Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Organizing Sim Protests

Posted by Hemos on Tue Nov 19, 2002 02:04 PM
from the fight-the-man dept.
Shadow Wrought writes "Alternet has an article about how to go about protesting McDonald's in the Sims Online universe. According to the story "A deal struck between Sims publisher Electronic Arts and the fastfood mega-corporation allows Sims players to open up their own McDonald's kiosk and improve their game stats by consuming McD's greasy goodies." This then tells how to vent any rage that such may conjure. Mayhaps a venue to protest other issues as well?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Organizing Sim Protests | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 597 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Rational for protesting? (Score:4, Funny)

    by egg troll (515396) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:06PM (#4708848) Homepage Journal
    Most Sims players are already fat from eating McDonalds and playing The Sims all day. They don't want the shame of having their Sim alter egos puffing up on SimBigMacs and SuperSizedSimFries.
  • Nothing makes a statement (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:06PM (#4708851)
    Like staying at home playing games.
  • Interesting Idea (Score:5, Insightful)

    by davidmcn (606752) <`moc.liamg' `ta' `silencmd'> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:06PM (#4708855) Homepage
    To think, we've moved into a society that has a need to protest virtual issues online. Even more interesting is that sometimes people seem more interested in these virtual issues than the ones that actually plaque society.
    • Re:Interesting Idea by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:10PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Interesting Idea by flyneye (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:13PM
    • Re:Interesting Idea (Score:5, Insightful)

      by zanerock (218113) <zane@za n e c o r p . c om> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:16PM (#4708983) Homepage
      Ha! I think you're correct, there is really not much rational for "protesting" per se. It's not really a moral issue... well, maybe in a round about way.

      There is something interesting happenning, though. By encouraging people to act a certain way and getting a reward, even if it is in an fake world, it does have consequences in the real world. Here, it's not *so* bad. It might encourage people to get fat (in the real world).

      The problem is that a reward is a reward. While buying a virtual hamburger is not the same as buying a rela hamburger, the actions are related. The cause-effect is not direct, but it is real. Studies have shown as much (which I should cite, but I'm at work now and shouldn't take too much of my employer's time... maybe after I get home). McDonald's certainly thinks there's a link, or they would not have made the deal.

      What happens is that people get desensitized to the concern's about bad fast food. While this case is rather innocuous, as online games like this get bigger, and attract more people and interest, one must be more aware of the effect. What if they made a deal with the Republicans where you got a better rating by voting Republican? Or, more subtley, whenever a Republican ruled the virtual world, things were great, and when a Democrat was in charge, your pretent economy tanked. Likely few would even notice, and the ones that did would be discounted, but the effects could be very real.

      A thousand votes either way...
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Interesting Idea by jandrese (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:20PM
    • Rational for plaqueing society? by kalidasa (Score:3) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:22PM
    • does it work though? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ryochiji (453715) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:23PM (#4709072) Homepage
      I don't play games (much less Sims) so I don't know, but I wonder how effective "virtual protests" are. One of the things that makes a physical protest effective is that, well, it's physical. If you fill up downtown Washington with people, somebody's bound to notice (even politicians). But when people congregate online, who really notices?

      I also wonder about the effectiveness of email campains (i.e. when we send email to our 'representatives'). I have a feeling that a fax machine spewing messages is a lot more noticeable than a full mailbox.

      So, yeah, it is interesting. But what interests me more is whether or not it works at all.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Interesting Idea (off-topic) by landaker (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:34PM
    • Re:Interesting Idea by bwalling (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:56PM
    • Re:Interesting Idea by EggMan2000 (Score:3) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:23PM
    • Re:Interesting Idea by louzerr (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:50PM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Uhm... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jennifer Ever (523473) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:06PM (#4708859) Homepage
    Don't buy the fucking game?
    • Re:Uhm... (Score:4, Funny)

      by tomstdenis (446163) <tomstdenis@gmaPERIODil.com minus punct> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:07PM (#4708871) Homepage
      Whoa slow down. Common sense? Where did you find that?

      Hehehehe

      I bet it didn't occur to any of the /. crowd todo just that.

      Tom
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Uhm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:10PM (#4708915) Homepage Journal

      WARNING: Your comment "Don't buy the fucking game?" brings common sense into a slashdot discussion. Common sense on slashdot goes against several RFCs.Your karma will be appropriately decimated.

      Thank you,

      The Editors
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Uhm... by joebagodonuts (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:10PM
    • Re:Uhm... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by unicron (20286) <unicron.thcnet@net> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM (#4708943) Homepage
      I think the better solution would be to just not give a shit. If you like the game, you can overlook this. I pity the fuckers that think this is the cause for them, like it's some travesty against their fellow man. Choose your battles, indeed.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Uhm... by avante (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:37PM
        • Re:Uhm... by EditorType (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:54PM
        • Re:Uhm... by Cruciform (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:00PM
          • Re:Uhm... by duren686 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:19PM
            • Re:Uhm... by Cruciform (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:28PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Uhm... by TamMan2000 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:05PM
        • Re:Uhm... by Prong (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:08PM
        • Re:Uhm... by Malcontent (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:24PM
          • Re:Uhm... by Inthewire (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:53PM
            • Re:Uhm... by teamhasnoi (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @08:50PM
            • Re:Uhm... by Malcontent (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @11:45PM
        • Re:Ahh, finally... by unicron (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:31PM
        • Re:Ahh, finally... by unicron (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:37PM
        • Re:Uhm... by ivan_13013 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:56PM
        • Re:Uhm... by avante (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @09:10PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Uhm... by travdaddy (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:14PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Uhm... by cmaroney (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:25PM
        • Re:Uhm... by BurKaZoiD (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:32PM
      • Re:Uhm... by mgblst (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:28PM
    • The game is already out (Score:5, Insightful)

