Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Turbo Tax Melts Down on Tax Day

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Apr 18, 2007 08:10 AM
from the procrastinators-in-a-pinch dept.
Raven17 writes "Turbo Tax by Intuit completely melted down under the load from last minute filers. Some people have been having problems as long as 24 hours already. I surrendered 2 hours before the East Coast deadline and schlepped on down to the Post Office."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Turbo Tax Melts Down on Tax Day 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • Back up at the wire (Score:5, Informative)

    by kannibal_klown (531544) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:12AM (#18780845)
    My mom used TurboTax (I got stuck w/ TaxCut this year). Anyway, she said it came back up just a few minutes before midnight. People were flipping out.

    Personally, I did mine back in February.
      • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Interesting)

        by TheRealFixer (552803) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:27AM (#18781071)
        I did the same. I think it was back in 2002. Caused a huge black eye for Intuit because they took forever to acknowledge there was a problem.

        I've been using TaxCut online since 2003, and it works great.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Insightful)

          by LordKronos (470910) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:41AM (#18781293) Homepage
          I think it was probably a bigger black eye for H&R block last year (or was it the year before) when they mailed out a bunch of TaxCut CDs to past customers and put their SSN on the address label.
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Interesting)

        by ryanov (193048) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:40AM (#18782273)
        The taxpayers may be saving money in salaries, but $16.95 goddamn dollars to file? Forget it, let them open my letter.

        If it's going to save the government money, why should I pay for it?
        [ Parent ]
        • You should be asking instead (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Shivetya (243324) <[shivetya] [at] [archonon.com]> on Wednesday April 18 2007, @10:18AM (#18782789) Homepage
          why in the hell is the tax code so complicated we need computer programs to sort it out?

          the real problem is the tax system and the fact that Congress does nothing to simplify it.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:4, Informative)

          by Mortanius (225192) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @11:41AM (#18784047) Homepage
          NPR had a longer on-air piece about this, but unfortunately all I could dig up on their website was this brief (though the Listen link provides the whole story).

          NPR : IRS Urges E-filing - But by Vendors Only, Please [npr.org]

          Basically, Intuit (and presumably H&R Block and any other tax software producers) lobby long and hard to make sure the public can't e-file directly to the IRS, only by proxy. So your $16.95 is presumably going entirely to Intuit. Plus the $44.95 (or more, or less if you're lucky) you paid for the software. Plus the additional $29.95 if you have to file to two states.

          It's a pretty nice gig.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Interesting)

            by Asphalt (529464) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @10:49AM (#18783229)
            Um, because they are getting paid YOUR TAX DOLLARS to open the letter?

            Actually they aren't. Nobody working for the government gets paid with "YOUR TAX DOLLARS".

            They get paid with Federal Reserve Notes well before you remit any of your earnings. And they will get paid whether you remit anything or not. Because there is a printing press that will give it to them regardless.

            Your tax Reserve Notes go to the Federal Reserve to prevent devaluation of the currency. And since the "money" is created out of thin air, that's really the only reason you pay taxes.

            The more dollars the general population has, the less a dollar is worth. So taxation serves to remove as many dollars out of circulation as possible, thus supporting the fiat currency.

            When you pay FEDERAL taxes, you are not directly paying for any employees or programs ... as the money is simply printed and given to the Federal Government on demand, to distribute to whomever they want. So why, if money is printed on demand, does the Federal Reserve need YOUR money? They can create as much as they want. They don't need yours.

            The reason is value. The more money YOU have, the less *value* your neighbor's money has and the government's money has.

            Federal taxation doesn't pay for anything, it simply removes monetary supply from the hands of the populace. Less supply = more demand = curtailed inflation.

            In short, your are not paying for anything with taxes. You are just supporting the perceived value of paper and ink that has no intrinsic value in and of itself.

            [ Parent ]
            • Money is a convention (Score:5, Interesting)

              by DragonHawk (21256) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @12:23PM (#18784803) Homepage Journal

              You are just supporting the perceived value of paper and ink that has no intrinsic value in and of itself.

