Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Embedded Linux In Onkyo's Home Music Server

Posted by timothy on Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:36 PM
from the heavy-duty dept.
IrateSurf writes "ExtremeTech has a story about a new use of embedded Linux from Onkyo, which runs a home music server. Their NAS-2.3 has a CD-player as well as an 80GB hard drive for storing music and streaming it to other players on the an Ethernet network. Also check out the web site for the NAS-2.3." If only they would make it record radio, too ...
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Can it... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Tuxinatorium (463682) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:38PM (#5085465) Homepage
    ...rip CDs to MP3s? It seems like that would be a pretty good feature to have in a portable CD/mp3 player.
    • Re:Can it... by TokyoBoy (Score:1) Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:58PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Can it... by enomar (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:23AM
      • Re:Can it... by orthogonal (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @07:56AM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • they must be rich (Score:4, Interesting)

    They must be rich if they can afford to have 80gigs worth of legal copies of their music...

    if each album takes 80megs about.. then the hd can hold 1000 albums... 1000 albums at 20$ an album is 20,000$ !

    Who can afford to spend that much on music?
    • Re:they must be rich by ChrisMG999 (Score:1) Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:41PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Other sources (Score:5, Insightful)

      by pompomtom (90200) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:43PM (#5085495)
      Legal mp3's don't have to come off a $20 CD.

      Check acidplanet.com mp3.com mp3.com.au spinwarp.com etc etc etc
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:they must be rich by StArSkY (Score:2) Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:51PM
    • Re:they must be rich by infolib (Score:3) Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:57PM
    • Re:they must be rich by GregGardner (Score:2) Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:03PM
    • Re:they must be rich by Dalroth (Score:3) Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:49PM
    • Re:they must be rich by sammy.lost-angel.com (Score:3) Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:08AM
    • Re:they must be rich by rednox (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:12AM
    • Re:they must be rich (Score:4, Insightful)

      by ediron2 (246908) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:55AM (#5085947) Journal
      Spread the cost out, man... ask 'Who can afford a few grand a year?!'

      Young people. 15 to 25, no mortgage or significant debt, a job, and lots of exposure via friends to help thin out the good music from the bad before buying...

      I bought music from when I was 15 to about 28 yrs old, and didn't buy much compared to most of my music-fanatic friends. Since then, I've tapered off to a few cd's a year, plus a few more as gifts. I've got well over 100 tapes, 150 in vinyl, 250 cd's, and one 8-track (Abbey Road, don't ask why). And I repeat, I wasn't SERIOUSLY into music like several friends I had...

      So, 1000 seems quite plausible. What's more, a lot of those I got via cheap sources: rummage & yard sales, used bins, friends, etc. Nowadays, I pick up a cd when I hear a good concert or live band in a bar. Since the night's bar tab has usually cost me a lot more than the $10-15 for the CD, I consider it a tip to a good band and a chance to reminisce later.

      Round down to 15k (that's being charitable compared to your $20 per album), give me 1/5 the needed collection, and spread it over the last 30 years, and it seems laughably cheap... $100 a YEAR on average. Rich?! Shee-it, I spent more last weekend on sushi! Throw in the wife's similarly-sized music collection, not force me to waste a wall in my li'l house (not to mention portability like ipods and archos units have) and give me access to stuff that's only available on out-of-print vinyl and I'd probably start collecting old, good music like a fiend.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:they must be rich by BrittPark (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:27AM
    • Re:they must be rich by gmhowell (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:28AM
    • Re:they must be rich by mbbac (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @08:48AM
    • Re:they must be rich by Tyrell Hawthorne (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @10:16AM
    • Re:they must be rich by Slashdot Junky (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @10:50AM
    • Re:they must be rich by The_K4 (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @11:06AM
    • Re:they must be rich by Excarnate (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @11:15AM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Why not wireless? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Metalhead01 (587101) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:39PM (#5085475) Homepage
    There are a lot of these little guys popping up on the market, yet all of them use a physical connection. Is there some inherent technical problem with using an 802.11b device to stream the music?

  • Archos Radio Recorders (Score:5, Informative)

    by Foxxz (106642) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:39PM (#5085476) Homepage
    "If only they would make it record radio, too ..."

