Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AMD

It's (Almost) Hammer Time 344

thelizman writes "C|Net is catching up on the buzz with AMD's Hammer line of processors. Of note in the article is how AMD demonstrated their 64-bit contender using Linux and Windows, instead of just Windows. In reality, Linux will likely have 64 bit applications more quickly than Microsoft, and will see use on this processor more readily than your average WinTel machine, so you know...like...it only makes sense."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

It's (Almost) Hammer Time

Comments Filter:
  • M.C. Hammer TIME! (Score:0, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:20PM (#3073790)
    Well, for all you non-Americans who have never heard of MC Hammer:

    U Can't Touch This
    By M.C. Hammer

    It's hammer time (Repeat 5x)

    My, my, my music hits me so hard
    Makes me say "Oh my Lord"
    Thank you for blessing me
    With a mind to rhyme and two hype feet
    It feels good, when you know you're down
    A super dope homeboy from the Oaktown
    And I'm known as such
    And this is a beat, uh, you can't touch

    I told you homeboy (You can't touch this)
    Yeah, that's how we living and you know (You can't touch this)
    Look at my eyes, man (You can't touch this)
    Yo, let me bust the funky lyrics (You can't touch this)

    Fresh new kicks, advance
    You gotta like that, now you know you wanna dance
    So move, outta your seat
    And get a fly girl and catch this beat
    While it's rolling, hold on
    Pump a little bit and let 'em know it's going on
    Like that, like that
    Cold on a mission so fall them back
    Let 'em know, that you're too much
    And this is a beat, uh, you can't touch

    Yo, I told you (You can't touch this)
    Why you standing there, man? (You can't touch this)
    Yo, sound the bell, school is in, sucka (You can't touch this)

    Give me a song, or rhythm
    Make 'em sweat, that's what I'm giving 'em
    Now, they know
    You talking about the Hammer you talking about a show
    That's hype, and tight
    Singers are sweating so pass them a wipe
    Or a tape, to learn
  • by JPriest ( 547211 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:29PM (#3073874) Homepage
    Kevin McGrath (AMD senior tech) gave a great presentation at Stanford on the Hammer and how AMD took on many design concepts of the X86-64 architecture. This was probably one of the more informative lectures I have seen on the topic. The video is long though http://murl.microsoft.com/videos/stanford/ee380b/0 00927_ee380_OnDemand_100_100K_320x240.htm
  • Re:hammer time (Score:2, Informative)

    by Andrew Coles ( 546117 ) <[andrew_coles] [at] [yahoo.co.uk]> on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:33PM (#3073912)
    Clawhammer supports either single processor or dual processor operation. Sledgehammer supports 4 and 8 way multiprocessing.

    I plan to get a 2 processor Clawhammer box myself, it's the only reason I haven't upgraded for the past year. I'm bored of having a mainstream PC (P3 550MHz, don't ask...) after using a StrongARM/NetBSD box for a few years. Time for something novel and exciting - dual processor new fangled chip sounds like just the thing...

  • Re:cf: IA64 (Score:5, Informative)

    by storem ( 117912 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:38PM (#3073968) Homepage
    It seems AMD [amd.com] is aware of this. They even sponsor a website dedicated to 64-bit [x86-64.org] porting open source software. (Including GNU [gnu.org]/Linux [linux.org] offcourse).

    The site also has a 64-bit simulator [x86-64.org] for you favorite 32-bit processor based Linux system.

  • Re:Can't touch this (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:38PM (#3073975)
    I was just thinking the same thing I googlized my thought and found this a AMD Whitepaper [amd.com]. Looks like its ah, ax, eax, and rax.
  • Re:Can't touch this (Score:2, Informative)

    by storem ( 117912 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:46PM (#3074061) Homepage
    Isn't that:

    mov ah, #1
    mov ax, #1
    mov eax, #1

    mov rax, #1

    Feel free to read the specs [amd.com].
  • by Soko ( 17987 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:46PM (#3074065) Homepage
    FYI, Windows NT 3.51 and 4.0 on the Alpha were 32 bit still, not 64 bit. It was some sort of backward comaptibility 32 bit hack thing done with the compiler. (Aside: Anyone remeber FX/32 on the Alpha?)

    AFAIK:
    - NT code isn't 64 bit safe. 2000/XP I'm not sure of.
    - the 64 bit port of NT was developed on the Alpha, initially anyway, and then ported to the Itanium.
    - Alpha Linux has always been 64 bit. One of the earlier kernels had to be extensively revised to be 64 bit safe in order to run on the Alpha.