      by DunbarTheInept (764) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:19PM (#4709038) Homepage
      Protesting by not purchasing fails when you can't find out about the thing you object to until after the purchase.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Uhm... by Xaoswolf (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:20PM
    • Re:Uhm... by GunFodder (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:20PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Uhm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by startled (144833) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:24PM (#4709078)
      If you played Everquest, you'd be well aware that half the fun of playing a persistent online game is paying them money while simultaneously complaining about how bad it is.

      In fact, some people buy second or third accounts for the sole purpose of being able to say "I'm going to cancel any day now, watch out!" twice or three times as often.

      Watch for upcoming world-shattering Sims Online events, such as the mass threatened cancellation following the first anchovie pizza nerf, or the mass threatened pizza making work slowdown when a customer service rep says something that isn't very nice.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Uhm... by sonarniche (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:01PM
    • Re:Uhm... by koh-der (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:12PM
    • Re:Uhm... by Dr. Awktagon (Score:3) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:31PM
    • Re:Except that... by martyn s (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:11PM
      • Re:Not quite by martyn s (Score:1) Wednesday November 20 2002, @11:54AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Finally! by DeadMoose (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:07PM
  • What's the point? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:07PM (#4708870)
    Why do you need to protest a business? If you don't like it, you aren't forced to eat there. The government doesn't subsidize them, they don't provide them with a monopoly. They don't even have a monopoly.

    Charlize Theron is hot
  • Sell out with me oh yeah (Score:3, Insightful)

    by pwarf (610390) <`pwarf' `at' `yahoo.com'> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:07PM (#4708872)
    I for one, am willing to have a little bit of product placement in my video games to defray the cost. It's better than pop-up ads. Anyway, of course eating McDonalds is going to increase your stats. Anything that bad for you has to taste good, right?
  • Problem Solved. (Score:5, Funny)

    by cioxx (456323) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:07PM (#4708873) Homepage
    A simple workaround would be to go "dine" at the particular McDonalds restaurant, spill virtual coffee on player's lap and sue Maxis for damages.
  • So? (Score:5, Funny)

    by onShore_Jake (80260) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:08PM (#4708879) Journal
    I am outraged that they have found a way to keep themselves profitable without charging more. If we don't all get in our comfortable shoes and make protest signs out of recycled cardboard,then the next thing you know we will start seeing animated banners and huge blocky ads on slashdot!

  • by stratjakt (596332) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:08PM (#4708882) Journal
    Seriously.

    "Giant megacoroprations are adversely affecting the quality of life for my imaginary computer friends!"

    This aint no posterchild for mental health and social skills.

    There are enough injustices in the world worthy of protest, we don't need virtual ones.

    EA's selling, McD's buying. Get over it.
  • by Captain Pedantic (531610) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:08PM (#4708885) Homepage
    Then they shouldn't hang out there. As it is, are these peoples lives so meaningless, that they have to get themselves worked up over a game?
  • Mayhaps a sign by sulli (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM
  • by ekrout (139379) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM (#4708891) Journal
    Hear me out.

    So, McDonald's wants people to think their food is tasty and fulfilling. We all know that's not true (especially 60 minutes later when you're in the bathroom trying to get their filth out of your digestive system).

    I say we organize anti-ad movements to pay the maker of The Sims to add the following code:

    if(character.justAte(McDonalds)) {
    wait(60, minutes);
    character.CrapBrainsOut();
    }
  • by Tebriel (192168) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM (#4708894)
    Virtual women burning their virtual bras....oh...wait...it's a family game.

    Maybe letting people die of heart attacks in at the kiosks and haunting them?
  • by mhesseltine (541806) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM (#4708895) Homepage Journal

    But, if you are this concerned about your SIMS stats, maybe you need to quit watching simulated people with lives and get one yourself.

  • Disgusting, yet strangely compelling by s20451 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM
  • text of the article by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:09PM
  • What's next? by greechneb (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:10PM
  • i wonder... by mschoolbus (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:10PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Alright! (Score:5, Funny)

    by UncleOzzy (158525) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:11PM (#4708921)
    Just what we need - SimHippies stinking of SimPatchouli with hygeine meters redder than a baboon's ass sitting around in a SimDrumCircle outside SimMcDonald's because it's SimEvil. Please. Get me some SimTearGas and a SimTaser and I'll have them working the SimFry-o-Lator by SimTomorrowMorning.

    Anyway, there are two problems with The Sims Online, given experience with the current play test: you can't fucking connect; and, when you can connect, it's boring as hell.
    • Re:Alright! by p_rotator (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:29PM
    • Re:Alright! by JasonUCF (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:49PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • I am full of rage by Hamstaus (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:11PM
  • 3 Words (Score:5, Insightful)

    by serutan (259622) <doug@nOspam.geekazon.com> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:11PM (#4708929) Homepage
    It's.
    A.
    Game.

