Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Marxist Hacker 42's Journal: On the eve of 9-11: the question must be asked 4

Of everybody who still supports our troop presence in Iraq instead of going after Osama bin Laden directly:

Why do you support letting one of our major enemies off the hook? Why shouldn't we pull out of Iraq and stage a major invasion of EVERY city or state he's rumored to be in: Tehran, Paris, Northern Pakistan? Why won't we demand his surrender by holding Mecca hostage, blockading the haj, until he surrenders? Why should ANY Islamic believer be allowed access to Mecca until bin Laden has been put on trial and executed?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

On the eve of 9-11: the question must be asked

Comments Filter:
  • by RailGunner ( 554645 ) * on Monday September 10, 2007 @01:54PM (#20541859) Journal
    Why do you support letting one of our major enemies off the hook?

    I don't, in fact Osama may already be dead. Why does the video stop when he talks about current events?

    Why shouldn't we pull out of Iraq and stage a major invasion of EVERY city or state he's rumored to be in: Tehran, Paris, Northern Pakistan?

    The last two, France and Pakistan, are our allies and it would be better to coordinate our efforts there instead of invading. Which reminds me - Barack Obama wants to invade Pakistan... I'm guessing Unilaterally? I thought that was bad. Or does he mean Unilaterally like we went into Iraq - with Canada, the UK, Austrailia, Don't Forget Poland, etc.

    Why won't we demand his surrender by holding Mecca hostage, blockading the haj, until he surrenders? Why should ANY Islamic believer be allowed access to Mecca until bin Laden has been put on trial and executed?

    Do you think pissing off every member of OPEC is a good idea? Maybe if more nuclear power plants were built, but liberals have been bitching about those seemingly forever.

    • I don't, in fact Osama may already be dead. Why does the video stop when he talks about current events?

      If he's already dead, that's fine too- take his body, partition it into small chunks, wrap them in bacon and send a branch of the Ringling Brothers to tour the middle east exhibiting what happens when somebody defies the greatest country on earth.

      The last two, France and Pakistan, are our allies and it would be better to coordinate our efforts there instead of invading.

      We've been trying that for 6 y
  • Why won't we demand his surrender by holding Mecca hostage, blockading the haj, until he surrenders? Why should ANY Islamic believer be allowed access to Mecca until bin Laden has been put on trial and executed?


    If we do that, we prove him correct, martyr him, and create a whole generation of new Osamas. Al Qaeda claims our presence in the Middle East is a new crusade, it's not usually advisable to go proving your opponents propoganda for them.
    • If we do that, we prove him correct, martyr him, and create a whole generation of new Osamas. Al Qaeda claims our presence in the Middle East is a new crusade, it's not usually advisable to go proving your opponents propoganda for them.

      And if we let him go free, he becomes a martyr anyway, and creates a whole new generation of Osamas. The propaganda is correct- we are in a crusade, either we destroy Islam wherever we find it or we might as well convert right now. There are no other options left, and the

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...