Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Transmeta Details Continue to Unravel

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Nov 15, 1999 08:17 PM
from the we-need-more-data dept.
KrisJon writes "Redherring has some info on Transmeta's pending announcement of its product line." It comments about Torvald's keynote today (and it says he won't spill the beans, but that The Transmeta Website should update and actually contain content tonight). Update by RM: as of 9 p.m. EST there was new content on Transmeta's Web site. Not much, but more than it had before. Read the HTML for the secret message.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Transmeta Details Continue to Unravel | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 327 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4
  • ssh by thermal_noise (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:38PM
  • I Know what this is! by walla (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:44PM
  • Re:But I'm disappointed by AndyL (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:00PM
  • Re:Actually... by Aussie (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:47PM
  • Re:I'm reminded of the SEL 32 by T-Ranger (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @07:48PM
  • Re:Can we moderate CmdrTaco? by Cid Highwind (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:05PM
  • Re:Secret Message by Q*bert (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @07:56PM
  • I saw feet on the page. GNOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Nassah The Zerg! (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @05:05PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by Q*bert (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @08:04PM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by severed (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:19PM
  • Re:Sheesh guys by Chemical (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:27PM
  • Re:Keynote is archived here by modulus (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:06PM
  • Re:out of order Source = Crusoe? by xHost (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:29PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by osu-neko (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:07PM
  • Sheesh guys (Score:3)

    by extrasolar (28341) on Monday November 15 1999, @05:08PM (#1530174) Homepage Journal
    I wonder if they hired Linus for marketing.

    But geese guys! Linus is an excellent coder from what I've heard but this reminds me way too much of the celebrity worship I despise so much in the mainstream. Now my comrades do the same in our bailiwick?

    Please, say it ain't so? There isn't even anything worthwhile on the page and people already want to by one or four!

    I am very skeptical with this new chip. Especially with so many people are going to fall over each other to buy one. I certainly hope everyone will wait for this chip to prove itself before we all hop on the bandwagon.

    Also, think about this: Which one do you want to win? Linus the marketer or Linus the coder? In other words, let this chip be succesful on its own merits. Linus shouldn't be a factor.

    ***Beginning*of*Signiture***
    Linux? That's GNU/Linux [gnu.org] to you mister!
  • Geek company by Chilli (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:08PM
  • Re:THIS is what I was waiting for... by osu-neko (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @05:09PM
  • transmeta page... by dayeight (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:30PM
  • Re:Enough with the circles already by Chemical (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:30PM
  • Re:I've got it! by BluBrick (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @08:40PM
  • Re:I would... by ainsoph (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:10PM
  • Re:It's quite simple really by mcjulio (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @08:55PM
  • by mochaone (59034) on Monday November 15 1999, @03:19PM (#1530183)
    It's people!!!! It's people!!!!!! Transmeta is people!!!!!!!
  • Re:Linus's Involvement by odaiwai (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @08:56PM
  • Transmeta and Debian by bgdarnel (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:20PM
  • Transmeta's web site IPs by jeep (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:16PM
  • Re:the real news is of course... by mcc (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:14PM
  • THIS is what I was waiting for... by sparkmanC (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:23PM
  • Re:Secret Message by jeep (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:25PM
  • Secret Message (Score:3)