    See archos [archos.com] for devices that record raido directly into mp3. They have a hard drive and a smart media device that does that i beleive. Plus they keep the last 30 seconds of audio in memory in case the song you want has already started you can still get the begining.

    -Foxxz
  • does it matter what OS it's running? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rtphokie (518490) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:41PM (#5085486)
    mod this flamebait if you must but I gotta ask, what does it really matter what OS it's running?

    It could run TRS-DOS for all I care as long as it gets the job done efficiently.
  • Article Text (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:44PM (#5085501)
    Onkyo (www.onkyousa.com) is one of the better-known Japanese manufacturers of home theater gear. Recently, the company has begun building audio and home theater equipment with built-in Ethernet ports, rather than some proprietary connectivity scheme. PC Magazine wrote about one of Onkyo's product, the NC500 Net-Tune Receiver. However, the Net-Tune receiver is perhaps the least interesting of the products, offering the now-familiar paradigm -- the digital receiver that can route music from your PC to your home audio system. The NC500 does have a stereo amplifier, but is otherwise similar to products from Turtle Beach, Sonic Blue and others. However, Onkyo is bringing Ethernet capability to a full-fledged, Dolby Digital/DTS 7.1 receiver in it's TX-NR900, THX-Select certified home theater receiver. The TX-NR900 offers 110 watts RMS into 7 channels, supports all the major surround sound standards and can act as a Net-Tune client, allowing you to pipe the digital music from your PC directly to your home theater rack. In addition to the usual array of input and output ports is a standard, 10 megabit Ethernet port.

    That's pretty cool, but that's not all. Onkyo also sells a line of high-end gear targeted towards custom installations under its Integra brand. Onkyo offers products similar to the NC500 and TX-NR900, but with additional capabilities. What's most interesting, though, is the Integra NAS-2.3 Net-Tune Server.

    At first blush, the NAS-2.3 seems like a CD player, but it also has an embedded 80GB hard drive. So now it appears to be like any number of digital music players on the scene. But the NAS-2.3 also has a 10/100 Ethernet port, and is capable of acting as a music server to a network of Net-Tune devices. Running on the Integra product is an embedded Linux operating system, which acts as the server software.

    The NAS-2.3 can support up to 12 simultaneous streams to Net-Tune receivers or other clients. You can have different tracks playing in multiple rooms, move music to a PC, display a playlist on most types of displays (the NAS-2.3 has VGA, S-Video and composite video outputs) and can even connect up to CDDB to download track information on various CDs.

    One other interesting aspect of the NAS-2.3 is the availability of an empty drive sled inside the box, allowing users or installers to add additional hard drive space. You can't use a standard, PC-formatted hard drive, according to Eric Harper, Integra's Custom Installation and Product Manager. The formatting is somewhat different, but a knowledgeable user or installer should be able to add another drive to the server.

    So if you don't want the headache of building your own music server from a PC, then the NAS-2.3 can integrate into your home Ethernet network, co-existing quite well with your PC systems. It's an intriguing idea that embraces the PC network, rather than trying to remain isolated.

    NNY News with a twist of lime [pajonet.com].
    • Also cool ... by Greedo (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @11:01AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by SuperCal (549671) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:51PM (#5085533) Homepage
    I'd like one to work more like a radio Tivo. Say I always listen to Neal Boortz and Sean Hanity, then maybe the machine will sugest old Rush. Or if I always listen to the new rock station, maybe save the new rock show (or what ever the call radio segments) on a different station. Of cource without any real listings of radio shows, like a radio TV Guide, all that may be asking to much...
  • Ogg (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Gyorg_Lavode (520114) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:59PM (#5085571)
    It mentions that files must be in mp3 or pcm format. Now alot of my music is actually in ogg. First, if it's embeded linux, will there be a means by which we can install other codecs? (say ssh or such.) Second, will there be a supplied means to upgrade the hard drive? (I know you might not need 80gigs for your legal collection but my illegal collections already over that. by far.)
    • Re:Ogg by enomar (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:30AM
      • Re:Ogg by technos (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @04:16AM
      • Re:Ogg by Gyorg_Lavode (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @09:37AM
    • Re:Ogg by Gyorg_Lavode (Score:1) Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:31PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • RIAA Sez: (Score:2, Funny)

    by nfotxn (519715) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:07PM (#5085601) Journal
    If only they would make it record radio, too ...

