Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

In Korea, Email Is Only For Old People

Posted by timothy on Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:19 AM
from the u.s.-has-officially-been-lapped dept.
_martini_ writes "This short article suggests that, in Korea, email is used only for formal communications, or by older, less tech-saavy generations, while IMs, blogs, and SMS has taken over as the primary means of day to day messages."

Related Stories

[+] In The US, Email Is Only For Old People 380 comments
lxw56 writes "Two years after Slashdot discussed the theory that Korean young people were rejecting email, an article at the Slate site written by Chad Lorenz comes to the same conclusion about the United States. 'Those of us older than 25 can't imagine a life without e-mail. For the Facebook generation, it's hard to imagine a life of only e-mail, much less a life before it. I can still remember the proud moment in 1996 when I sent my first e-mail from the college computer lab. It felt like sending a postcard from the future. I was getting a glimpse of how the Internet would change everything--nothing could be faster and easier than e-mail.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Greasy Kids Stuff (Score:5, Insightful)

    by insensitive claude (645770) * on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:20AM (#10950118)
    (Last Journal: Monday November 29 2004, @11:43PM)
    I can understand how IM appeals to kids (regardless of nationality), but I find IM incredibly distracting. I guess it's the natural evolution though. As telephones cut into the postal load, so are chat functions overtaking email.
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by lordkuri (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:29AM
    • by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:51AM (#10950288)
      We use e-mail for our help desk for example. You send an e-mail to the help address, it creates a new ticket for your issue. This works well, as we get documentation of everything you say to us, and us to you, and it allows us to deal with your problem when a person with the requisite knowledge has time.

      IM would be totally unsuited for this. When peopel have your attention in realtime, they want results in realtime. If I answer a chat about a Solaris problem, I'm not the one you want, you want the Solaris admin. With e-mail, this is all taken care of. Someone submits their request, and when the Solaris admin is available, he deals with it.

      I certianly don't think IM is useless, but I think young people (I include myself in this category, I'm 24) are a little too caught up with the wow factor. When it comes to bussiness, there are major reasons to want to use e-mail instead.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:There's also lots of stuff it's not good for by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:08AM
        • by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:54AM (#10950731)
          No, sorry, doesn't work that way. Help requests are not processed in the order recieved, they are processed based off of importance, policy, skill, and time.

          If you submit a request to have a handholding session for how to use Power Point 5 minutes before someone else submits a request to fix their desktop that won't boot, you aren't getting processed first. The most important work gets done first. Someone having no access is more important than some training.

          There is alos policy as to order of requests. Critical systems are first, then professors, then staff, etc (university here). This is departmental policy, not somehting we control. So if a student asks for something, and a professor asks for something, the professor gets help first.

          Then there is skill. Not all the tech staff are skilled at the same thing. If you send in an advanced Solaris problem, I am not going to attempt to solve it simply because I am the one who saw it first. I'll hand it off ot the Solaris admin, who is likely to fix it right, and fix it efficiently.

          Finaly there is time. If your job is something like installing 10 systems with an OS and apps, and another job comes in that is the quick update of a single app, the quick job gets processed first. Your job is a long endevor anyhow, there isn't any reason to make 5 minute work wait a day on it.

          Logging is important in all this, which e-mail is good for. If you sumbit a request for 10 systems for install, we need to have a record of what you wanted on them. It's not going to happen in 10 seconds, there needs to be a reference for what was needed.

          It's also important since, as I noted, the first person to read the ticket isn't necessiarly the one who does the job. You don't want second-hand miscommunication of information, you want an accurate record of what was requested.

          Of course I think the main problem here is you have a self-superior incorrect picture of what a helpdesk is. This is not a reference to a group of people that sit behind desks and do nothing but take calls. This means the entire technical department, the manager, all the admins, and so on.

          There is no gaurentee that any of us are at our desks at any time. If someone needs support on their desktop and I am the one who is best to provide it, I must go and support them. If an issue then comes in that I am uniquely qualified or at least the most qualified to deal with, it needs to wait until I get back.

          Perhaps it's different where you work, but where we are, e-mail is essential. E-mailing a ticket to help is a great way to ensure your job is done fast and correct. Stopping the tech manager in the hall is a great way to ensure he adds it to his already overloaded plate and it may never get done.

