Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Star Wars DVD Set Previews/Reviews

Posted by michael on Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:00 AM
from the let-the-wookie-win dept.
Reducer2001 writes "USA Today has an article up that has a couple more details about the upcoming Star Wars DVD release. The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously." Reader Jutebox150 writes "Time magazine has an early preview of the Star Wars DVDs and gives some justification for Lucas issuing the updated versions of the trilogy and talking about his many mental and physical battles to finish filming. The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga. 'The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'" Reader spoco2 writes "The Star Wars Original Trilogy is due for worldwide release on the 21st on DVD, but the first reviews are appearing already in Australia (obviously of the PAL version). Yes, they are the SEs with even more differences (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!). I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Star Wars DVD Set Previews/Reviews | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 465 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Uh-oh! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:02AM (#10200797)
    Oh shit. Time for a thread triage. Everyone complaining about how Star Wars is terrible and your childhood is ruined, reply here. People discussing Lucas and his never-ending quest to rape the franchise for more money, over on the left. If your contribution to the discussion is "HAN SOLO SHOT FIRST!", over on the right. GNAA... well, you know what to do.
    • Get Yours! by mishmash (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:52AM
      • Re:Get Yours! (Score:4, Funny)

        by pdangel (812046) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:27AM (#10201896)
        I cant believe after 4 years of lurking i registered on /. just so I could post this. WALMART PRE ORDER [walmart.com]
        Dont feed the monkeys. and yes I could have posted AC.
        [ Parent ]
        • No thanks. by no_such_user (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:54PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Call to all Lucas-haters by rd_syringe (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:20AM
    • Please sign the petition by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:23AM
    • Hey, it almost works this time by Daetrin (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:37PM
    • Re:Uh-oh! (Score:5, Insightful)

      "It is only a fucking movie people. Get over it."

      Exactly - it's only a movie that redefined special effects, and by lucas choosing to bar the future generations of artisans who do this sort of thing from seeing their roots would be like the Charlie Chaplin being able to prevent future film makers from being able to learn anything from his work.

      It's a slap in the face of everyone who worked on a movie that was revolutionary for it's time to have Lucas, who was only one of hundreds of people involved in the creation of the film(s) legacy to claim "They're work was shit so I will do all in my power to make sure future generations cannot lay eyes upon it" - release both you swollen headed egomaniac.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Uh-oh! by bonkedproducer (Score:2) Friday September 10 2004, @12:30PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Holding your breath... (Score:5, Funny)

    by jeffy210 (214759) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:02AM (#10200800)
    "I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."

    Riiight, you do that... can you also let me know when Duke Nukem Forever comes out?
    • Re:Holding your breath... by mzkhadir (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:07AM
    • Re:Holding your breath... by hpulley (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:11AM
      • Re:Holding your breath... by MikeMacK (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:15AM
        • Re:Holding your breath... by gowen (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:29AM
        • Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:35AM
          • Re:Holding your breath... (Score:5, Informative)

            by Schnapple (262314) <tomkidd@NospAm.viatexas.com> on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:29AM (#10201919)
            (http://www.schnapple.com/)
            There are actual torrents of Laserdisc to DVD conversions on there for fans of the original
            At the risk of the storm troopers kicking in my door, I have these. They're real, and they're fantastic. They're ~4.7GB images, so the video quality for 2+ hour movies is not as good as it could be (the bit budget on a 2-layer DVD-R would provide for more) but they're really pretty good, all things considered. They even have Dolby Digial 2.0 surround and - get this - the audio commentaries from the definitive collection [blam1.com], complete with on-screen text. The menus even have easter eggs and production notes, along with the definitive collection logos. Make no mistake - whoever made these did it as a labor of love.

            There's also a fourth disc of extras (not sure if it's on suprnova) that comprises most of the extras from the definitive collection, such as documentaries, old trailers, etc. It's geek ecstasy and it's an interesting look back at Lucas when he was seemingly quite content with his creations.

