Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

China Plans Manned Space Launch By 2005

Posted by timothy on Sat Nov 24, 2001 09:17 AM
from the after-that-maybe-the-moon dept.
cosyne writes: "CNN.COM has this article on China's space program planning to send a man to the moon. 'The mission is part of Beijing's plans to create a space industry and earn the prestige of joining the United States and Russia as the only nations to have sent humans into space.' I wonder if they'll make it before the recently mentioned amateurs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • New product labels (Score:5, Funny)

    by ch-chuck (9622) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:24AM (#2606651) Homepage
    So will most consumer products soon start bearing the label: "Made in Space" ?
  • Our Space Program (Score:5, Funny)

    by gillbates (106458) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:24AM (#2606652) Homepage Journal
    Reminds me of the Cold War that stimulated our space program. There's nothing that can stimulate a space program better than a military advantage. Perhaps this little bit of competition will encourage Congress to give NASA the funding they need to do more than just crash probes into distant planets.
  • monkeys! (Score:1, Insightful)

    by TheM0cktor (536124) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:25AM (#2606655) Homepage
    lets see...

    China: billions of dollars, no need to get licenses to launch rockets (they own their own damn country), infinite supply of monkeys to test rockets on.
    Amateurs: finite (comparatively tiny) supply of money, have to jump through dozens of hoops to launch anything at all, no monkeys.

    What do you think?
    • Re:monkeys! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Saturday November 24 2001, @09:50AM
    • Re:monkeys! by fishebulb (Score:1) Saturday November 24 2001, @10:26AM
    • Re:monkeys! by snake_dad (Score:2) Saturday November 24 2001, @11:26AM
    • Re:monkeys! by ho11yw00d (Score:1) Saturday November 24 2001, @11:27AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Cagey (Score:1)

    by 1alpha7 (192745) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:26AM (#2606658) Homepage

    CNN.COM has this article on China's space program planning to send a man to the moon.

    Actually, they're quite cagey about the Moon thing.

    Sun Laiyan, vice director of the China National Space Administration, declined to give any details of the moon exploration plan other than that it was part of China's space industry plans.

    Of course, they dead set against "militarizing outer space". Oh yeah, such peaceful people; naturally they're against that. For us, anyway.

    1Alpha7

  • Exciting but... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by pigeonhk (42292) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:26AM (#2606660) Homepage

    How much resource and money would be spent on sending people onto the moon? Should they be spending on something else to solve other problems in China?
  • Spending (Score:3, Interesting)

    by InnovativeCX (538638) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:27AM (#2606663)
    It seems to me that China really has no other reason to do this other than to say that they have done it, and they are spending giant amounts of money in the process. Think of what else that could be used for! Even if they succeed, that does not take care of their other problems such as hunger, poverty, etc. This whole plan is reminiscent of Orwell's 1984; It's all just to boost military morale.
  • one question... (Score:1)

    by Beowulf_Boy (239340) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:29AM (#2606666)
    What exactly is there to do on the moon?
    yeah, we could build a base or something, but if we are there for just a few hours or days, what can be said rather than "WHOOO!!! were on the moon!"?
  • Nice to see.. (Score:1, Troll)

    by zentec (204030) <lists&rudn,com> on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:30AM (#2606668)

    that technology Bill Clinton allowed Loral to sell to the Chinese being put to good use.

    After all, if you can put a man in space, you can put a nuke in Washington.
  • by dj28 (212815) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:34AM (#2606679)
    Weren't they concerned about human rights over there in China? Why would the cooperate with a communist state? You would think with all the money they have they would develope their own space project rather than funding the Chinese.
  • Moon Landing (Score:5, Informative)

    by Alien54 (180860) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:35AM (#2606680) Journal
    There were earlier reports from the middle of the week that China was planning to eventually go to the moon. Later Reports showed that this was not correct, at least not yet.

    They just want to get their feet wet, for now.

    New Scientist [newscientist.com] has a good story on this. And there is this page with links [usembassy-china.org.cn] on the chinese space program from U.S. Embassy Beijing Environment, Science and Technology Section.