          Getting a person in realtime may provide more instant satisfaction, but it doesn't necessiarly get what you want done. Also, we have a phone line (and office to visit) for such requests, but that doesn't lessen the usefullness of e-mail.
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:There's also lots of stuff it's not good for by Issue9mm (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:46AM
      • Re:There's also lots of stuff it's not good for by cayenne8 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @11:02AM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff..good! by majid_aldo (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:08AM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff (Score:5, Insightful)

      by segmond (34052) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:49AM (#10950522)
      I hate IM for this reason, I usually tell people I don't have any IM account till I make sure they are not part of the "i am often bored" group. Else, I tend to give them only email. It's amazing how people who can't find the strength to write a 2 line email can write 5000 lines over IM.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by 12 inch pianist (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:54AM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by leonmergen (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:31AM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by Cougem (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:09AM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by quarkscat (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:14PM
    • Re:Greasy Kids Stuff by henleg (Score:1) Wednesday December 01 2004, @04:19AM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • replacement for soviet joke? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Heem (448667) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:21AM (#10950122)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday August 29 2002, @02:04PM)
    In Korea, (current subject) is only used by old people!
  • An yet... by youknowmewell (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:21AM
  • But... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:21AM (#10950127)
    How do they get their v4lub13 P3n!s 3n1arg3men+ notices?
    • Re:But... by daeley (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:27AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • That's just the point by Moraelin (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:39AM
    • Re:But... by Anonymous Custard (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:56AM
    • Re:But... by powermung (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @11:43AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • On slashdot... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ejdmoo (193585) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:22AM (#10950129)
    On slashdot, engadget is for dummies!

    Seriously though, no credit? Come on!
  • How about the Legal Community? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cbelle13013 (812401) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:23AM (#10950135)
    (http://votenewt.net/)
    I wonder how the legal community operates? In this country, you'd be disbarred for sending an SMS to a judge or use AIM to communicate with opposing council (for serious matters). As much as email is used, all the documents we use at our firm are typed up and made official.
    • by Sebadude (680162) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:55AM (#10950305)
      (http://www.workbench-music.com/)
      It would probably be typed up, but it might look something like this

      DEAR AOL KOREA USAR

      IT HAS COMA 2 MAH ATENTION TAHT U HAEV MAED AN UNAUTHORIEZD USE OF MAH COPYRIGHTED WORK IN DA PR3PARATION OF A WORK D3RIEVD THEIR!N WTF LOL I HAEV RESERVAD AL RIGHTS IN TEH WORK FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2003 [AND HAEV REGIST3R3D COPYRIGHT THEIR!N OMG LOL UR WORK IS ASENTIALY IEDNTICAL 2 TEH WORK AND CLEARLY USAD DA WORK AS ITS BASIS.

      AS U N3ITHER ASK3D FOR NOR R3CEIEVD P3RMISION 2 USE TEH WORK AS DA BASIS FOR UR WORK NOR 2 MAEK OR DISTRIBUTE COPEIS INCLUDNG ALECTRONIC COPEIS OF SME I BLEIVE U HAEV WILFULY INFRNGED MAH RIGHTS UND3R 17 USC!!!!11 OMG WTF LOL S3CTION 101 ET SEQ!1!!111! WTF AND CUD B LIABL3 FOR STATU2RY DMAEGS AS HIGH AS $15000 AS SAT FORTH IN S3CTION 504(C)(2) THEIR!N OMG WTF

      I DAMAND TAHT U IM3DIAETLY CEAES DA US3 AND DISTRIBUTION OF AL INFRNGNG WORKS D3RIEVD FROM TEH WORK AND AL COPEIS INCLUDNG ELECTRONIC COPEIS OF SME TAHT U DELIEVR 2 ME IF APLICABLA AL UNUSED UNDISTRIBUTED COPEIS OF SM3 OR DESTROY SUCH COPEIS IMADIAETLY AND TAHT U DESIST FROM THIS OR ANY OTHAR INFRNGEMANT OF MAH RIGHTS IN DA FUTURA1!!1 OMG LOL IF I DO NOT RECEIEV AN AFIRMATIEV R3SPONS3 FROM U INDICATNG TAHT U HAEV FULY COMPLEID WIT THAS3 R3QUIERM3NTS I SHAL TAEK FURTHER ACTION AGANEST U!!!!1!!1 WTF