            A website I won't link to out of courtesy (slashdotting) has images you can download and print out that look like and work like DVD covers. They have covers that look like the style of the currently released DVD's and covers that have the original movie posters. I opted gor the movie poster ones. Printed out on a color laser printer, the untrained eye can't tell a difference between them and the episode 1 and 2 DVD cover spines on a shelf (save for the reflective gold ink on the official ones).

            Now I must say, after getting these, watching them, etc., I'm content with the DVD's coming out later this month. Sure, I would still like official releases of the theatrical cuts, but these work for me. Heck, since for some reason they've decided to make the spines of the official widescreen releases silver I won't even have "duplicates" on my shelf.

            So to recap, get these laserdisc --> DVD-R rips. They're worth however many days it takes to download them. Find a DVD burner somewhere, somehow. Buy the officials (like I am). Be happy that you have both.

            [ Parent ]
            • Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:34PM
              • Re:Holding your breath... (Score:5, Informative)

                by Schnapple (262314) <tomkidd@NospAm.viatexas.com> on Thursday September 09 2004, @12:47PM (#10202917)
                (http://www.schnapple.com/)
                They're widescreen, but non-anamorphic. Or at least mine were. Word is there's a set floating around that is anamorphic but but the video quality is actually worse. The video quality on these is pretty damn good - you'll definitely know you're watching an unofficial DVD, but it's scores better than VHS, more durable, and has the extras of the laserdiscs.

                Note that the commentary track is not screen-specific (i.e., it's not Lucas & crew sitting around watching the movie). I believe this hails from back when Laserdisc commentaries were rare and so few people did that. What it is is a bunch of audio clips from interviews, documentaries, etc. It's done such that the thing you're hearing has to do with what you're seeing but it's not like the people were sitting there and commenting in real time. The upcoming DVD's, I believe, will have a commentary like this.

                Also note that there's an obsessive 67-page thread [originaltrilogy.com] on the OT.com forums on it dissecting all the various versions (many will sell you DVD's with the OT on them) and people discussing making their own DVD's from laserdisc. Apparently there's some short scenes that go missing now and again from all the various reissues. And now that dual-layer DVD burners are coming into vogue there's people discussing making higher quality anamorphic discs.

                [ Parent ]
              • yes they are widescreen by spoco2 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @09:13PM
              • Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:15PM
              • Re:Holding your breath... by davidbix (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @09:12PM
            • Re:Holding your breath... by Carnildo (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:56PM
            • Re:Holding your breath... by WoodstockJeff (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:13PM
            • Re:Holding your breath... by taernim (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @04:50PM
            • Re:Holding your breath... by gad_zuki! (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @05:39PM
            • Re:Holding your breath... by Apro+im (Score:2) Wednesday September 15 2004, @10:20AM
            • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Holding your breath... by enrico_suave (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:52AM
        • Re:Holding your breath... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by nomadic (141991) <nomadicworld&gmail,com> on Thursday September 09 2004, @12:13PM (#10202465)
          (http://go.away/)
          I still have the originals on laserdisc (widescreen) and my laserdisc player still works - so some of us can keep the dream alive.

          An elegant format for a more civilized time.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Holding your breath... by Bushcat (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @09:18PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Holding your breath... by j_sp_r (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:24AM
      • Re:Holding your breath... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by cmpalmer (234347) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:19AM (#10201798)
        (http://cmpalmer.blogspot.com/)
        You know, the problem with this whole discussion is that if Lucas *did* decide to release the "original" versions, we would still expect him to cleanup the matte lines, fix the light sabre glows, digitally clean-up the prints, tweak the soundtracks, etc., so they wouldn't really be the "original" versions.

        Of course, replacing actors with their prequel equivalents, making Han shoot first, changing bad songs to even worse ones (ROTJ), and adding more burping and farting creatures goes a bit beyond cleanup and director's cut land.

