Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Sendo Can't Get Microsoft Source; Ditches Windows

Posted by michael on Thu Nov 07, 2002 12:40 PM
from the shared-source-ha-ha-ha-ha dept.
An anonymous submitter wrote: "Just when you thought the award-winning data leech Microsoft had become invincible... cellphone manufacturer Sendo, in a statement on the front page of its web site, announces the termination of its Z100 smartphone development on the Microsoft platform, licensing the rival Symbian from Nokia instead. (Further reports by ZDnet and Heise.)"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • **** THE PROOF THAT linux IS EVIL **** by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:44PM
  • The way to change things (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Soporific (595477) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:45PM (#4617872)
    I guess this is the way that vendors can get a change out of Microsoft. If you don't like someones product, take your business somewhere else.

    ~S
  • M$ finally gets screwed! (Score:4, Funny)

    by hbmartin (579860) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:45PM (#4617878)
    Oh, I'm sure they'll repent to everybody they ever screwed, now that they know what it feels like. NOT! They'll probably just use more Halloween stuff to kill Nokia and Sendo. Anyway, it's nice to see a company slap M$ in the face on their front page. It kinda give me a warm, fuzzy feeling. Or mabe that's just the caffeine.
    • Re:M$ finally gets screwed! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:22PM
      • stupid by danro (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @04:14AM
    • Re:M$ finally gets screwed! (Score:4, Insightful)

      by mentin (202456) on Thursday November 07 2002, @02:07PM (#4618564)
      Microsoft does not have to do anything. Slashdot users will do the retaliation instead!

      From now on, every IT vendor knows: if he turns away from Microsoft and uses other's products, an article describing this will be immediately published on /. and his Web site will be immediately slashdot'ed.

      This will obviously stop those IT vendors from doing such a crasy thing.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:M$ finally gets screwed! by sharkey (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:19PM
    • Re:M$ finally gets screwed! by agallagh42 (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by PhysicsGenius (565228) <physics_seeker&yahoo,com> on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:47PM (#4617892)
    Windows keeps on getting better and better. From it's award-winning design to it's revolutionary kernel architecture, Windows is the best in the biz. Says Internet Guru Dan Hertzfeld, "I rely on Windows and Office for Windows every day to deliver top-notch performance and it has never let me down." Many others praise Windows, too, including Chief Technology Officer Bill Patterson of Ford Motor Company, "Windows allows us to leverage our most valuable assets, people, into a world-class synergy to delight customers all over the globe."
  • mirror? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:47PM (#4617894)
    Gentlemen, how about a mirror? Their site appears to be served on a cell modem.
    • Re:mirror? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous DWord (466154) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:36PM (#4618323) Homepage
      Your "GET / HTTP/1.1" is important to us. Please stay on the line, and your request will be answered in the order it was received. Thank you for your patience.

      (Flock of Seagulls tune here...)
      [ Parent ]
  • by typical geek (261980) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:47PM (#4617900) Homepage
    phones. When you are trying to packet send and receive while jumping from cell to cell, you don't want the OS hung while a Window repaints, or an icon flickers on and off. You want an realtime OS tied down to the actual sending/recieving packets and doing the d/a a/d conversion on the speaker and microphone. You want a steady stream of conversation, you don't want the equivalent of an oral hourglass.

    This is also why Windowing software is also the wrong paradigm for industrial strength routers. The reason CICSCO certified people make such great money compared to test passsing MCSE monkeys is that the Cisco OS is all commandline/terminal driven, when you're routing a T3, you don't the overhead for pretty graphics.
    • Re:Big deal, Windows is the wrong paradigm for cel by Telastyn (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:03PM
    • It IS a big deal by burgburgburg (Score:3) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:05PM
    • by mrm677 (456727) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:09PM (#4618113)
      Oh please. I didn't know whether to respond or mod you down on this one. I choose the former.

      Of course Stingray (Windows for cellphones) uses an underlying RTOS. I interviewed with that group. We talked about it. All of the fancy UI/Windows stuff is in a low-priority task.

      Just like with the Palm OS. The "Palm OS" doesn't actually run the PDA. It runs on top of a small RTOS kernel that handles interrupts, hardware drivers, and other real-time things that have little to do with the UI. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the same Palm OS runs on different RTOS kernels. In fact, I can almost guarantee you that the Qualcomm Palm thingy they had a few years ago likely did not use the same RTOS kernel as my Palm Vx.