    • So, what... by BillyGoatThree (Score:2) Saturday November 24 2001, @10:30AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • another great adventure? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by TheM0cktor (536124) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:35AM (#2606682) Homepage
    I wonder if this will embarass the US government into mounting another of its great space adventures... Wishful thinking i suppose, but my grandparents got to watch a moon landing with their kids and i want to watch a mars landing with mine. (when i find a geek-friendly woman that is)
  • by Quizme2000 (323961) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:37AM (#2606683) Homepage Journal
    "I should point out that some powers in the world are on the way to militarizing outer space, not peacefully exploring outer resources," Huang Huikang, an official from China's foreign ministry, told the China Daily.

    "Another arms race in outer space has begun since 1998 and we should be watchful," Huang said.


    I would like a few more facts and less fundumentalist tone to be interested in this. A satallite program for China makes perfect sense for communications and survey for the billion(s) of people. I sure the US will be paying attention to the launch activites of our future olympic hopefuls, but an arms race in outer space is not econmically nor politiclly fesiable to begin with. Talk is cheap and that is all this is, political grandstanding: US bad--China good.

    "The Proples' rocket is going to lay the smack down on the evil american capitalist pigs!"

    Please don't take this article as being newsworthy.
  • The Secrecy of China's Space Program (Score:2, Interesting)

    by GNU Zealot (442308) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:37AM (#2606685) Homepage
    Chinese Manned Space Program: Behind Closed Doors [friends-partners.org] is a very interesting read. It details not only a large chunk of the history of the Chinese space research, but also describes the secrecy that has shrouded most of it.
  • Those were the days (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rogerborg (306625) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:37AM (#2606686) Homepage

    How well does this translate into Mandarin?:

    "We choose to go to the moon, and to do these other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard."

    Cynical old bastard that I am, those words actually choke me up every time I hear them. Space exploration (not arsing about in low earth orbit) exemplifies everything that is great about the human spirit. Our reach should exceed our grasp.

    We in the west have forgotten that, and now it's all about the bottom line. Sounds like China still gets it. Good luck to them, I reckon.

  • Very Cool (Score:2, Insightful)

    by DiSKiLLeR (17651) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:40AM (#2606689) Homepage Journal
    This is extremely cool, and a good thing for all of us.

    Hopefully it will kick start another space race, and get the americans off their butts. Bush has done nothing but slowly kill NASA with its budget cuts.

    In 2005, Russia may become the only country with access to the ISS. (find the story on space.com somewhere -- With all the budget cuts the US no longer has a HAB module or Crew Return Vehicle. Russia's obligations supplying Soyuz Rockets ENDS in 2005 leaving the USA totally stranded.)

    With China sending men and women into space on its own, and making plans to build its own Space Station and sending men to the moon, EVEN if it doesn't wake up the US govt. and inject more money into NASA, at least we are making progress and reaching for the stars.

    Communist regimes are very good at certain things. The Soviet Union was a powerful military country, and built 9 space stations. (Salyut 1-7, Mir, and now the ISS).

    Hopefully China can also achieve some amazing things.

    I want to live on Mars someday. I don't care how it happens, or who gets me there, i just want to be there.

    D.
  • ICBMs (Score:2)

    by Alien54 (180860) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:42AM (#2606690) Journal
    One of the military connections to the US space program was the development of huge missiles. A missile that can launch a payload to go to the moon can also be used as an ICBM.

    China may be interested in things like this.

    • ICBMs came before by mangu (Score:2) Saturday November 24 2001, @10:55AM
      • I doubt this. by Krapangor (Score:2) Saturday November 24 2001, @11:05AM
    • Re:ICBMs by rela (Score:1) Sunday November 25 2001, @01:41AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Yeah, go China! (Score:2)

    by LordNimon (85072) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:50AM (#2606701)
    I think this is a great idea. I think China should be strongly encouraged to expand its space program. In fact, I would be happy if they became the leader in space exploration. As soon as they announce plans to colonize Mars, it will scare our government into funding plans for the same, and then our space exploration work will be back on track.
  • by LibertarianCrackSmok (536453) on Saturday November 24 2001, @09:51AM (#2606704)
    From the article: A monkey, a dog, a rabbit and snails were sent into orbit aboard the second Shenzou launch but scientists say that more unmanned tests will be necessary.