              Every word you wrote is absolutely true. From an economic theory standpoint, it's really quite a critical concept. As a philosophical statement, that was really quite deep and insightful (seriously). However, from a strictly pragmatic point-of-view, that is absolutely worthless.

              Money is an abstraction which exists for convenience. It saves us from having to carry chickens to the gas station. Rather than being carrying chickens around, we say, here's an abstraction which we'll all agree to deal in. It's a lot easier and less messy than carrying chickens around. The first step was using tokens to represent chickens. Rather than carrying the chicken, we carried a token that represented a chicken. But it quickly became obvious that, hey, all I really care about is the value represented by the token. I don't care about the chicken (maybe I prefer beef anyway). So let's all just agree to say the token represents an abstract concept of value. Saves the trouble of keeping all those chickens around.

              It's true that paying taxes "supports the perceived value" of the currency. So does any use of the currency. When I pay for my gas or Internet in US dollars rather than chickens, I'm supporting the currency. When I get paid in US dollars, I'm supporting the currency. When I browse Slashdot and look at the ends, that translates into resources used, which are paid for in US dollars, which supports the currency.

              If you prefer, substitute some other tangible good, such as "cows", "cheese", or even "gold" for "chickens". It's all the same concept.

              [ Parent ]
            • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Informative)

              by ThosLives (686517) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @01:16PM (#18785719) Journal

              Except that's not at all how the government controls money supply: The Federal Reserve is the source/sink of dollars, not the IRS.

              Money supply is controlled by the sale and purchase of bonds and the interest rate, not through taxes. This is why the Fed uses the interest rate to affect inflation. It's the effect on the amount of cash the Fed has to pay out to 'buy back' its bonds. Basically, if the Fed wants more cash in the market, it buys bonds more than it sells them; if it wants to curtail the money supply, it buys fewer bonds back than it sells. Note that the Fed target interest rate is based on the supply and demand for the notes. Also note that it's a target rate - the media and literature always calls it "the target federal funds rate". Because to get that rate, the Fed has to buy or sell its bonds. To increase the rate and "slow down" the economy, the Fed sells more bonds. The reason this increases the rate is because to sell more bonds, it has to make them more lucrative to the purchaser which means a higher interest rate. What happens then is the buyer gives dollars to the Fed in exchange for a bond. Note that a bond is not money, so money has effectively left the money supply.

              When the Fed wants to reduce the interest rate, it starts selling fewer and fewer bonds (or buying bonds back). This reduces the supply of bonds so, for a given demand, the "price" the buyers are willing to pay (a lower interest rate) increases. Either way, this either puts dollars directly back into the economy via a buy-back, or indirectly because fewer people are buying the bonds so their cash stays in the system. Buying back takes bonds out of the free market and replaces them with dollars.

              This mechanism, while not perfect, also helps adjust the money supply to a larger economy, because when real wealth is created in the economy, the creator of that wealth gets more dollars and more bonds are purchased. When those bonds are purchased back or redeemed for face value plus interest, there is an increase in available dollars. Inflation happens when the market guesses wrong at the interest rate, and more dollars are paid out during redemption than is representative of the current actual wealth. Similarly, if the economy contracts the money supply can also contract because eventually the interest rates on the bonds will fall and less additional money is required to redeem the notes; this will reduce the money supply relative to the amount of wealth. Stagflation happens when the nasty effect of a shrinking economy is paired with increasing inflation. (Yay for basic macroeconomic theory).

              Another key thing to remember is that the Fed and money supply only control the tokens representing value in the US; they don't directly control wealth (and, as is important to note, value and wealth are not the same thing).

              [ Parent ]
              • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Interesting)

                by crabpeople (720852) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @12:33PM (#18784965) Journal
                You should watch a doc called 'money, banking and the federal reserve [google.com]'. For every real dollar in the system, the fed loans about 10k to the banks. The american dollar hasn't been backed by gold since nixon killed the gold standard in the 70s. You could say that the american dollar is kept afloat on the global stage because its a petro dollar, people use it to buy oil. This is why iraq (2000) and iran (recently) have switched to euros. Iraq got bitchslapped back into dealing in USD, but if somewhere like saudi arabia started dealing in euros there would be big problems for the us.