      And you comment about Cisco Certified Internet Engineers and Command-line interfaces is a joke, right? A CCIE doesn't make more money because he or she can use a terminal instead of dragging icons. They make more money because internetworking is more of a niche and is arguably more complex than setting up Windows. It also costs much more to become CCIE than MCSE. Trust me, Cisco's next generation routers will be configured remotely through a graphical interface. I guess when that happens, CCIE's will be making just as much as a MCSE, huh?
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by br0ck (237309) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:48PM (#4617909)
    Sendo Z100 NOT TO LAUNCH

    Company Statement
    Sendo has terminated its Smartphone development program utilising the Microsoft Windows Powered Smartphone 2002 software.

    As a result, Sendo regrets to announce that it will not be shipping the Z100 Smartphone.

    It has been a very difficult decision for Sendo given its leadership position in the development of smart devices. We are disappointed that we will not be able to ship the Z100 given the high level of interest shown in the device.

    Although a set back, we are pleased to announce today that we have licensed the Series 60 platform from Nokia for our smartphone category. We believe this will create the opportunity for us to continue as a lead player in the development of smartphone products for 2003.

    SENDO CHOOSES NOKIA'S SERIES 60 PLATFORM FOR ITS SMART PHONES
    Thu Nov 7 2002
    Sendo, a British mobile phone manufacturer, today announced that the company has decided to license Series 60 Platform from Nokia for its smart phone category. The Series 60 is a software platform for feature- and application rich smart phones that Nokia licenses to mobile handset manufacturers. The platform is optimised to run on top of the Symbian OS. Sendo joins as the newest member to the Series 60 licensing community with Matsushita, Samsung, Siemens and Nokia.

    "Earlier this fall we reviewed our smart phone strategy. While our mission of providing customers with feature-rich and ubiquitous devices remains unaltered, seeing that the Series 60 fully embraces both our mission and the new strategy we decided to approach Nokia," said Hugh Brogan, Chief Executive Officer of Sendo Holdings Plc. "The platform utilises open standards and technologies, such as MMS and Java , jointly developed by the industry. The platform is robust, yet uniquely flexible, bringing great benefits to licensees, operators, developers and consumers."

    "We welcome Sendo, a pioneer in smart phone development, to join our Series 60 community. We see that a combination of Sendo's technical expertise and growing market presence will bring significant contribution to the mobile market with Series 60 devices. Interoperable solutions that are built on open and common industry standards are proving to be the winning formula in meeting demands of business users and consumers alike," said Niklas Savander, Vice President and General Manager, Nokia Mobile Software.

    Nokia licenses Series 60 Platform as a source code. The model enables licensees to contribute to the development of the platform while fully executing their individual business strategy, brand and customer requirements in fast developing and highly competitive mobile communications market. Licensees will be able to include the Series 60 into their own smart phone designs, thus speeding up the rollout of new phone models at lower costs.

    The Series 60 is a comprehensive software platform for smart phones, created for mobile phone users that demand easy-to-use, one-hand operated handsets with high-quality colour screens, rich communications and enhanced applications. The Series 60 platform consists of the key telephony and personal information management applications, the browser and messaging clients, as well as a complete and modifiable user interface, all designed to run on top of the Symbian OS, an operating system for advanced, data enabled mobile phones.

  • OH NO NOT SENDO! by poot_rootbeer (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:49PM
  • Sendo.co.uk eh? by MrFredBloggs (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:49PM
  • Sendo (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Cowtard (573891) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:51PM (#4617943)
    Who the hell is "Sendo" and why should I care that this company no one has heard of has "stood up" to Microsoft?
    • Re:Sendo (Score:5, Funny)

      by Alan Partridge (516639) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:56PM (#4617990) Journal
      What the hell is "Google" and why should I care that this website that no one has heard of can "search the web" for information?
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Sendo by Geek_in_Marketing (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:01PM
    • Re:Sendo (Score:4, Funny)

      by orthogonal (588627) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:11PM (#4618134) Journal
      Who the hell is "Sendo"

      I think Sendo was a character in Star Wars. You know, the black dude who sold Hands Soloing out.

      This is /., so you can assume it's from Star Wars, Star Trek, The Lord of the Rings, The Simpsons, or some anime cartoon.