    I agree 100% that this type of product placement is a sad sign. But it's EA's game, and if they want to ruin it by giving points for hitting yourself on the head with a duck, well, either get a duck or spend your gaming budget somewhere else.
    • Re:3 Words by Pike65 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:28PM
    • Re:3 Words by JordoCrouse (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:35PM
    • Re:3 Words by Guppy06 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:56PM
    • Re:3 Words by ameoba (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:41PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why McDonalds? by 91degrees (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:11PM
    • Re:Why McDonalds? (Score:4, Informative)

      by ProppaT (557551) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:19PM (#4709042) Homepage
      Actually, there's plenty of reasons to protest them. While they're good for the American economy, they're bad for the global good. Why? They buy their beef from 3rd world nations.

      At first you would think "You idiot, it just helps the economy of third world nations." Actually, it does the opposite. The profit is so good for the land owners in these South American countries that they've converted their crops (crops that sustained the country) into cattle fields. So, while the land owners get wealthier, the poor that don't farm get poorer by having to buy imported produce...or pay inflated prices for domestic produce. In addition, rain forests are being chopped down in South America to be converted to cattle farm space.

      I eat at McDonalds every once in a while and enjoy it, don't get me wrong. But whoever says that people who do protest McDonalds have no basis for doing so are fooling themselves.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Why McDonalds? by DrFrob (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:49PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Easy Enough (Score:5, Funny)

    by daeley (126313) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM (#4708933) Homepage
    Just build a swimming pool around your local McDonald's, then include a diving board, but no ladder to get out. Problem solved! :)

    Off-topic note: This is my 500th comment. I asked in my journal what I should do to mark my 500th comment, and somebody (can't imagine who) said I should say this: 'Not few enough to claim I have a life, and not enough to be super cool like gmhowell (who is currently typing number 2694).' So this message is dedicated to gmhowell [slashdot.org], poster extraordinaire, to whose lofty heights (up to 2712 comments as of this writing) I can but dream to aspire.

    Besides, he's got FortKnox [slashdot.org] beat by at least 400. ;)
    • Re:Easy Enough by FortKnox (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:29PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • TSO Playtest by Splat (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM
  • Protest I'd like to see by executioner (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM
  • Protest methods? by AugstWest (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 'Protest Pack' add-on by pr0t0plasm (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM
  • But.... why not a Subway? McDonald's sucks! by SexyKellyOsbourne (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM
  • sims can't get fat (Score:5, Funny)

    by mr_gerbik (122036) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:12PM (#4708945)
    Ironically, there are no fat Sims. Veterans of the original game will know this, and the same is true of the online game. There are various head and body skins that simulate different sexes, ethnic types .. even species.. but there are no various body sizes.

    Maxis (EA) should really turn this into a profitable venture by allowing the Sims to gain weight from eating at the SimMcDonalds.. They could strike a deal with Ballys so that people can work their fat Sims out to loose weight at a virtual Ballys.

    -gerbik
  • First, people ASK for a game that mimics life.. by 19Buck (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:13PM
  • Messed up priorities? by Prince_Ali (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:13PM
  • I've been waiting for this ... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by mustangdavis (583344) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:13PM (#4708953) Homepage Journal
    This is probably only the beginning.

    At one point in time, I was consdiering creating a "real world" game, similar to everquest in terms of graphics and game style, but using modern weapons instead of old style weapons. The ctach was this: I was hoping to drum up enough advertising revenue from companies, such as McDonalds, but placing their companies in the game. The hope was to defeat everquest by reducing or eliminating the monthly service fee for playing the game with advertsing dollars.

    Of course, then I realized the McD's probably wouldn't like people blowing up their buildings with a rocket launcher ... so I gave up on the idea.

    But give it a little more time. I'm sure a game, like the one I just vaguely described, will exist before soon.

  • Product Placement by Bytenik (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:14PM
  • Umm by segfault7375 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:15PM
    • Re:Umm by rhkaloge (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:35PM
  • New Spinoff - SimProtest (Score:3, Interesting)

    by LittleGuy (267282) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:16PM (#4708984)
    Let your voice be heard from the comfort of your home. Send a Sim to a major city to protest (War on Iraq, IMF policies, or a hundred other causes), and watch your Sim be peppersprayed and arrested by well-armed SimCops.
  • by JThaddeus (531998) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:16PM (#4708991)
    A pox on Ronald MacDonald!!

    Actually, my kids have been boycotting MacDonald's since they were in elementary school (they are in high school now). A few years back, MacDonald's bought the failing Hardee's chain in the Washington, DC area. Hardee's also owned the Roy Rogers chain, about the finest fastfood burger joint in town (I fondly remember their "Fixin's Bar" and their fried chicken). MacDonald's then closed both Roy Rogers in our town and would not negotiate with other fastfood franchise for their old buildings. Boston Market tried and failed. Both buildings finally went to sit-down places.

    Anyway, for closing Roys and for denying Boston Market, my kids decided--quite on their own--that they prefered Wendy's and Burger King. We haven't been in a MacDonald's since. This nonesense with Sims tells me that we're not ready to go back.

