Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Slashback

Slashback: 640K, Pioneer, Payback 465

Slashback tonight with an mini-avalanche of updates and corrections on Pioneer 10 (it's not a Star Trek series), Canadian copyright hearings, Intel's stance on SSSCA and similar laws, and -- Oh Yes, whether 640K really is enough for anyone. Read on for the details. Update: 03/05 00:19 GMT by T : "Pioneer," not "Voyager." Asleep at the keyboard.

Kudos to the guys behind Pioneer 10! Soft writes: "As a follow-up to yesterday's story, Pioneer 10 was successfully contacted for its 30th birthday, as announced in sci.space.news. The commands that were sent yesterday have been executed by the spacecraft, and more data has been collected by the Geiger Tube Telescope." lostchicken adds a link to Associated Press wire story on Yahoo!', writing "Not bad for a 30 year-old spacecraft. Perhaps those making time capsules could learn something from this?" Several readers also pointed out the SpaceDaily version of the goings on.

What, in the middle of Canadian winter?! schon writes: "An update to this /. story - The Canadian Copyright Board has announced the details of the public hearings on Canadian Digital Copyrights, at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/rp00838e.html. Interested parties should register before attending (details available on the page.)"

Sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation An Anonymous Coward writes: "Back in June of 2000 Slashdot.org reported a story called ' Taking On A Spammer' about a spammer being hacked by a pissed sys-admin. The Behind Enemy Lines web page talked about a pump-and-dump spam done by Premier Services and Mark Rice."

(See this page for more information on that scam.)

"Well on February 25, 2002 the SEC filed charges against Mark Rice!"

Death of a legend? Jean-Luc writes "The New York Review of Books has published an article that contains an e-mail from Bill Gates denying he ever said the infamous "640K should be enough for anyone" quote. He foists the blame on IBM and claims he tried to convince them to include more address space from the get go. Very technical and fairly convincing, showing that for all his might Bill is still basically a geek's geek."

They hadn't even gotten to the bowlderizing chip yet ... Dan Gilmor pointed out Intel's strong statement Thursday on copy protection front, "much stronger than the letter sent yesterday. Surprising given their history..." Maybe Intel believes they can do a better job of what deciding what goes into Silicon than a committee of bureaucrats steered by the entertainment moguls can.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Slashback: 640K, Pioneer, Payback

Comments Filter:
  • by cliche ( 562037 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:02PM (#3109393)
    do they have any plans to have voyager ten still be usefull?
  • by sprouty76 ( 523155 ) <stephen_douglas@ ... inus threevowels> on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:06PM (#3109412) Homepage
    I thought it was Pioneer 10, not Voyager 10. IIRC, there was no such thing as voyager 10.
  • Rock on, Intel! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Merconium ( 551470 ) <merconium@gQUOTEmail.com minus punct> on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:13PM (#3109469)
    I have to say that the final statement in the article is exactly my assertion. Valenti and his minions cannot stop progress.

    I love music and movies. I'm slowly becoming an afficiando of the art of film--more so than most other J6P I know. The SSSCA would only introvert me--I would not consider to purchase any product that met the required compliance. I'd buy everything I could from Taiwan--mostly b/c you damn well know they are going to capitalize on any openings in the market that they can.

    I've written my representitives, have you?

  • by SynKKnyS ( 534257 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:17PM (#3109498)
    ... but he is also still Microsoft's Chief Software Architect. He very much isn't stupid when it comes to the internals of the PC. MS-DOS tried to work around the 640k limitations IBM set in place using EMM386 and HIMEM.
  • by RaAmun ( 217775 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:18PM (#3109503)
    We have just recently passed through the 32-bit limit and are going to 64-bit

    I'm sorry I must have just been dreaming about alpha's and sparcs these past few years.
  • by SynKKnyS ( 534257 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:21PM (#3109524)
    It probably cost less silicon space to access the next portion of the segment than to hardwire to zero. This could also be a benefit in some ways but having a true 32 bit addressing would of been the thing to opt to at that time.
  • by alfredw ( 318652 ) <alf@[ ]ealf.com ['fre' in gap]> on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:24PM (#3109543) Homepage
    Well, as far as PIONEER 10 goes, the answer is probably no. It's moving too slowly to hit any interesting features (that we know about) before its batteries fail.