      Didn't somebody post the other day that Knuth was a Simpsons character, and Turing was an Elf? Or something?
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Sendo by gowen (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:43PM
        • Re:Sendo by Ozymandias_KoK (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @05:44PM
    • SirCam Worm by yerricde (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:42PM
    • Re:Sendo by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:02PM
    • Re:Sendo by _ministry (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:56PM
    • Re:Sendo by tryfan (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @04:30PM
    • Re:Sendo by razerblade (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @07:58AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Source ? by j_dot_bomb (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:52PM
  • Can't get source? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Twid (67847) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:53PM (#4617962) Homepage
    I'm not sure where the "can't get source" comment in the title came from. I clicked through to the announcement, read both stories, and even translated the german text, and nothing in there said they terminated the agreement due to inability to get the source.

  • Big defeat... yay... by FurryFeet (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:53PM
  • couldn't get source? by rm -rf /etc/* (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:54PM
  • The Reg has it (Score:5, Informative)

    by buzzdecafe (583889) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:54PM (#4617973)
    Sendo junks MS smartphone, joins Nokia camp [theregister.co.uk]

    BTW, What happened to theregus.com? It seems to be gone. :-(
    • Re:The Reg US by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:05PM
      • Re:The Reg US by gosand (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:39PM
    • Re:The Reg has it by BeeShoo (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:45PM
  • How prominent is Sendo? by burgburgburg (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:55PM
  • I wish Sendo the best of luck... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by GnomeKing (564248) on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:55PM (#4617984)
    but I have to question the business heads of those who cancel a product DAYS BEFORE THE LAUNCH...

    Sure, it must have been a hard decision, but unless they made some huge fkup working out the per-device costing (did they forget to license windows? ;) ) then surely its worth showing your stock holders that you HAVE something for the millions spent on R&D

    But, as I said at the start of the article... good luck to them
    Now, not only have they "wasted" millions, they will probably have the beast on their back
    • Re:I wish Sendo the best of luck... (Score:4, Informative)

      by bstadil (7110) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:42PM (#4618376) Homepage
      I have to question the business heads of those who cancel a product DAYS BEFORE THE LAUNCH...

      One of the first things you learn in business school is that cost already expended should have no influence on your future actions.

      Failure to understand this is sometime called "Throwing good money after bad".

      Lots of reason not to launch springs to mind, Support cost being an obvious one. Once you sell the first unit you need to support it.

      Second Economy of scale. If you can't sell enough units you will not reach the required production cost. You loose money (variable cost) on each unit you sell. Better not to sell anything at all. Lots of other reasons, so I think the people running Sendo has business acumen. It actually takes guts to do what they have done. (Maybe this is a ploy to get code and whatever they else they want. Maybe they want to be acquired by MS and act as their development arm. Who knows)

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I wish Sendo the best of luck... by Frag-A-Muffin (Score:3) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:23PM
    • Behind closed doors... by wiresquire (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @10:24PM
  • that's not the issue by jacquesm (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:55PM
  • the last thing we need (Score:3, Interesting)

    by asv108 (141455) <alex@phat a u d i o .org> on Thursday November 07 2002, @12:57PM (#4618003) Homepage Journal
    Is a phone running windows, with phones interface design is crucial, that's why I'm still using an older nokia even though my cell phone provider has the color Ericsson T68i [attws.com]. I went down to the local AT&T Store, ready to shell out the bucks for the T68i. After checking out the interface, I asked the guy when could I expect to see color Nokias. He told me December, but knowing AT&T, that translates in to March or April.

    It doesn't matter what features you pack in to a phone, if the interface sucks, most people are not going to buy it. Everyone I know who has switched from Nokia to another phone in order to get the latest gadgetry has regreted it. I just wish nokia would get their ass in gear and release some of the phone that are available in fscking Africa in the US.

