fustakrakich's Journal: 'Conspiracy Theory' vs. Official Narrative

It is becoming even more obvious that the Official Narrative is being written by Hollywood (as work for hire, of course), not the other way around. Maybe that's what makes it so much more compelling. Really the very fuzzy dividing line is the production value, not the content. The interesting thing in all the kabuki is how people so easily dismiss out of hand any contradiction to the Official Narrative. The magic still works to this day. Obama wants to be Rambo. I see him more as Bart in Blazing Saddles, riding off in his limo into the sunset.

Obama wants to be Rambo.

[smittyoneeach]

I think Dinesh D'Souza's portrait [wikipedia.org], while served with a conservative slant, still offers a relatively compelling theory of his motives. And that without veering into conspiracy theories, though a DNA test against Frank Marshall Davis could provide a surprise (to the extent that I really care fig #1).

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Obama is not the object of discussion. Again you use personality to evade the generic subject of the JE. Round and round you go. I was merely personifying the position with the current occupant in the attempt to relate a common psychological issue. My simple question was only, who are we supposed to believe, and why?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I was sufficiently tired that I missed the nuance that you were saying "the narrative is that Obama wants to be Rambo". Sorry, I don't think I've ever seen anyone try to portray the Community Organizer in Chief as such. Closer to an ersatz Robin Hood, maybe. Except that R.H. is an Anglo-Saxon thing, which is tantamount to Jewish.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

It's a generic thing. You wouldn't understand. Dream up what you want.

The tell

[smittyoneeach]

"You wouldn't understand."