    But recording off the radio could mean the end of the music industry as we know it!!

  • PCM Digital Out Though? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:08PM (#5085607)
    I love the ease of CD's on an HD, but as a semi-audiophile I want something that does uncompressed audio.
    The last unit from Integra (Made into an Onkyo brand) also offered digital out but only for MP3s. If you played PCM the digital out turned off! Anyone know if this unit does the same thing?
    AFAIK iMerge UK is the only company that has given RIAA the finger and offers PCM digital out, oh, and their players are much cooler but also more expensive.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Recording Radio.... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Penguin2212 (173380) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:09PM (#5085612)
    I would question the market viability of a device designed to copy songs from the radio. When you copy a CD that you bought and paid for, you are buying the material on the CD. You are purchasing a copy. When you hear a song on the radio, you are hearing performance of the song. An artist/record company makes money for every copy and performance made. If you buy a CD and copy it (assuming that you don't share it or anything) just to listen to it on a device such as this, you aren't taking any more than what you paid for. But if you copy from the radio, you are. In fact this was the basis for the case against radio stations streaming broadcasts over the internet, because temporary copies of songs were made on the user's hard drive therefore making it a copy. Most of you have probablly heard of that case. Most radio stations have ceased to do so because of this, and are fighting it as well. I'm not trying to defend the RIAA in any way. However, a device that would facilitate copying of music from the radio would definitely come under serious fire from the RIAA, IMHO.
  • by iJed (594606) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:09PM (#5085613) Homepage
    Does this thing support zeroconf?
    It would be nice to see one of these new zeroconf enabled TiVo reading its music off one of these.
  • Input Sources (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Dark Warrior (132803) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:14PM (#5085632) Homepage
    Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see ethernet as one of the input sources. I have that 1400 legal MP3s ripped from my CDs--I'm not sure I want to go thru that again.
  • Running gerbilware (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:23PM (#5085662)
    Sorry for the subject line, but that's what I think whenever I see one of these embedded Linux stories--"For all I care it's powered by gerbils running in exercise wheels." Am I happy to see Linux get a little positive press? Sure, but let's not read more into this than it deserves. The rest of the world won't know this thing has "Linux Inside", nor will they care. The Linux crowd should be focused on the real battleground, the desktop, and derailing MS's monopoly.
  • Yoko Ono? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:30PM (#5085688)
    Does anyone care what Yoko Ono does?

    Oh, ONKYO. Sorry...
    • Re:Yoko Ono? by KingDaveRa (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @07:36AM
  • Redundant hard drives? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by zerofoo (262795) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:00AM (#5085779)
    Of all the "music server" products i've seen on the market, i've yet to see one that has redundant hard drives. Maybe these things haven't been on the market long enough, but eventually the hard drives in these devices will fail, and when they do, there are going to be some very pissed off consumers out there.

    Until recently, audio gear manufacturers never had to worry about the storage media. When you bought the music, you bought a hard copy of that media (cd, record, tape...etc). I understand that these devices still require you to purchase the "hard copy" of the music, but do you want to re-rip 500 CDs just because your hard drive went clunk-clunk?

    -ted
  • by sammy.lost-angel.com (316593) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:14AM (#5085825) Homepage
    A rendezvous enabled wireless device that ties into my music collection (yes, iTunes). The reality of the situation is, if Apple doesn't release it, we won't see it for at least a year. Well, depending on how the HomePod is made, maybe it could incorporate rendezvous...

    Anyone have any home brew devices in the works? Maybe now's the time to start :)
  • Protocol Specs? (Score:1)

    by Rick Richardson (87058) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:14AM (#5085826) Homepage
    Has anybody found a link for the protocol specifications? I looked around on the Onkyo site and didn't find them.

    Ethernet is great, but not if I have to reverse engineer the protocol in order to serve music to the receiver.
  • by MrLinuxHead (528693) <mrlinuxhead&yahoo,com> on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:53AM (#5085937) Homepage Journal

    Onkyo is smart for using Linux. Nearly all the Pacific Rim (Sony, Pioneer, Panasonic, ect.) manufacturers are testing it or are ready to deploy because they don't need to pay out royalties per unit, can share innovations with each other, and can share data with each other's units over 100Mb Ethernet or 802.11x or whatever. The most important thing to remember is they don't need to spend huge amounts on R&D. Linux will become the Linga Franca of consumer electronics, unless Microsoft buys one of the big players and twists everyone's arm to go along. Maybe not even then, as the long term gains are too big. And most Japanese electronics manufacturers are thinking very long term.