    Maybe we should add Electronic Arts to our boycott as well!
  • Wanna know what I think? by ksplatter (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:16PM
  • It's simple by Waffle Iron (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:17PM
  • More worthless protesters by NaCh0 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:17PM
  • McDonalds part of society. by jellomizer (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:17PM
  • it's already there by buckthorn (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:18PM
  • Not going to work by ChuckMaster (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:18PM
  • I wonder by hrieke (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:18PM
  • Why not go one step further? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Savatte (111615) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:19PM (#4709035) Homepage Journal
    and have the characters in Sims sit around all day playing sims where their characters protest Mcdonalds?
  • The Next Logical Level (Score:3, Funny)

    by limekiller4 (451497) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:19PM (#4709036) Homepage
    I can't wait until they come out with a game in which you take control of a salaryman who plays The Sims.

    Then I wouldn't play that, either.
  • Simoutside by Malicious (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:21PM
  • Fast Forward to 2005 (Score:3, Funny)

    by fobbman (131816) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:21PM (#4709059) Homepage
    Maxis has struck so many deals with corporations that players of The Sims discover that their Sims are being oversaturated with commercialism, thereby causing them to buy a copy of "The Sims for The Sims" so that their Sim Family can get away from it all.

    Marketing genius, I say.

  • They need to finish it up (Score:4, Funny)

    by r_j_prahad (309298) <r_j_prahad@hotma ... m minus language> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:22PM (#4709063)
    After all that pigging out at MacDonald's, do your Sims end up weighing a simulated 300 pounds each? Do they get simulated atherosclerosis? Sim diabetes? Sim strokes? Sim food poisoning? Do Sim children come down with simulated ADHD?

    Not entirely accurate then, is it?
  • I hate McDonalds food! by dethl (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:22PM
  • Sims as propaganda (Score:5, Interesting)

    by dpbsmith (263124) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:24PM (#4709080) Homepage
    This brings up an issue I have with simulation games such as The Sims. It does, of course, apply to other games as well, and to many other situations where the viewer or player must distinguish between fantasy and reality.

    Nevertheless: simulation games convey a certain impression of verisimilitude. As you play them, you cannot avoid gaining skill in dealing with the simulated universe, and learning "lessons."

    To the extent that the player preceives the game as authentically realistic, these "lessons" may sneak in past the barriers we've built against other forms of propaganda

    Some are of these lessons are semi-political. And some, it seems, may be product placements.

    For example, in SimCity, as I recall, the citizens clamor for a sports stadium and it is very important to the success of your city that you build one (at the right time, of course).

    Did the creators of the game base this on actual data about the economic effects of sports stadiums on cities? (Unlikely). Or were they just building in a plausible and entertaining set of game rules? (Probably). Or... were they carrying water for some group that was trying to get a stadium built? (No, I don't really think so--but the possibility exists). Similarly, is the behavior of SimCity residents with respect to tax rates an authentic simulation, artistic guesswork--or a political agenda?

    Of course these problems exist with all games, and to some extent it's an issue of developing antibodies against the newer games. There's no real danger that I will speculate in Atlantic City properties just Monopoly has given me the illusion that I understand how to do it.

    Still...

  • Big picture (Score:5, Interesting)

    by felis_panthera (160944) <felis...panthera@@@gmail...com> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:24PM (#4709083) Homepage
    I've seen a lot of /.ers already talking about not buying the game, not playing the game, etc. The problem I have with this philosophy is that it's like wrapping your face in a towel, figuring that if the problem sees that you can't see it, it won't be able to see you, and will therefore go away. THIS DOESN'T WORK.

    The problem is not the people worried about advertising in games. The problem is that this could open up a Pandora's Box of other companies buying advertising time inside games.

    "You have cleard the 13th level of monsters, through this door is the Ultimate Evil, all you must do is cross this threshold and defeat him... But first, here's a word from our sponsors..."

    I already do everything in my power to eliminate my exposure to mind numbing advertising. If it starts getting put into video games, I won't be able to go for popcorn until the previews start, or to go grab a snack until my show comes back on.

    Of course, it's just my opinion.
    • Re:Big picture (Score:5, Insightful)

      by NineNine (235196) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:36PM (#4709207) Homepage
      I've seen a lot of /.ers already talking about not buying the game, not playing the game, etc. The problem I have with this philosophy is that it's like wrapping your face in a towel, figuring that if the problem sees that you can't see it, it won't be able to see you, and will therefore go away. THIS DOESN'T WORK

      Well, what does work, Mr. Wizard?

      Call me nuts, but I'd think that a company seeing a significant drop in sales would take a step back and ask themselves, "Dear sweet christ on a pony!! Why has revenue dropped through the floor? We're all gonna get fired and live on the streets and forced to kill and eat each other! aaahh!". Well, maybe it wouldn't go quite like that, but what effects a company more than profits? Since companies exist to make profits, what could be more effective? Don't like it, don't buy it. If you want to go a step further and tell them why, even better.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Big picture by merky1 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:06PM
        • Re:Big picture by Dalcius (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:58PM
          • Re:Big picture by NineNine (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:23PM
            • Re:Big picture by Dalcius (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @08:08PM
        • Re:Big picture by AnyoneEB (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:40PM
    • Re:Big picture by JordoCrouse (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:44PM
    • Re:Big picture by TheTick (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:58PM
    • Re:Big picture by crnium (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:00PM
      • Re:Big picture by mehip2001 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:07PM
        • Re:Big picture by be-fan (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:30PM
          • Re:Big picture by mehip2001 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:21PM
            • Re:Big picture by be-fan (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:46PM
              • Re:Big picture by mehip2001 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @10:16PM
              • Re:Big picture by be-fan (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @11:53PM
              • Re:Big picture by mehip2001 (Score:1) Wednesday November 20 2002, @12:06AM
        • Re:Big picture by crnium (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @08:01PM
    • Re:Big picture by catch23 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:12PM
    • Re:Big picture by Tokerat (Score:3) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:00PM
      • Re:Big picture by Tokerat (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:02PM
  • Improves what stats? (Score:4, Informative)