      URS TRULY, SEBADUDE

      It might be a bit of a challenge to decipher for most of us, but for these highly trained legal experts I'm sure it's nothing.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:How about the Legal Community? by magarity (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:17AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • So what? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mOoZik (698544) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:23AM (#10950136)
    (http://www.henrygaboyan.com/)
    SMS still costs some money, IM isn't as formal, and email is more wide-spread. Doesn't mean anyone has to do what HelloKitty loving teens are doing in a place where technology changes daily.

    • Re:So what? by shmergin (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:53AM
      • Re:So what? by cyborch (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @03:47AM
        • Re:So what? by GuyWithLag (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:18AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:So what? by Spectra72 (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:26AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:So what? by minus_273 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:27AM
      • Re:So what? by koie (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:25PM
    • Re:MOD PARENT DOWN -- BIGOTRY by laughingcoyote (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:21AM
    • Dutch, more likely by Aropax20 (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @05:19AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • if... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by torrents (827493) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:23AM (#10950141)
    (http://www.solidz.com/)
    email is for old people what do they think of those who use the "physical" postal service...
    • Re:if... (Score:5, Funny)

      by kfg (145172) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:28AM (#10950174)
      . . .what do they think of those who use the "physical" postal service...

      What's that, Gramps?

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:if... by kabocox (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:20AM
    • Re:if... by cylcyl (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:03PM
    • Re:if... by Ingolfke (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:31PM
    • Re:if... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Flyboy Connor (741764) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:34AM (#10951456)
      by interpolation, snail mail is for dead people.

      Agreed. But don't discount the undead. Lawyers do everything by snail mail.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:if... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:45AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • e-mail and telegrams by tin foil hat dude (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:23AM
  • Credibility of E-mail? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tyleroar (614054) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:25AM (#10950151)
    (http://www.barkinbarnyardkennels.com/)
    From the article: "Email's efficiency falls in terms of promptness, convenience and credibility," observed Yoo Hyon-ok, president, SK Communications. "With the continuous emergence of new communication means, communication formats will develop further in the future."
    How do IMs, blogs or SMS provide any more credibility than E-Mail?
  • Heh heh (Score:5, Insightful)

    by daeley (126313) * on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:25AM (#10950154)
    (http://www.celsius1414.com/)
    In Korea, Email Is Only For Old People

    Of course, there is the corollary: IM, blogs, and SMS are kiddy tech. ;)
  • Does SMS ensure the message arrives? by ezberry (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:25AM
  • by wrinkledshirt (228541) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:25AM (#10950158)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I love Korea a lot, but it's got some drawbacks, particularly in its journalism and media. The impetus behind this article might have a lot less to do with the actual oncoming death of email and a lot more to do with maintaining a tech-obsessed culture -- much easier to do if you're constantly promoting new toys, which Korea is.

    It'd be like a Hollywood tabloid saying that indipendent film is on the way out.

    The ebb of email is confirmed by a diminishing trend in pageviews, a tabulation of frequency in service used by email users. Daum Communication, the top email business in the country, saw its email service pageviews fall over 20 percent from 3.9 billion in October last year to 3 billion in October this year. By contrast, with SK Telecom, the nation's No. 1 communication firm, monthly SMS transmissions skyrocketed over 40 percent in October from 2.7 billion instances last October. Cyworld, a representative mini-homepage firm, witnessed its pageviews multiply over 26-fold from 650 million instances in October last year to 17 billion in October this year.

    This paragraph, for instance, is as much about corporate branding as it is about giving email stats.
  • Um no... by ReeprFlame (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:26AM
    • Re:Um no... by tekunokurato (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:50AM
  • They must have by RealProgrammer (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:26AM
  • by Indy1 (99447) <spamtrap@fuckedregime.com> on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:26AM (#10950165)
    (http://www.fuckedregime.com/)
    i'm not surprised, korea is one of the worst spam sewers on the net outside the US, and many mail admins just pre-emptively firewall or ACL korean (or all of apnic) net space. Apparently Korean isp's could care less about all the firewalling, ACL's, and blacklists they end up in and their users are just moving on to IM's.
    • by Ilgaz (86384) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:33AM (#10950646)
      (http://www.noooxml.org/petition)
      I can't agree more.