    by Hanzie (16075) on Monday November 15 1999, @03:23PM (#1530191)
    From the source:
    ---------------------
    !---Yes, there is a secret message, and this is it:
    Transmeta's policy has been to remain silent about its plans
    until it had something to demonstrate to the world.
    On January 19th, 2000, Transmeta is going to announce and demonstrate
    what Crusoe processors can do.
    Simultaneously, all of the details will go up on this Web site
    for everyone on the Internet to see.
    Crusoe will be cool hardware and software for mobile applications.
    Crusoe will be unconventional, which is why we wanted
    to let you know in advance to come look at the entire Web site
    in January, so that you can get the full story and have access to all
    of the real details as soon as they are available.---
  • Transmeta ist menschfleisch! by Craig Davison (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:15PM
  • all speculation by jon_c (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:44PM
  • One of the turning points? by EverCode (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:15PM
  • So it seems the CPU rumors were true. by Nuke Skyjumper (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:23PM
  • Re:Secret Message by Trojan (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:46PM
  • What a tyop is... by ToastyKen (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @05:15PM
  • Re:Secret message on the Transmeta page by inl101 (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:24PM
  • by Denor (89982) <denor@yahoo.com> on Monday November 15 1999, @03:25PM (#1530202) Homepage
    This change is only for the worst, everyone. We all thought that the Crusoe would be our salvation, that Transmeta and Linus would invent something that would destroy Microsoft and all that is non-open source. In short, we looked to Transmeta for our salvation. But we will not find it. Why? It is as simple as it is shocking: The transmeta homepage once carried an announcement that it was y2k compliant.

    That announcement is no longer there!

    Let the mourning begin.
  • Re:I've got it! by greenrd (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:10AM
  • Re:I've got it! by greenrd (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:13AM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by spazimodo (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:27AM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by /dev/kev (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:47PM
  • don't forget by Alton (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:35AM
  • What is a CPU designed for "mobile applications" ? by renoX (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:37AM
  • Re:Y2k non-compliant webpages (marginally ontopic) by Skybert2 (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:47PM
  • it's interesting to note... by cswiii (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:42AM
  • Is there a play on the date by SerpentMage (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:50AM
  • Blah to Mobile! by LordStrange (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:23PM
  • Re:the real news is of course... by Mark J Tilford (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:56PM
  • Re:Sheesh guys (Score:3)

    by drix (4602) on Monday November 15 1999, @05:23PM (#1530216) Homepage
    A little of both. Sure, they probably could have found a better coder - one w/o a family and completely willing to put in those 80 hour weeks for a year straight until shipping time, for example - but on paper it works so well - put the guy who wrote the operating system from the ground up in charge of writing code to load operating systems from the ground up. You can't find one single person who created Windows, Solaris, or OS/2, but with Linux, it all started with one guy. It's perfectly fitting for him to be doing what he is doing now.

    On the other hand, this company is all about "names" - Linus, David Ditzel, VC funding from one of the most reputable firms in the valley. Plus, it's great psychological ammunition for your competitors. Take a bunch of names that are constantly in the press, stick them at an ultrasecretive company - to my knowledge, they don't even have a PR department - and you end up with an extremely volatile mixture, so to speak. Intel is sweating a lot more bullets right now than they would be if Transmeta had announced their product years ago as is standard to drum up buzz around the net and in RL. It's a smart move.
    --
    "Some people say that I proved if you get a C average, you can end up being successful in life."
  • Where Systems Engineering Laboratories is now. by penguinicide (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:50AM
  • If it needs Coprocessor 'Friday' by ak (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:01AM
  • Cruose Logo? by jonr (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @09:59PM
  • Re:But are they going to explain... by osu-neko (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:24PM
  • Re:Is there a play on the date by SgtPepper (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:05AM
  • Dreamcast - Cinnabon - and Crusoe by SonicRED (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @10:14PM
  • Actually... by Brian Knotts (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @05:25PM
  • Source for your sig by ToastyKen (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:27PM
  • Re:It's quite simple really by toriver (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @10:22PM
  • Re:Other interesting things on their site by monstar (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @10:25PM
  • A Non-Secret Secret Message? by nevets (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:32PM
  • MicroKernel? by Zule_Boy (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:34PM
  • Re:Crusoe.com is a mirror of Transmeta.com by 3waygeek (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:08AM
  • obligatory beowulf comment :P and other stuff.. by smash (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:16AM
  • NSA facilities by timothy (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:19AM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast & microwave owens... by WowTIP (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:19AM
  • by jsm2 (89962) on Monday November 15 1999, @10:32PM (#1530238)
    Well, "Crusoe Debian Dreamcast Cinnabon" is an anagram of "Concessionaire adumbrate and NBC". The "concessionaire" is cleraly Linus, "adumbrate" is a reference to the number-crunching power of the Crusoe processor, but where does NBC fit in?