    by _xeno_ (155264) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:24PM (#4709090) Homepage Journal
    Unless the Sims Online is adding a bunch of stats to the Sims that weren't in the original game that I admittedly don't play anymore, your stats are mostly things like exaustion, hunger, etc. Eating a Big Mac probably satisifies a Sim's "hunger" stat and maybe even makes the Sim happier.

    Admittably, I don't know exactly what stats a Sims Online Sim has. So this is also half a question - what stats does it improve? I'd imagine that it isn't something stupid like eating a Big Mac improves your charisma, intelligence, and strength - it just satisfies a Sim's hunger (and increases the Bathroom need). Which makes an amount of sense - eating a Big Mac in real life is usually done to satisfy hunger. There are plenty of other people here to make fun of McD's crappy food, so I'll let 'em do it.

    (Anyone else think McDonalds fries are crap? America's favorite fries? I'd hope not...)

  • Why protest? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:26PM
  • How about.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Patman (32745) <(pmgeahan-slashd ... (thepatcave.org)> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:26PM (#4709100) Homepage
    ...the radical techniques of 'not buying the add-on', 'ignoring the option', or 'finding something else to do with your time'.


    I am constantly amazed by the stuff people will get their panties in a bunch over.

  • so, let me get this straight : by joshsisk (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:27PM
  • by Future Linux-Guru (34181) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:27PM (#4709119)
    Kiosk owners will find one of the business challenges is dealing with virtual nuts who form sit downs and disrupt the business for no good reason at all.

    Maybe the owners will get to own virtual bazookas that fire burger patties...
  • get a life! by peter303 (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:33PM
  • Why not Pizza Hut? by computechnica (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:34PM
  • How is this realistic? by Qzukk (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:35PM
  • by antis0c (133550) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:36PM (#4709212)
    It's been reported that eating virtual McDonald's hamburgers will positively affect your "Fun" and "Hunger" game stats. But what if you're a vegetarian? What if you're an eco-activist? What if you think it's more Fun dining at Biff's Family Restaurant? Although the game hasn't hit the stores yet, the free public beta is open. The time to act is now. Log in, Revolutionary, and fight the good fight:

    What. The. Hell.

    Seriously. What if you're a vegetarian? What?? Ok. I'm morally opposed to murdering people, but I don't have a problem with Quake 3, GTA3, Hitman 2, Dead to Rights. Heck I even enjoy playing those games. Why? It's a damn video game, and it's not real.

    With EA touting such egalitarian rhetoric, it follows to reason that freedom of speech is as alive in The Sims Online as it is in the real world. Test this theory by standing up and shouting for what you believe in, my Revolutionaries! If the thought of being force-fed Big Macs makes you sick, you'd better start giving this advertising model a serious case of indigestion.

    Alright. First off it says you have the option of opening up a McDonalds. Let me guess to, you also have the option of eating at said McDonalds. Seems like real life to me. No where does it say you have to open a McDonalds and have to eat at them. McDonalds just happens to be the only company EA made a deal with to use their image in the game. I wouldn't be surprised if in future Sim games we see Burger King, Chick-Fil-A, TGI Fridays, Bennigans, all those places. So what the hell is the problem?

    And dare I say it, some people like McDonalds. I like the occastional French Fry from McDonalds or the occastional Quarter Pounder with cheese. I don't live off the stuff, I don't consider it high quality food. It's funny how these guys go on to say how we all hate McDonalds, and how we all 'know' McDonalds food is terrible, yet somehow, McDonalds continues to be the worlds largest fast food chain.

    Then we get the people who believe McDonalds and other fast food places are the cause of obsesity in the world. I'm no underwear model myself, but seriously, Ronald McDonald didn't come to my house and force feed me Big Macs until I couldn't see my feet anymore. There are no bad foods, there are only food abuses. But I digress. The point is, it's a video game people. A video game simulating every day life. McDonalds for many people, is a part of every day life. So are other things. I don't think EA can afford to pay all the popular fast food places to use their likeness in the game, nor do they have the time to program the game to handle them all.

    Seriously. Repeat after me. It's a video game, it's not real.
  • Loooosers by mehip2001 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:37PM
  • A fun experiment... by goldenfield (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:37PM
  • Art Imitates Life... (Score:5, Informative)

    by quakeslut (107512) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:38PM (#4709236)
    The author of the article wants you to take a stance against the integration of games and advertising by protesting in the online world.

    Can anything make less truth?

    Let's be honest: it follows logically that there would be a plethera of McDonalds in a simulation of America, because America really is over-run with fast-food resturants, advertisements, endorsements and the associated garbage.

    Do you really want to make a change? Then follow these rules:
    1) Don't protest within the Sim World.
    This won't get you anywhere. In fact, you may wind up wasting more of your time away playing...

