Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Build Your Own PCB Milling Machine

Posted by timothy on Sun Mar 30, 2003 07:59 PM
from the for-large-values-of-it dept.
mwandel writes "It used to be that one off amateur printed circuit boards were all etched in acid. A lot of companies nowadays use a special form of milling machine to mill them out of solid copper clad circuit boards. This guy Jonathan Westhues built his own PCB milling machine out of various parts, with a laminate trimmer as the milling head. Lots of other neat hacks on his Webpage as well."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Amateur (Score:1)

    by djupedal (584558) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:06PM (#5628784)
    ...is the key word.

    Whatever happened to the guys that were going to print out boards on inkjet printers?

    Also since these would be milled, they would be called MCB's. Get it straight.

    Milling machines, while a marvel of modern technology in their own right, cannot create multi-layered circuit boards, unless you ignore the obvious extra steps involved. Sounds like overkill, and a solution looking for a problem.
    • Re:Amateur (Score:4, Informative)

      by bjcubsfan (471972) <yhsmiller@nOSPAM.yahoo.com> on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:15PM (#5628818)
      They're still called PCBs even if they are milled. It's a naming convention that has stuck. It is in no way incorrect.

      Also, It is not difficult to make a double sided PCB with a milling machine. There are many times in circuit board design that you don't need more than one or two layers. This is a solution that solves a lot of smaller problems every day.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Amateur by Degrees (Score:3) Monday March 31 2003, @04:09PM
    • Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:16PM
    • Whatever happened to the guys... by The Jonas (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @09:10PM
    • Re:Amateur (Score:5, Interesting)

      by uglomera (138796) on Sunday March 30 2003, @11:31PM (#5629596)
      Milling machines are not an overkill or a solution for amateurs, they are a very good solution for inexpensive prototypes or production needed in small-mid volume.

      Acid etching produces a functional board, but it simply does not look good, and you can't make 100 boards that are exactly alike. The lines are almost straight, the edges are not perfect, and if you are on a contract to deliver a product, this is not an option. Examples of where a milling machine is one of the best solutions: a university lab where the researchers are under government/industry contract and are supposed to deliver a working prototype or a small business with a military contract (small volume products).

      I worked for a startup company for a while, and part of my job was to work on a QuickCircuit [t-tech.com] milling machine, and that thing had milling bits that were 4 mils thick (comparable to hair). You can hardly reach this precision with acid etching. I also adapted the machine to dice wafers, which replaced the company's practice of using an exactoknife :)

      If you are in the IC design business, testing cheaply is of primary importance. You can get a full setup for producing boards for less than $10K. How's that compared to billions of $$$ for setting up an IC production plant? And if you are in the RF design business, you need the precision so that a crappy board does not screw up your high-frequency measurements.

      Of course, milling is no option for producing high-volume PCBs with many layers, but don't think that ASUS spent months to design such a board to test their new motherboard design. First they have to verify that design works, which is done with a cheap PCB design, one that would hook up the ICs. Only after that stage can the final PCB design begin.

      As long as the Z80 or 68K processors are still in use, simple PCBs will be here, and we need a cheap and fast way to design and make them.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Amateur by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:36AM
      • Re:Amateur by kcelery (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @05:56AM
      • Re:Amateur by TimTheFoolMan (Score:1) Tuesday April 01 2003, @08:57AM
    • Re:Amateur by darqchild (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @02:40AM
    • Re:Amateur by mbreitba (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @04:03PM
    • What using about an old plotter. by lukme (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @11:57PM
    • Re:These are NOT "Hacks" by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:31AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Mirror (Score:5, Informative)

    by MrP- (45616) <rob@nosPaM.elitemrp.net> on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:07PM (#5628786)
    (http://elitemrp.net/)
    The site seems to be down at the moment, I grabbed it before it made the front page (yay slashdot subscriptions!)

    Here is a mirror:
    http://mosascii.com/sd/pcb/index.html [mosascii.com]

    (The mirror should remain up for a few days, unless my site gets slashdotted heh)
    • Re:Mirror by Blaine Hilton (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:43PM
    • Re:Mirror by bluyonder (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:43PM
    • Re:Mirror by caino59 (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:08PM
  • milling machines are cool (Score:3, Interesting)

    by zymano (581466) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:07PM (#5628792)
    If you type in "home built milling" at google you'll get an interesting type of mill called a CNC mill that is made out of regular Dremel rotary drills and computers. Very cool.