    Well, let's see, NBC is owned by General Electric, which is a major competitor of Sega, who make the Dreamcast. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE is a known associate of Warren Buffet, who is thought to be a big fan of the Cinnabom [tm] breakfast roll.

    It seems to me that the logo must be part of a secret code between Welch, Buffet and Stallman (probably all members of the Illuminati), to put the wind up Sega, and remind them not to stop putting Satanic symbols in the Sonic games.

    fnord fnord fnord, etc.

    jsm
  • Don't forget this one: by VValdo (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @11:28PM
  • Help us out a little, please? by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:40AM
  • Hmm, now the old Transmeta / Amiga connection... by Count Fragula (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @11:55PM
  • Of all the speculation, I can only say this. by Ziviyr (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:37PM
  • Uh oh... Re:I've got it! by King Babar (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:52AM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by severed (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @07:08AM
  • Re:I'm reminded of the SEL 32 by Detritus (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @11:59PM
  • wandering offtopic by itachi (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:42PM
  • Re:A Non-Secret Secret Message? by artg (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @12:15AM
  • Re:Keynote is archived here by Micah (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:44PM
  • Re:Dear Moderators, by Catullus (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @12:28AM
  • more speculations by craw (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:47PM
  • Re:Sheesh guys by moonboy (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @12:29AM
  • Re:according to netcraft by Ian Schmidt (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:56PM
  • Re:Secret Message by Negadecimal (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @05:58PM
  • For the people who want the RM file, not RTSP by Mr Z (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @06:07PM
  • Never Never Land by Ungrounded Lightning (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @07:56AM
  • Re:Y2k non-compliant webpages (marginally ontopic) by copito (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @09:08AM
  • Re:Source for your sig by ToastyKen (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @09:39AM
  • this is what it is... by **SkipKent** (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @10:36AM
  • Re:A few facts... by fwad (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @12:39AM
  • MS support not necessary. by McMac (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @11:15AM
  • PNG? by MikeFM (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @11:27AM
  • This one's far fetched... by teeheehee (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:10PM
  • Super Bowl Commercial by bmac526 (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:13PM
  • Re:RJB Consultiing by artg (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @01:00AM
  • Re:Transmeta ist menschfleisch! (-1, Offtopic) by HP LoveJet (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @01:25PM
  • You couldn't more elegantly summarize the concept of distant, non-attached, portable computing than with the image of footprints in the sand.

    A dream for many geeks.

    So not only do they have very good programmers working for them, (Linux et al), they also have semi-decent marketing types too.

    Cool.
  • Re:I've got it! by Thagg (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @01:09AM
  • Re:Other interesting things on their site by thraxil (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @06:14PM
  • Waaaaaay off topic by Entropy_ah (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @06:54PM
  • re: Transmeta and mobile computing by dafunn (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @06:23PM
  • Re:I've got it! by Trojan (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @01:10AM
  • a joke! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:26PM
  • Re:A Non-Secret Secret Message? by nevets (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @01:55AM
  • CRAP! by Xtacy (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:02AM
  • Is it like.. by Axe (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:32PM
  • You are all missing what the mobile part is about by LarsWestergren (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @08:54PM
  • Maybe this? by LarsWestergren (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @09:29PM
  • It's already available by LarsWestergren (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @11:38PM
  • Re:Source for your sig by MindStalker (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:34AM
  • Re:Waaaaaay off topic by copito (Score:1) Wednesday November 17 1999, @09:32PM
  • Mirror by Pyr (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:27PM
  • Re:Wow.... by Nipok Nek (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:36AM
  • Re:Secret message by Natedog (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:27PM
  • Re:Odd thing about What's Related by MushMouth (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 1999, @01:22PM
  • GIFs by Col. Klink (retired) (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:39AM
  • Re:exactly by kuro5hin (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:46AM
  • I'm gettin all goosebumpy,. by MonkeyPaw (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:28PM
  • according to netcraft by bogdan (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:28PM
  • exactly (Score:4)