    Voyagers 1 and 2, on the other hand, are headed for the heliopause. The heliopause is where the solar wind meets the interstellar medium. The ISM is probably quite different than the energetic particles the sun spews out. They should be out into interstellar space in the near future (less than 10 years). The good news is, they're still operating well! Voyager 2 is unfortuantely running low on propellant, though.

    Find updates at the Voyager Project Homepage [nasa.gov].

    And /. eds, make sure you have real spacecraft :). Voyagers 1 and 2 are headed at high speed out of the solar system. What would have been Voyager 3 is in the Smithsonian. And Voyager 6 is pure Gene Roddenberry :)
  • Re:Go Intel! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ender81b ( 520454 ) <wdinger@@@gmail...com> on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:24PM (#3109544) Homepage Journal
    Indeed props to intel for standing up to the RIAA and MPAA. Of course Intel could buy them both and still have enough money to purchase Rhode Island, but I digrees. But, give credit to microsoft also. Steve ballmer is mentioned as a signee of the letter sent to the Recording/Movie industy. Give credit to all EIGHT companies who signed the letter. They all realized that this would be the death of the PC as we know it and are trying to stop it - course I wonder why they haven't bought a few senators yet..
  • by vanyel ( 28049 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:44PM (#3109650) Journal
    7.42 billion miles, a little over 22 light hours away. Lesseee, divide by 22, times 2, divide by 27380 mph, divide by 24 hours/day: so in 1026 days, or about 3 years, it will cross the 1 light day boundary...
  • by Frank T. Lofaro Jr. ( 142215 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @08:57PM (#3109725) Homepage
    Never mind embedded, the regular Linux kernel has to switch into protected mode itself.

    By the way, why is the obsolete (286 compatibility) "lmsw" instruction used there instead of mov cr0, eax, which works just as well. mov cr0, eax won't work on a 286, but since Linux doesn't run on those that's not a issue. :) We don't want to be one of the people that are forcing Intel to keep backward compatibility cruft in the CPU, do we?

    Also, the Intel docs say you should immediately do an intersegment jump after entering protected mode - linux does a local jump first.

    I patched my kernel to address these issues and it worked fine. Any comments?

    (*) Also, the new SMM (System Management Mode) is a quasi-real mode which is becoming more popular for certain functions (such as power management, etc).
  • by Allen Akin ( 31718 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:05PM (#3109758)
    I was working in the compiler group at Microsoft in the early '80s, so I remember some of the historical context.

    I recall suggesting to my boss (who reported to Bill back then) that Apple made a mistake by choosing 128K as the initial memory size for the Mac. My argument was that they'd need 256K to eliminate code swapping in the apps that were under development. The next-generation memory chips would make 1MB machines affordable, and I thought that would be enough for the foreseeable future. (I'm not claiming I was a visionary, either. :-))

    My boss replied that the consensus opinion at Microsoft was that no one would ever buy machines with a megabyte of memory. Even if it were affordable, just consider how long it would take to clear it! An app would never really *use* that much memory on a PC; it would just be too slow.

    (CPU speeds and memory speeds were not only much lower than they are today, they tended to be more closely coupled. Datapaths were much narrower. And Moore's Law wasn't widely understood outside a relatively small group of hardware-savvy folks.)

    So Bill may have been fully prescient, and busy paving the way for large-memory machines. But that definitely wasn't the general belief at Microsoft around 1983. If he really did understand things as well as he says, he didn't manage to communicate it successfully even to his direct reports in engineering.
  • by LagDemon ( 521810 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:09PM (#3109777) Homepage
    Silly boy, Star Trek IS reality!
  • by TheFrood ( 163934 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:17PM (#3109816) Homepage Journal
    Voyagers 1 and 2, on the other hand, are headed for the heliopause. The heliopause is where the solar wind meets the interstellar medium. The ISM is probably quite different than the energetic particles the sun spews out. They should be out into interstellar space in the near future (less than 10 years). The good news is, they're still operating well! Voyager 2 is unfortuantely running low on propellant, though.

