Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal damn_registrars's Journal: Obviously, this validates the conspiracy 18

Islamic State operative suspected in 2012 Benghazi attack killed in US airstrike

Because certainly they must have known that he had all those deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's email server - particularly the ones where she asked him to initiate the strike - on his person when he was killed in Iraq this week. Hence this airstrike was done only to bring about the coronation of Mrs. Clinton.

Am I getting the conspiracy about right this time? I haven't heard anything from the usual gang here to tell me what to think about this yet.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Obviously, this validates the conspiracy

Comments Filter:
  • My only question: Given all of the Emailgate hue & cry (running private email, the Blumenthal revelations, delivering the emails to DoS _hardcopy_ [seriously?] ), one would like to know what would constitute prima facie evidence of rotten behavior with you?
    I mean, it's blatantly obvious to even the most casual observer that Hillary! is a dodgy character.
    But keep defending her, and huffing that paint.
    • Et tu, Brute?

    • Given all of the Emailgate hue & cry (running private email, the Blumenthal revelations, delivering the emails to DoS _hardcopy_ [seriously?]

      Yawn. Really, is that the best conspiracy you can present today? You must be tired or something.

      But keep defending her

      You are confusing my mockery of your conspiracy-of-the-week mentality with being a supporter of the target of your conspiracies. Sure, I would vote for her over any living republican who has announced intention of running in the past several decades - but I would vote for Reagan over any of them as well, as they would kick him out of the tent today for being too liberal.

      Make no mistake though, if the dem

      • Yeah yeah yeah: "facts" = "conspiracy" with you. I get that.
        Glad you're supporting Bernie. But if Her Majesty succeeds in having JEB nominated, and her little minion Trump runs, I'm totally voting for Donald. #PartyLikeIts1992, muhfuzz.
        • "facts" = "conspiracy"

          No. Conspiracy comes in when you try to claim that the absence of the facts you are looking for indicates that your hypothesis is the only possible explanation.

          For example, I admit that the private email server was a bone-headed move by Hillary. But you amp it up to 11 by claiming that she personally managed it and intentionally destroyed it.

          I acknowledge that the Benghazi attacks (which used to be your favorite conspiracy of all - what happened to this?) occurred and cost the lives of several Am

          • For example, I admit that the private email server was a bone-headed move by Hillary. But you amp it up to 11 by claiming that she personally managed it and intentionally destroyed it.

            I'm by no means saying she personally admin'ed the thing. But if you are so simple, naive, and benighted as to think she had anything other than nefarious purpose to employing such while in office, then just go lay by your dish.

            You however are still desperately looking for a way to make Hillary, Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi the causative agents of the attacks.

            Alex Jones said they were all over there leading the attack!

        • Hillary owns Trump? Eh, anything's possible...

      • For me, it's a Tuesday-only, FP ritual, though I support and defend maximal promulgation of the troll. Thanks for linking it.
        • I noticed you tended to be most proud of it when you got it in as FP. I wasn't watching the pattern closely enough to see that it was a Tuesday thing. And frankly, yesterday felt kinda Tuesday-ish at work for me :)

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...