    More people need to be able to make their own parts out of steel and plastic. The problem is cost. It's curious that a country that is inventive as ours doesn't have some type of affordable CNC(computer numeric computation) milling machine.

    Affordable metal cutting lathes are expensive too.

    • Re:milling machines are cool by Cyno01 (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:11PM
    • Re:milling machines are cool by robwills (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:21PM
    • It's a plotter by oneiros27 (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:32PM
    • Re:milling machines are cool (Score:4, Interesting)

      by UniverseIsADoughnut (170909) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:49PM (#5628940)
      ""The problem is cost. It's curious that a country that is inventive as ours doesn't have some type of affordable CNC(computer numeric computation) milling machine.""

      You underestimate what it take to make a good mill. A none computer controlled Bridgeport Vertical Mill will set you back 16 grand depending on how you option it. There are not a highvolume thing. It takes massive peices of perfectly machined metal to do this. Theres a lot to it. You can't just cheapen one up without it becomeing well cheap.

      Adding Computer Numeric Control is not so easy. Though i'm sure if someone wanted to do it it would not be impossible. But there is a heck of a lot to G code (what runs CNC's). You'll be working the bugs out for a while. And then you still need a CAD program to pop out G code, thats a few grand there at the cheapest level. Granted if you want to spend a lot of time you can code it by hand. Many machinist do much of the G code by hand, but they do that everyday.

      There are reasons CNC's aren't cheap, Mainly the fact everything about them is expensive. If you ever get to see a real high end CNC mill or lathe going you will understand why the cost $100K to a million bucks. Watching one at work will blow your mind. Especialy if you stick your head in it.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:milling machines are cool (Score:5, Interesting)

        Good try, but not quite. If all you want to do is mill simple things and etch circuit boards with it, it's not that hard. There are a few little bits, but you can build a good one for under $100 (plus steppers, etc). It would cost less if you already have some of the stuff around.

        As for CNC not being easy, it's not easy, but it's not impossible. Especially if all you're doing is PCBs. How expensive is the software? Dirt cheap. You can use the free version of TurboCAD to make your parts. You export them as DXF files. Then the program that controlls your motors can convert that to gcode for you (or you can use another piece of software). You can get free DXF->GCODE converters that work quite well. You can also get free software to run your motors, or nice commercial programs for $20.

        It's true that a "real" CNC machines start in the 10s of Ks, but you can make one that will do just about everything a hobbiest will ever need for just a little. For more information see my other posts to this discussion, or see John's [crankorgan.com] website.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:milling machines are cool by SpamHeart (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:54AM
    • Maybe if it weren't for... by Max Threshold (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @09:38PM
    • Re:milling machines are cool by Jason1729 (Score:3) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:27PM
    • Re:milling machines are cool (Score:5, Informative)

      by madfgurtbn (321041) on Monday March 31 2003, @12:00AM (#5629711)
      See www.desktopcnc.com for a comparison of various tabletop cnc machines. Depends on your personal definition of "affordable", but there are some small machines $3k

      I don't think you could reach .0001 tolerance on those low-end machines, but most of them would get close to .001, which is plenty for most hobbyist projects.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:milling machines are cool by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:43AM
    • Re:milling machines are cool by ArsonPanda (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:59PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:milling machines are cool by zymano (Score:2) Monday March 31 2003, @01:11AM
      • forgot one. by zymano (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:19AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • slashdotted already (Score:2, Funny)

    by doowy (241688) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:07PM (#5628795)
    (http://mork.ca/)
    /. really needs a mirroring system or at least ask guys like this and/or give them fair warning to prepare.

    2 comments so far and its already down. What's the point? The article might as well be yanked all together.
  • There are easier ways (Score:5, Informative)

    by John Jorsett (171560) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:12PM (#5628808)
    Seems like a lot of trouble to go to when it's pretty cheap to get small-quantity custom boards done [pcbexpress.com].
    • Re:There are easier ways by Monkelectric (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:55PM
    • Re:There are easier ways (Score:4, Informative)

      by lirkbald (119477) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:33PM (#5629153)
      A couple others to try:

      ExpressPCB [expresspcb.com]- Has an offer that will let you make 3 3.8"X2.5" 2-sided boards for about $60, as well as a more general off that's not too much more pricey. They have their own board design software you have to use, which is a bit primitive but adequate for hobbyist use, though it's a problem if you were to ever want someone else to make your boards.