                [ Parent ]
                • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Interesting)

                  by gnuman99 (746007) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @12:57PM (#18785359)
                  Saudis are already using Euros *and* USD for oil. Virtually all of Europe is using Euros only to get their oil. Russia is selling their gas to Europe in EUR as well.

                  I can't believe that Iran switched 100% to using EUR for oil. China is their biggest customer and they have tons of USD to spend. They probably have tons of EUR as well, but they probably have more USD at this point.

                  [ Parent ]
            • Re:Back up at the wire (Score:5, Informative)

              by profplump (309017) <zach@kotlarek.com> on Wednesday April 18 2007, @11:29AM (#18783797) Homepage

              Who the f*** decided that sentences on the Internet shall no longer be formatted with two spaces after a period?!
              The doubled space after after a period rule was a hack to deal with the hard-to-read mono-spaced fonts on old computer and typewriters. Set type never used a double space after a period, before or after typewriters -- they used 1.5 spaces. And if your fonts are worth anything, they should approximate that 1.5 spaces with a full stop and a single space.
              [ Parent ]
  • I submitted mine (Score:5, Funny)

    by Timesprout (579035) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:13AM (#18780857)
    on my blackberry.
  • Perhaps (Score:5, Funny)

    by niiler (716140) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:14AM (#18780865) Journal
    Sourceforge could help them with their server load next year :-)
  • Only Fools Wait Until The Last Minute (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NeverVotedBush (1041088) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:14AM (#18780879)
    It was basically a manual DNS attack. With so many waiting until the last minute, what do people expect? File at least a day before the deadline. What difference does a day's worth of interest make on the average IRS tax bill? And if people are so concerned about a day's worth of interest, print the damn return and mail it with a check. That way you get a few more days of interest.

    I just don't understand the dorks that wait so long they have no options.
    • by Mr. Underbridge (666784) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:20AM (#18780955)

      It was basically a manual DNS attack. With so many waiting until the last minute, what do people expect? File at least a day before the deadline. What difference does a day's worth of interest make on the average IRS tax bill? And if people are so concerned about a day's worth of interest, print the damn return and mail it with a check. That way you get a few more days of interest.

      All true, but the fact that people wait until the deadline is not news. If you're going to get into the online tax-prep business, you'd better have a stout server. This kind of failure can kill a business.

      [ Parent ]
      • by tehSpork (1000190) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:28AM (#18781099)
        All true, but the fact that people wait until the deadline is not news. If you're going to get into the online tax-prep business, you'd better have a stout server. This kind of failure can kill a business.

        Or a stout series of servers, God knows you shouldn't be relying on a single box to handle that information with that liability.
        [ Parent ]
        • by Maximum Prophet (716608) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:50AM (#18781441)
          I'm using my poor memory here but there are something like 180 million filers, 60% of which use Tax software or professional help (almost all the professionals use Tax software)

          TurboTax should know it's market share, let's pretend it's 75%. That's 180,000,000 * .60 * .75 * .20 = 16.2 million on the last day. Let's say most, 75%, wait until the last half of the day, that's 8.1 million in the last 12 hours. That's 187 per second.

          On NPR they gave a figure that the TurboTax servers were processing like 40 per second.

          I do peak load extimation for Unix servers for a living. Somebody at TurboTax screwed up big time, real big time. They should have doubled the number of servers they thought they might have needed. They should have contracted with a company like Google to cache the returns, then process them batchwise as fast as they could.
          [ Parent ]
          • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:04AM (#18781701)
            They should have contracted with a company like Google to cache the returns

            Excellent, then my tax return could be stored along side my e-mail, calendar, documents, searches, and every website I've visited that uses Double-click or Google ad services ... in fact, can't Google just fill out my returns automatically now, with the info they have?
            [ Parent ]
          • Yuh Huh... (Score:4, Funny)

            by Greyfox (87712) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:36AM (#18782187) Homepage
            And here's how most companies do load estimation:

            Peak Load Estimation Guy: You need 300 xeon class servers on optical fibre to handle the load!
            Peak Load Estimation Guy's Manager to His Boss: Yeah we'll be fine with a 486 on DSL!

            Later...

