Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×
User Journal

Journal smitty_one_each's Journal: Could technology liberate? 4

Across the US, from Maryland to Seattle, work is underway to construct user-owned wireless networks that will permit secure communication without surveillance or any centralised organisation. They are known as meshnets and ultimately, if their designers get their way, they will span the country.

via Instapundit

Likely as important as the 2nd Amendment, in its way.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Could technology liberate?

Comments Filter:
  • "You have to have someone accept what's on your node in order for them to pass your traffic around,"

    The whole point is to prevent exactly that. Prevent blockage, no matter what. People who are passing your traffic around should not be allowed to control the content or even know it any more than the government or corporate service provider. Otherwise no ground is gained. The aim is to create a true dumb pipe that nobody can control.

  • Without the wires.

    802.11 sniffing, spoofing, eavesdropping and jamming are trivial, 'tho.

    No. Crypto doesn't help here - because the issues are trust, not mechanism. And if you are really deemed worth of attention, your radio can just be flacked with DoS.

    Better idea? Massive stenography across existing super-dense information channels - like popular Tumblrs or Vines feeds. Huge bitmapped data sets to hide private communications in. SamizData!

    Add a "chaffing" capability of false referrers and gigs of bog

It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.