    by / (33804) on Monday November 15 1999, @06:42PM (#1530318)
    If I were inventing a new chip that is supposed to revolutionize the industry, I certainly wouldn't pin my hopes on getting Microsoft to port its operating systems onto it for a bunch of reasons:

    1) Their operating systems provide subpar performance and never really made some of the easier chip-technology leaps that have already happened. They're having enough trouble porting their wares to Intel's Itanium chips, which are less revolutionary than what Transmeta is alegedly making.

    2) Try as they might otherwise, they are still joined to Intel, and if I had a new wonderful process to protect, I wouldn't wave it anywhere near Intel.

    3) Ultimately, it would be up to MS to decide whether and how well to support the new chip.

    4) It doesn't look like this chip will even be competing on the normal pc part of the spectrum, which makes sense if Allen is hoping to keep his paper billions from crashing about his ears.

    Hiring Linus makes perfect sense, because if they want a non-MS operating system to run on this chip, their best bet is Linux, and if they're therefore betting hard on Linux, it is in their best interest to make sure the maintainer of its kernel is secure in that position. They also get the bonus of getting to develop their own modified kernel in house while subtly steering the public kernel in a direction most favorable to the sudden incorporation of their modifications when the chip is finally unveiled.
  • This looks really cool. by awyeah (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:28PM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by arielb (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:42PM
  • Linus's Keynote by rmull (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:28PM
  • Re:I've got it! by A Big Gnu Thrush (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @02:59AM
  • Re:I would... by Scott Wood (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:45PM
  • Actually... by Edd (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @06:47PM
  • Re:Secret Message by Klaas (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:49PM
  • Re:www.crusoe.com by Scott Wood (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @06:51PM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by Witch Doctor (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:08AM
  • Re:Transmeta and Debian by SPK (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:30PM
  • Re:REAL Transmeta Secret Message by Witch Doctor (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:08AM
  • Re:I'm gettin all goosebumpy,. by Fizgig (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:32PM
  • In a world of hype ... by Bearpaw (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:09AM
  • Re:Sheesh guys by A Big Gnu Thrush (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:11AM
  • But are they going to explain... by synaptik (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:33PM
  • Re:Dreamcast - Cinnabon - and Crusoe by Afrosheen (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:11AM
  • TI by James Lanfear (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:34PM
  • But I'm disappointed by Imperator (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:35PM
  • Mobility? by Junks Jerzey (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:21AM
  • the real news is of course... by sh_mmer (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:35PM
  • Re:Secret Message by Mike A. (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:37PM
  • DOH! by Brian Knotts (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:25AM
  • Wow.... by Chris Brewer (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:37PM
  • Why mobile processing? by Our Man In Redmond (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:26AM
  • big deal by Hard_Code (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:29AM
  • Re:according to netcraft by Harvey (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:37PM
  • http://www.kernel.org by SpookyR (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:35AM
  • Debian and Dreamcast by hawkestein (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:37PM
  • A few facts... (Score:3)

    by Amphigory (2375) on Monday November 15 1999, @03:38PM (#1530351) Homepage
    1. Their web server is running Linux.
    2. They hired Linus.
    3. Linus has been talking more and more about small computers being the future lately.
    4. One of the big thrusts in kernel development has been pda's and small environments.
    5. The Transmeta web site promises new hardware and software for mobile computing.
    6. Transmeta have been very tolerant of Linus' foibles as far as spending time on Linux at the office.
    Boys and girls... I will leave the conclusion to the student. Hint: processor's are cool... But the did say and software

    woohoo!