      In fact, first thing I do on a new account, I block .kr domain.

      I am against blocking entire country domains in fact, I generally report spam through Spamcop (taking my time) and review report while sending.

      The problem? They do NOTHING!

      http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=inprogress

      Look at top spam senders, it will explain everything.

      Oh btw if there are Korean-Americans out there as moderators, spare your time teaching postmasters of your native country at least how to enable smtp-auth instead of marking parent post troll.

      Or, if you can give me my your mail address, I can auto forward 100 spam/week, ONLY coming from hananet etc to your mail address.
      [ Parent ]
    • Apostrophe Liberation Army! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:55AM
    • Re:korean spam killing korean smtp traffic by Amata (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @05:14AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • naim by Brainix (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:27AM
  • Here too (Score:5, Insightful)

    It's like that here (in America) too. Most teenagers in America use AIM, IRC, or MSN more than they email. Reasons for this are pretty simple. IMs (and chat rooms) provide instant communication (this is comparable to a phone call, or talking in the halls), whereas an email is like passing a note. The reader has to read and respond seperately.

    And as far as blogs, teens like talking about themselves, so this gives them a place to write about themselves as much as they want. Then anyone who knows how to get to it can read it, so its spread to the masses.

    And SMS. Many teens have cellphones, and aren't at their computer 24/7, so an easy way to communicate is to a device that they carry with them all the time.
    • Re:Here too by theguywhosaid (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:32AM
      • Re:Here too by timftbf (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:27AM
        • Re:Here too by theguywhosaid (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:54AM
    • Re:Here too by Flyboy Connor (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:38AM
    • Re:Here too by Vicsun (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:49AM
    • Re:Here too by Cthefuture (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:59AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Korean e-mail usage spammed to death? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by McDutchie (151611) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:28AM (#10950175)
    (http://www.interlingua.com/)
    Coincidentally, the spam problem in Korea is also worse than just about anywhere else, it's for good reason that much of the world is firewalling the country off. So I wonder how much of the decline in e-mail usage there is due to the spammers.
  • Meaningless Criticism... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by NoTheory (580275) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:28AM (#10950179)
    Most of the reasons they give for email being shunned for other mediums are pretty flimsy.

    I know people who set up their AIM client so that you can't tell whether they're idle, and only respond to messages 10 hours after you've sent them, and i know people who watch their inboxes like obsessive hawks.

    as for email being less "fun" than aim... I don't know, i think my gmail account is pretty cool... and conversational for that matter.

    This debate is pretty silly, after all, all we're talking about is persistant electronic messaging. In terms of user experience, email and a client like ICQ aren't -drastically- different. Presumably email will get faster and friendlier, and hell, at some point probably may as well be the same as an IM system.
  • Wow, email lacks credibility... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Jeff DeMaagd (2015) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:28AM (#10950181)
    (http://www.demaagd.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 27 2002, @06:53PM)
    (like I didn't know that) ...and IM and SMS is supposed to be a more credible alternative?

    The one thing I like about email is that I can get to it when I need to. IM basically requires both parties to be at a computer and logged in at the same time. SMS solves that, I guess, but is it as reliable as email yet?

    I'd try SMS if it weren't so much more expensive than email and if I weren't charged to recieve messages I didn't want. I suppose SMS in Korea is a lot cheaper.
  • It's a shame, really... (Score:5, Funny)

    by YouHaveSnail (202852) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:30AM (#10950190)
    You know, writing decent email is an art form, something we used to take pride in. But these days, with these kids texting ungrammatical half-phrases all over the place, it's becoming something of a lost art. I tell you, kids today can't write a complete sentence, and they barely even know how to use an emoticon properly. :-\ It won't be long before people forget how to type. Oh, the inhumanity!
    • Re:It's a shame, really... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:55AM (#10950304)
      stfu nub th1s is fster f u kan read it then stfu ^-^

      wut r u leik 90!!???!!1111 evry1 i knoe noes wut I say. ^-^; oh shit, moms coming. g2g kay thx bai
      [ Parent ]
    • Writing is not about email by Ray Alloc (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:46AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:It's a shame, really... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by dasunt (249686) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:21AM (#10950622)

      Your post was probably intended to be humorous, but the point is valid.

