Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal smittyoneeach's Journal: Let me get this straight 53

Journal by smittyoneeach
d_r and krustyjackwagon note that Senator Tom Cotton is in DC, and therefore is morally equivalent to everyone else there. Also, while a magna cum laude graduate of Hahvuhd, no cursory googling could turn up a transcript, so I guess Cotton's academic career is as faked as that of the No-Talent Rodeo Clown.
You guys are (a) the best, and (b) irrefutable. Keep Barabbas; chuck ol' Cotton. There is no alternative.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Let me get this straight More

Let me get this straight

Comments Filter:

  • You know those old stock market ads, don't use past performance as an indication of the future. I don't care about his academics. They are no indication of the person, except he can get good grades, and once again it is just another one of your fantasies with some whack thing about them being fake? You are just so goofy! Is it supposed to divert attention from what he is doing now? Seems to be your intention. Sorry, babe, go play that somewhere else. Look It's all very simple. His voting record is garbage s

    • The man is sane. Apparently this terrifies you, and you have to play some "appeal to authority" card.
      That you have precisely zero (0) of substance to say on the man's actual words shouts the impotence of your argument.

      • The man is sane.

        The only alternative then is evil! I shall choose to believe he's just under a bad influence, similar to what is happening to you, so I shall not judge.

        His voting record, which contains all the substance I need, confirms everything I have said about him. Another simple fact you choose to deny over and over. Your appeal to authority (cozying up with the alpha) is the attempt to use his glorious past to justify what he does in the present. Deny all you wish, but there it is, in plain sight, so

  • Also, while a magna cum laude graduate of Hahvuhd, no cursory googling could turn up a transcript

    But you proved my point by claiming it. You think that one guy who went to Harvard was awesome, because he has the correct consonant after this name. You think that a different guy who went to Harvard is the antichrist, because the consonant after his name is the mark of the devil himself.

    And being as a certain ex-cowboy who you admire [wikipedia.org] also went to an ivy league school and you think that's pretty swell, you have established a pretty clear bias against reality, there.

    • because he has the correct consonant after this name

      No, he sounds rational, and has demonstrated courage in the Army.

      You think that a different guy who went to Harvard is the antichrist, because the consonant after his name is the mark of the devil himself.

      No, because he's a no-talent rodeo clown (as demonstrated by his record) defended by putzes such as yourself.

      you have established a pretty clear bias against reality, there.

      Oh, that there is one sick burn. Owie.

      • because he has the correct consonant after this name

        No, he sounds rational, and has demonstrated courage in the Army.

        How does serving in the Army change the validity or existence of an Ivy League degree? That is quite a non-sequitur, there.

        You think that a different guy who went to Harvard is the antichrist, because the consonant after his name is the mark of the devil himself.

        No, because he's a no-talent rodeo clown (as demonstrated by his record)

        Smitty can't you keep from contradicting yourself a little bit longer than that?

        defended by putzes such as yourself.

        Only if the category of "such as yourself" is anyone who is not a hard-core GOP'er. I have scarcely defended President Lawnchair any more than you have.

        you have established a pretty clear bias against reality, there.

        Oh, that there is one sick burn. Owie.

        That was not an insult. It was an observation regarding your comments.

        • How does serving in the Army change the validity or existence of an Ivy League degree? That is quite a non-sequitur, there.

          Military service is a viable (though by no means sole) path to manhood. I commend it to you.

          That was not an insult. It was an observation regarding your comments.

          And then you go all Krustyfrackwench on me.

          • How does serving in the Army change the validity or existence of an Ivy League degree? That is quite a non-sequitur, there.

            Military service is a viable (though by no means sole) path to manhood. I commend it to you.

            Are you aware that I asked a question before you wrote that statement? You quoted the question, but you most certainly did not answer it. I would expect that your wife would be rather unhappy with you if you were to tell her that college degrees are only valid if the holder of them completes some path to "manhood".

            That was not an insult. It was an observation regarding your comments.

            And then you go all Krustyfrackwench on me.

            You can brush off logic and observation any way you want, but it won't change the facts.

            • You've fact off for so long, one has no idea what to do about it.
              • And now we see that grammar has gone out the window as well. I guess we might as well try speaking different languages at each other, we would likely get the point across just as well.

                To je mÃsto, kde pÅ(TM)ÃbÄh pokraÄuje odtud.

                (Jumal neetud kuradi Unicode)

          • Military service is also a very viable path to socoipathy, and very many do follow that path. Judging by the man's voting record, as opposed to his academic/military record, he has also chosen that path. Very shameful.

            • Wow. Implying that he might be a sociopath. Keep it classy, man.

              • His voting records says so.

                • Really. Is your diagnosis confined to the one Senator?