  • Re:the real news is of course... by Kintanon (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:51AM
  • Crusoe processor useless? by Bocaj (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:55AM
  • Lynx Compliant by CMU_Nort (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:38PM
  • Re:Transmeta and Debian by shango dee (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:56AM
  • Transmeta is using the Debian and Gnome logos! by urgleburgle (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:40PM
  • Runs Linux? I doubt it... by Joseph Vigneau (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:58AM
  • But what about motherboard compatibility? by RayChuang (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @03:59AM
  • Re:But are they going to explain... by sh_mmer (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:40PM
  • Re:Enough with the circles already by miscellaneous (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:00AM
  • Re:Wow.... by engel (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:01AM
  • Legal Page by CMU_Nort (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:40PM
  • Re:THIS is what I was waiting for... by Royster (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:05AM
  • Re:Moderation by Mentat21 (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:14AM
  • reverse vaporware (Score:4)

    by mcc (14761) <amcclure@purdue.edu> on Monday November 15 1999, @03:42PM (#1530367) Homepage
    i love it.. the concept of vaporware in reverse. By waiting until they actually have something definite to speak up, everyone tries to theorize about what you could be doing, analyses your every action, gives you as much free publicity as you could possibly need. And that way, since you aren't the one giving out the "information", the information can be incredibly innaccurate without any kind of backlash against you. Also you avoid the "vaporware backlash" inevitable if you spend _any_ amount of time actually making the product worth shipping instead of just shipping whatever you have on the date you gave earlier.

    Apple has been attempting this for years with their "we do not comment on unannounced products" policy, but never have they done it so successfully as Transmeta has here.
    although take a warning from apple's experience: This kind of thing _can_ backfire. Look, for instance, at the ibook; through apple's silence, the mac rumors sites constantly talked about the ibook even when there was nothing to report, whipped up everyone into such a frenzy over the upcoming P1/consumer portable/ibook/ebook that apple was basically forced eventually to release the ibook despite the fact that it would appear they weren't quite _ready_. In fact, apple was frequently accused by relatively respectable people and news outlets of engaging in "vaporware" with the ibook-- despite the fact they had never really admitted the ibook existed, just a vague mention in Steve Job's speech the previous year they'd like to create a "consumer portable".. (if they had had time to _get_ ready, clearly they would have chosen colors other than blue and orange.. :)

    Anyway, i am looking forward to the transmeta Crusoe chip, built using 100% Technology Stolen from Alien Spacecraft.
  • Linus's Involvement by bravehamster (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:42PM
  • http://www.transmeta.com/images/ [transmeta.com] - their img dir including a few files not visible on their index page; for some reason I was redirected to http://www1adm.transmeta.com/images/ [transmeta.com] once

    http://www.transmeta.com/legal.html [transmeta.com] - the least interesting thing you've seen in a long time

    http://www.transmeta.com/robots.txt [transmeta.com] - why don't they have one? tsk tsk

  • Re:Significant transmeta problems. by Kintanon (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:18AM
  • I feel CHEATED!!! by Uruk (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:43PM
  • Re:Sheesh guys by moonboy (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:29AM
  • It's quite simple really by Serk (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:43PM
  • Re:I'm gettin all goosebumpy,. by MonkeyPaw (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:44PM
  • I've got it! (Score:5)

    by / (33804) on Monday November 15 1999, @03:44PM (#1530378)
    I finally figured out Linus's connection! According to the secret message, come January we will "have access to all of the real details". In other words, the information is going to become open. But then, if you turn to the processor's name, Crusoe, you'll quickly realize as I did that it's just an anagram for SOURCE. Transmeta's processor is going to be OPEN SOURCE!

