C0LDFusion's Journal: Peaceniks are Anonymous Cowards

I've noticed this four posts ago. Some dickweed decided to post an off-topic about Bush in the middle of a discussion on High-Tech Civilian Firearms. I decided to take his two little points against Bush, redirect into context and tell him to STFU for off-topic-ing.

Little did I know that 4 AC's would strike back with postings similar to each other with ad hominem insults.

Now, there was ONE who posted in a manner that required more IQ than AOL-Speak, and for that, I give props to Orthanc_duo (who, while being a peacenik for apparently the wrong reasons, didn't wuss out by going AC to make his points).

If peaceniks believe in their cause, they should be willing to argue for it in their name, rather than hiding behind an anon. If they feel their case is so poorly formed that they have to go anon and post 4 posts in order to create the illusion of a consensus against me, then it's apparent that few people agree with them, and they know it.