    2) Don't support this game.
    This isn't the first game to include coroprate advertising, but it has reached a new (sickening) level. SPEAK WITH YOUR DOLLARS: don't buy this game!!

    3) Boycot McDonalds.
    The fast-food industry's move to tie fast-food to children at an early age is well known, (they even admit it theirselves [adbusters.org]), but you don't have to stand for it. Do you REALLY want to protest? Take it to the streets in front of a real McDonalds. Talk to families... educate them.

    4) Begin a letter writing campaign to EA.
    Write it out by hand. Sign your name. Tell them that you refuse to buy their games until they change their policies regarding advertising. They'll get the message.

    5) Support Ad-Busters.
    If you don't have the time or energy to do these things yourself, then support those individuals and organizations that do. I'm not affiliated with them, but Ad-Busters [adbusters.org] (aka: the Media Corporation [Canada]) is great. You should support them [adbusters.org].
  • Joshua says (Score:3, Insightful)

    by agentZ (210674) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:39PM (#4709246)
    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

    Would you like to play a nice game of chess?
  • by omnipotus (214689) <jason.lunn@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:39PM (#4709247)
    New from Rockstar Games: SimActivist

    From the streets of the WTO riots in Seattle to the steps of World Bank in Washington, D.C., your job is to stop globalization where ever it raises its ugly capitalist head. Guide your SimActivist through multiple venues of anarchaic protests! Pickup adhoc weapons of the street like chain-link fences and road signs, or show up to rally with an arsenal of homemade fireworks.

    Invoke your right to civil disobedience, buy SimActivist today!
  • problem? where? by dextr0us (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:40PM
  • So what? They're not making the game, are they? by Polyphemis (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:41PM
  • by Maul (83993) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:43PM (#4709286) Journal
    11/18/2002
    Sony/Verant has announced their partnership with several companies to produce an extensive sponsorship program in their upcoming online RPG, EverQuest 2.

    Players will now be able to interact with several name brands they can associate with in the World of Norrath.

    Verant has released a preliminary list of the new features of EQ2 as follows:

    All armor will be replaced with namebrand apparel. All towns in EQ2 will have an OLD NAVY store instead of local merchants, where players will be able to buy normal clothes. Additionally, apparel designed by several top fasion designers will appear in the game. Only the most uber players will be able to obtain Versace threads.

    PEPSI products have replaced the mundane food and water of EQ1. Players will have to go to the in-game KFC, Taco Bell, or Pizza Hut locations to refill on rations. The in-game stores will also provide Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, and Mountain Dew rather than normal water.

    Players can now earn extra experience by slaying monsters with brandname weapons.
    There will be a distinct advantage using a CRAFTSMAN Power-Sword Deluxe, rather than a regular sword.

    "We feel that these imrpovements add to the game," said a Verant spokesman. "In EQ1, players had a hard time identifing with the normal items in the game. In EQ2 we are bringing players into a world that is full of the brand names they can identify with. We hope to promote a lifestyle where players can consume high quality goods from companies like OLD NAVY, PEPSICO, and many others both online AND offline!"

    EverQuest 2 is slated for release for fall of next year. Players will certainly be pleased to pay the full MSRP of $60.00 for the game on top of the monthy $17.99 fee with such improvements.
  • Something to chew on..... by poetry_in_gasoline (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:46PM
  • Can Someone Explain Me? by $0.02 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:46PM
  • by angst_ridden_hipster (23104) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:47PM (#4709324) Homepage Journal
    ... it's going for Sim Realism.

    Players who have Sim Protests will get their machines Sim Wiretapped.

    Sim players who organize the protests of McVomit's will get slapped with Sim Product Libel suits.

    Players who have too many Sim House Parties will be Sim Evicted from the Sim Neighborhood.

    Players who set up affairs on Sim Hot Date will be Sim Sued for Sim Alienation of Affection.

    Player who have too many Sim Vacations will be Sim Fired from their jobs for Sim Absenteeism.

    Players who go on Sim Safari will get Sim Blood thrown on them by Sim PETA Protestors.

    Then it'll get even worse:

    The people who play "Crush, Crumble & Chomp" with their Sim world will get sent to the Sim Guantanamo Bay for Sim terrorism.

    Players who allow the "incorrect" pairings on Sim Hot Date will be Sim Damned.

  • You are asimilated by oliverthered (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:49PM
  • Protesting for the wrong reasons by Guppy06 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:49PM
  • Silly by Quill_28 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:50PM
  • ... Naked riot? :D (Score:3, Funny)

    by Theaetetus (590071) <drose@@@wbur...bu...edu> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:50PM (#4709349) Homepage Journal
    History has shown gamers that online protest can result in positive change, as exemplified in Ultima Online's 1997 naked riot demanding bug fixes and server upgrades.

    Naked... riot...

    Um, anyone have screenshots?

    -T

  • Mickey D's Strikes Back (Score:3, Funny)

    by UberOogie (464002) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:51PM (#4709353)
    McExec: We're getting some bad press about sponsoring the Sims game. What can we do?

    McExecWithAClue: Quick! Post the story to Slashdot. That will take care of that protest site. Mu-ha-ha.