    Hallelujah!
  • Re:Significant transmeta problems. by BobLenon (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:45PM
  • Re:out of order Source = Crusoe? by scrytch (Score:2) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:43AM
  • Can we moderate CmdrTaco? by itachi (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:46PM
  • Re:I know where they got their logo... by mbrooks (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:49AM
  • Crusoe.com is a mirror of Transmeta.com by rueben (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @04:55AM
  • Re:I'm reminded of the SEL 32 by greenrd (Score:1) Tuesday November 16 1999, @05:06AM
  • Re:It's quite simple really by synaptik (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:47PM
  • Another Portable, or a portable other? by JawzX (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:48PM
  • It's chocolate! Now I want one more than ever... by Daffy Duck (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:48PM
  • Hype Machine by They_Call_Me_Spanky (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:48PM
  • Re:But are they going to explain... by CmdrPorno (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:48PM
  • There is an "images" directory... by Dacta (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:50PM
  • Re:Wow.... by Captain Nitpick (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:50PM
  • Re:But are they going to explain... by mjankows (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:52PM
  • Moderation by Hanzie (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:52PM
  • Duh!!! by Dacta (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:53PM
  • Re:But are they going to explain... by synaptik (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:53PM
  • Re:Significant transmeta problems. by pb (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:56PM
  • Will Crusoe really be that great? by tred (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:58PM
  • This isn't totally new... by Matt Bridges (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:58PM
  • Images "Created With The Gimp" by Adnans (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:59PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by Chandon Seldon (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @03:59PM
  • Re:So it seems the CPU rumors were true. by /dev/kev (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @03:59PM
  • Re:A few facts... by Ranger Rick (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:00PM
  • Re:Wow.... by Field Marshall Stack (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:03PM
  • Re:This isn't totally new... by Guy Harris (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:05PM
  • The page was obviously written... by Anonymous Bullard (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:25PM
  • Enough with the damned swirls already! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:05PM
  • I know where they got their logo... by jht (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:25PM
  • by aberman (85869) on Monday November 15 1999, @04:27PM (#1530416)
    Ok, let's take it a bit more seriously.

    We already know that they have a patent on a microprocessor which should be able to run other processor instructions.
    +
    Crusoe = out of order sourCe.

    Ok, here it is: It's a multiprocessor that, given any instruction set, figures out ways to parallelize the code as much as possible by performing instructions out of order.
  • GABBO IS COMING! by kwashiorkor (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:05PM
  • www.crusoe.com by TrisMcC (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:06PM
  • Will XISC kill the JavaChip? by Wyvern13 (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:27PM
  • Re:Other interesting things on their site by ovlaski (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:28PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by Zan Thrax (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:29PM
  • Re:Enough with the damned swirls already! by 187 (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:30PM
  • Wednesday... by MrCreosote (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:07PM
  • Re:Hype Machine by bgdarnel (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:08PM
  • no longer accessible (403 forbidden) by mcc (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:09PM
  • Run condition.... nah it's deadlock by Flammon (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:11PM
  • RJB Consultiing (Score:3)

    by gavinhall (33) on Monday November 15 1999, @04:11PM (#1530431)
    check out all the domains they have registerd
    BR> GO-CRUSOES.COM
    GO-CRUSOES.ORG
    GO-CRUSOES.NET
    GOCRUSOES.NET
    RJBAKER.COM
    GOCRUSOES.ORG
    CRUSOE.COM
    CRUSOES.NET
    GOCRUSOES.COM
    CRUSOES.COM
    CRUSOES.ORG
    CYBERBORG.COM
    Y2KSANDIEGO.COM
    FROTZ.COM
    MOBILE-PROCESSOR.ORG
    MOBILE-PROCESSOR.COM
    MOBILEPROCESSOR.NET
    GO-CRUSOE.ORG
    GO-CRUSOE.COM
    MOBILE-PROCESSOR.NET
    GOCRUSOE.ORG
    GO-CRUSOE.NET
    MOBILEPROCESSOR.ORG
    GOCRUSOE.NET
    MOBILEPROCESSOR.COM
    GOCRUSOE.COM
  • Moderate this UP! (Re: I've got it!) by orcrist (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:13PM
  • [doc brown voice] "...The only problem with a Slashdot effect is that you never know when one's going to strike!"[/doc brown voice]

