Slashdot Log In
Ceefax Turns 30
Posted by
michael
on Thu Sep 23, 2004 08:37 AM
from the over-the-hill dept.
from the over-the-hill dept.
VirtualUK writes "Ceefax, the text information service from the BBC turns 30 today (just 3 days after myself)!! For those not lucky enough to have seen what Ceefax is about, it is text information pages sent in out-of-band data space of TV transmissions in Great Britain. What started off as a subtitling project evolved into a service still used by over 20 million viewers a week even in the face of the Internet revolution. It just goes to show that for a lot of people, the best source of sport results, last minute holiday bargains and horoscopes is still just a click away on their TV remote."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Ceefax Turns 30
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 375 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Information non-overload (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Friday April 27 2007, @02:20PM)
One of the reasons Ceefax/Oracle was so popular was that it gave "just the facts, ma'am". It had to display on a 40x23 (ish) screen to work on the TV's of the time, and most pages used ZX81-style graphics (huge "pixels"
Curiously, this reduced content actually worked in its' favour - about all that could be put on a single page was the raw information, without political or other bias; there just wasn't the space for opinion. Even when they used linked pages (page displays, waits 30 secs, new page displays, repeat and loop) the real-estate was severely limited since each page had to stand alone.
I clearly remember preferring the minimalist information from Ceefax over the long-form in a newspaper. If I wanted more about a story, I could listen to the news or buy a paper, but to get an overview it was ideal. A good example of 'less is more'. It helps that the Beeb has good journalists who can succinctly tell a story, of course...
Simon (on-topic, for once
Re:Information non-overload (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Micro [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext [wikipedia.org]
Re:Information non-overload (Score:5, Interesting)
It always amazed me to see how much they could do with those glyph blocks [freeserve.co.uk]. Maps of the UK, Europe, the world for weather, traffic and airport news, even Snoopy. Undoubtably,ASCII art at it's finest. And they could manage to compress entire news stories into 400 characters or less, while still maintaining the reading level.
Re:Information non-overload (Score:5, Informative)
(http://vollerama.com/)
OK I'll bite.
It is true that we have to pay the Televison Licence every year and it's about £110-£120 (I have not checked). But look at all we get!
7 national, commercial free radio stations giving high quality music, spoken word, and live event output (like One Big Sunday if that's your bag or BBC Proms); 6 or so digital national commercial free TV channels with some pretty good original programming (and not so good too); loads of regional TV and Radio of similar quality; BBC Online [bbc.co.uk]; and, er, we gave the Yanks The Office, didn't we?
Sorry, I'm getting a lump in my throat here... Let me just step outside.
Re:Information non-overload (Score:4, Insightful)
I wasn't aware that the TV license was more than just a "license to watch tv". That fact that you get what you do (ad free) makes it seem like a rather good deal. *jealous*
Re:Information non-overload (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.karmadillo.org/)
How your licence is spent
Each household's colour TV licence cost £9.67 every month in 2003/2004. On average each month, this was how the BBC spent your money:
Average monthly licence fee spend
BBC One £3.37
BBC Two £1.45
Digital television channels £0.98
Transmission and collection costs £0.98
BBC Radio 1, 2, 3, 4 and Five Live £0.99
Digital radio stations £0.08
Nations & English Regions television £0.90
Local radio £0.61
bbc.co.uk £0.31
Re:teletext (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 06 2005, @12:39PM)
All four terrestrial analogue broadcasters have teletext services and the hundreds of terrestrial/cable/satellite broadcasters have similar digital services too.
One interesting factoid about teletext is that, at one stage, over half the holidays in Britain were bought via teletext (ads on teletext, response by phone). Obviously, with the development of the Internet that's changed, but the teletext holiday market is still pretty big.
Re:teletext (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 06 2005, @12:39PM)
Don't like to be picky either (well, sometimes I do), but BBC1 and BBC2 are both BBC channels. That's one terrestrial broadcaster providing two channels. So the four terrestrial analogue broadcasters are the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and five.
Re:teletext (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.intelligentblogger.com/ | Last Journal: Monday August 27, @11:47AM)
Personally, I find this story very interesting. I had heard about teletext from one of those old Usborne books as a kid, but I'd never actually SEEN it. I'd always assumed that it was one of those little known services that really didn't go anywhere. It seems I was wrong.
Re:teletext (Score:4, Informative)
To confuse things the company who have the rights to broadcast teletext on ITV, Channel 4 and Five (the rights were sold separately from the rights for general TV broadcasting on the frequencies) are now held by a company called Teletext Ltd, or just Teletext for short.
Pretty cool stuff (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.intelligentblogger.com/ | Last Journal: Monday August 27, @11:47AM)
Of course, the proliferation of U.S. BBSes started in the mid to late 80's and gained momentum right up until the Internet became popular in the mid-90's. Which makes me wonder. Is there a telnet machine somewhere where we can access the CeeFax info? It would be interesting to see what they're pushing over the airwaves.
Ah memories. Sometimes I wonder if the tech of the 80's wasn't cooler than the tech we have today. Sure, we have Gooey interfaces and full color graphics, but what's that compared to the thrill of interfacing systems over a modem, cursing at natural language interfaces, designing BBS screens in TheDraw, and wowing at the amount of info that's (unknown to the general populace) being pushed over massive research networks and dial-up nodes? (3 days for an email? That's speedy, man!) Or maybe I'm just nostalgic.
