy extorts future campaign contributions from RIAA, MPAA, and all major media corporations, ensuring the continuation of his political career."
Re:Democrats are against this bill (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Democrats are against this bill (Score:2)
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
And in case anyone's thinking that they have to buy music from the Big Five, I just purchased a CD from my upstairs neighbor last night. He's in a band, and they're trying desperately to get some exposure. I paid $5 for the disc, and you know what, it's damn good. There's one song that could actually take off, given some airplay. My point being, you can find good music all around you, if you're willing to look.
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
1. No, he doesn't have a Web site.
2. My point was, since you obviously weren't reading the post thoroughly, is that there are good independent artists out there, maybe closer than you think.
3. Don't go off like an asshole just because you haven't read carefully.
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
Right, so everyone can shriek "SPAM! SPAM!! SPAAAAAM!!!"
No thanks.
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
No, unfortunately, he doesn't have a Web site. I need to talk to him about that. I don't know him that well, but since I used to work in college radio, he wants to talk to me about getting his CD out to more stations.
But I can share a Web site of a really good band from Fort Smith/Fayetteville, Arkansas. Their name is Oreo Blue [oreoblue.com], and they play a rock/blues mix. To tell you the truth, they sound best in live concerts, but they have some really good albums. "Live by Demand" is one of their best, I think. They have some of their stuff MP3'ed on the site, but whoever was doing it wasn't paying attention to the quality because there's often skipping and other errors in the tracks. Still, their music is awesome.
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
Re:Beware the tale of By-Ends. Boycott! Boycott! (Score:2)
And, as another person in this thread suggested, support indie music/films.
Maybe this AC likes his monastic life, but I like my media. This is a guilt-free way of getting around the RIAA/MPAA hegemony while still getting your pop media fix. It might mean you have to wait a while before seeing that movie you wanted to see, but oh well. I sleep better at night this way.
Re:Ah the American Legislative System... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Just occured to me. (Score:2)
1) Bill is introduced.
2) Thousands of letters get written.
3) Judiciary Chair stomps on it.
Makes sense to me!