    [marty mcfly voice] "We do now! January 19th, 2000! 12:00am! http://www.transmeta.com [transmeta.com]!" [/marty mcfly voice]

  • Re:reverse vaporware by Vacuum (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:13PM
  • DIG @ns.best.com transmeta.com axfr by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:34PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by reptilian (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:34PM
  • Re:Other interesting things on their site by CFN (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:14PM
  • What is it with swirl Logos? by andersen (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:36PM
  • Hmmm by Daniel (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:37PM
  • by severed (82501) on Monday November 15 1999, @04:40PM (#1530444) Homepage
    If you view the source at:
    http://www.transmeta.com/super/sekrut/message/in dex.html

    From the source:
    ---------------------
    !---Yes, there is a secret message, and this is it:
    Transmeta's policy has been to remain silent about its plans for world domination until it had something to demonstrate to the world.
    On January 19th, 2000, Transmeta is going to announce and demonstrate what Crusoe processors can do by destorying the capital city of every nation on Eatrh.
    Simultaneously, all capital cities of an alien race known as the Juridians will be reduced to component atoms as payment for this new technology that we have accquired from a friendly alien race. Of course, all of the details will go up on this Web site for everyone on the Internet to see.
    Crusoe will be cool hardware and software for military applications.
    Crusoe will be unconventional, which is why we wanted to let you know in advance to stay away from any major cities. If you do this, then you can come look at the entire Web site after the attack in January. Please avoid viewing any of the public media in the mean time, so that you can avoid the alien propaganda, and get the full story and have access to all of the real details as soon as they are available.---
  • Re:There is an "images" directory... by jwang (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:40PM
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 1999, @04:20PM (#1530449)
    Transmeta domain names:

    RJB Consulting (GO-CRUSOES2-DOM) GO-CRUSOES.COM
    RJB Consulting (GO-CRUSOES3-DOM) GO-CRUSOES.ORG
    RJB Consulting (GO-CRUSOES-DOM) GO-CRUSOES.NET
    RJB Consulting (GOCRUSOES2-DOM) GOCRUSOES.NET
    RJB Consulting (RJBAKER-DOM) RJBAKER.COM
    RJB Consulting (GOCRUSOES3-DOM) GOCRUSOES.ORG
    RJB Consulting (CRUSOE5-DOM) CRUSOE.COM
    RJB Consulting (CRUSOES5-DOM) CRUSOES.NET
    RJB Consulting (GOCRUSOES-DOM) GOCRUSOES.COM
    RJB Consulting (CRUSOES4-DOM) CRUSOES.COM
    RJB Consulting (CRUSOES3-DOM) CRUSOES.ORG
    RJB Consulting (CYBERBORG-DOM) CYBERBORG.COM
    RJB Consulting L.L.C. (Y2KSANDIEGO-DOM) Y2KSANDIEGO.COM
    RjB Consulting / Frotz SubVersions (FROTZ3-DOM) FROTZ.COM
    rjb consulting (MOBILE-PROCESSOR2-DOM) MOBILE-PROCESSOR.ORG
    rjb consulting (MOBILE-PROCESSOR3-DOM) MOBILE-PROCESSOR.COM
    rjb consulting (MOBILEPROCESSOR-DOM) MOBILEPROCESSOR.NET
    rjb consulting (GO-CRUSOE3-DOM) GO-CRUSOE.ORG
    rjb consulting (GO-CRUSOE2-DOM) GO-CRUSOE.COM
    rjb consulting (MOBILE-PROCESSOR-DOM) MOBILE-PROCESSOR.NET
    rjb consulting (GOCRUSOE3-DOM) GOCRUSOE.ORG
    rjb consulting (GO-CRUSOE-DOM) GO-CRUSOE.NET
    rjb consulting (MOBILEPROCESSOR3-DOM) MOBILEPROCESSOR.ORG
    rjb consulting (GOCRUSOE2-DOM) GOCRUSOE.NET
    rjb consulting (MOBILEPROCESSOR2-DOM) MOBILEPROCESSOR.COM
    rjb consulting (GOCRUSOE-DOM) GOCRUSOE.COM
  • Mobility Means?? (Score:3)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 1999, @04:21PM (#1530450)
    There is a body of research on mobile code and/or mobile programs. In short, code that can be run anywhere (e.g., java bytecode, Obliq, etc.).