  • Silly Sendo by Gene303 (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:58PM
    • Re:Silly Sendo by saider (Score:3) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:16PM
      • Re:Silly Sendo by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @03:12PM
    • Re:Silly Sendo by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:30PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • A little bit of research.. (Score:5, Informative)

    by tagevm (152391) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:01PM (#4618036)
    ...would have been nice, before giving Nokia full ownership of Symbian [symbian.com]. As the article says the licensed software is optimised to run on Symbian, but it is not Symbian. From the Symbian website: "Symbian was established as a private independent company in June 1998 and is owned by Ericsson, Nokia, Matsushita (Panasonic), Motorola, Psion, Siemens and Sony Ericsson. Headquartered in the UK, it has offices in Japan, Sweden, UK and the USA."
  • by FyRE666 (263011) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:02PM (#4618043) Homepage
    Although many will doubtless claim this is insignificant to MS - the fact they're further delayed in getting their own hardware out there will do them serious damage in the mobile device arena. Nokia and other phone manufacturers have a growing army of 3rd party developers writing new software for their devices, which in turn makes them more desirable for anyone who wishes to expand their capabilities. Although the phone manufacturers are making some mistakes (mostly messing about with the J2ME standard classes, and offering little support) the number of apps is increasing very quickly.

    Contrast this with MS, who have no platform, no 3rd party developers (as far as I know), and very little to offer over the established brands. The other mobile makers already have software to sync their devices with Windows/Linux/Mac OS', and they're pretty reliable.

    MS is going to have a very very hard battle trying to convince anyone to buy their phones, even moreso than the XBox - which isn't doing well compared to the competition.

    This is a good thing ;-)
    • Re:Don't just dismiss this as unimportant! by fredrik70 (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:05PM
    • Re:Don't just dismiss this as unimportant! by cybrthng (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:17PM
      • by ivan256 (17499) on Thursday November 07 2002, @03:16PM (#4619193)
        hell, microsoft will be in the black shortly.

        Um, no. I hate to burst your "I bought an Xbox, so it damn well better succeed" bubble, but Microsoft is demonstrateably nowhere near having brought in $1 billion in revenue from the Xbox. Look at their last few quarterly reports. You'll see two things. First, they group Xbox revenue in with revenue from MSN subscriptions, PC games sales, and consumer software. Basically everything microsoft makes that's not Office, Windows, or a server product, and all the revenue (not profits, revenue) from MSN. Second you'll see that they bring in under $2 billion a year with all those things. There is NO WAY that Xbox accounts for half of Microsoft's non Windows/Office sales, especially since those numbers aren't significantly increased from the previous year when Xbox didn't exist. Not only that, but revenue figures don't take into account the expenditure for building each device.

        Estimates I've seen tend to agree that Microsoft must sell between 10 and 20 games to break even on an Xbox sale. How many games do you have for your Xbox?

        The xbox is selling very well

        Again, bullshit. There's loads of market research that shows Xbox in an uphill battle for second place. http://www.instat.com/press.asp?ID=390&sku=IN02004 1ME

        You need to shell out $3k for the numbers, but it's not to hard to figure it out from the abstract. If sony sold >20 million consoles in the last 12 months, 31 million consoles were sold overall, and Nintendo and Microsoft have sold roughly equal numbers of consoles, you can see that the Xbox is not selling very well compared to PS2. That means there are 40 million PS2 in people's houses, and ~5 million Xboxes out there. Also, if you head over to NPDFunworld [npdfunworld.com], you'll see that for the last 6 months Xbox has had on average 1 game in the monthly top ten based on sales. That's not anything to write home about, especially when there are typically 6 PS2 games and 3 GBA games on the list.

        Maybe someday there will be enough good Xbox exclusive titles out there to get more people to shell out the $200 for an Xbox, but with microsoft already planning on releasing Xbox 2 in just over 2 years, and 90% of the good xbox games being available on other platforms, Xbox sales may not be picking up anytime soon.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Don't just dismiss this as unimportant! by Fjord (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @03:25PM
    • Re:Don't just dismiss this as unimportant! by rbrome (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @04:44PM
  • Forbes on Fox (Score:5, Funny)

    by bhsx (458600) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:06PM (#4618094)
    I was stuck at the Hyatt in downtown Chicago this past weekend and was watching Forbes on Fox. Steve Forbes and his writers and editors were speculating on tech futures when they brought up hopeful Nokia and Motorola sales increases. One of the panel, via satelite, discounted the possible sales increase with the reasoning that Microsoft is entering the cell arena with OEMs rather than traditional cell phone manufacturers and that that would stimey Moto and Nokia. To which one of the enlightenned panel members replied:
    I've had to agonize with Microsoft on my computer, I certainly don't want them on my cell phone."
    It was an unexpected comment and I couldn't stop chuckling.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • darn it by WildBeast (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:08PM
  • Misleading title (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ChronoZ (561096) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:11PM (#4618127)
    Yes the article states that they are ditching MS, but other than stating the openness of Symbian source code, there doesn't seem to be any specific reference stating that Sendo ditches Windows because it "can't get Microsoft source".
    • It does. by jotaeleemeese (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @06:57AM
  • Another win for Open Source (Score:3, Interesting)

