Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Businesses Google Media

Amazon's A9: How Well Is the Hype Justified? 217

Posted by timothy from the battelle-ground dept.
An anonymous reader submits "Amazon have put up a new version of their A9 search engine. The "Beta" label was dropped, the color scheme changed, and new search types were added: Images (provided by Google), Movies (provided by IMDB), and Reference (provided by GuruNet). Several sources are already reporting this." Theopd writes with a more critical view of the hype surrounding A9's launch (note the link to battellemedia); read on below.

theodp writes "As Amazon's search service A9.com officially goes live today after being in beta for months, it's receiving rave reviews. A Business 2.0 story penned by John Battelle says A9 has raised the bar for innovation in search. Paying heed to John Battelle's statement that Google and everyone else involved in search are going to be watching A9, BusinessWeek asks: Can Amazon Go Beyond Google? And the NY Times reports that A9 is insanely powerful (story linked above), relying on a quote from - you guessed it - John Battelle. The NYT notes that Battelle is the organizer of the upcoming Web 2.0 conference, but doesn't mention that his conference's keynoters include A9 CEO Udi Manber, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Amazon Board Member John Doerr, Amazon's Wall Street Cheerleader Mary Meeker, and Amazon subsidiary Alexa's Brewster Kahle."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon's A9: How Well Is the Hype Justified? More

Amazon's A9: How Well Is the Hype Justified?

Comments Filter:

  • It's very slick. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:17AM (#10255435)
    I like it. I did a quick search for "Red Mage", found the forums I was looking for, and got some cool pictures to go along with it on the sidebars. Plus the advertisements are not intrusive at all!

    • Really FUCKING slick (Score:4, Insightful)

      by danila ( 69889 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @03:33PM (#10259190) Homepage
      Yeah, it sure is slick, at 92 kilobytes... In comparision, Google main page is only 9 kilobytes, of which 8 kilobytes is the logo. Result pages are upwards from 100 kilobytes. This includes bloated table-based design, some ugly javascript hacks of undeterminable usefulness, sign in for a search engine instead of anonymous cookies and a fucking diary!

      While A9 may not win any bloat contests among search engines, calling it "slick" is a bit of a misnomer.

      When I am in the mood for some indie searching, I'd rather use Vivisimo [vivisimo.com], Teoma [teoma.com] or All the Web [alltheweb.com].

      P.S. A9 may be great and all, but at 100KB per page I am not using it.
      • $time wget http://a9.com/?nocookie=2
        edited for lameness
        real 0.263 user 0.006 sys 0.008 pcpu 5.32

        $time wget http://google.com/
        edited for more lameness
        real 0.290 user 0.008 sys 0.004 pcpu 4.14

        Whats your point? Can you not wait the 0.03 seconds?

        Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
        Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.
        random gnaa chat to avoid filter still.. wow thats sensitive.
        rolloffle. ctrl-w pwns me again
        Jesusbird. Oh shit, nearly sundown
        Jesusbird. So Jews, what are your New Year's Resolution
    • What puts me off it is that it's named after the most dangerous road in the UK...
  • I'm still the first hit result for my name, so it's cool by me ;)

  • The search results (Score:5, Informative)

    by Jugalator ( 259273 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:20AM (#10255459) Journal
    I see the article missed a bit

    Images (provided by Google), Movies (provided by IMDB), and Reference (provided by GuruNet).

    ... and web search results (provided by Google, with Amazon products added among them where an algorithm find them to fit).

    Google also gets 50% of the revenue A9 makes from its text ads.

    • So, its little more than an interface to Google. That's okay, I guess. It's quite a neat interface in its way, with the buttons for different categories of search.

    • Re:The search results (Score:3, Interesting)

      by LetterJ ( 3524 )
      Definitely powered on several levels by Google. I was surprised (probably shouldn't have been) to see several of *my* Google ads running as ads on A9.

  • Subject (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    What? Where's the "Google Killer" headline? I thought that's what every tech news sotry was about these days, "killing" something else.

  • Not hit hard... yet..... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Puls4r ( 724907 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:20AM (#10255461)
    A9 has a lot yet to prove. It isn't "wide spread" so the optimizers haven't pounded it yet and figured out how to slew the results. It's not being widely used, so we can't particularly tell how the load balancing is set up, or how "quick" the searches will be. Finally, while most search engines started out anti-advertising, it only took a while for them to develop a following and then implement advertising to improve their profit outlook.

    We'll see.

