Journal ender81b's Journal: Slashdot Suckage 2
You know I like this site, I really do but this is crap. For a site that preaches about standards compliance Slashdot HTML is horribly noncompliant, full of errors, and coded in ancient HTML 3.2. This is something that the editors don't want you to know. Check out the URL below, you get a 403 forbidden error.
Blah they wonder why nobody will buy subscriptions. Let's see, crap like this, no grammar/spellchecking, no fact-checking on submitted stories, dupe stories, Michael, and numerous other annoyances.
Validation Results
Blah they wonder why nobody will buy subscriptions. Let's see, crap like this, no grammar/spellchecking, no fact-checking on submitted stories, dupe stories, Michael, and numerous other annoyances.
Validation Results
why? (Score:1)
Very strange.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Also, if you are looking for how to do valid HTML I have a couple of sites that are valid HTML 4.01/CSS/XHTML.
http://www.midmed.net is a 'expieremental' XHTML 1.1 Transitional + CSS 2.0 site I did awhile back. most of the links don't work but I did a nice and pretty CSS 2.0 style sheet commented and everything.
http://www.fowlercustomhomes.com/ is a site that is HTML 4.01 transitional valid throughout(the two errors that crop up are actually a problem with the parser/validator - not with the site).
Finally, the w3c has the actual HTML 4.01 standards document (fairly easy to read) available somewhere on there site: http://www.w3c.org
Additionaly, while I am no HTML god, if you send me a link I could take a quick look @ it.