Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Google NASA Partnership Announced

Posted by Hemos on Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:29 PM
from the word-hit-the-paper dept.
eldavojohn writes "Google & NASA announced their partnership today with many benefits. The director of a NASA site said 'Just a few examples are new sensors and materials from collaborations on bio-info-nano convergence, improved analysis of engineering problems, as well as Earth, life and space science discoveries from supercomputing and data mining, and bringing entrepreneurs into the space program.'" Update 23:51 by SM As pointed out by so many readers the GoogleNASA site originally linked was completely bogus.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Google NASA Partnership Announced 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • Gah! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Karganeth (1017580) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:31PM (#17288444)
    Apparantly, taking over Earth isn't enough for Google...
  • Now I know... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Stanistani (808333) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:32PM (#17288448) Homepage Journal
    The next flag on the moon will be Blue, Red, Yellow, and Green.
    • Re:Now I know... (Score:4, Funny)

      by spellraiser (764337) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:38PM (#17288564) Journal

      Yeah, it's true. They were offering jobs [google.com] on the Moon as early as April 1, 2004!

      [ Parent ]
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          I may be missing the joke... is this legit? I don't expect to be launched to the moon but is there something to this? Does anyone know? Am I about to be come the laughing stock of /.? Dag, better post AC... too scared of /back effect

          Yes its a joke they
  • Well... Duh! (Score:4, Funny)

    by smbarbour (893880) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:36PM (#17288512)
    How else will they get their employees to the Google Copernicus Center [google.com]?!

    They've got a lot of work to do though if they plan to open it in late spring, 2007.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 18 2006, @01:38PM (#17289560)
      GoogleNasa is NOT an official Google site, and is just phishing for Google account information. What the fuck, Slashdot - do you EVER look at these links? Such incompetence...
      [ Parent ]
      • Mod parent up! (Score:4, Informative)

        by FhnuZoag (875558) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:58PM (#17289836)
        Checking whois leads to Chris C Kemp: (Notice website similarities)

        http://www.chrisckemp.com/ [chrisckemp.com]

        This guy doesn't seem to have any connections to google or NASA, true, though I don't know if phishing is an accurate accusation.

        But be careful, folks.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        A: The site is only open to EMPLOYEES of Google and NASA. (Who would know better if it were a phishing attempt)
        B: The partnership was announced by NASA in September of 2005.

        Not only is this old news, but the registered "owner" of the site is a well-respect
          • Update (Score:3, Informative)

            NASA's Dec 2006 Press Release [nasa.gov]

            Excerpt of interest (as was shown under other links found within the other threads):

            "NASA has collected and processed more information about our planet and universe than any other entity in the history of humanity," said Chris
      • by chrisckemp (257820) on Monday December 18 2006, @05:49PM (#17293472) Homepage
        Hi, sorry for the confusion, I am Chris C. Kemp, Director of Business Development at NASA Ames Research Center. I originally created the site as a "neutral ground" for NASA employees and Google employees to collaborate (we're trying to experiment with new ways of doing business). I paid for and set the site up myself which is why it is listed under my name to minimize the "bureaucracy" We were not ready to release/announce the site, and after getting slashdotted, Google requested that we take the site down, which I did.
        [ Parent ]
  • Land rush is on!!! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Average_Joe_Sixpack (534373) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:36PM (#17288532)
    www.gogglenasa.com
    www.googelnasa.com
    www.nasagoogle.com
    www.googlnasa.com
  • i think i'd be pretty happy about this.
  • Well that's just funny... (Score:4, Informative)

    by pclminion (145572) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:37PM (#17288538)
    A friend who works at Google took me on a tour of a few of their buildings a little over a year ago. It was the weekend and hardly anybody was there, but I did remember noticing a big whiteboard (Google has thousands of whiteboards, which seem to be the primary medium for communication and development of ideas) with the headline "Google And NASA in 2007" at the top. I remember thinking at the time how odd that seemed. But it looks like out of all the zany ideas at Google this was one that actually survived for over a year and came to fruition.
  • The site is running on IIS 6.0 (Score:3, Informative)

    by ranperry (757673) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:37PM (#17288546)
    Google? IIS 6.0? Helllooooo?
  • Computronium Cloud ... (Score:5, Funny)

    by lysdexia (897) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:38PM (#17288562) Homepage
    Slashdot - Space - December 2014

    GoogleNASA Announces Dissassembly of Mercury and Venus

    GoogleNASA's strategic alliance with FungibleNano has pushed their disassembly of the "useless" innerplanets into a computronium cloud. The "Massively Massive Massive 4D Quantuum Processor Fog" will reportedly use 10 years of spam filtered from gmail users to train an AI to solve large N-Body problems and appreciate fine wine.
  • Hey, I recognize that CMS! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by theGreater (596196) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:40PM (#17288604) Homepage
    That's Dot Net Nuke, with an altered default blue theme. Good enough for Google, good enough for NASA, good enough for me.