    Translation: The monkey, dog and rabbit died together or one of the animals died. China isn't ready to go to space.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by flacco (324089) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:03AM (#2606728)
    China wants space-based military capabilities to compete with the US, including killer satellites to knock out US spy and GPS satellites.
  • Fox? (Score:1)

    by flewp (458359) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:04AM (#2606730)
    Who wants to bet Fox is already working on creating a show stating how the China mission was all a big hoax?
  • A new world instability (Score:2, Flamebait)

    by SumDeusExMachina (318037) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:05AM (#2606734) Homepage
    I think that I speak for many when I voice my concerns over China in space. This is the same country that constantly threatens to invade Taiwan and is very militaristic in general. What happens when they militarize space? Do we let them hang out with a bunch of nukes hanging over our heads?

    I thought I'd never say this, but Bush's missle defense plan is looking better and better every day...

  • THANK YOU CHINA! (Score:1)

    by xeeno (313431) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:12AM (#2606746) Homepage
    It's about time someone kicked the US in the pants and got them going. In the past, we've complained about China's policies regarding "subversives", their willingness to exploit child labor, and their lack of hesitation to cane the crap out of American teenagers that
    think that they can get away with being obnoxious in someone else's country. But unlike us Americans, they're actually interested enough in space to get back into orbit and possibly to the moon. They're going to get results. Can we, as Americans, stand to see space dominated by the threat from the East? Maybe we'll see something other than talk from American politicans now. Maybe we'll see a push into space.

    This pleases me greatly. I was frightened that
    we'd never seriously get back into space in my
    lifetime. Come on, George. Respond to the yellow threat! Get us back into space where we belong.
  • by Ella the Cat (133841) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:14AM (#2606750) Homepage Journal

    I just finished re-reading "Voyage" and "Titan" by Stephen Baxter. Spooky. Chinese space program (including the objective of landing on the moon) and the death of the US manned space program figure in Titan, while the goals of the US space program are a big part of Voyage. If you haven't read any of Stephen Baxter's fiction, try Voyage first.

  • Slashdot Hypocrisy (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Knunov (158076) <eat@my.ass> on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:31AM (#2606788) Homepage
    If any post mentions the U.S. govt's plan to build a missle defense system, it gets modded down into oblivion, usually with associated comments dismissing the threat as being unlikely or impossible.

    But China is getting ready to put men in space, and it is widely cheered as a Good Thing.

    How so many people miss the correlation is beyond me.

    A rocket is far more complicated than a missle, and the technologies are remarkably parallel.

    You see a country that doesn't like the U.S. developing technology that can easily be used to deliver a nuclear payload and you cheer, while simultaneously objecting to the very plan that can protect us from the developing threat.

    If the idea of another cold war appeals to you, by all means, cheer on.

    Now, go ahead and mod me into oblivion as 'Flamebait' or 'Offtopic'. What /. really needs is a 'Doesn't Buy Into Liberal Utopian Ideologies' or 'I Don't Like The Way You Think' negative mod option. It would be closer to the truth.

    Knunov
  • by xah (448501) on Saturday November 24 2001, @10:37AM (#2606806) Homepage
    I read this article last night and just shook my head. Yes, it is very intersting that China plans to send humans to the moon. That makes an impressive headline for CNN.com. Actually, it's in the sub-headline. But where does it say that China will send a man to the moon within the article itself? Nowhere. Reading the piece from beginning to end left me bewildered. They announce something, give some background facts, and never investigate the chief fact of the article, not mentioning it even a single more time.

    This is an important development. The world's most fearsome tyranny is attempting to take the lead in the space race. We deserve better reporting on these plans than this amateurish effort.