    What does Voyager 2 need propellant for? If it's heading out toward heliopause, won't it keep moving that direction forever? I'm sure it must be using propellant if it's "running low", and I'm sure there must be a reason for that. Just curious about what it's actually doing with the propellant. Attitude adjustments, maybe?

    TheFrood

  • by Frank T. Lofaro Jr. ( 142215 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:19PM (#3109831) Homepage
    I can make a good case for 192 bit addressing.

    64 bits local memory address plus
    128 bits of IPv6 address.

    So you could have a pointer to memory location X on IP address Y. Distributed memory access over a network.

    256 bits might make more sense, then both parts would be equal (128 bits).

  • by nyet ( 19118 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:28PM (#3109889) Homepage
    Not really that cold [uiowa.edu]. But then if you consider that it has a pretty hot on board heat source (i.e. reactor), and the ONLY means for dissippating it is black body radiation (yup, its a hard vaccuum)... This means its pretty dark (i.e. cold, since its a vaccuum, the only external heat source would be incident radiation).

    So, ya, its cold out in deep space ;)
  • by The Famous Druid ( 89404 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:51PM (#3109993)
    Gates didn't design the hardware.

    The original PC came with a choice of 3 operating systems, CPM/86, Windoze (a cheap knockoff of CPM) and UCSD P system. It was _not_ 'designed' to Microsofts specs.

    The software designers were (as usual) not consulted, and had to work with what they were given.

    I work with embedded systems, and those mistakes keep getting made. Hardware designers design minimum-cost boards, without consulting the softies at all. We're presented with a finished board, and told to put s/w on it. I've seen hundreds of man-hours wasted on working around design decisions that saved 5 cents a board, and we typically ship in quantities of 100-200 boards per project.

    The solution, of course, is to have a prolonged session with the hardware designers and a large bit of 4 by 2, but management doesn't see it that way.
  • by cicadia ( 231571 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @09:59PM (#3110031)
    As the other artices say, that baby is getting quite cold.

    Cold? The thing's practically burning up! I thought it was getting cold, too, until I saw that the most recent temperatures are actually negative, and then realised that the table is in degrees Farenheit.

    As of 1991, the spacecraft was still at 251K, and it had only cooled off about 40K in the twenty years since launch.

    I mean, -7F is still pretty cold -- you'd probably get your tongue stuck to it out there -- but it's a lot warmer than its environment. Probably has a lot to do with the onboard nuclear reactor...

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @10:10PM (#3110081)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • My Letter to Fritz (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mikeboone ( 163222 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @10:19PM (#3110108) Homepage Journal

    As I am a South Carolina resident, I'm about to ship off a letter to Fritz Hollings. Please critique it and feel free to suggest ways to improve it before it goes. I wonder if complaining about the draft of the SSSCA at this point is worthwhile since they seem to ignore its existence. I also wonder if I'm going overboard by insinuating he's acting in the interests of his contributors and not citizens. It seems fair to me, but I want my arguments to look reasonable and not have my letter ignored.

    The Honorable Ernest F. Hollings
    United States Senate
    Washington, DC 20510

    Dear Mr. Hollings,

    I am a professional software developer and a constituent in your state. I've recently become concerned with your proposed bill, the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA). I am against such a bill, and I'll explain why below.

    No Public Participation / No Regard for Fair Use: In Section 104(b)(1)(A), the proposed bill describes the security standard as being determined by "representatives of interactive digital device manufacturers and representatives of copyright owners." In effect, you are permitting corporations to determine the scope of this law, with no input from the public who will be using such devices. The public's fair-use rights have been slowly whittled away by recent laws. The SSSCA will continue this disappointing trend of protecting the profits of media companies at the expense of the consumer.

    Open Source Software: There is an entire industry of software manufacturers and support organizations that write software that is freely available. This software is installed on millions of computers around the world, including servers that run the Internet. Software engineers like myself earn a living supporting this software. Open source software contains software code that is freely published. Your draft bill could, in effect, make this type of software illegal, since developers would be unable to "hide" security software in open code.

    Digital Devices: There are any number of digital devices that have no need for these protection schemes. My scientific calculator is a "digital device." So is my Global Positioning System unit. They have absolutely no need for built-in protection systems. Your bill would place an undue burden on digital hardware manufacturers to protect things that don't need it. This will result in less hardware being produced, and increased development expenses which will be passed on to consumers.

