Tiny Apps 318
box2321 writes: "There's a time and a place for large and feature-filled software. And there's a place for tiny apps - in fact, there's tinyapps.org. This is a mighty-fine resource for free and shared Win/DOS programs that weigh in under 1.44 MB. I learned of TinyApps from a pleasant source."
Small Unix utilities written in assembly (Score:4, Informative)
Interesting concept. Linux's standard utilities are unnecessarily bloated, replacing them with smallutils allows a respectable distribution to fit on a 1.44MB floppy. According to the documentation, these utilities are included:
Tiny operating systems (Score:4, Informative)
PicoBSD's applications are really small. Fitting a whole OS onto a single floppy diskette is quite beneficial, and often means that the expensive hard disk can be eliminated. There are also several other small Unix clones, including Minix [freshmeat.net] and Alfalinux [freshmeat.net] (Slackware on 2 floppies). BBIAgent Router [freshmeat.net] is simply amazing: it's a single-floppy Linux-based router and firewall.
slashdotted -- here's a mirror (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.consume.org/~jshare/mirrors/www.tinya pp s.org/index.html (no spaces in URL, obviously)
Or, click here. [consume.org]
Jordan
Re:Irony (Score:3, Informative)
Contrariwise. When your OS is big, all you got left is room for tiny apps.
(I [heart] Boxer for DOS, myself. I'm pretty sure it's floppy-sized or less, at least in minimal version. If I could find my stupid interface cable, I'd put it on my HP200LX.)
Re:Small Unix utilities written in assembly (Score:3, Informative)
On the other side, those utilities only work on GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd.
Again with this shit? (Score:2, Informative)
Move over Alex Chiu, you've got competition for goofiest internet crackpot, and right here on slashdot!
In response... (Score:5, Informative)
1. Yes, 1.44mb can hardly be called "tiny". To be honest, the reason it was chosen is that I just *had* to include the QNX Demo Disk [qnx.com] and the OffByOne Web Browser [offbyone.com]. But much of the site is dedicated to apps in the 2 to 200kb range, which I think can fairly be called "tiny". One example is EVE [myeve.org], a very cool vector graphics editor whose executable is a mere 39k. There are many more listed along these lines.
2. Yes, Windows is very bloated, but by customizing the shell, removing IE, and performing a host of other surgeries, it can actually be quite a nice little OS. I just received an email reply from the author of Optimizing Windows [editthispage.com] (published by O'Reilly). His book explains (among many other things) how to get Windows 95 down to 17 mb.
3. I realize that Slashdot is generally geared towards *nix users and want to thank you for being kind enough to list a site mainly covering DOS/Windows apps. As I mention on the home page, folks (from any OS) interested in contributing to the site or having a link posted are more than welcome to contact me.
Also, many thanks to those responsible for the mirror [consume.org] mentioned in one of the posts.
Much aloha,
Miles Wolbe
miles@tinyapps.org [mailto]
http://www.TinyApps.org/ [tinyapps.org]
Re:...and what about old games... (Score:2, Informative)
Steve Gibson (Score:3, Informative)
Small? F***ing huge more like... (Score:3, Informative)
I used to write commercial apps for the BBC Microcomputer. You probably didn't have that in the US, but it was a neat bit of kit in its day (about 1984?) and very popular in the UK.
As I remember it had 32Kbytes of memory, most of which was taken up as screen memory. I think you were left with about 8K to program in. And you had to get everything in there because there was no hard disc or other storage.
I remember I wrote an educational program for schools which included an image drawing system that worked in a similar way to Macromedia Flash. Literally every bit of memory was used. In fact, there was 'spare' to store upto 32 images drawn in the format.
Tell that to programmers today, they don't believe you.