                  • Not at all! Believe me! And not just one party. Your top candidates? Most definitely... Those that aren't sociopathic are antipathic, generally the democrats are more of the former and republicans the latter, so then if he isn't a sociopath, he is definitely antipathic, expressing the hate that you repeat here, for war, against equality, all the usual stuff. He is a horrible senator, and shame on the people who vote for him. Sorry, that's just the way it is.

                    • Wait a minute. You should be freezing and personalizing the anti-Cotton animus. If you stop short of anti-Christ, you're not maximizing the crisis.

        • I have scarcely defended President Lawnchair any more than you have.

          Bullshit! You voted for him twice. What better 'defense' is there?

          It was an observation regarding your comments.

          And quit stealing my shit!

          • Oh, come on, f-bomb: your schtick is just warmed-over postmodern pscychobabble. You and d_r swapping spit is perfectly "natural". SCOTUS says you can do something and refer to it as "marriage".

            • do tell!

            • Oh, and SCOTUS merely recognized equal rights means equal rights. Only a bigot would be against such a thing.

              And this projection thing of yours. You keep doing it, over and over. It so lacks the 'maturity' you pine for.. Shine the light on yourself and see what you are projecting.. or just read your posts. And learn that you confirm everything...

              • And only someone with a shred of sense would prefer the notion that form follows function.

                • All of that is bullshit and irrelevant. All people are entitled to equal protection under the law, or the law is a sham.

                  • Well, if this Administration has taught us anything, it's that the law, with the right drums and guitar, sounds like shamrock. SWIDT?

                    • Yep, sure did, just posting more bigotry. No biggie. I wouldn't expect anything less anymore. That's just the way things are. Nothing can be done from this end. A bigot's a bigot. I'll just shoot out the occasional reminder whenever you try to claim otherwise.

                    • Oh. God. Yes. BIGOTRY! You love you that word, don't you? Give you the big o' tree, don' it? Come to my rainbow church, where your accusations are laughable, sir.

                    • I recognize the denials will not stop. Remember, the secret word is, 'equal'.

                    • You seem to say that "foolishness" equals "wisdom".

                    • Doesn't matter. Equal treatment is paramount. Your silliness can be safely ignored.

                    • I'm sorry: do you actually think that all people in this country are being treated equally before the law? Affirmative Action laughs at you.

                    • Argue all you want. You can't justify your bigotry. It just can't be done, not in civilized society. It is a social pathology. Oh, and while we're on the subject, suck on this [rawstory.com]! That's equality. How unfortunate that we may have to send in the guard to fill out the paperwork. You can deny all you want, which I'm sure you will, but you are simply standing up for Jim Crow. Accept it, embrace it, end the masquerade of denial, and be happy in peaceful, respectful coexistence with those who don't believe in supers

                    • Except that the bigot is the accuser.

                    • Sez you! (No, your mass media) Why do you deny the truth?

                    • I forgot to ask, what is this 'accusation' you claim that I am making? When something is true, how is it an 'accusation'? Is this some 'nuance' of the language you need a college degree to understand?

                    • I pursue the truth with pretty much all my fallible flesh can muster. If you actually have a "truthier" truth about you, by all means share. [Cue 'Yoda' response from f-bomb]

                    • When something is true, how is it an 'accusation'?

                      Please state (a URL to a full development thereof will do) to what objective truth you're pointing here.

                    • Well, here's your big chance to become a tiny bit less fallible. The choice is yours. Make it a good one.

                    • Been there, done that, quite explicitly I might add. It no longer matters. Nothing I can say to put a dent in the denials. Facts are facts. Bigotry is bigotry, no matter who practices it. I would tell the same thing to my own mother if she acted the same way. But, whatever... if keeping your eyes closed makes you feel better, then, by all means, don't let me disturb your sweet slumber.

                      Toodles... for now.. Y'all take care now, heah?

                    • tl;dr: "Shut up."
                    • Great work! I knew you could deliver!

                    • Oh please! Don't shut up! Would I ever ask Slashdot's Donald Trump to ever shut up?? Perish the thought! No no, no, not me, babe.

                    • I'm sporting a cue ball, baby. And, no, you misunderstood. "tl;dr" meant that I was summarizing *you*.

                    • Ah, so now the truth has become irritating. Well, first you need to stop sporting all that bigotry. Then I might consider...

                    • Once I realized you were just projecting, this particular specimen from your broken record collection got back to manageable levels of tediousness.

                    • Uh huh, the ever elegant "I know you are, but what am I?". Sorry, you've been tagged, you're it!

                    • OK, back atcha.

                    • No take backs. naner naner naner...

                      On that happy note, I'm having a drink!

      • Ah, I see! You condemn Obama for his record, but you ignore Cotton's (which is really quite despicable) in appealing to his unrelated glorious past.. Very astute! I wonder if d_r will fall for it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger

Close