      Advanced Circuits [4pcb.com]- Has a deal to make 2-sided boards for $33/ea, min qty 3. These boards have a solder mask, which is required for dealing with fine-pitch SMT parts, and makes your board all pretty and professional-looking ;-)

      Sierra Proto Express [sierraprotoexpress.com]- Has a similar deal to Advanced Circuits, but also has a good price to make four-layer boards.

      Some general notes- I've used the first two, and it worked alright, but I haven't tried the third one. The latter two require Gerber and Excellon data- this is the standard format for PCB plotting and drilling information information. Essentially any board layout software should be able to generate them. However, it is not trivial to figure out what precisely to send the board manufacturer- you can't just blindly trust your layout software to do the Right Thing. I keep meaning to write a little tutorial on my hard-won knowledge about this, but I've never gotten around to it :-/

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:There are easier ways (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Ratso Baggins (516757) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:57PM (#5629246)
      (http://slashdot.org/)
      You may be missing the point, he machine's turn-around-time is 1 hour(ish) the best you can get is 1 day from the fab co's. Secondly @$80 a board you will quickly pay for the milling machine, if you have need for it. I like it because @ 1:00am when I'm ready to do the board - I can... and how many things geek are done "because I can"?

      Granted it's only double sided - but at that it's wonderful. Wow, no more chemicals! I've always-forever wanted one of these but the pro milling machines are out of my league.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:There are easier ways by kaleth (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @11:04PM
    • Re:There are easier ways by arhines (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @03:53AM
    • Re:There are easier ways by John Jorsett (Score:2) Monday March 31 2003, @03:42PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Do It Right - John Has Great Plans (Score:5, Informative)

    note: the site is down, so I'm going off a mirror of the front page of the site, sorry if I get things wrong

    If you want to build a machine to mill circuit boards, do it right. Build a machine designed by John C Kleinbauer [crankorgan.com]. The Brute [crankorgan.com] is designed to make PCBs cheaply. I recently bought some of John's plans (well worth it) and they are quite nice. They are very well done, easy to understand, don't need things that are exotic and hard to get (if your in the US). He includes a booklet on how to mill PCBs with The Brute, or you can order it seperatly. He even maintains and activly participates on his forum, Hardware Store CNC [ezboard.com].

    I've started to build a brute, and things are going pretty well considering I'm doing this in my spare time with only some time to work on it. If you guys are like me (I really like to build things with my hands) this is a ton of fun. I can't wait to get it running so that I can make PCBs, robot parts, a wooden clock [woodenclocks.co.uk] and more.

  • It's a shameless plug, but.... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Arethan (223197) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:21PM (#5628838)
    (Last Journal: Thursday August 23 2001, @09:23PM)
    My dad wrote some CNC control software that would work quite well for this application. It's designed to run anything from table top machines (such as this) all the way up to large scale CNC retrofits, where the iron is good but the control is shot. Very competitively priced as well. Even has a free demo version with no time limit for those that want to check it out. Requires a dos based machine to run it on though. FreeDOS works fine, of course so does MS-DOS.

    I'm sure this will kill his pipe, but here is a link: www.cnczeus.com [cnczeus.com]

    It's listed in google as well, so you may want to check that out if/when the pipe goes dead from the load. :)
  • question? (Score:1, Redundant)

    Could someone explain what a milling machine is? Thanks

  • Acid etching is nearly extinct (Score:4, Interesting)

    by green pizza (159161) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:29PM (#5628863)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Good article for those that don't already have access to PCB milling equipment. There really is no reason to do the old-school etching method anymore, in fact, I don't even know any hobbyists that do that anymore. Milling equipment can be found, borrowed, or made pretty easily these days. I've even seen a working setup made from Lego Mindstorms and a cordless Dremel! Hey, it works and beats the heck outta the mask-and-acid roll of the dice method.
  • Electronics Enthusiasts... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kevin Burtch (13372) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:35PM (#5628891)
    It seems dabbling in electronics is a dying hobby for the younger crowds... I hope projects like this spawn new curiosity and interest.

    For those new to this hobby... here are some publications that could be of great value to you:
    http://www.nutsvolts.com/
    http://www.circui tcellar.com/
    http://www.poptronics.com/

    Anyone know of any others?
    • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Smidge204 (605297) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:57PM (#5628975)
      How about sources for new/surplus components?

      http://www.goldmine-elec.com/
      http://www.alltro nics.com/
      http://www.allcorp.com/
      http://www.new ark.com/
      http://www.jameco.com/

      Try to never buy from Radioscrap. Overpriced and crap quality...