      As we move from traditional letters to email and finally to instant messaging, it appears that we are taking less time and care in the composition of the messages.

      A carefully written message is more effective at transmitting an idea than a hastily written message. Proper spelling and grammar results in easier reading and a better impression of the author and the value of the message.

      I used to work for someone who would always use cute AOLisms in messages (e.i. "b4", "u", etc). While face-to-face conversations gave most people the impression that he was an intelligent guy, online he appeared to be a lot more ignorant, due to how he wrote.

      As I spend more and more time online writing quick messages, I find that my writing skills are slowly degrading. Hopefully, ten years down the road, the quality of my writing won't have suffered too much. But even now, writing this post, I see sentences that could be phrased better, words that should be replaced, etc.

      [ Parent ]
    • SMS typing speed problem? by zlel (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:58AM
    • Re:It's a shame, really... by DikSeaCup (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @10:22AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Maybe not just Korea (Score:5, Insightful)

    by matth1jd (823437) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:34AM (#10950209)
    My grandparents prefer e-mail. Why? Because they have always enjoyed writing letters. It was the preferred method of correspondance to people who they couldn't otherwise call on the telephone. E-Mail for them is just a "new fangled" way of writing letters.
    If shown Instant Messaging they wouldn't use it as nifty as they think it might be, because it's a paradigm they don't neccesarily buy into.

    I would imagine this would apply to many older people. Hell, I even enjoy the eloquence of well written letter.

    --J
  • Sample group by Novelty Act (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:36AM
  • Hell no (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BrookHarty (9119) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:37AM (#10950227)
    (http://www.ironwolve.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 09 2004, @12:59AM)
    IM clients piss me off, always in your face. They have pop ups, blink in your tool bar, whatever to get your attention. Then to top it off there are 4 major IM's and the good multi-im clients tend to have bugs and not support all the features. There is a good console multi-IM client that works well under screen, but has proxy issues.

    Email works, hell, I'd rather have an IM2mail gateway so I can use a mail client. Mail is passive and you control it, IM wants to control your life. (No this isnt a in Russia joke.)

    I can also sort mail, pop web mail, attachments, etc. Mail is much more powerful. And newer IM devices include email accounts (POP or Ldap) Even ATT Wireless (Er Cingular now) the Ogo.
    • Re:Hell no by wirelessbuzzers (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:49AM
    • Re:Hell no by omicronish (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:54AM
    • Re:Hell no by moeffju (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @03:00AM
    • Re:Hell no by hyfe (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:16AM
    • In Soviet Russia... by Atragon (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:25AM
    • Re:Hell no by iantri (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:00AM
    • Re:Hell no by zx75 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:01AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Hell no by NardofDoom (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:36AM
    • Re:Hell no by Geoffreyerffoeg (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @05:30PM
    • Re:Hell no by anothy (Score:2) Wednesday December 01 2004, @11:28AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Only in Korea? by Geoffreyerffoeg (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:37AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I call BS by Ars-Fartsica (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:38AM
    • Re:I call BS by gl4ss (Score:3) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:47AM
      • Re:I call BS by gl4ss (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @03:49PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Email vs. IM by fossa (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:46AM
  • according to my server logs... by CrackerJack9 (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:47AM
  • How about...both? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by laughingcoyote (762272) <barghesthowl@ e x c i te.com> on Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:54AM (#10950298)
    (Last Journal: Sunday December 03 2006, @11:20PM)

    Each serves their purpose. If I need to speak to someone interactively and immediately, IM is generally a better choice. On the other hand, if I want to send a good bit of information to someone that they're likely going to want to refer back to, or they're not online when I think of something I need to tell them, email is a much better alternative.

    I quite like the way gmail is set up, and that is certainly done well to support a "conversational" format. I don't see why this persistent need in the tech community that one tool is always and for everything better than another. It seems pretty frequent though (Windows vs. Linux vs. *BSD vs. Solaris, email vs. IM, blogs vs. newsgroups, I could go on but I'd fill up the server.)