    Copyright protection can be maintained with state-of-the-art technology. Your bill will encourage companies to create mediocre protection schemes backed by the threat of prosecution. Piracy will continue unabated in foreign countries.

    I am not sure exactly how you think you are benefiting South Carolina with this bill. My reading of the proposal is that it will only benefit the large corporations in this country, especially the media conglomerates. Please don't act solely in the interest of your high-dollar contributors.

    I believe you are doing a disservice to South Carolinians and Americans by proposing this bill, and I urge you to do away with it.

  • by Jayde Stargunner ( 207280 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @11:15PM (#3110299)
    From Encyclopedia.com

    (William Henry Gates 3d), 1955-, American business executive, b. Seattle, Wash. At the age of 19, Gates founded (1974) the Microsoft Company, a computer software firm, with Paul Allen. They began by purchasing the rights to convert an existing software package. In 1980 they agreed to produce the operating system for the personal computer being developed by International Business Machines (IBM). That system, MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System), and subsequent programs (including the Windows operating systems) made Microsoft the world's largest producer of software for microcomputers.
    In 1997 the U.S. Justice Dept. accused Microsoft of violating a 1995 antitrust agreement, because the Windows 95 operating system required consumers to load Microsoft's Internet browser-thus giving Microsoft a monopolistic advantage over other browser manufacturers. In late 1999 the trial judge decided that Microsoft was a monopoly that had stifled competition.

    Gates, who is chairman of Microsoft, is the wealthiest person in the world. He founded (1994) the William H. Gates Foundation (focusing on health issues in developing countries) and the Gates Learning Foundation (1997), renamed the Gates Library Foundation (providing education assistance). In 1999, he merged the foundations into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a philanthropy that was worth $17.1 billion, after Gates's donation of $5 billion that year.

    Gates has written The Road Ahead (1995, with N. Myhrvold and P. Rinearson) and Business @ the Speed of Thought (1999).

    From Encarta.com
    Gates, William Henry, III (1955- ), American business executive, who serves as chairman and chief software architect of Microsoft Corporation, the leading computer software company in the United States. Gates cofounded Microsoft in 1975 with high school friend Paul Allen. The company's success made Gates one of the most influential figures in the computer industry and, eventually, one of the richest people in the world.

    Born in Seattle, Washington, Gates attended public school through the sixth grade. In the seventh grade he entered Seattle's exclusive Lakeside School, where he met Paul Allen. Gates was first introduced to computers and programming languages in 1968, when he was in the eighth grade. That year Lakeside bought a teletype machine that connected to a mainframe computer over phone lines. At the time, the school was one of the few that provided students with access to a computer.

    Soon afterward, Gates, Allen, and other students convinced a local computer company to give them free access to its PDP-10, a new minicomputer made by Digital Equipment Corporation.

    In exchange for the computer time, the students tried to find flaws in the system. Gates spent much of his free time on the PDP-10 learning programming languages such as BASIC, Fortran, and LISP. In 1972 Gates and Allen founded Traf-O-Data, a company that designed and built computerized car-counting machines for traffic analysis. The project introduced them to the programmable 8008 microprocessor from Intel Corporation.

    While attending Harvard University in 1975, Gates teamed with Allen to develop a version of the BASIC programming language for the Altair 8800, the first personal computer. They licensed the software to the manufacturer of the Altair, Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems (MITS), and formed Microsoft (originally Micro-soft) to develop versions of BASIC for other computer companies. Gates decided to drop out of Harvard in his junior year to devote his time to Microsoft. In 1980 Microsoft closed a pivotal deal with International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) to provide the operating system for the IBM PC personal computer. As part of the deal, Microsoft retained the right to license the operating system to other companies. The success of the IBM PC made the operating system, MS-DOS, an industry standard. Microsoft's revenues skyrocketed as other computer makers licensed MS-DOS and demand for personal computers surged. In 1986 Microsoft offered its stock to the public; by 1987 rapid appreciation of the stock had made Gates, 31, the youngest ever self-made billionaire. In the 1990s, as Microsoft's Windows operating system and Office application software achieved worldwide market dominance, Gates amassed a fortune worth tens of billions of dollars. Alongside his successes, however, Gates was accused of using his company's power to stifle competition. In 2000 a federal judge found Microsoft guilty of violating antitrust laws and ordered it split into two companies. An appeals court overturned the breakup order but upheld the judge's ruling that Microsoft had abused its power to protect its Windows monopoly. (For more information on the history of Microsoft, see Microsoft Corporation.)

