I'm hoping that they updated the caching mechanism, as IIRC it didn't remove documents that you had moved or deleted. While this is handy sometimes for retrieving accidentally lost information, it does present a bit of a problem in that sometimes you really *want* that information gone.
That was about it, IIRC. Maybe there will be a plug-in for it so that if it is still around, there will be an add-on to allow full updates.
That's the problem with all solutions involving an external data collection program, just like locate, they never get in sync.
Why on earth don't people use BFS [osnews.com] ?
Since I have no use for google to search my own files, I'd rather mount google to search the web itself [clapcrest.free.fr]:D
So is there a catch ? (Score:5, Interesting)
I assume they're not risking their "don't do any bad "-policy for this ?
So what -is- the catch ?
I am fedup with using the regurlar search in Windows, so I am defenitely in for some improvement.
Re:So is there a catch ? (Score:4, Insightful)
That was about it, IIRC. Maybe there will be a plug-in for it so that if it is still around, there will be an add-on to allow full updates.
Re:So is there a catch ? (Score:1)
Since I have no use for google to search my own files, I'd rather mount google to search the web itself [clapcrest.free.fr]