    Why doesn't anyone acknowledge that, quite like in reality, software is a tool, and one type of tool is generally better at a given job then another? You don't use a hammer to loosen a nut, nor a wrench to drive a nail, and you wouldn't want to be stuck without either when the need arises.

  • Must fight the urge... by manual_overide (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:57AM
  • Same here by MaKS327 (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:57AM
  • Not surprised... by Lord Haha (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:58AM
  • Suburban eastcoast US by Squalish (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:02AM
  • Get the title right! by xswl0931 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:11AM
  • oh I didn't know by sixpacker (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:11AM
  • Should always specify North or South. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by UranusReallyHertz (567776) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:12AM (#10950381)
    Korea is still very much divided into two completely different countrys. South korea is rich, modern, and the most wired country on earth. North Korea is very poor, essentially unchanged in the last 50 years, and the Internet is illegal, along with cell phones. Pyongyang tried an experimental rollout of cell phone service but it was stopped, probbably because the authorities couldn't keep adequate control over it. I've oftened wondered what it would be like if the North actually invaded the South. It would be almost like time travel for the poor Northern soldiers.
  • Well, duh... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Sheepdot (211478) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:12AM (#10950382)
    (Last Journal: Monday May 30 2005, @01:21PM)
    Think about it for a minute.

    Spam typically COMES from Korea. It would make sense then, that Koreans generally do not use email (which, in most Korean's minds is for SPAM only) as a communication means.
  • That explains the spam ! by Ray Alloc (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:15AM
  • telephone is for OLD people... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Vellmont (569020) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:18AM (#10950407)
    What a dumb article. Email is hear to stay in one form or another for very basic reasons that make it different from IM. Each is suited to a different task. Email isn't well suited to saying things like "how did your day go" just like IM chat isn't well suited towards critiquing a paper. Really what this article is about is how email was being used for quick forms of communication where it really was never very well suited.

    Email is a medium best suited to explaining large topics where you need to compose and edit a message. That does tend to be more formal communication. Really it's an inherently different way to communicate because you get to compose a message rather than have a conversation. IM is realtime conversation, whereas email is a form of writing.

    I've had chat capability almost as long as email, probbably started somewhere around 1991. I actually do tend to use email to talk to people that are less tech savy, and IRC or IM to those that are more tech savy, so it's not just a Korean thing. The core reason for the tech-gap is because email caught on much quicker than chat because email doesn't require a constant on connection. With people having broadband connections that're always on more and more it's obvious why IM is becoming a more and more popular a form of communication. Most communication people do is the short "can you do blah" rather than "here's a long winded explanation of blah".
  • $25 for unlimited SMS usage in South Korea by ryuch (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:19AM
  • E-Mail? Bah who needs it! by Agret (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:19AM
  • Each one has it's use by Uukrul (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:23AM
  • In Soviet Russia... by DevNull (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:24AM
  • Email Groups by vinukr (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:24AM
  • What kind of communication are we talking about? by sailracer6 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:25AM
  • I'm not old, just anti-social (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Barlo_Mung_42 (411228) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:25AM (#10950441)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I don't like the immediate interaction of IM for the same reason I don't like phones, cell or otherwise. I don't like people virtually popping in and demanding my attention no matter what I am doing. Most of my calls go to VM and when I tried IM I found that I left it set to 'away' most of the time.
    If you need to get a hold of me, email is the fastest way. I check them every hour or so. I check the VM only 1-2 times a day. If only I could turn off the phone at work as well.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Avoiding work interruptions (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bigberk (547360) <bigberk@users.pc9.org> on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:25AM (#10950442)
    I'm in my early 20s, and have some major difficulties with IM. Some of my contacts are younger and do prefer IM for almost everything, but I get the sense that they are suffering from continual distractions. Some have admitted to me, jokingly, that they are "addicted to MSN". I think this isn't far from the truth.

    An instant conversation is nice to have, but if you have ongoing conversations throughout the day you simply can not focus on your computer work!

    People often think they are smarter than they actually are. I am willing to acknowledge that I don't have the mental capacity to seriously work on more than one thing at a time. I prefer the operation of email, since communications get queued up and will be answered at my convenience. Not only are they queued up (Jabber, ICQ does that too of course) but this is the expected mode of operation, so there is no etiquette problem with delays on the order of days before a reply.

