Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck

Code Red Refunds? 377

bubblegoose writes "In Washington state Qwest customers are asking for a refund due to losses of service during the Code Red thing. Qwest is refusing to give the refunds. Excite has a story about it here." I tend to think this is just complaining bull crap. My net connection when down too, and I don't run around demanding $5 back. I'd be more upset if I was a business and my server rooted by this. The irony is that this will probably end up just pushing subscription software.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Code Red Refunds?

Comments Filter:
  • hmmm (Score:2, Funny)

    by Beowulf_Boy ( 239340 ) on Wednesday August 22, 2001 @10:48PM (#2206439)
    While were talking about refunds, lets all get refunds from Microsoft because there crappy software has bugs and was affected by something as simple as the code red bug.
    Oh, I'm sorry, when we all sold our souls to microsoft when we signed the user agreement I bet that was covered.
  • by BigBlockMopar ( 191202 ) on Thursday August 23, 2001 @02:12AM (#2206912) Homepage

    Quoting from article:

    Steve Larsen, who heads the attorney general's new Cyber consumer resource center, said in a message to Mangus: "It seems reasonable that a customer should not have to pay for service they can't get. If you can't watch your cable TV or your newspaper doesn't show up for days/weeks at a time, I assume you won't pay. I believe that is all your customers ask here regardless of fault."

    Scenario. Some idiot is driving a poorly-maintained car which was ill-conceived at the design stage. Maybe he didn't even know he was driving...

    A wheel breaks off and his car plays Guardrail Ping-Pong on the turnpike.

    The ensuing traffic jam shuts down the city's busiest artery, halting all commerce in the city. Your newspaper doesn't arrive as a result.

    Multiply that by many, many cars at the same time [glowingplate.com].

    Why don't we go after the bigger problem and charge the jackasses [microsoft.com] who designed perpetually failure-prone cars and the jackass owners [google.com] who don't maintain them?

    Going after them instead of the local highway contractor [qwest.com] seems like a better idea to me.

    Especially since these drivers have no excuse for not knowing [yahoo.com] how dangerous their flawed little cars are.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...