  • Radical Leap? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by webword ( 82711 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:21AM (#10255468) Homepage
    The main issue with A9.com is that it is not a radical leap forward. It will certainly enjoy the halo of recent media exposure, and it will always enjoy traffic as a result of being affiliated with Amazon.

    However.

    It is NOT something that is going to drive people to switch. It is some sort of confused search portal. It is another swipe at Yahoo, Excite or altavista. It is another way to search.

    The results, and the display of the results, do not offer anything truly innovative. That is, innovative enough for people to say "wow!" and switch.

    Thought experiment: Are you going to personally recommend A9 to people you know? I know that I told people about Google years ago. "It's better" is what I said. But it wasn't just better, it was radically better to the point where I would convince people to use it and switch.

    A9.com fails the radical leap test. In the dog-eat-dog world of search engines, "better" doesn't cut it. It needs to be radically better...

    • Re:Radical Leap? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by aminorex ( 141494 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:43AM (#10255637) Homepage Journal
      You're absolutely right about A9. What is much
      better than Google, however, is Vivisimo. The
      search results are topically organized via
      clustering, making them easier to navigate by
      orders of magnitude.

      • Re:Radical Leap? (Score:3, Informative)

        by aminorex ( 141494 )
        Hey space ghost, you forgot to include a big, honking, link to Vivisimo [vivisimo.com]! Do you think anyone could *spell* "Vivisimo" in this hemisphere? Sheesh!

      • vivisimo -- not convinced (Score:5, Informative)

        by mattdm ( 1931 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:36AM (#10256075) Homepage
        What is much
        better than Google, however, is Vivisimo. The
        search results are topically organized via
        clustering, making them easier to navigate by
        orders of magnitude.

        I'm not convinced -- it doesn't seem to work well with anything I search for. It simply produces a list of vaguely relevant and vaguely irrelevant groups on the side. The only time I can see this being useful is when you search for words which are actually homonyms (or homographs, at least) -- but that's not actually incredibly common, and can be resolved easily by adding a second term to clarify.

      • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

        by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:58AM (#10256264)
        Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • If you've got a Mac, try running theConcept [mesadynamics.com] -- it does clustering via keyword extraction and does auto-citations via search engine data mining on the client side (as opposed to a web-based solution like Vivisimo).

        Disclaimer: Yes, I'm the developer.
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion

    • Re:Radical Leap? (Score:3, Interesting)

      by dasmegabyte ( 267018 )
      I dunno. I think the interface is clean, and I like that the graphics are down the side. Most of the time when I search google, I wind up switching to images.google to see what's up as well. Sometimes I hit up froogle to check prices on things I'm looking for.

      Combining three searches in one easy-to-view interface is the same sort of revolution Google made over AltaVista.

  • More info here.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Chuck Bucket ( 142633 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:21AM (#10255472) Homepage Journal
    What is Amazon trying to achieve with A9.com? [yeald.com] The thing I don't like is that all companies are trying to be all things. Apple is a software/hardware/online music store company, HP sells iPods, MS (and everyone else) is hocking an online music store while the orginal ideals are lost.

    Can't someone just get good at something and then improve on that? Look at what happened to Google.

    CB#

    • Re:More info here.... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by SvendTofte ( 686053 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:39AM (#10255603)
      Yeah look. They're a great company, with one assert, search. It's obviously clear how they're scrambling to counter the threat from Microsoft, or lest they be snubbed out.

      They're expanding out to community building. This is clear from the unified login you can share between Google groups, and Gmail. Aren't they also doing some friendster like thing? Orkut? They've reached into the OS, via the toolbar, but if it stops there, you can rest assured, Google will be no more in ten years.

      The keyword ... is synergy and convergence ...!

      • With Google Groups 2 [google.com], Gmail [gmail.com], and Orkut [orkut.com], Google has proven that they have three distinguishing characteristics in any new marketplace.

        1. People who know JavaScript well.
        2. Server errors.
        3. A legion of fans who brush away the server errors by saying "It's BETA! What do you expect?!"

        A year from now, when My Google and Google Messenger launch, Google will be nothing other than a less graphical, more geeky version of Yahoo!. The Slashdot crowd will tire of the new sell-out "evil" Google and move on to another se

  • Um... scary? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by theluckyleper ( 758120 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:22AM (#10255479) Homepage
    A9.com personalizes your search experience by remembering your searches

    Could it possibly do this with cookies? What if you search a lot?