    And yes these babies are BIG! And HEAVY! At 110 RMS per CH. Thats 660 Watts out, all discrete. No output IC's. Not to mentions pre amp and video switching. Schwweett.

    Inputs:

    Audio and AV Inputs - 3/6

    HDTV-Ready Component Video Input/Output - 2/1

    Front-Panel Video Input (with S-Video) - Yes

    S-Video Compatible Jacks Input/Output - 6/3

    Digital Inputs:

    5 Optical (1 Front Panel), 3 Coaxial

    Digital Output - 2 Optical Amp In

    RS-232 Control Port

    IR In/Out - 1/1

  • Net-Tune details? (Score:1)

    by __david__ (45671) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:12AM (#5086011) Homepage
    Onkyo's site says the ethernet hookup thing uses "Net-Tune". They offer Windows Net-Tune software on their site, but only if you have one of their boxes. Does anyone know anything about this Net-Tune? Anyone reverse engineer this yet? I have done some google searches but I haven't found anything worthwhile yet...

    I've spent a substantial amount of time getting all my cd's onto my linux server (240 gigs worth! (flacs, not mp3s)). If I could get my machine to spew out my music using the Net-Tune protocol, Onkyo just might get some of my money! :-)

    -David
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by trasgu (603018) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @02:47AM (#5086351) Homepage Journal
    Sansui and Onkyo were renowned in the 80's for low-low-low-distortion amps and high-end recievers. This company has been in the consumer-audiophile business for a long time. I remember touch-sensitive controls and FM lock WAAAY before these things became maintsream. It doesnt surprise me that they are "pioneering" new ideas in consumer A/V appliances.

    Dennis
  • by Morgaine (4316) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @06:17AM (#5086712)
    Integra + Onkyo, please market this in the UK!

    At last a networked digital audio recording and storage device that actually looks like a proper piece of hifi gear for the rack in the lounge.

    While there are several units along these lines on the market now, they haven't really respected the basic ergonomic and stylistic standards for hifi separates in the modern home until now. This product seems to be the closest so far --- I want one, purchaseable here with a UK warranty! :-)
  • by woobieman29 (593880) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @06:29AM (#5086736)
    From the article:

    You can't use a standard, PC-formatted hard drive, according to Eric Harper, Integra's Custom Installation and Product Manager. The formatting is somewhat different, but a knowledgeable user or installer should be able to add another drive to the server.

    Anyone know which format is used? I wonder if when they say you can't use a PC standard format, that maybe they really mean you cannot use FAT/VFAT/NTFS?? I certainly hope it is something standard so that you won't have to buy a second/replacement drive from Onkyo - I would imagine that their prices for a drive with a proprietary format would be much more expensive than a standard drive.

    Looks pretty cool otherwise....I can definitely attest to the fact that Onkyo makes very solid audio gear. I have an older Onkyo receiver that I have had for almost 10 years, and I'm still impressed by the sound quality.

  • by martijnd (148684) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @06:54AM (#5086775)
    Animated (Flash) diagram demonstrating their home music network (Net-Tune) system :

    http://www.net-tune.net [net-tune.net]

    From the Onkyo FAQ: [onkyousa.com]

    While WAV, WMA, MP3 are supported formats, there are many variations of these. Please check that the bitrates used are compatible and if certain files will not play back, check the following: * The file must not be saved in a system folder, such as C:\Windows or C:\WINNT. * WMA file contains Digital Rights Management (DRM) which prevents reproduction on other devices. * The WAV file is not in RIFFWAVE format or is corrupt. Format Bitrate Sampling Frequency WAV(PCM) ---- 32k/44.1k/48kHz MP3 All 32k/44.1k/48kHz WMA 32/36/40/44/48/64/80/96/128/160/192bps 32k/44.1k/48kHz

    Further, it uses DHCP to get an IP address. And needs ports 60096,60097. But that is of course all useless information until I actually find one of these machines.