    Hey, it's at least mildly ontopic, and it proves I actually FOLLOWED A LINK!

    -theGreater.

    captcha: outrages
    • Re: (Score:2)

      That's Dot Net Nuke, with an altered default blue theme. Good enough for Google, good enough for NASA, good enough for me.

      GoogleNasa.com? It's running on Apache, with domain servers at InterMedia.net. The registrant is:

      Kemp, Chris junk@chrisckemp.com

      P

  • Partnership with benefits? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Is that anything like "Friends with benefits"? Because that would be hot in orbit.
  • Google Earth improvement? (Score:2, Interesting)

    Hopefully we'll get decently up-to-date satellite photos for Google Earth now. I'm tired of seeing my town as some vaguely greenish-brown blur.
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      Hopefully we'll get decently up-to-date satellite photos for Google Earth now. I'm tired of seeing my town as some vaguely greenish-brown blur.
      I'd agree with you, except my town actually is a vaguely greenish-brown blur.
  • Corporate partner (Score:2, Insightful)

    I think this is a great idea for NASA to take on a corporate partner. Not only does it look promising from a financial viewpoint, but it greatly expands the knowledge base and brainpower from using brainiacs from both the govement and corporate pools that
    • Re: (Score:2)

      NASA has plenty of corporate partners, including several large players in the aerospace industry. Lockheed Martin has a facility right next to Ames. The NASA/Google partnership is old news though, we were joking about GAmes (Google/Ames) maybe a year ago.
  • Seems perfect to me (Score:5, Funny)

    by Kuukai (865890) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:44PM (#17288678) Journal
    Yes, a search company teaming up with an agency that's always losing things! Maybe now they can find that Mars lander, those Moon photos, and what exactly Neil Armstrong said...
  • Interesting... (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    But will it ever get out of beta?
  • budget (Score:4, Funny)

    by michaelvkim (981938) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:47PM (#17288720)
    Maybe now NASA will have the budget to do some really cool stuff!
  • Disappointing (Score:2, Interesting)

    I was expecting an announcement about Hubble images. There must be millions of them by now, but there isn't a great way to access them. Sure, NASA announces a new image once in a while; they come out in dribs and drabs. It would be great to see Google's ta
  • Nerd Porn (Score:3, Funny)

    by derrickh (157646) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:49PM (#17288744) Homepage
    To 99.5% of the population, the following sentence is pure gibberish. But for the chosen few, it's like porn and candy all rolled up into one.

    "Just a few examples are new sensors and materials from collaborations on bio-info-nano convergence, improved analysis of engineering problems, as well as Earth, life and space science discoveries from supercomputing and data mining, and bringing entrepreneurs into the space program."

    D
  • by VeryProfessional (805174) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:00PM (#17288926)
    To me, the site http://googlenasa.com/ [googlenasa.com] seems extremely suspect. It looks like a targeted phishing scam to get the personal details of Google and NASA employees. Slashdot, you owe us better.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        "NASA has collected and processed more information about our planet and universe than any other entity in the history of humanity," said Chris C. Kemp, director of strategic business development at Ames. "Even though this information was collected for the
  • Am I missing something? (Score:3, Informative)

    by jmerelo (216716) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:01PM (#17288952) Homepage Journal
    The news release is one year old [nasa.gov]. And the site is neither registered to NASA or to Google, but to INTERMEDIA.NET [intermedia.net]. It's basically PR, anyways.
  • by blueZ3 (744446) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:05PM (#17289034) Homepage
    for NASA. Who knew you could just Google "alien lifeforms"? All that SETI CPU time was wasted
  • ...we never made it to the moon, it was all done on earth, google's earth."

    Maybe we can call it the Googleplex.

    If only we can find it thru google/nasa earth search engine.

    The simple logic question the above is based on is:
    What does a web search engine and
  • Yay now when I'm looking at the moon through the 'ole telescope with the kids I also get the latest deals from Amazon, Ebay, and whoever else uses their ad system.
  • The New Name (Score:4, Funny)

    by Cytlid (95255) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:14PM (#17289166) Homepage
    I'm hoping for GASA and not Noogle.
  • Perfect match (Score:5, Funny)

    by Fujisawa Sensei (207127) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:21PM (#17289274)
    Perfect match. Google makes money, NASA spends money.
  • by QuietLagoon (813062) on Monday December 18 2006, @02:24PM (#17290208)
    Just wait until Ballmer hears that google has outmaneuvered Microsoft in courting NASA and all its data.
  • Lofty ideas (Score:3, Funny)

    by LilGuy (150110) on Monday December 18 2006, @03:04PM (#17290784)
    I for one welcome our cybernetic space overlords.
    • That is quite common in companies. They will often use the proper "legal" name for the email address and display the preferred spelling elsewhere.