            CEO to Public: There's no way we could have foreseen the huge spike in traffic that caused our servers to melt down.

            [ Parent ]
        • by sloveless (518479) <sdlNO@SPAMtwosixteen.com> on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:57AM (#18781559) Homepage
          You don't get penalized for filing a federal return late if you're getting a refund. A few years back, before I started filing electronically, I prepared my taxes, noticed I was getting a nice little refund, and promptly failed to put it in the damn mail. It was December before my lazy butt realized I hadn't received my check. (No, I'm not exaggerating.) So I mailed it. The IRS promptly issued my refund PLUS INTEREST! Granted, it was a crappy rate and I would have been better off putting that money in a savings account. Regardless, no penalties.
          [ Parent ]
    • by Aladrin (926209) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:21AM (#18780965)
      I think you meant 'DOS attack', but it was more like a self-slashdotting.

      As for people... Combine laziness and hatred and you end up with a gajillion people that will wait until the last possible second to deal with it. It shouldn't be a real big surprise.
      [ Parent ]
    • by powermacx (887715) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:34AM (#18781189)
      Losers. I did my taxes last year. - Homer
      [ Parent ]
    • by LordKronos (470910) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:53AM (#18781497) Homepage

      File at least a day before the deadline. What difference does a day's worth of interest make on the average IRS tax bill?


      File a few weeks before. When you file and when you pay can be different, so you aren't actually losing any interest. You can file in January but tell the IRS to deduct it from your bank account on the due date in April. Or you can do the same if you are paying by check (file in January, mail check in April).
      [ Parent ]
    • by pla (258480) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:58AM (#18781609) Journal
      What difference does a day's worth of interest make on the average IRS tax bill?

      Just for those who never thought about this, what you suggest works the other way, as well... As long as they owe you a refund, nothing bad happens if you file a day late.

      The IRS bases all its penalties on how much you owe. Don't owe anything? No penalties for filing a day late.



      The government cares that it gets your money. It doesn't care so much if you don't get your money.
      [ Parent ]
      • by hal2814 (725639) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:06AM (#18781745)
        "He had no home telephone because it cost money."

        "he won't have spent any of the money he saved on anything to give himself any happiness."

        Yes, because you haven't experienced true joy until you get interrupted during dinner by telemarketing calls.
        [ Parent ]
      • by GoRK (10018) <johnl @ b l u r b c o . com> on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:25AM (#18781997) Homepage Journal

        I didn't get the figures for my last 1099 until YESTERDAY. Kinda makes filing hard ya know.


        No it doesn't. They missed the filing deadline; not you. What you are supposed to do here is timely file your 1040 without that information then re-file your 1040 when you get the additional information then either pay the difference with interest or claim the difference as a refund (in many cases this is with interest too). Optionally you can include estimated tax payments on your first 1040 filing if you want to avoid paying interest when you file again. Your final easy option is to file form 4868 for an extension along with your estimated payment. If you expect a refund the best thing is to file 1040 twice so you can go ahead and get your money back. If you expect to pay, the 4868 is much simpler.

        [ Parent ]
  • by otacon (445694) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:16AM (#18780901) Homepage
    schlep : to drag or haul (an object); to make a tedious journey (from Yiddish shlepn; cf. German schleppen)
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      ...and pronounced like someone with pneumonia would pronounce "slept"
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I think a better word is "went".

        Ahhh, but the key here is the 'tedious journey' part, which is not conveyed at all if he simply said "I went to the post office."
  • same as in real life (Score:3, Insightful)

    line backs up at post office, line backs up with turbotax. Do they have some kinda guarantee about "if you file by x, even if our systems are down, you get credit?" I doubt it, they must've anticipated this very scenario!
      • Re:same as in real life (Score:5, Informative)

        by tha_mink (518151) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:38AM (#18781241)