      I've ordered from Alltronics before. They have a $15 minimum order, and sometimes an order may be delayed if something you requested is out of stock. They answer your e-mails rather quickly, though.

      Jameco also sells the seemingly elusive PCI prototyping cards [jameco.com], though they're pricey ($70). Anyone know another supplier of these? (They're also good if you're looking to pick up a 266MHz PII motherboard for $20)

      =Smidge=
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by c_oflynn (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:38PM
    • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Thatmushroom (Score:3) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:39PM
      • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... (Score:5, Informative)

        by Kevin Burtch (13372) on Sunday March 30 2003, @11:18PM (#5629551)
        Well, there used to be Electronics Now and Popular Electronics (which merged, and became Poptronix), but the printed publications are gone (to my knowledge). You may be able to find all the old issues at your local library... although ones over 1 year old may be only on microfische.

        As much as I'm annoyed with Radio Shack for turning into a toy and appliance store (they used to be an electronics hobbyist store), they do still have a handfull of items for the electronics tinkerer.
        I'd recommend picking up all of their Engineer's Mini-Notebooks to start with.
        I'd also recommend checking out some of their X-in-one kits... I think they have a 300-in-one now (I hope they haven't stopped making these).
        They have all kinds of example circuits that you can make by hand wiring (read: no soldering) the circuits together - and some of the examples are kind of cool for a beginner. I started with a 150-in-one kit (it was the biggest at the time) way back when I was a teen.

        After this... if you want to get into digital electronics, pick up the TTL Cookbook and CMOS Cookbook by Sam's.
        If you want to get into audio electronics, pick up the Audio IC OP-Amp Applications (also by Sam's).
        If you're a musician, there's a VERY cool one called Electronic Projects for Musicians by Craig Anderton. Use this one with the above audio book to come up with some really cool guitar effect "pedals".

        I hope this helps!
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by haggar (Score:2) Monday March 31 2003, @08:29AM
    • Get off my lawn you little punks!! by ArsonPanda (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @12:12AM
    • Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by PD (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @01:40PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by bplipschitz (265300) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:36PM (#5628896)
    for general mcb construction, but it really depends upon the application. Most of the stuff I would use it for would be RF, and 'ugly' construction is a heckuva lot faster, and usually performs better.

    For computer hacking stuff, or for audio, this might be a handy thing to have.
  • Coming Soon! (Score:2)

    by 1stflight (48795) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:42PM (#5628913)
    Opensource Hardware!!!
  • Useless (Score:3, Informative)

    by tftp (111690) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:42PM (#5628917)
    (http://www.lib.ru/)
    I can't get to the site (slashdotted). But I used one of such machines. Nowadays they are absolutely, unconditionally useless. They can't make the fine traces that are required for modern chips. Instead, it is cheaper now to order your PCBs from a board house (such as Advanced Circuits). $30 per board is not that expensive.
    • Re:Useless by MBCook (Score:3) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:06PM
    • Re:Useless by theLOUDroom (Score:3) Monday March 31 2003, @01:49AM
    • Re:Useless by FotoPlasma (Score:1) Monday March 31 2003, @05:17AM
      • Re:Useless by tftp (Score:2) Monday March 31 2003, @01:05PM
  • by miketang16 (585602) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:48PM (#5628937)
    (Last Journal: Saturday June 12 2004, @11:07PM)
    At the risk of sounding like an idiot, how exactly do you get the electrically conductive metal in the etching?
    • Re:That's all well and good.... by jfmiller (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:55PM
    • Re:That's all well and good.... by Kevin Burtch (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @08:55PM
    • Re:That's all well and good.... by Jason1729 (Score:2) Sunday March 30 2003, @10:33PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • by Jennifer E. Elaan (463827) on Monday March 31 2003, @12:16AM (#5629763)
      (http://caladan.nanosoft.ca/)
      Actually, you missed the secret of the really high-volume people. Photoresist is actually primarily for rapid prototyping, not production. Due to the harsh nature of etchants, there are very few compounds that are both photosensitive and resistant to them. Most of them are quite dangerous.

      The most serious problem comes in from the really high-end etching systems. Photoresist is fine with ferric chloride, but when you start using something like an acid-peroxide etchant, it will actually eat many "resist" inks. The resist pens become TOTALLY useless, for example.

