Marxist Hacker 42's Journal: The video that some slashdotters don't want you to see

Yep, a child can survive an abortion, at least, long enough to perform vivisection on a being that can feel pain. Which, of course, is what the genocidal maniacs claim is safe, legal, and rare......

Hypocrite

[chill]

The number one proven techniques to reduce abortions is easy access to contraceptives. If you honestly cared about eliminating as many abortions as possible, you'd be promoting contraception left and right.

No, I don't mean your holier-than-thou abstinence bullshit.

I mean the "realize there are 7 billion people in this world because sex is fan-fucking-tastic, and the vast majority of humans aren't anywhere near in control of their hormones -- and never will be -- so here are cheap and plentiful condoms, pills and shots so you can control when you get pregnant" effort.

But you won't. Because forcing your beliefs on others is MUCH more important. You want to reduce abortions, but only if they do it YOUR way.

The Catholic Church and their head-up-ass teachings on contraceptives are responsible for more abortions than Planned Parenthood, Cold War Communist regimes and coat hangers combined.

Don't like what you see in the video? Grow a set and do something about it that might actually help reduce the number of abortions in this country. Lobby for real sex education classes -- ones based on medical facts and no religion involved -- starting in Middle School, and start passing out free condoms at High Schools.

Until you do that, you're doing relegating all those unborn fetuses to lesser importance in your world.

Re:

[Marxist Hacker 42]

"The number one proven techniques to reduce abortions is easy access to contraceptives. "

Except, of course, that just is another form of abortion. Population reduction is always evil. Need more resources, lower your standard of living.

What's fascinating

[smittyoneeach]

What's fascinating about cries of "hypocrisy", as up the page, is that they pretend all of these conceptions were "immaculate". That is, there is never a context (besides rape, incest, or going to college while male) spoken of.
It's all about stipulating what you should do, and not the fundamental truth that these conceptions are overwhelmingly occurring within the context of human sin.
I'm old enough to remember when arguments were (purportedly) dispassionate affairs involving balanced consideration of a q

Re:

[fustakrakich]

The joy of sex shall not be infringed.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

One person's joy is another's palomino [hulu.com].

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Relativist!

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

[joke about yo muthuh]

Re:

[Captain Splendid]

I'm old enough to remember when arguments were (purportedly) dispassionate affairs involving balanced consideration of a question from all angles.

Yeah, but then you gave women the vote. Downhill from there, really.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

See, now, that is how you troll.
I'll see your 19th Amendment and raise you the 16th: 'twould seem a trifle peevish to make women into paying customers and then disenfranchise them.

Re:

[Marxist Hacker 42]

Yep. That's just about correct.

rare

[Captain Splendid]

Good point. Gonna need a few more thousand videos if you want to refute that claim.

Give it a rest.

[Jeremiah Cornelius]

There's many more issues at play here.