    • More likely it tags you with a unique ID and then maps that unique ID on to your searches on the server. I imagine after a while they start dropping entries out of the logs and killing entries for people they've not seen for a while to avoid storing redundant data for people who switched web browsers, got a new PC or whatever.

    • Privacy policy (Score:5, Interesting)

      by theluckyleper ( 758120 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:30AM (#10255533) Homepage
      Hm... the privacy policy says they won't share user data with 3rd parties, but they do store it, and will share it with subsidiaries like Amazon.com.

      On generic.A9.com, we will not recognize your Amazon.com cookie

      So, on regular A9.com they will recognize your Amazon.com cookie? Nice! So now they can link your purchase history and your search history.

      Hm, I don't really know why this is bothering me so much. It's early, and my tinfoil hat kept poking me in the head as I slept last night, I think.

  • But A9 doesn't have such a nice ring to it... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Lank ( 19922 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:23AM (#10255485)
    When I hunt for something on the web, I usually refer to the search as Googling - I almost always use Google to find whatever information I'm looking for. A9 doesn't really work as well. For example:
    Before
    Other student: Hey, cool page - where'd you find it?
    Me: I Googled for it.
    After
    Other student: Hey, cool page - where'd you find it?
    Me: I A9'd for it.

    Yeah, definitely feels wrong...

  • Uphill battle (Score:3, Insightful)

    by keiferb ( 267153 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:23AM (#10255488) Homepage
    It's going to be tough for anyone to take away Google's share of the search engine market. With all of the neat little side-projects they have going, their fans tend to be quite rabid when it comes to their search engine preference.

    Is Google vs. A9 the next vi vs. emacs?

    • Re:Uphill battle (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Is Google vs. A9 the next vi vs. emacs?

      I would never kill a man for using A9.

    • Re:Uphill battle (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Chess_the_cat ( 653159 )
      It's going to be tough for anyone to take away Google's share of the search engine market.

      Tough but not impossible. Remember when you thought the same about Altavista? Yahoo!? Hotbot? Webcrawler? etc. etc. Do you seriously think that Google is the last word in search engines? I'm not saying that A9 is The One but I've been on the web long enough to know that Google will be replaced one day. As it stands now, it'll most likely be Microsoft's offering.


    • Hmmm... maybe, but A9 has not yet been shown to actually blow goats.

    • It's going to be tough for anyone to take away Google's share of the search engine market.

      Yeah, especially when they use Google for the backend and give part of the ad money to Google (according to summary and other posts; I didn't RTFA).
    • No, because Google, like Vi, is clearly superior. :)

  • Here's My First A9 Search... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Chaotic Evil Cleric ( 622653 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:25AM (#10255503) Journal
    I just hopped over and searched for Resident Evil 2 [a9.com], and lo and behold, I got anime porn pictures down the right side!

    Yes, Google has just been erased from my memorybanks thanks to this killer feature.

  • "the color scheme changed" (Score:5, Informative)

    by tod_miller ( 792541 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:27AM (#10255513) Journal
    *shudders*

    I hope someone got shot for that first colour scheme. It was like someone had opened up the back of my monitor and vomitted profusely into the electrode guns, and then unrinated on my retina.

    quite beautiful, and grabs amazon stuff as well as google but:

    it is more useful as a replacement for amazon search than google search

    I would use this instead of amazon search, I can find the amazon product, and cross compare with third party sources.

    I wonder if froogle results will come up for book searches :-) :-)

    search test

    I like thier url format, a search for orwell [a9.com] gives a url http://a9.com/orwell, and the results are nice, with web and images turn on by default.

    Actually this feature alone makes it nice, web results and image results side by side...

    Turning on more of the features makes it busy, and the history feature for your searches is a quirky idea.

    For amazon searches 9/10 (because you are not in amazon)

    For google + images 10/10 because it adds to the experience.

    So I say it is useful.

  • Results open in new windows - yuck! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Random BedHead Ed ( 602081 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:33AM (#10255554) Homepage Journal

    Looks like Amazon stuck a tarket="blank" attribute in each of their search result links to conveniently open up new a window when you click on a result. This will be great for idiots who would otherwise be confused by the extremely complicated "click-on-a-link-and-go-elsewhere" concept.

    For people who have used the this new-fangled World Wide Web device before this morning, it is a pain in the butt.

    As a control freak my personal take is this: Abandon Search Engine. I'll stick with Google until Amazon realizes that if I want a new window I'll open it from a context menu myself (better yet, I'll open a new tab). I like to control my browser window, thank you very much.