      And so this is where the old technique of serigraphy comes in. This is the "screen-printing" that makes the name Printed Circuit Boards. The resist ink used on the actual board is usually just some form of lacquer, which holds up well to even the harshest etchants. A stencil is prepared on a screen, usually through a photographic process. Since the screen resist doesn't have to deal with the same harsh chemicals, it is generally much more environmentally conscious and cheaper than PC-Board photoresist.

      I actually set up to do this method myself, in a semi-hobby context. I had some previous experience with serigraphy, and the acid/peroxide system was cheaper, far more effective, and much easier to dispose of than the ferric chloride. On the flip-side, it will eat virtually anything metallic and smells aweful (it isn't much of a health hazard except in the sulphuric/peroxide system, but should be ventilated nonetheless), so it's not for the faint of heart.

      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by KillerHamster (645942) on Sunday March 30 2003, @08:57PM (#5628979)
    (http://www.l4l.org/)
    Back in my high school electronics class, we used to etch our PCBs in acid, and when the teacher was out of the room, we'd put things like pennies and copper wire in the tray just for kicks. Milling the boards is probably a lot more efficient and safer, but doesn't sound like as much fun.
  • by yakko nef (640432) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:15PM (#5629073)
    PCB killing machine? I guess more beer less sleep isn't always better but it can be more interesting.
  • Recursive construction (Score:3, Interesting)

    The best thing about this milling machine is that it built itself. The first version [mosascii.com] was controled by electronics on a breadboard. The second version [mosascii.com] uses much more sophisticated electronics on a PCB that had been milled by the first version of the machine. That is unbelievably elegant.
  • by cybergibbons (554352) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:22PM (#5629106)
    (http://www.urbex.org.uk/)

    I used a small CNC miller to produce two complex alumnium plates that I used to produce a winch. It was complete overkill, but I was bored, and it did a very good job.

    It had dodgy software and the sheet I was using was too large (X and Y) to use in the machine, so I had to make a jig using MDF and steel rod to locate the plate, so that it could be flipped, and the machine used to cut material much bigger than it was designed for.

    The software and PC controlling it was updated last year, and now it can accurately profile 3D shapes. There are obvious restrictions, such as no undercutting (unless you use special bits, which is awkward). You can use opaque acrylic and etch photos onto it, with the darkness being converted into depth. By then holding it up to the light you see an image. Quite a neat idea.

    I could see it being used for PCB production, but to be honest, it wouldn't be much use for anything small. It is very accurate, without a doubt moreso than the homebuilt one, but even with the smallest tips, I can't see SOIC outlines being milles with enough precision to be used. And most PCBS have some sort of surface mount components now.

    I also see problems with raising the edges of the copper tracks slightly with milling. This would make surface mount components hard to get flat on the board.

  • Isn't it a salt? (Score:4, Informative)

    by shoppa (464619) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:25PM (#5629117)
    were all etched in acid

    Isn't Ferric Chloride (the stuff you buy in bottles at Radio Shack, or at least I did when I was a kid) actually a salt? FeCl... looks like a salt to me!

    • Re:Isn't it a salt? by Cheerio Boy (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @09:31PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Isn't it a salt? by sstamps (Score:1) Sunday March 30 2003, @09:42PM
    • Re:Isn't it a salt? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Paul Neubauer (86753) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:45PM (#5629206)

      Yes, it is a salt. Copper is more reactive than iron, so the etch works by the chlorine trading iron for copper. The "filings" left after etching are the iron that was freed in the reaction.

      Some folks see it anything that 'eats' away at something as being caused by an acid, even if no acid is really involved. Wouldn't it be nice if chemistry was taught? And taught in a way that was effective?

      [ Parent ]
    • Not Just Ferric Chloride by Jennifer E. Elaan (Score:2) Monday March 31 2003, @12:23AM
  • Milling machine (Score:2)

    by Doppler00 (534739) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:45PM (#5629207)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday January 04 2006, @09:14PM)
    The college I go to has a milling machine. I've milled about 4 boards from it. That would be great if I could just have my own though and use it on my own time. However, could a home built milling machine achieve an accuracy of 10 mills for track width? Also, what software (opensource) could be used? I couldn't imagine a homemade machine achieving the same functionality as a $15,000 device, but if it could, a low cost home milling machine for hobby projects would be a great product.