  • China & the Press (Score:2)

    by Guppy06 (410832) on Saturday November 24 2001, @11:07AM (#2606864) Journal
    It's a shame that China is taking the classic police state stance of "We'll tell the press about it once it's over successfully, or not at all if its a failure" with these launches. Because the People's Army Navy has to send specialized tracking ships to around the world in order to keep in contact with the capsule, both foriegn intelligence and foreign news agencies know of a pending launch long before the rocket is put on the pad. And I haven't even mentioned NORAD yet.

    With all that going against them, if there is a failure it will be all over the internet long before the state officially confirms or denies that there ever was a launch. That can't be good for their credibility...
  • missed the boat. (Score:1)

    by xanthig (538198) on Saturday November 24 2001, @01:36PM (#2607347)
    So china plans on sending a human into space... Hmmm Oh my god! The Chinese are catching up on american technology, they're only 40 years behind our space program!!
  • by yggdrazil (261592) on Saturday November 24 2001, @01:41PM (#2607363)
    Now is the time to go to Mars.
    Not because it is easy, but because it is hard.

    Send a bunch of equipment first,
    then a large party of humans, one way.
    Let them explore the planet,
    and then figure out how to change the planet, plants, animals and humans to be able to live there, selvsufficiently...

    Everone who would like to become the first martians, raise their hands...
  • They're going to beat us! (Score:2, Funny)

    by JWhiton (215050) on Saturday November 24 2001, @02:03PM (#2607434) Homepage
    Sounds like China is trying to get the jump on us! We all know what we must do...

    We must be the first country to send a Chinese man to the moon!
  • huh? (Score:2)

    by austad (22163) on Saturday November 24 2001, @02:05PM (#2607445) Homepage
    I thought I remember hearing that they were planning on shooting someone into space sometime this year? Wasn't that on slashdot a few months back?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by peter303 (12292) on Saturday November 24 2001, @02:08PM (#2607461)
    The US seems to be ignoring this market-
    people who'd pay a hundred grand for a week in
    orbit. Perhaps a clever competitor like China
    will figure out how to do this cost effectively.
  • by ba-iii (531014) on Saturday November 24 2001, @03:19PM (#2607688)
    In this ascriptive world, this is more than expected! Of course it has its good and bad parts.
    It is good since it is furthering of science and technology in a different part of the world and this will create more momentum to advance science as all the world notices.
    It is bad because of the veiled goals that are being met. China is set to meet more such goals with its portending currency devaluation.
    We should only expect more of this!
  • by kcbrown (7426) <slashdot@sysexperts.com> on Saturday November 24 2001, @03:30PM (#2607732)
    1. The space race might start up again, and that might be a good thing, but don't let it get your hopes up. The goal I (and many others) would like to see achieved is a permanent, independant manned presence in space, because only then will we as a race truly be able to survive whatever happens to our planet.

      But there's a reason for the opposition to private manned space missions expressed by the government: the government opposes an independent manned presence in space. The reason is that such an independent group would wield much more power than the U.S. government does, because it could (if it wished) threaten to drop small asteroids anywhere on earth with relatively high precision. It's only when the U.S. government has an adequate defense against such an attack that it will truly allow a manned presence in space.

    2. Another cold war might be good for the United States, in terms of freedom and such. Didn't anyone here notice how quickly our freedoms started to erode once the cold war with the Soviet Union ended? Without an "enemy" that exemplifies traits that are in direct opposition to the ones the U.S. ostensibly stands for (liberty, justice, etc.), it seems we move quickly away from what we stand for -- we forget who and what we are. If we get into another cold war, we might get some of our freedoms back. Because it would not do at all for us to look so much like the enemy.

      Of course, that's probably wishful thinking: we'll probably wind up in another cold war and lose more freedom all at the same time, and in the name of that cold war to boot!

    Sigh... The world seems like such a hopeless place right now, because there's no place left on earth that I know of where real liberty isn't on its deathbed.

  • by AnimeFreak (223792) <colin@@@afreak...ca> on Saturday November 24 2001, @11:07PM (#2608991) Homepage
    Reason?

    In the next bit, China is going to join WTO. Many people, including me, will see this as a stab into Lady China's chest as it will cause the country's economy to crumble further and then cause the current government to collapse out of Communism.