    Gates has made personal investments in other high-technology companies. In 1989 he founded Corbis Corporation, which now owns the largest collection of digital images in the world. In 1995 Corbis purchased the Bettmann Archive of 16 million photographic images and announced plans to digitize part of the collection. In 1994 Gates and Craig McCaw, a pioneer in the cellular telecommunications industry, became primary investors in Teledesic Corporation. Teledesic planned to launch several hundred low-orbiting artificial satellites to create a global, high-speed telecommunications network.

    In the late 1990s Gates became more involved in philanthropy. With his wife he established the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which, ranked by assets, quickly became one of the largest foundations in the world. Gates has also authored two books: The Road Ahead (1995; revised, 1996), which details his vision of technology's role in society, and Business @ the Speed of Thought (1999), which discusses the role technology can play in running a business.

    In 1998 Gates appointed an executive vice president of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, to the position of president, but Gates continued to serve as Microsoft's chairman and chief executive officer (CEO). In 2000 Gates transferred the title of CEO to Ballmer. Gates, in turn, took on the title of chief software architect to focus on the development of new products and technologies.
  • by mughi ( 32874 ) on Monday March 04, 2002 @11:48PM (#3110393)
    ...the history that he provides (i.e., we really wanted to do things right, but the evil hardware people wouldn't let us) is self-serving and not exactly correct.


    That it was not correct seems to pinpoint it. This interview with Bill Gates that's in the Smithsonian paints a slightly different picture:

    http://americanhistory.si.edu/csr/comphist/gates.h tm (A transcript of a 1993 interview) [si.edu]. Specifically under the mouse: http://americanhistory.si.edu/csr/comphist/gates.h tm#tc44 [si.edu]

    "I laid out memory so the bottom 640K..."


    So he seems quite clear that he himself did that. In the same interview he used "Microsoft" and "we" when appropriate, so it seems that in context this is indeed claiming that he himself did that.

    Now, let's compare to the "spin" version of things:

    1996 Bloomberg: "The IBM PC had 1 megabyte of logical address space. But 384K of this was assigned to special purposes, leaving 640K of memory available."


    contrast that statement to the earlier one of:

    1993 SI: "I laid out memory so the bottom 640K was general purpose RAM and the upper 384 I reserved for video and ROM, and things like that."

    D'oh! By 1996 he 'forgot' that he was the one who did that. Ooops.

    1996 Bloomberg: "We at Microsoft disagreed. We knew that even 16-bit computers, which had 640K of available address space, would be adequate for only four or five years."

    contrast that with his statement from the SI interview:

    1993 SI: "But to my surprise, we ran out of that address base for applications within -- oh five or six years people were complaining"


    Look's like 20-20 revisionist history. Seems to be in-line with having held the opinion that 640K (ten times the shipping memory of the IBM PC) would be enough. In 1993 he was defending it. In 1996 he was denying it.

  • by Art Tatum ( 6890 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @12:08AM (#3110461)
    Not too bad. Under "Open Source Software" I would take this sentence: "Your draft bill could, in effect, make this type of software illegal...." and remove the "in effect". That extra qualifier makes you sound less confident of the symptom you describe. Also, the end of that sentence ("...developers would be unable to "hide" security software in open code.") sounds odd and *will* confuse the reader. The idea of hiding security in Free code won't seem right to them. They're going to read that phrase and say, "Huh? If the source code is freely available, then this law makes no difference to you!" The way these people think, Free Software is a special case and no one would really "bother" you. They're naive but that's the way they think.

