Personally, I find the trade of prescription drugs on the dark web more interesting. People buying inhalers over the dark web for $30 because they can't afford the $300 demanded at the pharmacy for the same thing.
You don't really want crack to become legal do you?
It's not that expensive to produce, so if it were legal, there would be much less incentive to commit crimes since it would be much less expensive. The same argument applies to basically all drugs. The only reason people traffic them in spite of the often significant risk is because making them illegal has driven up the prices and the rewards are also significant.
If you give addicts enough drugs to OD on, then eventually they will either do that or find a level of addiction which they can manage, or even im
I know it sounds a bit crazy, but not all thieves are drugs users and not all drug users are thieves. Seems like we should concentrate on the actual crime and not your preconceptions and prejudices.
I mean, we could lock up niggers too if they're gonna be black, because we know they all eventually steal from good white folks... makes about as much sense as your argument.
I'm told that pure MDMA is actually fairly safe as illegal drugs go; the problem is with the variability in manufacturing along with mixtures and substitutions means that people using it don't really know what they're taking. Pure cocaine isn't good, but it's going to be a hell of lot healthier than crack cocaine cut with candle wax or something worse.
When you start looking at it statistically, most of the damage "done by" illegal drugs is either going to be because of
Personally, I find the trade of prescription drugs on the dark web more interesting. People buying inhalers over the dark web for $30 because they can't afford the $300 demanded at the pharmacy for the same thing.
You don't really want crack to become legal do you?
It's not that expensive to produce, so if it were legal, there would be much less incentive to commit crimes since it would be much less expensive. The same argument applies to basically all drugs. The only reason people traffic them in spite of the often significant risk is because making them illegal has driven up the prices and the rewards are also significant.
If you give addicts enough drugs to OD on, then eventually they will either do that or find a level of addiction which they can manage, or even im
How about we just lock up thieves?
I know it sounds a bit crazy, but not all thieves are drugs users and not all drug users are thieves. Seems like we should concentrate on the actual crime and not your preconceptions and prejudices.
I mean, we could lock up niggers too if they're gonna be black, because we know they all eventually steal from good white folks... makes about as much sense as your argument.
I'm told that pure MDMA is actually fairly safe as illegal drugs go; the problem is with the variability in manufacturing along with mixtures and substitutions means that people using it don't really know what they're taking. Pure cocaine isn't good, but it's going to be a hell of lot healthier than crack cocaine cut with candle wax or something worse.
When you start looking at it statistically, most of the damage "done by" illegal drugs is either going to be because of
best they could do is try and use the list for probably cause to get a search warrant, which would be a stretch
everyone forgets that Prohibition of Alcohol didn't end because the Feds decided it was a good idea
Prohibition of Alcohol ended because enough States said "Fuck you, its legal here, if you want to enforce Fed law, do it yourself"
The Feds don't have the resources to do that, alcohol's status changes at the Fed level.
That is what will happ