        In real life, and online, you can get much better results by filing a day earlier.
        Not true with Turbo Tax, they were melted on Monday too. The meltdown's been reported on the boards since Monday morning.
        [ Parent ]
  • As a Hog Farmer (Score:5, Funny)

    by ReidMaynard (161608) * on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:17AM (#18780925) Homepage
    I shipped my 15% (30 hogs) early, to avoid problems just like this
  • Turbotax Issues (Score:4, Informative)

    by mwilliamson (672411) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:24AM (#18781021) Homepage Journal
    I had royal problems when I got to the very last step on turbotax, right where you click to submit to the IRS. After a good 15 second wait, I got an error about being overloaded, and to try again later. What really sucked is that I couldn't start from that point again, but instead had to re-visit the last bunch of questions I had already answered. Being their Website is so format heavy, each screen took a good 10-15 seconds to draw on this 1.8 Ghz box, so the entire process was quite annoying. After 3 tries and some minor sheet-rock damage, I had to print the whole damn thing out and drive across town to our main post office. To add insult to injury, turbotax took my money before this last step was available. This sucks. I got ripped off, and I wont't get my tax refund in the usual week and 1/2 since I had to mail it. (at least a got a refund though...albeit little bitty)
    • Re:Turbotax Issues (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Applekid (993327) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:30AM (#18781127)
      "(at least a got a refund though...albeit little bitty)"

      Because someone has to say it:

      Getting a refund compared to having to pay is bad. The government collected too much in taxes (well, more than they are required to by law). This money was denied to you throughout the year. Money which could have been earning interest, used for investments, hell, eating out a few more nights a month.

      You get your refund back interest-free from the gov. It's really no different than if you left a $20 in your coat pocket during the winter only to find it the next year. Sure it FEELS GOOD, but, that could have been doing something much more useful than just sleeping in a pocket.

      Then again, there are penalties imposed if you fix your W-4 (and other forms) so that they don't withhold anything and you have to pay all your tax once a year. I think that's too bad.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Turbotax Issues (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Zenaku (821866) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:17AM (#18781891)
        That's all true, but I'd still rather get a refund every year than owe. The amount of interest that I would earn by having that money in my pocket throughout the year is not significant. In reality, it is non-existent, because (and here I'm just being honest with myself) I'd only end up pissing it away on small luxuries. The amount of extra money in my pocket each paycheck would only be enough to make me dine out more, upgrade my cable package, or buy a new ipod or something.

        And then when my tax bill came at last, it would feel like a hardship.

        This is because each time I get paid, I pay my mortgage and bills, transfer a fixed amount into my various savings and investment accounts, and consider whatever is left to be mine to play with.

        By getting a refund at tax time, I may have missed out on the interest, but the "found" money is large enough that I won't be inclined to waste it -- I'll make a major purchase, pay off a loan, or -- now that the amount is big enough to mean something to me -- put it into an interest-bearing account or investment.

        Plus, the fact that I'm getting a refund is motivation to file in February, and avoid this whole April 15th mess.

        So yeah, giving the government an interest-free loan is mathematically foolish -- but when you take psychology into account it can be better than owing them.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Turbotax Issues (Score:5, Interesting)

        by vorpal^ (114901) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:34AM (#18782151) Homepage Journal
        Sure it FEELS GOOD, but, that could have been doing something much more useful than just sleeping in a pocket.

        In my opinion, feeling good is highly underrated. If the psychological joy of getting money back on taxes outweighs the joy from interest incurred from having that money early for someone, then I don't see a problem. God knows we pay enough in entertainment costs in a year to make ourselves feel good.
        [ Parent ]
  • It's so unfair (Score:5, Funny)

    by Aaron_Pike (528044) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:28AM (#18781077) Homepage
    If only there were some way to file in March, or even February. But that could only happen if employers had a deadline to send out W-2 forms by like the end of January.
  • Turbo Tax: Pain in the rear (Score:4, Insightful)

    by cyberkahn (398201) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:31AM (#18781153) Homepage
    I used Turbo Tax for the last time this year. This was my second year and in retrospect it is just not worth it. Over $60 for the software, then it's I think $30 dollars to e-file, which I didn't do (certified mail). The total cost of software plus all the hours of my personal time to me it just isn't worth it. I am going to pay to have someone do it for me next year.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Wow, that's expensive. I'm using uFile in Canada, and it's $16 to fill in your return, and submit it electronically. All inclusive.
  • Obligatory Simpson's Quote (Score:3, Funny)

    by CastrTroy (595695) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:36AM (#18781217) Homepage
    Would you look at those morons... I paid my taxes over a year ago!
  • For next year... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Avatar8 (748465) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:45AM (#18781363)
    Will Intuit learn their lesson and strengthen their servers and network for next year's last minute rush? Given their track record of quality, I seriously doubt it.