    Then again, they're not really Communist when they have moved away from the Communist side of Economics.
  • Rescue? (Score:2)

    by istartedi (132515) on Saturday November 24 2001, @11:27PM (#2609039) Journal

    How hard would it be to retrofit a Space Shuttle for a Lunar mission? Could the cargo bay hold an Apollo-style LEM and enough fuel for the mission? Perhaps the shuttle could rendezvous with some kind of booster, although I imagine you'd have to EVA to bolt them together. Really, I don't care how they do it, it would just be really cool to see the Shuttle in Lunar orbit, with a lander coming out of the cargo bay.

    If the Chinese are serious about this, they should swallow their pride and establish rescue plans with the US and Russia. Even if we can't fit a lander in the cargo bay, we might still be able to rescue them from Lunar orbit.

    It seems like this whole business might actually be done best by combining Russian and US technology. Use the US lander technology, and the Russian disposable rockets to launch fuel modules into low orbit. Link up with the fuel module and away you go! Come to think of it, why bother just using it to rescue the Chinese? Why not just go there ourselves? Oh wait... there's not much reason to go, and establishing a permanent presence would be EXPENSIVE.

    So, unless the Chinese find something really valuable to mine up there, I don't see the rationale for a permanent presence at this time. Then again, maybe they know how to make rockets really cheaply, but based on my experience with cheap metal products made in China, I wouldn't want to ride one.

    If there is stuff to mine up there, we should send robot mining units. Why risk people for such a prosaic activity?

    • Re:Rescue? by DerekLyons (Score:2) Sunday November 25 2001, @01:47AM
      • Re:Rescue? by istartedi (Score:2) Sunday November 25 2001, @02:19AM
        • Re:Rescue? by DerekLyons (Score:2) Sunday November 25 2001, @10:49AM
          • Re:Rescue? by istartedi (Score:2) Monday November 26 2001, @05:18PM
            • Re:Rescue? by DerekLyons (Score:2) Tuesday November 27 2001, @01:19AM
  • err... (Score:1)

    by air1 (520719) on Saturday November 24 2001, @11:40PM (#2609060) Homepage Journal
    'The mission is part of Beijing's plans to create a space industry and earn the prestige of joining the United States and Russia as the only nations to have sent humans into space errr... isn't ariane a european project, wasn't jean lou chretien sent in space...???? oh well
  • by Radical Rad (138892) on Monday November 26 2001, @12:17AM (#2612189) Homepage
    Perfect timing. I just finished researching synthetic fibers. If I hurry production in three of my cities I can launch my spaceship by 2004.
  • by Halloween Jack (182035) on Monday November 26 2001, @05:39PM (#2616143) Homepage
    We all know what they're really up to [palantir.net].
  • by Guppy06 (410832) on Saturday November 24 2001, @11:19AM (#2606900) Journal
    If flying over the Atlantic is so profitable, why such a large gap between the Wright Brothers and Lindburgh?

    If the internet was so profitable, why did it take decades for anybody to even notice its existance?

    If the steam engine would revolutionize the world as we know it, why were there several millenia between the first development of one and the real adoption of it?
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Eh (Score:1)

    by crawling_chaos (23007) on Saturday November 24 2001, @12:04PM (#2607004) Homepage
    We can't build the Apollo hardware anymore. Although we have the plans (contrary to urban legend [urbanlegends.com]), it all uses obsolete technology that isn't made anymore. It would be cheaper and faster to design and build a new lunar vehicle than clone late 60s technology at this point.

    Has anyone worked out the mass of a lunar transfer and landing vehicle that would take off from the highest orbit the shuttle can reach? I'm assuming the shuttle would not tag along. Or even better, with a Soyuz tagging along as an Earth re-entry vehicle? The Soyuz was designed to go to the moon and it's still being built.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Eh (Score:1)

    by redcliffe (466773) on Saturday November 24 2001, @06:52PM (#2608335) Homepage Journal
    No they weren't. That's just an urban legend. They are still in the archives, although some of the plans that weren't necessary were disposed of, they are stil on microfilm and digitial media AFAIK.

    David
    [ Parent ]
  • 9 replies beneath your current threshold.