  • nice and clean (Score:2, Interesting)

    by PerlDudeXL ( 456021 )
    I never heard about a9.com before I found the /. story. I tried it and it has a clean interface
    and the results are displayed in a non-bloated
    layout. Its good that someone tries to integrate
    Google and other Search engines into a single
    interface. It has been tried before, but this looks
    different. I think I'll continue to use it.

  • Mozilla Firefox plug in for A9.com (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:34AM (#10255563)
    For those smart slashdotters who have made the switch to Firefox, you can get integreted firefox search for a9.com [mozdev.org]

    Search for a9, then add it to your list of search engines!

    And if your still unfortunate enough to use IE, download Firefox now! [spreadfirefox.com]
    • Why not just set it up as a Quick Search bookmark? Map it to keyword "a" or something, then just type "a mysearchterm" in the URL bar. YMMV, but I love this UI and find it far more usable than the "official" search UI, which is ludicrously small, clunky if you want to change engine and doesn't get the focus when you open a new tab.

  • GAHHH (Score:4, Interesting)

    by theridersofrohan ( 241712 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:34AM (#10255567) Homepage
    Search for "hello" in the a9.com engine (click here if you are lazy) [a9.com] and check out one particular picture in the first column on the right of the page.


    Note it's definitely NOT safe for work. Gahhhhh

    • Re:GAHHH (Score:2, Funny)

      by MikeDX ( 560598 )
      There must be a preference setting somewhere that says "show me the porn and sick stuff" because so far the two links (resident evil and hello) havent showed me either anime porn or our great goat leader....
      • There must be a preference setting somewhere that says "show me the porn and sick stuff" because so far the two links (resident evil and hello) havent showed me either anime porn or our great goat leader....


        As the images are provided by images.google.com, it could be that I've turned off the "adult" filter on images.google.com (which I have) and you haven't ;-)

    • Wow, it's been a while since somebody got mod'ed +5 for a goatse link. Congrats.

      (Didn't click on it, but I know the goatse guy's picture was hello.jpg.)
    • How about "string" [a9.com]? Programming strings, yarn, etc.? Nope, g-strings and thongs. It's funny that the text links on the left have nothing to do with the photos on the right.

  • Just tried it out and, not liking to be limited by someone elses ideas of what constitues a "safe" result, I turned off Safe Search. Of course, in regular google, this would not pose a problem... you simply don't click on the links you don't believe are particularly savoury.

    However, in a9, by default it shows images related to the search. I searched for the term hello [a9.com]. What do you thing I saw? A nice (gaping) thumbnail of goatse.cx.

    Everytime I see that pit of despair, I swear that is the last fucking

  • Amazon's site search (Score:5, Interesting)

    by malarkey ( 514857 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:45AM (#10255650)
    I would prefer Amazon to work on the search of their own site before moving to the web. If you could filter results like ebay does, things would be so much easier to find.

    Also, the search in amazon.com doesn't bring up most likely results. If I search for the name of a song, I get all cd's with songs with those words in it alphabetically. Searching under "song title" for unforgettable gets me 662 results, starting with "The Unforgettable Year 1919', Op. 89: The Assault On Beautiful Gorky"

  • The page linked to from Web 2.0 does not say that he works for Amazon.

    Here is a page by him [manber.com] that says so.

  • A9 is slow. If your search engine can be slashdotted, it isn't ready for prime time. Better put the beta label back on.

  • Bah! Why bother? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by mankey wanker ( 673345 )
    Nothing I can't get via Google or Dogpile or any number of other search engines. Google is still champ for the clean interface with simple tabbed options.

    And I really hate the Amazon tie-in with the cookie tracking my name, search history and etc. That's too creepy for ordinary searching. The last thing I need to know at a later time is some of the weird meaningless shit I sometimes look up on the web. If I need to know where I've been I have my own browser history I can look back through.

    • And I really hate the Amazon tie-in with the cookie tracking my name, search history and etc.

      Google is also tracking users with a cookie. They just don't tie that cookie to a real id.

  • Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @09:59AM (#10255772)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  • ahem google competitor? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by linuxislandsucks ( 461335 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:01AM (#10255792) Homepage Journal
    Come on folks read the freakign fine print..

    Google is an investor in a9..

    and even google results are supplied to a9 by license with google..

    boy did Business week goof up huh?