    Will the procrastinators learn their lesson and file at least a day early? Heck no. They even had two extra days this year. If paying the taxes is the issue, that's what an extension is for.

    I am a horrible procrastinator myself, but I guess my greed overpowers that. My taxes were done, returned and spent in February. Woot! New PC!

    I also learned a few years back that Turbo Tax is no better than most of the other products out there, free or otherwise. I've been using http://www.taxact.com/ [taxact.com] for the past three years. I usually do the download, but I tried the web version for my mother-in-law's taxes. Very smooth, quick, painless and best of all, completely free. I did my mother-in-law's taxes Sunday, 4/15. That's the latest I've ever filed a return. Guess I'm getting sloppy like the unwashed masses.

  • 2-day Extension (Score:5, Informative)

    by flamingnight (234353) <chris.garaffa@noSPAM.gmail.com> on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:04AM (#18781697) Homepage
    If you were affected by the storm that hit parts of the East Coast over the weekend, the IRS has granted [marketwatch.com] a 2-day tax extension. Just write "April 16 Storm" on your return.
  • EULA (Score:4, Informative)

    by Wisconsingod (995241) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:09AM (#18781781)
    TurboTax online has a few key points in their EULA that will protect thiem from these fiascos.

    to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, intuit and its suppliers are not liable for any indirect, special, incidental, exemplary or consequential damages or for damages relating to loss of business, telecommunication failures, loss, corruption, security or theft of data, viruses, spyware, loss of profits or investment, tax positions taken by you, inability to file your return, or the like, whether based in contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability, product liability or otherwise, even if intuit or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages and even if a remedy set forth herein is found to have failed of its essential purpose.

    the software and services are provided "as-is" and, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, intuit, its affiliates, licensors, participating financial institutions, third-party content or service providers, retailers, distributors, dealers and suppliers (collectively, "suppliers") disclaim all guarantees and warranties, express or implied, regarding the software or services, including any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, title, merchantability, and non-infringement. intuit does not warrant that software or services are secure, free from bugs, viruses, interruption, errors, or other program limitations
    or my personal favorite, don't buy the software until you print clause....

    you may use the software without charge up to the point you decide to print or electronically file your tax return. printing or electronically filing your return reflects your satisfaction with software, at which time you will be required to pay or register for the product.
  • efiling a ripoff (Score:4, Interesting)

    by virtual_mps (62997) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @09:27AM (#18782039)
    Am I really the only one who thinks it's ridiculous to pay intuit $30 to send my return electronically (which actually is cheaper for the IRS to process) rather than slapping a stamp on it and dropping it in the mailbox on the way to work? What am I missing here?
    • Re:efiling a ripoff (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Lxy (80823) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @10:24AM (#18782853) Journal
      It's all about speed. How quickly do you want your refund?

      efile + direct deposit means a refund in (usually) 72 hours or less. It's almost instant money.

      mailed + direct deposit means a refund in 2-3 weeks. Very acceptable, and if you're cheap like me it's a great option.

      mailed + mailed check means a refund in a month or two.

      Mailing a check is apparently the biggest delay. So if you, for whatever reason, efiled and want a paper check, you're wasting your money.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Our W-2 (report of what we made - required when filing the return) doesn't arrive until Jan. 31st or a little after. The earliest most of us can do our taxes is early in February. And if you're like me and your former company filed an amended W-2, you ge
    • Re:Netcraft confirms (Score:5, Informative)

      by chong (67651) on Wednesday April 18 2007, @08:43AM (#18781321) Homepage
      TurboTax.com does not host the online TurboTax application - that's the brochure-ware for turbotax. Those servers also do not host Intuit's electronic filing services (which are hosted indenpendently from turbo tax online as well).

      The TurboTax web app is hosted @ www.turbotaxonline.com and still runs on Solaris (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.turb otaxonline.com)
      [ Parent ]