Yahoo News Posts Advertisements as News 396
An anonymous reader writes "Yahoo is now putting ad banners as news stories. This is highly misleading and is an awesome way to sell out."
I don't really think Yahoo has been sold in in a few years, but this
is a new level of yucky. No doubt it is a sign of things to come:
the news is the ad. The ad is the news. It's one step worse then the
bizarre advertising/news merge that was amazingly evident when Disney/ABC was doing
with Monsters Inc while Time/Warner/AOL/CNN was hyping Harry Potter.
Oh, in case they change it, basically they have a list of news stories,
and one of them links simply to a page advertising (not surprisingly) X-10. The link isn't marked as an ad -- its simply one of the headlines in
the news list. It's one thing to have more ads... it's another to
simply disguise the ad as actual news. Update The ad was yanked.
For those who missed it, there were a dozen news articles, but one
was an advertisement. It was indistinguishable from the actual news.
That's not quite true. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:As A Bat (Score:5, Informative)
Half the headline links DO point to non-yahoo sites, though, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those sites use those newfangled interrupting ads that make you wait 10 seconds or some crap before the actual page appears. I've seen ads like that break on more than one occasion, and I wouldn't be surprised if thats what caused the fuss.
Re:Are you sure? (Score:3, Informative)
Space program research creates "smart bed" sleep surface
Unique formulation combats oxygen deficiencies without chemicals
But when you click on one of them, it just takes you to a page with product and ordering information. It's pretty obvious to me that it's a advertisement (especially since there's a note on top of it that reads 'Advertisement').
Re:Are you sure? (Score:5, Informative)
My new favorite option in Mozilla.. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:You can easily disable ALL X10 Ads. (Score:5, Informative)
If all you have to do to get me to stop leaving burn bags of dog crap on your front porch is to ask me, does that make it ok for me to leave those shitbombs until you say otherwise? (With the understanding that I'm free to start up again in a months time unless you keep repeating your request?)
Annoying and rude behavior is not ok even if the offendor agrees to cut it out when asked.
Er, yeah, but... (Score:3, Informative)
- A.P.
Nothing new here (Score:2, Informative)
So this is nothing really new.
Link (Score:2, Informative)
Screen shot of the Ad (Score:3, Informative)
screen shot [carlsoncarlson.com]
Try news.bbc.co.uk (Score:2, Informative)
And no it's not just for the UK, they have plenty news for the rest of the world too, American [bbc.co.uk] for example.
Other publications (like NY Times) do it too (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Wow, ya know.. (Score:3, Informative)
Well, you make a good point here, but I have mixed feelings on this issue. Yes, advertisements are a necessary evil and I too would rather see 5 banner ads (and, perhaps, even pay attention to them on occasion) than pay for CNN, but the trend that Taco points out in the article - that of "sneaky" promotion-as-news - is what I'm more concerned about.
In this case, we saw Yahoo slipping in links to unsuspecting users. In the CNN + ABC cases, we see a concerted effort by news organizations to promote products/movies/services by _artificially_ hyping them up. THAT's what I consider unacceptable: Harry Potter, while it may be a consumer phenom that merrit's some attention, is only given such phenom status when it gets (and keeps) front-page status on CNN for weeks on end.
Just this morning, in fact, I forwarded this article [cnn.com] to a friend during a similar discussion. CNN is actually promoting Survivor's "lack of being cool anymore" as a TOP news story, right on the front page. Of course they included the time and station where people can catch the finale, but that was just as a service to their readers ... right?
The worst example I can remember recently was this one [cnn.com], which was in the "top news" section on the front page when it was published -- basically a meanlingless and contentless article about a lead in the JonBenet case, but one that mentioned AOL and therefore got front-page CNN coverage. No other news organizations covered the story, for obvious reasons...(it wasn't newsworthy).
While I understand that organizations need new and better ways to promote products, the trend for supposedly impartial news organizations to allow corporate promotions to taint story content is worrysome.
Re:Or... (Score:2, Informative)
Foxnews and Subway (Score:3, Informative)
I think that was the day I stopped watching TV news for good.
Re:Er, yeah, but... (Score:2, Informative)