    You also write: "Copyright protection can be maintained with state-of-the-art technology." Copyright originated as an artificial right that is only enforcible by punitive action. They very well might be aware of this and look askance at that statement. You could just say, "Your bill will encourage copyright holders to develop mediocre protection schemes while relying too much on threat of prosecution. The result of this mediocre protection will be continued unauthorized copying in foreign countries." This makes the connection between mediocre protection and foreign copying operations more obvious. Also, you will note that I have used the more accurate phrase, "unauthorized copying" rather than piracy. This is essential because copyright is not a property right--it is an artificial monopoly right.

    I loved your prediction of "increased development expenses" under the Digital Devices section. Good point.

    BTW, where do you live in SC? I'm originally from the Greenville/Spartanburg area (I just moved to New Jersey to go to school).

  • by AdamBa ( 64128 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @12:23AM (#3110512) Homepage
    In an interview in the very first issue of PC Magazine, February-March 1982 (a copy of which I am looking at right now), he said (p. 21-22):

    In five years the cost of computation will really be effectively decreased. We'll be able to put on somebody's desk, for an incredibly low cost, a processor with far more capability than you could ever take advantage of. Hardware in effect will become a lot less interesting. The total job will be in the software, and we'll be able to write big fat programs. We can let them run somewhat inefficiently because there will be so much horsepower that just sits there.

    This makes is unlikely he ever thought 640K would be enough...but he also said, in the same interview (p. 18-19):

    16-bits is extremely important, and it is not because of speed...the main reason for the 16-bit micro being advantageous is its increased address space...The logical address space limit...is for all practical purposes gone away. The chip is designed to address a megabyte."

    So he did seem to indicate that one megabyte address space was basically limitless.

    - adam

  • by Alsee ( 515537 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @12:54AM (#3110643) Homepage
    [running out of propellant]
    It's keeping the dish pointed at Earth

    If the limiting factor is the propellant supply they could extend it's lifespan simply by not tracking the earth. Of course we would then only be able to communicate with it during twice-a-year-windows. It's the old "a stopped clock is right twice a day" trick.

    -
  • Re:Rock on, Intel! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Alsee ( 515537 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @03:32AM (#3111112) Homepage
    Rock on, Intel!

    I'm just as thrilled as everyone else to see intell fighting the SSSCA. But there's one thing that keeps nagging at me...

    Remember the Microsoft Digital Rights Managment Operating System patent from a while back? I read most of that sucker. It parts of it require a matching Digital Rights Managment CPU. There is no way in hell that Microsoft has overlooked this point. SOMEONE must have plans and/or patents on this beast. Either Microsoft or a CPU manufacturer. The only company that comes to mind for this role is INTEL...

    One key and unique phrase in the DRM-OS patent was "monotonic counter". What is so special about phrase? It generates unique serial numbers beyond the user's control. It enforces "trusted" control over an "untrusted" user.

    Well, I just did a search of the US patent office database [uspto.gov] and found exactly 6 patents contining "monotonic counter". Two patents from MICROSOFT. Two patents from SEAGATE. Two patents from INTEL.

    The two Microsoft patents are explicitly DRM. The two Seagate patents are for uncopyable encrypted harddrives. One Intel patent covers secure communications in a "pre-boot environment". This may or may not be DRM relevant. The other Intel patent is subtle, but claim 9 is "in a security device configured to provide secure monotonic counting functions" and later mentions use "In sensitive applications, such as electronic commerce, it is also necessary for the counting function to be secure against unauthorized intrusion and security breaches". This would be security against authorized users.

    Is it possible that Microsoft, Segate, and Intel are involved in a secret DRM-Axis-Of-Evil?

    Can anyone find any other evidence pointing to the required DRM CPU?

    -
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @07:49AM (#3111721)
    Seems to be in-line with having held the opinion that 640K (ten times the shipping memory of the IBM PC) would be enough.

    Which brings up the good point that in 1981, the IBM PC was a "machine" and not a "architecture". Gates refers to other machines that supported 800K (and weren't 100% PC compatible).

    Given the history of PCs up to that point it's reasonable that nobody would have expected 20 years of hardware-level compatibility. Solutions (OS/2) that broke software but abstracted the hardware weren't popular.

    There's still many many PCs being shipped today that do not support memory expansion to 10x the shipping size. For example, the very common Intel i815 chipset only supports 512MB and ususally shipped with 128 or 256MB. Probably seemed like enough for anyone at the time a couple years ago.

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...