  • I've searched through the *for profit* GuruNet service, and I'm not really that impressed. As a long time user of Wikipedia, I have all the information there at my finger tips. Try a few searches on GuruNet and then do an equivalent on Wikipedia...I have yet to find a topic where Wikipedia doesn't blow GuruNet's information out of the water.

    It's a shame companies like Amazon don't embrace open, community supported services like Wikipedia for tools like A9. I would be much more likely to use A9 if they di

  • Not really search...technically marketed wrong (Score:5, Insightful)

    by myrashka ( 452794 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:45AM (#10256144)

    Clearly, a9.com [a9.com] isn't a new search engine - there's absolutely no improvement to the actual search algorithm - or so it seems (especially since it leeches off the search results of other engines). Perhaps the search of a new source of data (your history of searches) is novel - but even then, probably only marginally.

    Where I do see the possible value in the site is the "new features" (and I'll use the term "new" very loosely) for managing information - the information in this case being search results/bookmarks - and recording/managing trains of thought. Sorta like a lab book for a research scientist, here's a tool that allows you to perform the searches you search every day through say Google, but also record the sites you've visted during your searches, perhaps write a small entry about why you visited there and the relative value to the item you were searching for, and then to retrieve those thoughts later when you perform a related search (and perhaps find you had a related search you had forgotten about).

    As many have pointed out, this concept isn't necessarily new and I'm not sure that A9's method is the right approach (too early to really tell...). Examples of more likely competitors would be: Onfolio [onfolio.com] (albeit, not directly in search - but similar enough in terms of "managing internet research"); Endeca [endeca.com] - they call their concept "guided search" - part of which is the ability to search in the context of past searches; or even iKeepBookmarks.com [ikeepbookmarks.com] (never used it, just googled for something similar;) which allows you to manage your bookmarks centrally online. Amazon's "unique" approach here is to do the management with search results, but all the same, it's just an info management tool.

    So, given that Amazon has one of the largest databases of consumer information (both individual and aggregate trends, habits, etc) and they've never really ruled out being a company who will use that info to their advantage, I'm a bit concerned about A9's storage of my trains of thought and searches...and since they plainly say in their privacy agreement that "customer information will of course be one of the transferred assets" [a9.com] in the unlikley (their words) event that they sell the company. Ok, so Amazon sells the company to a marketing company who then uses the info to innudate you with advertisements in multiple forms (there doesn't seem to be anything limiting them from sending you email or contacting you via other means if you provide them with the info).

    Taking away any problems with a big company warehousing your data (and personal trains of thought), the idea is intriguing - but I don't need yet another tool for managing my information in a narrow niche way (I already have too many of those). If it integrated with a tool I already use for managing info I gather (say, like my private database of links - or my file system even) - then it might be cool. Otherwise, I save my links (and my lab books) pretty effectively already - and without the targeted advertising.

    My 2 cents.

  • INFORMATION COLLECTED AND STORED (Score:5, Informative)

    by helraiz ( 566464 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:48AM (#10256164)
    Here's a part of the agreement for the toolbar and it is possible that information is collected even if you are not using it. Me being an amazon.com customer, I see my full name printed at the rcorner when I went to A9.com for the first time. People blasted DoubleClick once for profiling people's online habbits and merging it with personal identifiable information. This is what Amazon is doing right now. Personally I don't care if they use this information to target "relevant" ads, but there's always a chance of it being missused.

    INFORMATION COLLECTED AND STORED BY A9.COM'S TOOLBAR SERVICE

    A9.COM'S TOOLBAR SERVICE COLLECTS AND STORES FULL UNIFORM RESOURCE LOCATORS ("URLS") FOR EVERY WEB PAGE THAT YOU VIEW WHILE USING THE A9.COM TOOLBAR SERVICE. THESE URLS SOMETIMES INCLUDE PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION. URLS FROM SECURE (HTTPS) WEB PAGES ARE NOT COLLECTED. BY COLLECTING URLS, A9.COM TRACKS AND COLLECTS A RECORD OF USERS' WEB BROWSING ACTIVITY WITHIN AND ACROSS WEBSITES. A9.COM ALSO COLLECTS AND STORES OTHER USER INFORMATION YOU GIVE A9.COM WHEN YOU DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL THE SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION YOU ENTER INTO THE TOOLBAR SERVICE. BECAUSE A9.COM IS A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF AMAZON.COM, INC., A9.COM IS ABLE TO CORRELATE INFORMATION IT COLLECTS WITH PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION THAT AMAZON.COM HAS, AND AMAZON.COM HAS ACCESS TO INFORMATION COLLECTED BY A9.COM. AMONG OTHER THINGS, A9.COM AND AMAZON.COM USE THIS INFORMATION TO CUSTOMIZE, PERSONALIZE, AND OTHERWISE IMPROVE THE SERVICES THEY PROVIDE TO YOU.