Re:Pretty cool stuff (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://205.205.253.95/Crackster | Last Journal: Wednesday September 22 2004, @09:57PM)
You see, public entreprises (that belong to the State) aren't always bad... Public service is exactly what it says: service for the public, and not a sinister plot by the Government to enslave the population, as you yankees seem to be happy to believe so easily...
And where is Compu$erve, nowadays????Re:Pretty cool stuff (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Pretty cool stuff (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://205.205.253.95/Crackster | Last Journal: Wednesday September 22 2004, @09:57PM)
Information (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.bannination.com/)
Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.eruvia.org/)
And yes, I'm in an NTL area that can't get it. And yes, I'm terribly annoyed - I used to use the subtitling quite often, even though I'm not deaf. Just wanted the volume off to listen to music, for instance, or needed to be quiet for some other reason.
NTL [ntl.com], please sort out the broadcasting of teletext as you claimed you weere going to do more than three years ago.
Cheers,
Ian
Ceefax is cool but dated.... (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.fluid-it.com/)
Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday November 28 2003, @02:48AM)
DecimalHexi (Score:4, Interesting)
The "public" pages only use hex numbers that consist only of numeric characters, but I once had a TV that allowed you to enter the hex numbers aswell, and you could find all sorts of cool stuff, including some kind of system to automatically set video-recorders etc.
Alevt (Score:5, Informative)
It runs all the time on one of my desktops - IMHO it is the very best source of concise, up-to-date information.
Here are some dumps of the current BBC front pages, courtesy of alevtd and w3m (some stuff snipped to avoid slashdot "junk" lameness filter).
TeleTekst here in the Netherlands (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.flylikebrick.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday December 25 2004, @04:36AM)
http://teletekst.nos.nl/ [teletekst.nos.nl]
So you basically see all the area in black on your TV screen... use your remote to search for the pages.
I guess they have this service on the web because a lot of people, like another poster said, like the sparse/terse way of information presentation. I frequently visit the weather (page 702) and news page (page 101) for a quick overview. Very useful.
Also used for TV program listings and stuff like that (page 201 usually).
Digitiser (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.lynn3686.freeserve.co.uk/digitiser.htm
http://www.mrbiffo.com/biffodigitiser.htm [mrbiffo.com]
'The Man' and his column and all that 'press reveal' only to uncover a weird swan or something with flashing red eyes.
I always wondered who was paying the wages of those crazy guys
Pictures of CEEFAX pages (Score:3, Interesting)
I still use Ceefax a lot, especially as a news source and for sports scores.
Re:Article error (Score:4, Funny)
(http://nymphs.org/)
You must be new here.
And long may it continue (Score:3, Informative)
(http://www.wibble.co.uk/ | Last Journal: Monday August 22 2005, @04:07PM)
One of the things I really miss about TV since moving to the USA is the various Teletext services. I've never understood why this system didn't catch on outside of Europe (maybe there's a technical reason, I dunno).
Long before I had internet, I could spend literally hours reading Teletext pages and playing the really basic, but still entertaining games (remember Bamboozle?). We even had a Teletext reader on the old BBC Micros at my school, about 10 years before they got the JANET linkup
The closest the US has is the information pages that DirecTV and some cable providers have. However, they're nowhere near as comprehensive.
Great for TV listings (Score:3, Informative)
Teletext to HTTP gateways? (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/~wowbagger/journal/87552 | Last Journal: Monday September 03, @08:07PM)
Skinternet (Score:3, Informative)
I've spent many a happy hour browsing Ceefax, and this website [mb21.co.uk] about how it all fits together. As a youth it takes a lot of effort to work out how Ceefax sends the page you ask for, but there's no two-way communication -- Page Frame Relay comes to the rescue.
Bit of trivia -- Ceefax is ocasionally known as in the UK as the Skinternet because of the relative cheapness of getting on to Ceefax as opposed to the internet.
[ Skint + Internet ]
Good human interface design (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.deryk.co.uk/)
It's consistent - okay, sometimes consistently blocky with consistantly slow waits for the carousel, but it's just darn consistent dammit! Same "fonts", same styles, Page 100 is always the start, it always has the same features (hold/reveal/mix etc) from one TV to the next etc.
The information you're most likely to want is shown immediately on page 100.
For novice users there are helpful indexes and usually coloured hotkeys that take you to well chosen related pages.
For more advanced users you can enter a page number directly and get to the information you want quicker.
It's highly accessible - huge, clear text on a plain black background that practically anyone can read even if they're hard of sight etc.
With such a low resolution you only get the information you want and can easily assimilate at one time instead of a huge screenful of ads and other garbage to wade through.
It's fairly quick (as long as you aren't after page 101 when the carousel has just gone past 102)
It's remarkably easy to use. My granny uses it.
Now, is it me or did the BBC do their theory research wonderfully (as they always seem to do, who says the license is a waste of money when so many slashdot articles originate from them) and have followed HCI principles really rather nicely. This is what happens when you develop a system properly - 30 years later, people are still using it and still love it!