    Another thing is, most of my friends who are non-techies have given up on email because: spam, and junk from friends. Well, neither of these is really a problem: wonderful, free spam filtering systems exist that will reliably get rid of 99% of your spam, and simple self discipline (and being politely firm with your contacts) will prevent your inbox from becoming the destination for circulated crap.

    If I want instant conversations, I pick up the phone or go outside. This is coming from a young guy who is plenty literate with computers! Besides, you can't reliably pick up cues from girls behind a keyboard.
  • USFK & Korean Phones by AndyChrist (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:32AM
  • Email needs as much tech-savvyness if not more by Vulcann (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:36AM
  • 2 Questions by dbc001 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:41AM
    • Re:2 Questions by DeepSpace (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:38AM
  • Ignore Digital Chosun Ilbo by gaemon (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:42AM
  • My mom would be a bad korean. by SetupWeasel (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:42AM
  • Whereas in America... by otis wildflower (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:46AM
  • It would be helpful to point out that everyone, everywhere, at ALL TIMES (no, i am not exagerrating) is within arm's reach of their mobile phone: on the subway, walking, in the car, meetings, in the hwajongshil, everywhere, always. The same does not hold true for what Koreans consider "email", where you sit down at your desk, open up Outlook, type a message, and send it off.

    The other cultural thirk here is that Koreans, especially in Seoul, are very very demanding of instant answers to the slightest issue. As such, there is no taboo for answering your cell phone in the middle of a meeting (by contrast, this is as bad as farting in a meeting in Japan).

    I will say that email is still used for "official" stuff: official sales responses, bids, inquiries, and for formal appointment arranging.
  • In Korea e-mail is only for spammers (Score:4, Informative)

    by mabu (178417) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:51AM (#10950533)
    We've blocked every IP block from Korea at the router level. The level of spam originating from their IP space is simply astronomical. Maybe if their telcos got their act together, more of their citizens who might want to contact people outside the country might be able to do so. Otherwise, I suspect the reason most people don't use e-mail is because it's completely unreliable due to spammers taking over their networks and being RBL'd.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Viagra only $19.95! by Tablizer (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:54AM
  • Korean t3h You... Or something. by Mulletproof (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:03AM
  • SMS now more expensive than pictures by Animats (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:22AM
  • Kind of ironic... by fluxrad (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:25AM
  • I loved the last line of the article which said... by zlel (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:28AM
  • Same in Denmark by jthiesen98 (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:29AM
  • by SunofMan (829776) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:29AM (#10950642)
    Here's my take on the issue:

    In America, e-mail is more widely used because it has a longer history. It's been around since the beginning of the Internet, and e-mail was a much better method of communication during the dial-up era. If you're getting charged by the minute (which is what used to happen on dial-up), you want to download your e-mail, read it offline, compose replies (still offline), then connect to send them so that you're not getting charged for nothing. Even after broadband became more popular (and dial-up cheaper), e-mail remained popular because it was well established.

    In Korea, Internet access exploded onto the scene with broadband access almost from the start. Imagine a situation where barely anybody uses the Internet, and then one day everybody's on a DSL or cable connection. Also imagine that these users have never been exposed to e-mail. Sure, some of them will use e-mail (especially in the academic circle), but most of the users will be drawn to the communications applications that are more interactive, less boring(?), and require more bandwidth. E-mail just has that much less of an established reputation in such a situation.

    Another eason may be cultural. E-mail is time consuming (compared to cell phones or IM), and it is a much more private medium. Koreans are very impatient, and they are also a very community-oriented nation of people. E-mail just doesn't cut it for these types of people, since you never know how long it'll take to get a reply back. Message boards, blogs, IM, and cell phone conversations do, however, satisfy the need for instant communication and community-oriented communication.

    Just my $0.02 (or roughly 20 won)
  • by Mal-2 (675116) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:33AM (#10950647)
    (http://mal-2.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 15 2004, @05:41PM)
    ...they'd better send us this fad [chosun.com] as well.

    Mal-2
  • i'm not old, but i don't care nevertheless by l3v1 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:33AM
  • I'm living in Beijing, China and have a lot of friends from Korea (both North and South)

    What you have to remember is that in this part of the world, not everyone can afford a computer desktop, but even my maid has a mobile phone, with SMS messaging.