  • Enough with the "recession" nonsense! by GMontag (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:52PM
  • Something for everyone... by pdboddy (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:52PM
  • many of you are missing the point by dandelion_wine (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:54PM
  • The original article is located here-- by tony_ratboy (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:55PM
  • In other news... (Score:4, Funny)

    by RiscIt (95258) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:58PM (#4709415) Homepage Journal
    In other new, cases of carpel tunnel syndrome are on the rise as millions of online participants move their Sims avatar back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, and so on, in virtual picket lines
  • Go Sims! Only One Problem.... by biffz0rs (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:59PM
  • Editors should check for broken links.. by deego (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:59PM
  • Old School Video Game Ads by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:01PM
  • So, what's new? by volsted (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:01PM
  • "Pizza time!" by Neillparatzo (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:02PM
  • You can download and play SIMS for free here by EggMan2000 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:07PM
  • This is fun! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jordanda (160179) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:09PM (#4709507) Homepage
    All you people who are saying, "If this bothers you then get a life." are missing a major point. Protesting in a virtual enviroment is fun! McDonalds has become a player in the game and players are treating it the same way they treat monsters in other games, as a villain.

    I think this is a really significant case study in how people behave in virtual enviroments. There are people in the Sims Online who are protesting McDonalds who never would in real life. People are expressing their feelings about McDonalds that they never could in real life due to pesky laws about vandalism and such.

  • It's not just a game, it's supposed to be a sim by Dick Click (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:10PM
  • Virtual Sim Protest (Score:5, Funny)

    by toby360 (524944) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:11PM (#4709519)
    Step One:
    Create a lareg "sims" family and purchase a plot of sim land
    Step Two:
    Create a square house with no windows, no doors and a television facing a wall thats turned on so the family can never sleep. Contact EA and eplain that your holding a family hostage in your sim-house and are protesting their McDonalds add-in.
    Step Three:
    ???????
    Step Four:
    Profit~!
  • alliance by mkelley (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:15PM
  • Missing the point. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RatBastard (949) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:15PM (#4709575) Homepage
    Many of you are missing the point. The point is that if this goes over and no one objects then soon all of our games will be stuffed with ads and product placements. Do yuo really want to be killing imps in Nike shoes? Nazi soldiers lobbing grenades painted like Pepsi cans? Imperial storm troopers in Tommy Hifliger (SP?) pants? Penguins in Victoria's Secret lingerie (wait, I retract that last one, some of you might!)?

    At what point do we say enough is enough? Are we so inundated by advertisements that we can't even see them anymore?

    Where I live billboards are banned. They do not exist. Every time I go to California I am reminded of the unholy blight those damned things are. Games have been one of teh few types of entertainment I've been able to get away from the pervasive flood of advertisements and I'm resentful that these people are trying to take that away from me.

    To those of you willing to put up with ads to keep the cost down I ask this: How far are you willing to let them go? Do any of you rememebr the album bu Zig Zig Sputnik (sp?) with commercials between the tracks? Is that what you want the world to be reduced to: every possible medium to be exploited by advertising? How much spam would you be willing to put up with to keep the cost of your email down?
  • McDonald's Griefers by Robotech_Master (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:18PM
  • Huh? by vmfedor (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:24PM
  • Listen toTeddy... by GreggyBUIUC (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:27PM
  • by binaryDigit (557647) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:41PM (#4709806)
    People are getting upset because the game (which is supposed to simulate "real" life, sorta) is becoming more real by having corporate presences? Just imagine how up in arms people would be if some group wanted to protest the game because it depicted sex acts ("there is just no need for such things to be in a game, it cheapens it and you never know where it's going to lead. Next thing you know they'll be having Sim kids and worse Sim Abortions, STOP THE KILLING OF UNBORN SIMS") followed of course by ("My Bits, My Choice!")
  • Ton Hawk Pro Skater X by peel (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:48PM
  • i'm in the beta by psiflare (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:48PM
  • Sued in real life from a gaming environment? by Big Bad Bassman (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:52PM
  • a matter of degrees by bigbigbison (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:57PM
  • Article is a little incorrect by slideshot (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @03:57PM
  • Why do I know who Carson Daily is?!?!?!?!? by YAN3D (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:00PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • soon-to-be blockbuster ??? by Pebble (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:00PM
  • Venting rage? by sharkey (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:03PM
  • In other news: by Dark Lord Seth (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:06PM
  • sims protest idea by jimf42 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:07PM
  • EA couldn't have paid for such great publicity by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:12PM
  • Needed: a "fat" mod by Animats (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:20PM
  • all they care about is $$$$$$ by A Vengrow (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:27PM
  • What in the hell is a mayhaps? by pOs*x (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:30PM
  • by cln (81126) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:30PM (#4710239)
    Actually, this is kinda a bogus story. While they may have the branding setup to appear in the game somewhere, its not there now. EA also got in a deal with Intel to brand them in the game, which IS there now. When a sim turns on a computer, the Pentium 4 logo shows on the sims computer for a moment, then it goes to him doing whatever. Gee, this sure influences me to get a P4. ;)

    Even if this DOES show up in game its not going to be any different than the current hotdog stand thats there now. A sim could buy one of these and then run it charging the visitors for food to up their Food motive. Thats it. The Food motive that you have to watch can also be satisified by, a sim cooking you food, the grill, a couple different buffet tables, a vending machine, and the before mentioned hotdog stand. So whats the big deal?
  • Now that is truly stupid (Score:3, Interesting)

    by uncoveror (570620) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:32PM (#4710261) Homepage
    Sims protests against imaginary McDonalds kiosks? I have to run up the B.S. flag over this one! Why not put your energies into protesting real injustice in the real world. If you have a problem with McDonalds, don't eat there, and encourage your friends not to, either. Here are some sites.

