Slashdot Log In
XBox Netplay Already
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Fri Nov 23, 2001 01:53 PM
from the surprises-nobody dept.
from the surprises-nobody dept.
ElectusUnum writes "Well, it's been a little while since the XBox was released and people are already playing online! The folks at xboxgw.com have written a program to create an ethernet bridge between xbox's over the net, fooling the xbox's into thinking they're on a LAN. 1v1 seems to create no major lag and reports have come in like this one that claim up to four xbox's work fine. It seems a DSL connection is preferred for hosting the server." I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
You're not the only one. (Score:1)
-Toli
other platforms (Score:4, Informative)
Microsoft can't be to happy about this... (Score:5, Insightful)
While it's true that developers can do whatever they want, I doubt Microsoft would let them use the system however they want (after all, do you think Sony would be very happy if someone released a 'game' that let people pirate PS2 games easily?)
This hack is pretty sweet, though. It would be really cool to play online games with people across the country (or world) without going through some stupid intermediary.
Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... (Score:5, Insightful)
The only thing that they might be angry about is that they didn't get there first, or they won't be able to provide the service if it's free.
Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... (Score:5, Informative)
I think you've read enough replies to your post, but I wanted to add this. I saw the Microsoft "CXO" being interviewed on CBNC, and Mark Haines *grilled* him about, "how do you expect to make any money if you're losing big bucks on every single unit?" The CXO replied that the unit ships ready for broadband access, and they plan make all their money selling online services.
I say be prepared for MSFT to attack anything and everything threatening their main source of income. They're banking on it.
Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... (Score:4, Insightful)
Just like MS looked the other way at casual piracy of Win9x and NT for years it will probably do so with the X-Box. But sooner or later payday will come.
When will MS' netplay be up? (Score:3, Interesting)
M$ seem to be on to a winner here (Score:3, Informative)
After this they just need to buy up bleem and release it so I can play my old PS games on the machine. If they can get EA, Namco and Capcom to support them they should make a killing.
The problem is that in America there is no price differential between the PS2 and XBox (both $299 me thinks). In the UK the Xbox should be coming out at £299, with the PS2 already at £199. There seems to be no incentive in the US for people to favour the PS2. But even over here I'm wanting a Xbox now. Oh well - only have to wait till next spring!
XBox is going to be the hacker's dream (Score:2)
Funny (Score:2, Redundant)
XBOX Development Team (Score:5, Informative)
Hobbyist Community (Score:5, Interesting)
I just want to say how fascinating I find this culture of console hacking and programming. Here is Japan in the home of the console, I wish we had a more active community, but it does not seem to be so. I am not sure why not, especially since consoles are nearly uniform in popularity among all age groups and such.
My only fear is for these programmers. Microsoft is well know for its business practices, and I worry that they will disaprove of this Xbox net-play project. I do not see how this will hurt them but I still think they will not like it. Too bad since it will only make their console more popular.
R. Suzuka
What about PC's.. (Score:2, Interesting)
oddwrold-sortof on topic (Score:1)
the description of oddworld on the xbox.com website is as follows:
Save Oddworld from greedy corporate bigwigs and evil animal-testing researchers. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll meet Fuzzles about to fry. Simply neurotic...
i added the bold. am i the only one who finds this funny?
2 XBox? (Score:1)
Do the math. XBox + linux PC for online play is not a deal. $300 + time to set up your xboxgw software alone, assuming you already have yourself setup on a Linux box... wait, better yet, I'll get 2 XBoxes, install Linux on 1 of them and set it up as the gateway for the other... then M$ will lose twice the money!
g=
How's this for irony!! (Score:1)
>> XBOXGW currently only runs on Linux.
I'm having a great laugh!!!
Its WAY easier than that! (Score:5, Informative)
Just pop the ethernet cards into promisc mode, set up a kernel IP filter to filter out any unnecessary traffic, and bridge the TAP to the ethernet card! works great! no noticible lag!
Net Ready (Score:1, Troll)
My Athlon I ordered came "net ready too"
The XBox is the whore of gaming consoles. It's a celeron processor with an nvidia video card. Whow, some great amazing technology that Microsoft gets to put their name on. I don't get it.
Gaming consoles are ment to be DIFFERENT then when I play games on my PC. The XBox is making you play games that you could play on your PC except with not as high resolutions (unless you plug into a HDTV that costs over $3,000.)
Play Metal Gear Solid 2 before you decide to jump on the xBox bandwagon.
