Cement Canoe With A Contrarian Approach
Posted by
timothy
on Wed Jul 04, 2001 12:34 PM
from the ignore-that-sinking-feeling dept.
from the ignore-that-sinking-feeling dept.
Markgor writes: "There is an article in Wired News today about a group of students at the University of Alabama (Huntsville) who entered into the 2001 ASCE/MBT National Concrete Canoe Competition with a canoe that was built to achieve forward propulsion through matching natural resonance."
"Normally, if two objects share an exact natural resonance, the excited vibrations would usually lead the weaker object to fall apart, much like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge did when the equal frequencies of the wind and the structure of the bridge matched. However, since the canoe was designed with a special mix of concrete, it was flexible enough to withstand the vibrations and harnessed it into forward propulsion. They're now talking about its possible use in space, such as interplanetary probes using natural resonance to propel itself."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Cement Canoe With A Contrarian Approach
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 103 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2

Guess what - boats are made out of metals too! (Score:4)
Boats can be made out of anything that that doesn't dissolve quickly and has the strength to displace the requisite volume of water. Iron, steel, concrete, waterproofed paper-laminate, whatever - they need not float on their own; it's displacing a volume of water of greater mass then their own mass that is key.
Concrete boats are popular in a number of parts of the world. In Africa they're popular as small calm-water ferries for their low cost, durability, and ease of contruction. Often they're a simple mini-barge with a line crossing the river. To power them one either pulls the line directly or employs a simple mechanism, dragging oneself across the water.
As to the concrete being used in this application - it's made with exotic materials as it has exotic requirements. Light-weight, flexible, etc. aren't usually the priorities for a concrete; durable, high compression strength, low cost usually are. None of this is breakthrough as the materials used in the boat wouldn't likely stand up under a season or two of highway or other civil engineering use.
Rules and Regs (Score:3)
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
In space? (Score:3)
If they can bend concrete... (Score:4)
Re:Concrete? (Score:5)
Cement, on the other hand, is a specific name for a substance, often alumina, silica, lime, iron oxide, and magnesium oxide. Cement is often used in the construction of concrete as part of the composite.
Composite structures != carbon fiber/kevlar/etc exclusively. Composites have been used for hundreds of years to make lightweight, strong things. This is merely the latest example of exactly that.
tacoma narrows (Score:3)
like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge did when the equal frequencies of the wind and the structure of the bridge matched
Just to do a little karma whoring...
Google [google.com] has some nice links [google.com] to video of the Tacoma Narrows bridge moving. This one [airspacemag.com] from the Smithsonian is pretty good.
--
Re:Concrete rowboats (Score:3)
Rubber Roads (Score:3)
Concrete? (Score:4)
Mix these in the right proportions, allow the mixture to dry for 12 hours and presto -- you have concrete so flexible that it will bend and snap right back with nary a crack.
Hmm.. Yeah its got Portland Cement in it, but it sounds like it is primarily rubber and plastic.. Are there no limitation in the rules about the composition of your 'concrete'?
Re:Cavitation + Resonance? (Score:3)
People Clear on the Concept Unclear on the Concept (Score:4)
The concrete doesn't ever need to be lighter than water. The boat plus passengers and gear needs to be lighter than water. Which means the maximum displacement of the boat (fully loaded volume including outside hull sectioned at a plane level with the waterline) needs to weigh less than the load plus the boat. The concrete itself can be far more dense than water.
Having concrete that is lighter than water means you can make a raft out of concrete. It means your boat won't sink if it floods. It also means your boat has less inertia.
It looks like a minor point, I know, but this is an engineering contest. It's all about minor points and the error bars on them. To put conflicting statements in the brochure is to sandbag the less-experienced contestants.
The real trick is that normal building concrete is much heavier than water (and somewhat absorbent, which reduces its effective displacement in contact with water). But this contest years ago ceased to be about floating a hunk of sidewalk.
--Blair
Like Homer says (Score:5)