    Soko

    (O/T - The Alphas still killed the Intel machines at the time with MHz as well as memory and I/O bandwidth, which is why we used them. Oh well.)
  • by Krieger ( 7750 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @06:48PM (#3074087) Homepage
    x86-64, which is what AMD is shipping with Hammer *IS* a hybrid. It is a x86 processor with 64 bit instructions added on top of the 32 bit ones. Like Intel's extension of x86 from 8 bit to 16 and later 32 bitness. It allows backwards functionality, and forward extensibility through 64 bit applications that might need it. I think it's a much more intelligent solution as there are a lot of applications that don't need 64-bitness...
  • by Tuzanor ( 125152 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @07:22PM (#3074389) Homepage
    Winsows NT was ported to alpha, 2k was never (or at least never released).
  • by renoX ( 11677 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @07:28PM (#3074447)
    64-bit on the desktop is next to useless IMHO, but the Hammer brings also many goodies:
    - it's fast
    - there are additional registers available which should help compilers quite a lot (avoiding false dependencies: more opportunities for executing more instructions at the same time)
    - it's fast.

    Ok maybe you could say that you don't need such speed, but the games you play don't look like Final Fantasy (the movie) and your opponents could really be smarter and I suspect that a good AI is very,very CPU-consuming.

  • by RainbowSix ( 105550 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @07:36PM (#3074504) Homepage
    How did this get modded up? Check www.sandpile.org. The P4 maxed out at 99 watts and the Athlon maxed out at 75 watts. Maybe AMD should add huge plastic brackets to their spec so people can use freakin huge heat sinks and then maybe they'll shut up about trying to cool a "megar" T-bird 1.4 gig@75 watts.
  • Re:AMD, i love you. (Score:2, Informative)

    by Spy ( 102303 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @08:33PM (#3074890)
    Uhh, dude... You have no clue. Look into the Hammer a bit. The main point (more so than the 64bit stuff IMHO) is that it can do glueless SMP. I.E. no special chipsets need for =or 8 procs.
  • by Chep ( 25806 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @08:41PM (#3074937)
    FWIW, there are several "AMD64" conditional #defines in the Windows XP DDK.

    It's been pointed out for ages in the NT Insider Newsletter.

    My guess is: Microsoft doesn't work in a fishbowl like the Mozilla team does; but it must not cost them much to keep an IA-64->x86-64 port of XP64 ready, just in case (especially since I guesstimate the HAL should merely be a hybrid of x86 and IA-64, the compiler an extension of the x86 logic (much less difficult than VLIW and much well understood), and the code above HAL, once 64-bit clean, is (reportedly) written in compiled, not assembled, languages).

  • by Spy ( 102303 ) on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @08:57PM (#3075003)
    At present a pally (Athlon XP) needs MB support for good thermal protection. We will see what the tbread (.13um Athlon) needs. The hammer was designed from the start as a server chip so really nice thermal protection will most likely be there (rumor has it a heat spreader like the K6's or P4's will be present).
  • by mikefoley ( 51521 ) <mike@@@yelof...com> on Wednesday February 27, 2002 @01:18AM (#3076036) Homepage
    Unless you worked at API (formerly Alpha Processor Inc.) in *1999*, you didn't have a 1GHz Alpha. And it for damned sure didn't cost $900.

    http://news.com.com/2100-1001-227510.html?legacy =c net

    There was ONE or two 1GHz Alpha's mounted in a SlotB format at API in *1999*. These had to use 250MHz cache (at a 1:4 ratio). Limitations in the Tsunami chipset didn't favor anything more than an 833MHz. This meant that with the slow cache and Tsunami limitations, the 1GHz was like putting a Corvette engine in a Cavalier. Goes fast doing only one thing. Don't take a corner.

    Those one or two 1GHz Slot B's were proto's. They are probably still on my former desk or in the lab or maybe have been shipped back to Korea by now. API closes its doors this week from what I've heard.

    I worked at API.
  • by mandolin ( 7248 ) on Wednesday February 27, 2002 @03:06AM (#3076331)
    Like Intel's extension of x86 from 8 bit to 16 and later 32 bitness.

    *cough* nitpick: x86 began as a 16-bit architecture; when you say "8-bit" you're probably thinking of the 8088 which had an 8-bit external data bus and which IBM used in their PC because, basically, they were doing their motherboards on the cheap.

  • by pointwood ( 14018 ) <jramskov@ g m a i l . com> on Wednesday February 27, 2002 @06:21AM (#3076610) Homepage

    Anandtech has posted an article with lots of information and pictures Right here [anandtech.com].

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27, 2002 @07:27AM (#3076725)
    OK, obviously you don't need more RAM.
    Physical RAM is not the issue here either. It's the virtual address space.

    Video editing is probably the best example: A full length video film will not fit into 4 GB (DVD quality). 64bit will remove ugly workarounds that have been necessary here. You don't have to actually have 10 GB of memory in your PC...

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...