    by miffo.swe (547642) <daniel@solleCOBOL.se minus language> on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:11PM (#4618138) Homepage Journal
    The more companies that gets used to have access to the source code and being able to make modifications the better. Once you are familiar with the concept its much easier to uncerstand why Gnu/linux works and what benefits it can bring. Also its much harder to fool someone with things like Shared Source if they are knowledged in GPL etc. and can see the really big differences between licenses.
  • by burgburgburg (574866) <splisken06NO@SPAMemail.com> on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:13PM (#4618155)
    Quick look at Series 60 here [wirelessdevnet.com]

    Book description of "Programming for the Series 60 Platform and Symbian OS" here [digia.com]

  • Shared Source by Airline_Sickness_Bag (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:14PM
  • Paradigm Shift (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot (227666) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:14PM (#4618160) Journal
    For some reason, I'm beginning to think that this could signify a slow paradigm-shift in certain tech-savvy industries.

    I worked for a telecommunications company that had started using NT 3.51/4.0 for embedded system work, because we were using off-the-shelf industrial servers, and at the time, Microsoft' Systems Architect for NT was gearing things toward being fairly decent as an embedded system. When the latter iteration of NT 4.0 and then 2000 came out, they had clearly changed their intent, and our product, to use a technical term, was "fucked". Ultimately, an investor with cold feet spelled the end of the company, but it was taking quite a long time to adapt to the new platform, and this was seen as a big problem.

    We had trusted Microsoft to keep the platform stable for our uses, and they failed to do so. Had we had the source code to the OS, we could have potentially rewritten the parts that we needed to make things work, while still giving them their licensing fee for the newest product. We never (obviously) had the chance.

    Now, I work for an organization that has to maintain a massive database, and while we bought the software that we use, we also received the source code, so we actively maintain our end. We and our vendor work to determine what changes we as an organization made, and sometimes these changes are rolled back into the next release or step of the product, if they're universally beneficial. Others aren't, and we simply have to go and check the new versions to make our changes. This approach works very well.

    Even if 'open source' isn't the answer to everyones' problems, simply having the source at all can be very beneficial. Hopefully, more and more medium to large companies and organizations will realise this, and that this, rather than lawsuits, attacks, etc, will cause people to abandon Microsoft.
  • Another perspective... by EggMan2000 (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:16PM
  • Another one... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Fnkmaster (89084) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:19PM (#4618200)
    Wow, that sure is one smart phone [sybian.com]. I mean, these Symbian things seem really popular [peoplesc.com] these days.


    I hope I can get the source code to a Symbian and hack on it to improve the vibration modes, the "gooey" interface, and even make it go faster.


    Oh, that's a Sybian. Never mind.

  • It is news.... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Sunkist (468741) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:19PM (#4618201) Homepage

    ...because MS is a minority shareholder in SENDO. Not only is it embarrassing to MS but points out that MS power to control is loosening and can't even strongarm companies in which it has a stake.
  • by bobetov (448774) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:21PM (#4618207) Homepage
    They'll no doubt bring the same fine usability and security features they've perfected in Outlook to my cell phone's address book.

    Just think of all the new capabilities we'll have! Helpful users (especially those swell guys in eastern europe!) will no doubt quickly create vbscript autodialers. Heck, my phone will probably call my friends more often that I do!

    And that's the Microsoft Promise: "We do things so you don't have to!"
  • Submission? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Yankovic (97540) on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:29PM (#4618262)
    Is there anyway to give a -1 Flamebait to a submission? SHEESH!
    • Re:Submission? by fantastic (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @05:30PM
  • Excellent Point by Dan Gillmore (Score:3, Insightful)

    by serutan (259622) <doug@nOspam.geekazon.com> on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:30PM (#4618274) Homepage
    Great links ... the last paragraph of Dan Gillmore's article [siliconvalley.com] gets to the crux of this and many other modern problems:

    The one chance is for people to realize what's at stake and do something difficult: Make choices that mean less convenience today in order to have liberty tomorrow. Americans are lousy at this, but a lot is now at stake. You may not care. You should.