    Now they just need to make a low cost device for placing and soldering SMD components on the boards.
  • UV Light does the trick (Score:3, Interesting)

    by PhlegmMaster (596165) on Sunday March 30 2003, @09:46PM (#5629209)
    Over here, (in school at least) we just print out the circuit diagram onto a transparency sheet (inkjet printer of course) and then just use a UV light to destroy the appropriate parts of the circuit.

    Use some chemicals (stored in a safe location and brewable in your own home) and you've got a nice PCB for you to use.
  • by uglomera (138796) on Sunday March 30 2003, @11:33PM (#5629604)
    Milling machines are not an overkill or a solution for amateurs, they are a very good solution for inexpensive prototypes or production needed in small-mid volume.

    Acid etching produces a functional board, but it simply does not look good, and you can't make 100 boards that are exactly alike. The lines are almost straight, the edges are not perfect, and if you are on a contract to deliver a product, this is not an option. Examples of where a milling machine is one of the best solutions: a university lab where the researchers are under government/industry contract and are supposed to deliver a working prototype or a small business with a military contract (small volume products).

    I worked for a startup company for a while, and part of my job was to work on a QuickCircuit [t-tech.com] milling machine, and that thing had milling bits that were 4 mils thick (comparable to hair). You can hardly reach this precision with acid etching. I also adapted the machine to dice wafers, which replaced the company's practice of using an exactoknife :)

    If you are in the IC design business, testing cheaply is of primary importance. You can get a full setup for producing boards for less than $10K. How's that compared to billions of $$$ for setting up an IC production plant? And if you are in the RF design business, you need the precision so that a crappy board does not screw up your high-frequency measurements.

    Of course, milling is no option for producing high-volume PCBs with many layers, but don't think that ASUS spent months to design such a board to test their new motherboard design. First they have to verify that design works, which is done with a cheap PCB design, one that would hook up the ICs. Only after that stage can the final PCB design begin.

    As long as the Z80 or 68K processors are still in use, simple PCBs will be here, and we need a cheap and fast way to design and make them.
  • PC Motherboards (Score:1)

    by TheDarkRogue (245521) <DarkRogue @ G Mail.Com> on Monday March 31 2003, @12:13AM (#5629757)
    Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but seeing that it seems that alot of people responding to this story know about board design and such, about how many layers does a normal PC (like an Athlon/P3 if that matters) motherboard have in it?
  • Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Score:2, Funny)

    by Dr. Cody (554864) on Monday March 31 2003, @12:19AM (#5629777)
    I dont know about milling, but I've got a PCB mining machine right here: a fishing pole dipped in the East River.
  • Don't bother (Score:2)

    by Animats (122034) on Monday March 31 2003, @12:56AM (#5629873)
    (http://www.animats.com)
    "In this world, you do not make your own PC boards" - The Art of Electronics, by Horowitz and Hill.

    Realistically, PC boards are made by sending output from a board design program to a service that makes boards. It's reasonably cheap, turnaround is good, and you can get double-sided with plated through holes, which is what you want.

    Toner transfer methods are for people who like looking at their boards under a magnifier and doing rework. Do it yourself photographic methods work better, but few people bother any more. Anybody still have one of those small etching tanks with the aquarium bubbler?

    A related business is making front panels. [frontpanelexpress.com] Send out your design and let a computer-controlled punch make all the connector holes. They also etch the lettering and anodize.

  • Clever of you (Score:2)

    by Neophytus (642863) on Monday March 31 2003, @02:10AM (#5630102)
    /. a sympatico cable modem. Next time use your head :) - If he caught it in time before his poor innocent home pc burned out he would have changed the ip on dyndns.org... if not you've just used his bandwidth quota for the month.
  • pretty unfortunate (Score:4, Informative)

    by RestiffBard (110729) on Monday March 31 2003, @05:08AM (#5630437)
    (http://restiffbard.com/)
    This is one of the cooler "News for Nerds" articles I've seen in a while and its completely unreachable at 4 in the morning because of the slashdotting.

    this is no longer humorous. As much as I often enjoy the +4 comments on certain articles reading slashdot is pretty much no longer worth the frustration of not being able to RTFA.