Re:Net Ready (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Net Ready (Score:5, Informative)
Ah, but it's not a celeron. You'd know this, had you read Anandtech's article yesterday. And while it is an nVidia video card, it's not one you can go out and buy for your PC. Sure, it's somewhere between the GF3 and GF3ti500 in terms of clock and memory speed, but that's ignoring the extra shaders on the card. And it's also ignoring the fact that the XBox IS A CONSOLE. What that means is that it's hardware that won't change for 5+ years. Developers can write directly to that hardware, and do many other programming tricks that they can't do with a PC because they don't know what hardware their game will run on. Yes, it uses some PC hardware. That doesn't make it a PC (if that were the case, then the GameCube is a Macintosh).
And the XBox IS different than the PC, where the games are concerned. While you might find Halo on a PC, you're not going to find Munch's Oddysey, Amped, DOA3, Cel Damage, SSX Trickey, and more. And as far as Halo goes, the XBox isn't the only console to have FPS games on it (nor is it the first). Hell, the old Super Nintendo had a port of Wolf3D. The PS2 has ports of NOLF and Half-Life , among many others. So just because you think that the FPS is the realm of computers doesn't make it so. But rarely will you play a fighting game or party game, for instance, on a PC. Oh, and you might want to go re-price HDTV's. You can get good ones for $2000 or so these days.
And play Halo before you write off the XBox for good. Then again, there's nothing saying you can't have both an XBox and a PS2. or an XBox and a Gamecube, or PS2 and Gamecube, or even all three.
PC-BOX (Score:1)
I wonder. (Score:2, Interesting)
Sega is gone. It's possible Nintendo is hurting. How far can they be pushed, before they have to give up too? Even Sony might have to pull out, if M$ behaves as I've suggested. Bingo. Video Game Industry Monopoly.
But... it gets worse. The powers that be have always HATED people building their own computers, upgrading them. Here is a viable PC platform, that is almost completely sealed. Even a bigger hard drive might be impossible for a user to install, if M$ wants to really cheat. If they release this as a home pc, or even business... and Office XP2 is released for it, what then? "People buy the Xbox, it's the end to all those hardware conflicts, software too!". Compaq(HP?), Dell, Gateway... their days are numbered.
Bingo. PC Industry Monopoly.
Won't affect you, you say? "I'll always buy my own, and build as I chooose!". Noble thoughts. But the fact is, the prices you pay for hardware are in part subsidized by the fact that everyone else is doing the same. People like you and I might be left paying prices similar to those that corporate enterprise purchasers are paying, since they will be the only other market that won't be able to use a sealed system like Xbox. The future looks grim, my friend.
Kali? (Score:1)
IIRC it's a decent package. Check it out.
Xbox OS? (Score:1)
Re:Xbox OS? (Score:4, Interesting)
All software runs in kernel mode, unified memory means the CPU and GPU get equal access to textures & vertex data, a second vertex pipe & some other fancy texture stuff on the GPU, specialised controllers - none of that exists in the PC space, and would all have to be emulated.
Of course, it'll be much easier to port an Xbox game to Windows & vice versa, compared to a PS2, but it's still far too different to just run.
MMOFPS? (Score:1)
PS2 ? (Score:1)
Microsoft FUD (Score:1)
> I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.
Inventive use of the apostrophe. (Score:1, Interesting)
"up to four xbox's"
Let bob the angry flower tell it:
http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif [angryflower.com]
XBOX vs. * (Score:5, Interesting)
And to gaming bigots - I am an avid collector of consoles, and have a PC and MAC for gaming as well, and what ticks me off more then anything is people who have some blind attachment to one way of gaming, usually because its what they blew 300 bucks on. Heres the point, for all those who still dont get it:
ITS ABOUT THE GAMES STUPID
Finally, about seeing Xbox games directly playable on PC... its going to be a while if ever. Fist reason is MS wont want to cannibalize their own market(although a lot of games will be ports, the strength will be original titles, and XBox first titles, to drive sales). The second is a technical hurdle: XBox on the surface may look just like a PC with a gForce3, but, it has one very important advantage: the programmers have ONE target spec to reach the whole audiance. This has always been a console advantage from a game making standpoint. So while on paper its looks like less then a high end pc, in then end you have better looking games because programmers write games to take full advantage of what resources are available, the target output is a TV (relativly low resolution and a constant), and no huge OS overhead.
Someone tell me (Score:2)
How is this specific to the xbox?
Unfortunately, it's already doomed (Score:1, Flamebait)
If you're hoping to get these as hack machines (a pretty good deal, actually), you better hurry, cause it's likely the xBox will be dead by springtime. The game industry only rewards the #1 and #2 spots, and xBox is radipdly becoming in danger from holding on to #3.
[caveat - I own both MSFT and NTDOY stock]
-
something's not right (Score:1)
wtf (Score:5, Funny)
who are you and what the hell have you done with rob malda?