    Yup. Americans ARE lousy at this, at least nowadays. We are the proud, the free, willing to fight for liberty justice for all, as long as we can do it with a remote from the couch. Today's America is a golden land of opportunity for anybody who can figure out clever ways to exploit our overriding aversion to inconvenience. That's the problem. Come up with a good solution to that, and the rest is details. My great fear is that fixing our sheep-like mentality is going to take something starkly real and immediate, like guerrilla warfare in our streets or an economic depression on the scale of the 1930s.
  • Also from reuters by Midnight Thunder (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:01PM
  • Reviews killed the Z100 by phkamp (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:21PM
  • 911 (Score:4, Funny)

    by sharkey (16670) on Thursday November 07 2002, @02:30PM (#4618757)
    I was reporting a murderer on my Z100 Smartphone, and it was like, bleep bleep bleep bleep bleep. And then it was like, half the call was gone, and I was like hhggnnngnn? It devoured my call, and it was a really good call. I described him good, 'cause I like looked at him when he was after me. I had to call again really fast, but it wasn't as good 'cause he stabbed me, and it was, like, a bummer.

    I'm Ellen Feiss, and when this sucking chest wound heals, I'm like, getting a Nokia.
  • also ditches amiga by roskakori (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:33PM
  • Finally killed off by lnixon (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:55PM
  • Yesterday, at the Wince Promotion Con... by Qbertino (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @03:02PM
  • Do you think that... by Eric Damron (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @03:39PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Hmmn (Score:5, Insightful)

    by johnburton (21870) <johnb@jbmail.com> on Thursday November 07 2002, @04:17PM (#4619737) Homepage
    So it's nothing to do with the fact that they announced this phone YEARS ago, never released it and now orange have gone a developed their own similar phone which is actually going to be available and for much less money than sendo were planning on charging? I think is entirely possible they were simply unable to produce a competative phone and decided to blame someone else.
    • Re:Hmmn by Action_Jax (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @08:16AM
    • Re:Hmmn by Eminence (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @08:39AM
  • Cant get the source for windows CE? (Score:3, Informative)

    by autopr0n (534291) on Thursday November 07 2002, @05:00PM (#4620257) Homepage Journal
    I thought you could just download that of the M$ homepage? Has something changed or is this a diffrent product they were after?
  • Sendo Sample Code by TheCag (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @06:06PM
  • They recieved their clarification: by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @07:28PM
  • A bit suspicious? by salimfadhley (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @07:36PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Yakkity Yak by whereiswaldo (Score:2) Friday November 08 2002, @01:49AM
  • Is that their only problem? by mattr (Score:2) Friday November 08 2002, @04:22AM
  • Sendo and Microsoft split by Alcohol Fueled (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @09:57AM
  • Sybian? by tgrigsby (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @01:03PM
  • Last Post! by alpg (Score:1) Thursday November 21 2002, @12:59PM
  • Re:good lord by cwis42 (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:47PM
  • Re:good lord by jshare (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:48PM
  • Re:good lord by Paolomania (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @12:51PM
  • Pay attention: It's OSS and Java (Score:3, Informative)

    by burgburgburg (574866) <splisken06NO@SPAMemail.com> on Thursday November 07 2002, @01:00PM (#4618027)
    As the ZDNet article says, the Series 60 user interface from Nokia uses open standards and technologies, such as MMS (Multimedia Message Service) and Java.

    It doesn't say anything directly about Linux.

    So the editors would be blithering idiot OSS/Java fanboys.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:good lord by afidel (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:02PM
  • Re:good lord by Nintendork (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:03PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Symbian by p3d0 (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:04PM
  • Re:good lord by SledgeHBK (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:07PM
    • Re:good lord by SledgeHBK (Score:1) Friday November 08 2002, @03:18PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:good lord by SirSlud (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:12PM
    • Re:good lord by Loki_1929 (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:32PM
      • Re:good lord by IIRCAFAIKIANAL (Score:3) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:05PM
  • Re:Bad news for Linux? by ceejayoz (Score:2) Thursday November 07 2002, @01:13PM
  • Re:Symbian by stewart.hector (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @02:35PM
    • Re:Symbian by NortWind (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @08:30PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:AmigaDE? by dammy (Score:1) Thursday November 07 2002, @03:23PM
  • 34 replies beneath your current threshold.