    Another important factor is that young people don't always have a personal computer that is private from their parents, while their mobile phone is typically very private. Also, most younger people don't like to hang around the house, they are typically out meeting with friends in some youth oriented location. This is both personal preference and the fact that they want some privacy. So SMS get's really popular because you can always have your mobile phone around.

    There are some political issues. Lots of people are more concerned that the gov't is checking emails servers for what is classified as subversive activity. Not that SMS is more secure, but I think that the gov't hasn't quite caught on to it yet, dispite what happened in the Philopeans a few years ago :)

    Another thing is that SMS and IM are more interactive, and during that time of life you are working a lot to develop your interpersonal skills, so you want to spend a lot of time chatting.

    Why not just call and talk? Well, typically SMS messagin is very cheap compared to talking on the phone. Actually when I first got to Beijing I really annoyed some people when I was calling them, because I was costing them a lot of money.

    You can also type SMS with your hand hidden in a coat pocket or in a purse, which is something that a lot of younger people in class do. You can SMS your friends while sitting in class much more easily than calling them on the mobile.

    When you get older and have your own apartment you don't mind spending so much time there because your parents are not peeking into your bedroom. So you will be more comfortable to use technologies like email with a desktop, that is tied to a single location. I don't worry that my parents will walk in and see me blowing kisses at my girlfriend when we talk online, for example.

    But yeah, this can be a big generation gap. I run a couple of social groups that I use email mailing lists to organize, and several of the younger people in the group are always sending me SMS's because they don't read the emails. So I guess I will look into some sort of SMS to email gateway, since the whole point of having the mailing list is so that I don't spend too much time organizing the projects.

    Anyway, just remember that tech is always evolving and that if you want to keep of the lines of comunication you need to stay on top of it.
  • If they got as much spam as they send out by rabbit994 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @02:59AM
  • in SMS my 2 cents... by viva_fourier (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @03:47AM
  • Sure by Fizzlewhiff (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:09AM
  • Similar in the states too, at least for me by m3djack (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:51AM
  • Other reasons for IM's popularity in Korea by dtmos (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @05:21AM
  • Meanwhile, back in the U.S... by Ross Finlayson (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @05:49AM
  • Impatience by Archibald Buttle (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:09AM
  • The line is blurred... by zecg (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:25AM
  • Breadth vs Depth by theonetruekeebler (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @06:39AM
  • Am I an old fart?? by stesch (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @07:20AM
  • SMS/IM, Email and Blogs by NoMercy (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:17AM
  • Alergic to MSN by hey (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @08:41AM
  • OI, EDITORS! by Hamstij (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:13AM
  • Do not disturb by qray (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:25AM
  • Hardly new.. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by chiller2 (35804) on Tuesday November 30 2004, @09:34AM (#10952307)
    (http://www.kelv.net/)
    This isn't new. Around 1993/94 my school friends and I had CB radios, as phonecalls were charged by the minute in the UK local or not. When uni started in 95 we left our irc clients running. IM came along and I use it all the time.

    The whole time though, for anything I want to pay serious attention to I'll use e-mail or the phone.

    It's just kids wanting instant gratification, same as ever. Nothing has changed; rather they just have more toys to play with. Patience is a virtue.
  • Korean SPAM by Lucky_Pierre (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @10:12AM
  • Old? by wcrowe (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @10:59AM
  • New formats for communication? by Thunderstruck (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @11:06AM
  • When I was a kid... by rf600r (Score:1) Tuesday November 30 2004, @11:25AM
  • SPAM destroys the real use of EMAIL ... by freaker_TuC (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:02PM
  • communication is only for the rich by 0111 1110 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:27PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Korea? Heck I see this everywhere. by Fantastic Lad (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @01:22PM
  • New , Superior technology eclipses both IM, E-mail by mr.workman (Score:1) Wednesday December 01 2004, @04:55AM
  • Re:Either that by RyuuzakiTetsuya (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:24AM
  • Re:IN KOREA by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:26AM
  • Re:In Korea by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @12:50AM
  • Only In America by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday November 30 2004, @04:46AM
  • 26 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2