    http://www.angelfire.com/pa/McCracker/
    http://www.openhere.com/life/activism/anti-corpora tion/mcdonalds/
    http://www.communityfood.com/dir-cache/Society/Act ivism/Anti-Corporation/McDonalds/
  • Eat Mor Chikin by SkreamNet (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:32PM
  • Effective Protesting (Score:3, Insightful)

    by AllDewedUp (20540) <chris,grau&gmail,com> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:42PM (#4710346)
    So people are protesting EA's "selling out" of The Sims by... playing The Sims. Sounds effective.
  • Prefixes? by Hormonal (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:45PM
  • Hmmm... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Fizzlewhiff (256410) <`jeffshannon' `at' `hotmail.com'> on Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:47PM (#4710393) Homepage
    I wonder how many people would have complained if they had chosen Hooters with their busty waitresses over McD's?

    In some games, product placement provides added realism. I think McD's and Sims is a good mix. If it were McD's and Star Wars Galaxies I could see a reason to complain.
  • Sims protests not really going to work... by Mantrid (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @04:56PM
  • The Most Important Issue Of Our Times by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:05PM
  • by bons (119581) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:11PM (#4710584) Homepage Journal
    It's probably been mentioned, but the Pepsi machine, complete with Pepsi products is already in the game. Why are you getting all upset now?
  • It's not as bad as y'all think. (Score:4, Informative)

    by Blackwulf (34848) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @05:35PM (#4710764) Homepage
    Since I was in the playtest of the game, I can safely say the following things about this.

    I never saw a McDonalds kiosk anywhere I played. The deal was announced several months ago, and I saw it in the game, but it was too expensive for me to put in my house.

    There ARE other places to eat. You don't have to eat at the McDonalds, and you don't have to put one on your property. A generic buffet table is just as good and much cheaper.

    INTEL IS DOING THE SAME THING. You can buy a computer with Intel Inside and it gives you much better stats than a lower-end computer. Your "fun" goes up quicker when you play games on it and your "Logic" goes up quicker when you're studying on it.

    So, if you're gonna go after McDonalds for being available, might as well go after Intel for the very same reasons.
  • I think it's a great tie-in... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:01PM
  • Uh, hello?!? Ads in games isn't new (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Torgo's Pizza (547926) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:03PM (#4710959) Homepage Journal
    In case you haven't noticed, ads in video games or video games serving as advertisments isn't a new thing. This has been going on for nearly 20 years.

    To the Chicken Littles on this issue, where were you when ads were placed in Pole Position? Where's the outrage in the fact that Gran Turismo is simply a advertising tool of auto manufacturers? Where are the boycotts of 7-Up for creating the Spot game? Should I stop buying Madden 2K3 because both John Madden and the NFL endorses the product? Should I protest that Tony Hawk 4 features brand name skateboards and products?

    I don't see anyone complaining that some video games use cheat codes of brand name products. Has the gaming experience diminished from having "Winners don't do drugs" on arcade games? Seriously, has all this really tarnished your video game experience? The reality is that most of you don't even give all the product placements that are already inside the game a second thought.

  • To prove this, I began eating nothing but McDonald's food for the past month. And had an increase in many statistics!
    * Weight -- I went from weighing a pittly 175 to weighing a healthy 350! That's a stat increase of 200% go McDonalds!
    * Running time -- Before I began the all McDonalds diet, I could run a mile in 6 minutes. The McDonalds diet increased my running time by well over 20 minutes!
    * Cholesterol -- Eating McDonalds food dramatically increases your cholesterol intake!

    So, for any of those nay-sayers, I think I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that McDonalds food does INDEED increase your stats!
  • At Last the Perfect Avenue For Real Geek Protests by cranos (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:38PM
  • Great. What's Next? Starbucks? by Dolemite_the_Wiz (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @06:50PM
  • This is what happens when Grimace and DonaldTrump by vandelais (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @07:43PM
  • I wonder if... by SlimFastForYou (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @08:11PM
  • Right.. by ThePhreaker (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @08:14PM
    • Re:Right.. by cookiepus (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @09:11PM
  • What's the problem? by geekee (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @09:37PM
  • But what I'm wondering by inkswamp (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @10:12PM
  • Don't protest... by Vegan Pagan (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @10:21PM
  • Want to know how to protest it? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by WiggyWack (88258) on Tuesday November 19 2002, @10:28PM (#4712740) Homepage
    Here's an idea... Don't play the game. Nothing speaks louder than your wallet.
  • Virtual Protesting by Catnapster (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @10:42PM
  • Finally something new to cure my BzFlag habit! by ChaoticLimbs (Score:1) Wednesday November 20 2002, @08:26PM
  • Last Post! by alpg (Score:1) Tuesday December 03 2002, @12:37PM
  • Re:The Sims is not open source. by mark_lybarger (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:29PM
  • Re:Naked Ultima? by stratjakt (Score:2) Tuesday November 19 2002, @02:45PM
  • Re:We have to Support This! by Herkum01 (Score:1) Tuesday November 19 2002, @09:21PM
  • 29 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2