  • Alexa search results = Niiice! (Score:5, Funny)

    by JAgostoni ( 685117 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @10:48AM (#10256165) Homepage Journal
    So I decided to search for "Alexa" since the web search results were "enhanced" by Google and Alexa. Along side the search results were the image results. A naked "Alexa" appears as the first results.

    This is a damn good search engine for that reason only (ha). Good thing I was at work, though...

    • So I decided to search for "Alexa" since the web search results were "enhanced" by Google and Alexa. Along side the search results were the image results. A naked "Alexa" appears as the first results.

      Of course, I tried this, um for research purposes only.

      This is the freakin' default! Aggh! (I was at work too ...).

  • I always like to see new innovations in the search market.

    A new beta engine funded by Mark Cuban called IceRocket is extremely promising to me. They have some neat ideas, like showing an image preview of the search reuslt, and the ability to load the first X bytes of the page in an IFRAME to see if it is really what you want before you havigate away.

    They also have a cool "people-search" feature that searches all the hot-Or-Not type sites.

    It is also extremely fast - though that is likely because no one u

  • Minor UI gripe (Score:5, Interesting)

    by .com b4 .storm ( 581701 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @11:14AM (#10256418)
    A9 hijacks the functionality of clicking and dragging a link - it does this in such a way that the link can't be dragged out of the window. So, I can't drag links from the search results and drop them into a specific bookmarks folder, or someplace on my desktop, or onto the tab bar of a browsing window.

  • What fun, but (Score:3, Interesting)

    by s-meister ( 580465 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @11:19AM (#10256484) Journal
    When I try to use the A9 engine I get warned by some "Finjan Vital Security" software I never knew we had at work, that the site is blocked.

    Access to http://a9.com/test was blocked.

    Forbidden virus (Trojan horse) 'JS/Exploit-DDay' was detected.

    Amusing this, because the info I finally found about this DDay is that it only affects IE, and I was using Firebird...I would upgrade to Firefox but every time I've tried to do so it fails to authenticate through our firewall so I stick to what works.

  • found in consecutive digits of e.com...

    A9 is hiring.

    check the jobs page [a9.com] if you're looking for employment.

    They're looking for
    * Software Development Engineers
    * Client Software Engineers
    * Operational Excellence Engineers
    * Systems Engineers
    * Quality Assurance Engineers
    * Help Desk Support Engineer

    You can apply here [a9.com]

    see you in the interviews,
  • How'd they get a 2 char domain name? They must have registered A9.com years ago.

  • By God, It Works! (Score:3, Funny)

    by Mixel ( 723232 ) on Wednesday September 15, 2004 @12:36PM (#10257350) Homepage
    Check out the first image result for Microsoft [a9.com]! Seriously though, I am pleasantly surprised at how good the search engine is performing.
  • First of all I note that most of the people posting here don't seem to have bothered to read the description on A9. This isn't a competitor to google, they are liscensing the google search for the web. It is just a front end slapped on top of google.

    On the other hand the book search is incredibly convienient. Especially when looking for serious references (math or philosophy) the book search being right there on a tab is pretty nifty.

    However, the interface is just plain ugly. Faded blue?? Maybe I can
  • What impresses me about A9 is the interface design that puts the image search in the right sidebar next to the regular search. It helps narrow searches quickly, especially if you're searching for a person. When I type in my maiden name, I get a picture of myself in the sidebar. Anyone looking for me under that name would be able to find me immediately and cut through all the clutter of the genealogy sites.
  • Google Browser [touchgraph.com] allows you to see at a glance clusters of sites that are "related" according to Google. If someone can make a similar display for search queries, not sites, using the same Google API, that would be a killer app. The best thing is that it could be naturally extended using a number of independent plugins.
  • I went to the A9 site and was shocked to see that it had my name. Obviously they have access to the Amazon cookie and are using the data. This means that they may not only be remembering your web searches for *your* convenience, but for Amazon's commercial uses. And what might they be??? Once Amazon has this data who else can get it? Can the government get it? Without my permission? You bet!

    I don't want anyone watching over my shoulder when I browse the net. I certainly don't want Amazon doing it,

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Close