    This fits with the rumors on a meta processor; indepence from instruction sets. Are you marooned on a instruction set you'd like to get off of??

    Then there is the mobile phone, mobile assistant, mobile computer.

    While a low wattage speedy microprocessor would be interesting. Everyone who isn't trying to do an Intel clone is in this market. There's room for another player. However, a player who is going to give the VC firms a 10x return on their investment? The margins down here tend to be small.

    So I'm not sure mobility necessarily means the latter here. Of course time will tell....

  • by Ungrounded Lightning (62228) on Monday November 15 1999, @04:41PM (#1530452) Journal

    Some years ago I worked with a Systems Engineering Laboratories SEL 32. This was a very high-end minicomputer, in the form of a six-foot hunk of 19-inch rack, chock full of circuitry. Just under 1 Megabuck.

    The computer itself was made of wire-wrapped socket boards stuffed full of standard chips, then tied together by a big backplane and some ribbon cables. It had downloadable firmware. Part of the standard documentation was the complete set of diagrams for the circuitry and complete listings of the firmware. You could get the listings of the OS if you wanted them.

    So it was an totally open-source machine, at least to the customers. You could hack the OS, or use it as a base to write your own system. you could change the firmware. You could even rewire the beast itself.

    Our hardware maintainence man was ex of SEL's own customer engineering (i.e. onsite-repair) department. He had a few tales to tell.

    It seems that a bit over half their production was delivered to designated loading docks at apparently abandoned warehouses, and was gone the next day. The bills were paid. And they never had to go fix 'em. (Or almost...)

    One time he DID have to go fix one. And they flew him there in an airplane with blacked-out windows, which did quite a few manouvers during several hours of flight. Then they took him from the plane to the building in a tent tunnel.

    It seems the computer was very popular with the No Such Agency, for doing cryptography. They could fix it themselves, using generic parts. They could hack on it to add stuff they didn't want out of their sight and into the industry. And they could be sure that did exactly what they thought it did.

    Or at least they could usually fix it. Which is why my collegue ended up in spookland for an afternoon.

  • Re:Another Portable, or a portable other? by Serk (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:23PM
  • Re:Significant transmeta problems. by Cvandal (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:43PM
  • Photoshop by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • VIEW PAGE SOURCE by babbage (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:25PM
  • Re:I know where they got their logo... by drix (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • No, it's Penguins! by Pope (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • Re:Linus's Involvement by mihalis (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • transmeta, and it's other employees by ovlaski (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • Re:out of order Source = Crusoe? by iainh (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:44PM
  • So do I get a prize? by Dacta (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @07:06PM
  • Re:It's quite simple really by paulm (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:06PM
  • Y2k non-compliant webpages (marginally ontopic) by copito (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @07:12PM
  • Re:Moderation by j a w a d (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:24PM
  • Re:Secret Message by UuCon (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:25PM
  • Re:[doc brown voice]1.21 giga-hits![/doc brown voi by knarph (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:37PM
  • Re: Transmeta and mobile computing by Raetsel (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @07:37PM
  • Re:according to netcraft by loki7 (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:53PM
  • [OT] Russell's Paradox!! by Gurlia (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:54PM
  • Re:Debian and Dreamcast by drwiii (Score:2) Monday November 15 1999, @04:56PM
  • Re:So it seems the CPU rumors were true. by socratic method (Score:1) Monday November 15 1999, @04:58PM
  • 84 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4