  • Wonderful... (Score:1)

    by Cygnus v1 (32061) <<ten.tsacmoc> <ta> <81nedraha>> on Wednesday January 15 2003, @08:18AM (#5086993) Homepage
    ..another beautiful audio server that I won't think of buying because it doesn't support Vorbis. And it only supports MP3 at 2 CBR bitrates (128, 320kbps) and 192kbps VBR.
  • Rendezvous? (Score:1)

    by mbbac (568880) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @08:40AM (#5087066)
    If it supported Rendezvous, I might care about it. It doesn't appear to, so I don't.

    I don't want to rip all of my CDs into a box in my living room. I want to rip them into my home server and then stream and download them to different devices around my house.
  • by Subotai (34761) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @10:35AM (#5087750)
    Too bad they didn't put a PCMCIA slot in there so I could stick a WIFI card in. THen I wouldn't have to run ethernet back to where my entertainment closet is.
  • by RMH101 (636144) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @11:57AM (#5088518)
    Assuming you've already got a big ass hard drive full of tunes sitting on a pc in your house (hands up?) then I think you'd be better off with QCast Tuner for your PS2. Your PS2's already hooked up to your hifi, right? Stick this on it and add a network card and you can use your PS2 as a media player over ethernet from your PC. Alternately, if Onkyo added a Kazaa Lite client to it...If this is running a form of Linux is it practical to add this?
  • by GlobalEcho (26240) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @01:27PM (#5089008)
    These countless manufacturers making home audio MP3 devices with integrated hard drives are missing the point: you want a single point of storage in your house for MP3's, or you are going to have chaos.

    Networks are not just for web-browsing. They're also for sharing files, like those MP3's. And if you're going to have them somewhere, you might as well have them on your PC where:
    (1) You can rip with that expensive Athlon or PPC processor using LAME
    (2) There exist myriad MP3 control tools like id3tool and mp3gain
    (3) Your portable MP3 player hooks up
    (4) You may be downloading files from mp3.com or other places
    (5) [Important] You have a chance of keeping the hard drive and fan whines away from your audio equipment

    Thus, you want the home audio component you buy to simply get its music off the network. Audiotron and SLiMP3 do just that, which makes them the only reasonable such devices.

    Between them, I prefer the Audiotron because it has digital output, which means I can use the expensive DAC in my receiver rather than the cheap one in the unit. The SLiMP3 is impressively flexible, though!
  • where to buy? (Score:1)

    by Peartree (199737) <idl3mind@gmCHEETAHail.com minus cat> on Wednesday January 15 2003, @02:02PM (#5089208)
    I never saw a link or any info on where/how to buy one...
  • The good question is (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Nawak (170627) on Sunday January 19 2003, @09:12AM (#5112884) Homepage
    Will I have access to source/documentation to customize this linux?
    If not, I think this kind of item would be frustrating as I am likely to end up with a dream of doing something totally different with this embedded computer...

    You know, some networked remote control for it for instance... arg... must... stop... thinking!
  • Re:why (Score:2)

    by EvanED (569694) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <denave>> on Tuesday January 14 2003, @10:54PM (#5085546)
    There's the display to, they want to make it look nice among the other stereo devices, and finally take a look at the back panel. They use virtually all the space.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:why (Score:4, Interesting)

    by YrWrstNtmr (564987) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:01PM (#5085588)
    why do they have to make these so big??

    1. space for all the connections in the back

    2. power amp cooling. Driving serious power to multiple large speakers takes power. That heat needs to be dissipated.

    3. It looks better
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:why by Zapman (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @10:39AM
    • Re:why by sholden (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:16AM
    • Re:why by YrWrstNtmr (Score:2) Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:30AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:why by whipping_post (Score:1) Wednesday January 15 2003, @09:17AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:why (Score:2)

    by carpe_noctem (457178) on Tuesday January 14 2003, @11:54PM (#5085766) Homepage Journal
    erm, mebbe because most stereo equipment is manufactured at 19" and they want to make it an actual audio appliance?
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Last Post! (Score:1)

    by Nawak (170627) on Wednesday January 29 2003, @04:24PM (#5184374) Homepage
    Last post???

    Your script is waaay too optimistic about the 'archiving' time...
    [ Parent ]
  • 24 replies beneath your current threshold.