damn_registrars's Journal: Did You Do This, TomHudson?

One of my journal entries from Friday is being bombarded with AC troll postings, many of them calling themselves APK. Tom I recall you have picked on the actual APK before, did you send him my way when you sensed I was bored with the lack of trolling volume on slashdot as of late?

Although at this point I'm still not convinced that any of the AC trolling is actually coming from APK, even though it seems rather clear he does like to post AC. I'm just not sure that he would actually both posting AC in my JE.

Well, on the plus side, I now have over 30 comments in that JE discussion. Amusing, though not the least bit insightful. In other words, thanks! Things were getting dull here.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

There you sound less like the real APK and more like an AC troll that used to follow me around previously. APK may be a raving lunatic but he often makes allegations with some shred of sense to them. The allegations in the post above have no sense to them at all.

Ha!

[damn_registrars]

That's a good one there. How you came to the conclusion that any kind of psycholanalysis was done, I have no idea. You should really log in so your sense of humor can at least be tracked to an account registered to an email address, as someone should get credit for that kind of silliness.

Sextuple HA!

[damn_registrars]

Ahh, these AC trolls sure brighten the day! I couldn't write such odd humor if I tried, yet they can collectively do it on a moments notice, many times a day!

yawn...

[damn_registrars]

I have no obligation to answer questions from ACs. Amongst other things there is no way to know that if you answer a question from an AC that the person who wrote the question ever read the response. For all I know the person who wrote the original question was run over by a bus immediately after and will never see a reply.

I will answer reasonable questions from logged in users. Questions from AC I almost universally mock and/or ignore. If the person who wrote the question actually wanted a response

foaming? hardly...

[damn_registrars]

While I am laughing at these lame AC trolls enough that I may spit up a little in their general direction, I am most certainly not "foaming at the mouth". You silly trolls need to find a new catch phrase, I think I've seen that one used incorrectly at least 20 or more times between this and my other troll-infested JE.

unlikely

[damn_registrars]

Not that the AC trolls here ever bother, but without a link to 4chan showing such an occurrence, I see no reason to believe that it happened. And I'm certainly not going to go search 4chan for it myself because I have better things to do.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

I very strongly doubt that, since I have seen no link to such a thing happening. AC trolls keep giving links to other silly AC posts here, but never to a 4chan post.

nope, didn't happen

[damn_registrars]

Funny, still no link to the alleged 4chan discussion. Hence it didn't happen. But that fits the AC troll mantra just fine.

Thanks for playing, and feel free to come back some time later when you think you can successfully troll me.

Confirmed, it did not happen

[damn_registrars]

Linking to an AC post does not do anything to confirm that anything happened. If you are the same AC that claims I am being mocked on 4chan, you are hereby confirmed wrong on that too. Feel free to give up now.

Re:

[mcgrew]

Responding to an AC is pretty pointless since there's little chance he'll see your reply, unless someone mods him above -1. Sometimes then one has to reply, even if the AC won't see it.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

referring to other baseless slashdot AC comments is a far cry from actually providing a meaningful link to what you claim to see happening.