XBox (Score:2, Funny)
Are you sure you wouldn't rather have Mandrake Gaming edition [slashdot.org]
It should be noted.. (Score:1)
Booo Hisss... XBox
Metal Gear Solid 2 X (Score:1)
"Don't ditch the PS/2 go play MGS2"
Well incase a lot of people didn't know
Metal Gear Solid 2 will be coming out to xbox
So really, if that's the only reason to hold onto a ps/2.....
CmdrTaco's turnaround? (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, that was a quick turnaround. I've been arguing for the benefits of an XBox in the living room for awhile (one of my posts during the release day Slashdot article generated over 20 replies), but I never expected Taco to become a convert.
Makes you wonder, though, if he has some kind of syndrome? :) Swings from one technology canvas to another. There should be something in the DSVIV for CmdrTacoism.
NEat..but.. (Score:2)
but this is nothing new.
Some mention KALI.. kali was based on bridging IPX I believe....
Of course, MS could always just make the damn game support tcp/ip in the first place...
"She kicks high" (Score:1)
Only for the pixel shaded bump-mapping and rich plot development, no doubt.
After having played Halo a few times online... (Score:4, Informative)
For instance, you can look around when you lag, but can't move or shoot in Halo. Since there's no error detection built into these games, you wind up in strange places when you resync with the server, and then get blown to bits. Many times.
The server doesn't lag, obviously. But the clients do.
Now, the game isn't bad multiplayer, but it was made with a LAN in mind. So, before everybody goes out and buys XBox's because of this, have that in mind. The programmers didn't think they would have to deal with Internet Latency in Halo, so there is nothing to help you if you have a high ping.
IRC #xbox-online on EFnet (Score:1)
-Sarkoon
Re:blerg (Score:2, Funny)
Have you seen VA's stock price lately?
Actualy, yeh that surprized me to. You can get them on ebay [ebay.com] these days for like $350
Re:he wants an xbox???? (Score:1)
Re:whoopsie (Score:1)
Re:who gives a shit (Score:1)
You don't need linux, it boots off a disk.. (Score:1)
Thanks! (Score:1)
Re:who gives a shit (Score:5, Interesting)
Well here's my 2 cents.
Consoles are far more convenient and more simple than a computer. How are they more convenient? They are small, light, and very portable. How are they more simple? Plug in a cartridge or put in your CD, press the power button and you're done. No installation required. I'm not suggesting that it's difficult to install a game, at least it isn't for most people, but not doing something is always easier than doing something.
Personally I think it would be great to have the simplicity of a console and the power, graphical quality, and networking capabilities of a PC all combined into one small, light weight, and portable machine.
I love getting together with friends for a weekend of LAN gaming [freedomware.org] at someones house, but I hate lugging my computer over there. On the other hand, if I had a console system like the GameCube (6x6x4.3 inches), it certainly would make LAN gaming a lot easier. A console and an LCD panel would be very portable.
Furthermore, if games were no longer any kind of a priority for my Desktop PC, I could save a fortune on PC parts. You wouldn't need to spend $350 for a ti500 GeForce3 video card. A $29 8MB AGP card would be fine for most people who just need to display 1280x1024 at 85Hz or less on a 19" monitor. Of course if you have other reasons for needing 3D power, like CAD, then this wouldn't be a factor for you. I also wouldn't be as quick about upgrading the rest of my PC parts if games weren't a factor. Games require more computing power than any other software for the most part.
Bottom line for me - I'm not willing to give up the awesome networking ability of PC gaming so until consoles can match the ability of PC's in that respect, I will continue to play games on the PC. But I would have no reservations at all about dropping PC gaming in favor of consoles when that day comes. So I think it's cool to see a project like this even if it is for the XBox.
I think you are right to say that "consoles were never meant for online gaming"... That's true in terms of all past consoles... But moving forward, I think consoles will be meant for online gaming and IMHO, it does make sense.
Let the flame begin.
Re:he wants an xbox???? (Score:1)
Re:he wants an xbox???? (Score:1)
Re:US based console (Score:1)
I think the X-Box is a great chance for the United States to show the world what our own game machines are really worth. And we'd be doing the Japanese such a favor... they won't have to write such difficult code for the Dreamcast or GameCube or PS2 anymore... they can just spit out the code once and ship it as soon as it compiles. Game development will go into overdrive, and the quality of the products will finally reflect some AMERICAN standards of ingenuity, creativity, and stability.
God Bless America, Goddammit!
Connect the xbox to ANY box, witha linux boot DISK (Score:1)
Guilty as charged (Score:1)
(and yes, still offtopic after 6 replies)