    Can't wait till this article moves down the frontpage.
  • To plot.. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by saqmaster (522261) <stu.hotmail@com> on Monday March 31 2003, @07:54AM (#5630694)
    (http://di.cx/)
    This is quite cool.. I wonder if you could hook up a drill to a normal flatbed plotter.. You can find old Roland plotters quite cheap on ebay and places now..
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by LordMyren (15499) on Monday March 31 2003, @02:03PM (#5632423)
    (http://ered.info/)
    I'd consider dumping $1000 and a couple months of "spare" time into building my own miniature end to end fab to serve me the rest of my life, but it seems kind of pointless without two/three features which seem to becoming exponentially more important: bga capabilities and multilayer.

    What would be required for BGA work? what sort of accuracy? does BGA automatically imply multilayer, or can you route between the contact patches? what sort of "fill rate" do the solder balls form? do you need to add more solder, or do the solder balls themselves suffice?

    Also, does anyone have thoughts for a BGA capable DIY soldering system? you'd have to hold the parts in place, i assume? heating elements: what's used by the big boys? how can you get a system that would provide the appropriate ramp up in temperature from that system? pizza ovens come to mind, but maintaining the constant and low delta-t has been described as an absolute requisite.

    moving on to multilayer...

    *gulp*.

    i'd think this would vaguely just be like solder masking - with which i happen to have no experience either. just mask a nonconductive coating, then glue. what adhessive is used? what is done for interboard connectivity?

    and where do you find thin PCB for use in such a system? somehow those 6 layer nvidia boards (random guess) are just as thin as my single layer ISA serial cards (bless them both).

    Myren
  • This is neat (Score:1)

    by iamroot (319400) on Monday March 31 2003, @05:28PM (#5634000)
    (http://www.ldwp.com/)
    I've always thought that CNC/rapid prototyping was pretty cool. The ability to take a design from CAD and manufacture a prototype that is true to the original design is cool in and of itself, not to mention the time it saves. I also like the artistic side to it. You can take complex shapes and lines, or a picture used as a depth map, and create a "carving" from it with great precision.

    My current CNC mill is a MaxNC [maxnc.com] NC-10. At around $1,300, it was the best deal I could find. Its a little slow, and not the best thing by any means, but works nicely. I'm going to be selling engraved desk signs, I'm going to use it for engraving. I'll probably eventually do 3D image engravings(depth mapping), but at first I'll just do lettering.

    I've made a couple keychains of Tux, some 3D statuettes, several more keychains, some lettering on wood, some robotics parts, etc... They all look really nice!

    Actually, my biggest complaint about that machine(the NC-10) is that the effective X work distance is only about 6 or 7 inches. Its big enough for small work, like engraving signs, but I'm thinking about building a much bigger CNC router with a 5x10ft(or something) table sometime.

    One thing I have to say to everyone who is going to buy or build a mill. Software for these can cost over $1000! You need the CAD program to design the item, the CAM program to create G-code from it, and the actual CNC program which will come with the mill, or be freely available. MecSoft [mecsoft.com] did offer a free "lite" version of their CAM program, but don't seem to anymore(Luckily, I have it archived), but that is what I'm using.
  • Vinyl and Inkjet (Score:1)

    by SWTP_OS9 (658064) on Monday March 31 2003, @08:09PM (#5634963)
    Have tried vinyl and the material is not destroyed by the normal RS etching solution.

    Found a printer late last year that has a strate paper path. A Lexmark i3. Cramed a CD and it actualy printed on the top of it. Did try a test with paper and printed test in some etching solution and it seam to pass ok. Now if I can get some time will cram a pc board and print out a circuit! Be nice if I could replace the std ink with a copper based and just print the layout.
  • Manual? (Score:1)

    by SharpFang (651121) on Tuesday April 01 2003, @08:15AM (#5637463)
    (http://sharpy.xox.pl/ | Last Journal: Wednesday September 14 2005, @02:12PM)
    Would it make sense (for strictly home use, no ultra-high precision required, just enough to attach normal surface-mounted chips) to build such a machine without step motors, just with manual dials, driven manually - so you follow a drawing on the board while etching, lift the drill manually, move the board by turning the dials etc? I have to admit my etched circuits with tracks thinner than some 3mm were a complete failure, the paths either shorted or broken (or both).
  • by NewtonsLaw (409638) on Monday March 31 2003, @12:24AM (#5629800)
    You might want to see if you can pick up an old X-Y plotter somewhere and use that as the basis of a DIY design.

    Replace the pen with a high-speed cutter and then you can interface to the plotter quite simply through the RS232 port or whatever the plotter supports.

    Here's a plotter on eBay [ebay.com] that might be a good starting point.
    [ Parent ]
  • 15 replies beneath your current threshold.