Microsoft's Future 486
cyberkine writes: "The Economist has an interesting article on Microsoft's technology strategies that ends with a very astute comparison with IBM's downfall and resurrection in the wake of its own antitrust battles. 'Microsoft's biggest underlying fear is that it will become like IBM - --a company that still has a strong business but no longer sets computing standards.'"
Re:Crashing.... (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft's Fear? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Microsoft not setting any more standards? (Score:5, Funny)
ms like ibm? (Score:1, Funny)
I pledge alligience (Score:5, Funny)
-Daily morning speech for employees
Re:Crashing.... (Score:2, Funny)
You can say a lot of bad things about old hardware, but then, back in 1865, they knew how to make strong and reliable equipment.
Re:systemlogic poll (Score:3, Funny)
Moderated -1 Flamebait (Score:0, Funny)
I've had posts moderated down for less.
Re:Did Microsoft set any standards? Yes. (Score:1, Funny)
Wah?
M$ and Karma (Score:3, Funny)
Re:VB (Score:3, Funny)
What's with the hostility for VB? (Score:3, Funny)
Some people have such glorified ideas of what a 'programmer' is. You give detailed instructions to a machine. If you spend a week writing beautiful code you cost your company 5x. If you spend a day writing ugly code you cost your company 1x. If both programs meet the functional requirements, the company that encourages spending one day will survive better. I have nothing against beautiful code, but I have nothing against utilitarian functional code either.
Re:Where Can MS Go? Nowhere? Not So. (Score:3, Funny)
The master paused for a moment, held up his hand and said
"Natalie Portman"
At this moment, the zen student was enlightened.
Re:systemlogic poll (Score:2, Funny)
Cowboy Neal?
Future? (Score:2, Funny)