Yahoo! Not Bound by French Court Ruling 423
Klerck writes "Luckily, a US federal judge has ruled that Yahoo! is not bound by the French ruling that demanded that all Nazi memorabilia be removed from its auction site. It's a nice surprise to have a sensible ruling come out of a federal court in times like these."
Yeah! (Score:5, Interesting)
And no, I don't think this is funny!
Re:Where was the EFF foundation? (Score:1, Interesting)
Actually, this opens up a larger question. (Score:3, Interesting)
This latest ruling, while all good in well in allowing operators to control their own content is just a baby step twords addressing the eventual evolution of laws governing the internet.
An interesting precedent (Score:2, Interesting)
So putting this into context. I could legally in US buy drugs so long as the transaction is carried out in Holland. Of course the comment would be "Gee Einstein how are you going to get the drugs to the US?". Well that is beside the point. What it says is that I can basically money launder because if the transaction occurs within a country that does not ask of the origin it is legal.
Consider it this way. I make drug money. The money is considered income in a country that does not ask questions. The country asks for a 10% cut and calls the money legal. At that point I have the right to take that money into my own country. Of course US citizens may have problems because they have special tax laws. But if I was a non-US citzen living in the US I would be exempt (I think). So at that point I have legal money since I paid tax at source.
Ok I may be over-simplifying some things, but the precedent is still set and freezing of terrorist monies may not be legal anymore. Interesting!!!
World Government (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is the dumbest shit (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:don't be an idiot (Score:2, Interesting)
Judges ruling against each other (Score:3, Interesting)
"We find you offensive, and demand you pay us to relieve some of the stench of your offensive nature"
In other times, disputes like this have led to wars.
ICraveTV (Score:2, Interesting)
I think I'm going to Canada and opening an ICraveTV-like website. Now, when major networks take me to court, I'll point to this ruling and laugh.
Oh, wait. Major networks will sue me and win anyway. Money talks, and both of these rulings went in favor of US companies. The day when US courts actually recognize that people in other countries (and non-US citizens) should have the same rights (and responsibilities) as US citizens is far away. Right now, if you're an outsider, you already lost.
m
Re:I hurts some (Score:4, Interesting)
Personally, I have several patches taken as trophies from the uniforms of dead and or captured German soldiers, brought back by my Grandfather after the war. There are a couple af swastikas, several rank and corps patches, and a modest-sized bird o' prey clutching a swastika, printed on linen cloth. I keep them on my shelf, next to my M1 rifle, to remind me of my Grandfather, and of what happened.
so happy for decss (Score:2, Interesting)
uh, right?
why is it that I have this feeling that this knife doesn't cut both ways? or will I be receiving a court document soon (to add to the other 1000 or so pages) that'll tell me I'm dismissed from the California DeCSS suit?
not holding my breath. the ruling is, of course, obvious. at least until the hague convention [lemuria.org] gets passed, which will invalidate it and make all those silly foreign lawsuits enforceable locally. that will be a day! finally you can sue everyone, everywhere for pretty much every imaginable reason.
Not all collectors are nazi sympathisers (Score:4, Interesting)
Any evidence to support this? While I'm sure neo-nazis love to get their hands on original artifacts, there are a lot of people (WWII veterans & history buffs) who collect war trophies from both sides. Both my grandfathers served in WWII; and we have several family friends who are WWII vets as well. One gentleman in particular, a retired Army colonel, has an extensive collection of artifacts that he
acquired in North Africa and Italy. The barber I used to patronize (also a WWII vet) had a huge display case in his shop of war souvineers. I've met dozens of people who collect militaria, and I wouldn't dare call any one of them a Nazi sympathizer (at least not unless I was looking for a fight). A collector isn't necessarily pro-nazi because he buys German artifacts, any more than he would be pro-slavery because he buys Confederate artifacts, or pro-communist because he buys Soviet artifacts.
Re:Sick person (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Yeah! (Score:3, Interesting)
I think anti-hate laws are crazy. Pure crazy moon-talk.
It's ALREADY illegal to beat someone up/kill them/etc. Is it really worse to do it because they're black (for example) than to do it because they nailed your wife? Why is one cause worthy of different legal treatment? Ooh, it's a crime based on HATE rather than old fashioned RAGE and STUPIDITY, we better throw the book at them!
Anti-hate laws are pandering to special-interest groups, and/or are some way for white guys to salve their own guilt about past events. In the end, I think they will do more harm than good, because the give special status to some people and that makes other people resentful.
(I don't support affirmitive action either, I think it cheapens the accomplishments of the minorities it claims to protect. But that's another argument.)
It's time for us all to grow up and lose our hyphenated nationality titles and all the stupid laws that protect & encourage their use.
Just my $0.02... better go put on my asbestos typing gloves now...
Re:Yeah! (Score:3, Interesting)