smittyoneeach's Journal: Is Uncle Choo-Choo Making His Move?

Hitlarious "Downfall" parody clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=59&v=Prls6Iz3B3E
I still doubt that the FBI seizure of the email server is anything more than removing the scandal from public view. The only reason Archuleta at OPM was held accountable was that she had offended the People Who Matter. Plus a horde of People Who Really Only Matter In Aggregate But You'd Still Better Respect Them Or They Gonna Pout.
But could this be Joe Biden actually flexing some muscle in preparation for swooping in to run the show?

Hillary does need an out

[fustakrakich]

The email provides a quick clean exit. And the sweet, center-right, moderate, uncontroversial Joe Biden can be the calm in the storm. But you still can't write Trump off yet. His 'George Wallace' campaign is definitely on a roll. It successfully appeals to those brute instincts that win every time. I wanted to think of his campaign as an exposé, and it is, more than I expected. The most newsworthy thing being its popularity. I hope people are just trolling the dumbass media pollsters. But if they tro

Re:

[fustakrakich]

By the way, though it hardly needs mentioning, you can expect a pardon... you know, in case something actually happens.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

That #Chappaquaiddick results in Presidential Pardon goes without an ersatz submarine.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Don't know what you mean, but ever since Nixon we've all known what it's about. Sounds like you're still playing your regular partisan thing here. Believe me, I feel your pain that she is not a republican. I know how you want her on that wall, to bring back that small sample of sanity that has been missing for over 40 years. As a republican she would have higher regard than Saint Ronnie himself amongst your people. Oh yeah, she's a snake in the grass, but she'll make you rich.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I just love how pointing out blatantly whacky behavior on the part of one person is "your regular partisan thing", Mr. Butterfield.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

That one person is no different from the rest. If you want wacky, look a little closer to home with your Ted Cruz and the horrible, disgusting perverts [arktimes.com] (I assume you ignored the previous reference) he associates with. What a crowd! As always your priorities are very revealing, and the denials and misdirection and deflection flow like water. Quite a sight. If you'd only notice yourself, you might learn something. I'm not holding my breath for that!

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

That one person is no different from the rest.

Don't besmirch yourself. You are a superior being. I, however, am an unteachable slug, so steeped in humus that I am incapable of self-awareness of my own debasement, relying on primitive pre-intellectual feelings to write even this.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

I, however, am an unteachable slug...

Only to the extent you choose to be. After all, you are still a human, theoretically one with a free will. Which also means you have the free will to stop with the continuous projection of your own foibles. Oh! What to do, what to do!

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Only to the extent you choose to be.

Wait, I thought I was completely lacking in will, and only capable of parroting Jonah Goldberg. You carelessly saturate my timeslice of the half brain cell all conservatives share, you big meanie.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

No, you choose those things, the only question is whether it is a conscious choice, or if you just allow yourself to react, the latter, being the path of least resistance, is much more likely, which is why you can be defined as reactionary, even more specifically driven in recent times by the irrational fear of loss of demographic supremacy, which you have been taught to regard as 'liberty'. It's real meaning you shall continue to deny to the bitter end. You do choose to believe what you are conditioned to

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

demographic supremacy, which you have been taught to regard as 'liberty'

Really? Do your epistemological wonders ever cease? You're as rich as d_r claiming I never read passages in The Communist Manifesto which I, in fact, read. You blokes are far beyond hilarious, in some bizzaro realm where two parallel lines are bent to smooch at infinity. God bless you both.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

I am not concerned about d_r. What you are denying is in plain view. We're just waiting for you to see it for yourself. In the meantime, *Keep the faith, baby!*

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

What you are denying is in plain view.

When have I denied the ultimate, anti-pride, anti-aristocratic, anti-demographic, anti-materialistic truth--Jesus Christ?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

:-) Cute

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Also: earnest.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

In faith, sure... You never heard me doubt that

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Of course faith. It's not intellectually forthright to serve up faith claims as some sort of mathematical proof. Though it's also commonplace.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

It's not intellectually forthright to serve up faith claims as some sort of mathematical proof. Though it's also commonplace.

:-) Ain't it the truth!