        To some extent, the only reason to release the really original release (which would still need a great deal of digital restoration as the film stock has aged) would be as an illustration of film history. All of those ground-breaking, breathtaking special effects that look a bit cheesy now will be lost. In 20 years, it will be nearly impossible to go back and see what state of the art effects were in 1977, or what Tatooine looked like when the cinematography was based on what cameras, filters, and lenses were used instead of what digital post-processing can do.

        These are the reasons I want *both* versions. I don't really want to watch the originals for entertainment and be distracted by David Prowse's eyes in the Vader mask, the bounding boxes and matte lines, or Vader's sometime's white lightsabre. I would like to have them to show my kids what I watched in 1977 and as nostalgia.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Holding your breath... by kill -9 $$ (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @03:11PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • can you also let me know when Duke Nukem Forever comes out

      Duke Nukem Forever is set to be released in a box set with the original unfscked with Star Wars trilogy, along with Rick Berman's three hour apology speech for what he has done to Star Trek. Unfortunately its release will happen on the exact same day that the Pentagon announces that it now considers the world "safe" and will be disbanding itself accordingly. Due to the lack of press over the release, all three features will tank. Luckily for the studios, however, no one will notice due to the overwhelming victory of the combined Bigoot and Antlantis forces over a disbelieving US. Or something like that...

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Holding your breath... by psmurf (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:13AM
      • Re:Holding your breath... by minotaurcomputing (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:40AM
        • Re:Holding your breath... (Score:4, Funny)

          by andyt (149701) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:27AM (#10201890)
          I've had my say. (as I sit back and wait for the flames about how Chewbacca would never say "RRRAAALLLLLGGG" because his dialect of Wookiese doesn't have such a term)

          Wookiese? Chewbacca, as a native Kashyyykian, speaks Shyriiwook you insensitive clod!
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:Holding your breath... by Carnildo (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:02PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Holding your breath... by Asprin (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:14AM
    • Never give up hope by Sith Lord Dormammu (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:34AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • its obvious (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Bhull (644157) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:02AM (#10200802)
    he's embarrased by the original trilogy. he should just get it over with and release the damn thing.
    • Re:its obvious by Krandor3 (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:08AM
      • Re:its obvious by |/|/||| (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:06PM
        • Re:its obvious by chromaphobic (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:42PM
    • George==his own worst critic (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ackthpt (218170) * on Thursday September 09 2004, @12:04PM (#10202366)
      (http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
      he's embarrased by the original trilogy. he should just get it over with and release the damn thing.

      If I was a typical moviegoer for the original trilogy, then he's banging his head on the wall for nothing, or actually self destructively.

      I was just mentioning my reaction to Star Wars (EP:IV ANH) yesterday.

      There were these inexplicable commercials on TV about some movie, but I couldn't make heads or tails of them and ignored them along with spots for Palmolive Dishwashing Liquid, Fleismann's Margarine and anything about the upcoming 6 O'clock news. Then a friend calls, with an almost frantic voice, and asks have I seen the new movie something something. No... Go see it! Drop whatever you are doing and go see it!

      Well, you don't get a phone call like that every day (though it may give the MPAA some ideas) I ask and it so happens my Dad, brothers and sister are already planning to go see it, because they've been told this is something really different. Gosh, what can this bee?

      So I'm sitting in the theater with my bucket of popcorn and soda and watch the titles, ready for another thrilling cinematic experience, or at the worst, ninety minutes of nursing my snacks and then immediatley forgetting about what I've seen. It wouldn't be like that. Above the broad curvature of a planet a little spacecraft is coasting along with something like short bursts of phasers hitting it. Then the star destroyer seemingly passes overhead while the sense-surround in the theater rumbles and popcorn I just put in my mouth falls back out into my lap. Wooowwww....

      The rest of the movie passes with chills of excitement and oohs and ahhs, I probably would have won a staring constest as I don't think I blinked once the whole time. I'd be back a few times, others would be back every day or a few showings every day for months.

      When I got home, still late afternoon, I stood in the sun on the driveway with my jaw still slack at what I had seen. Looking up, as if expecting to see a star destroyer cruise over my house. It seemed space fantasy had taken a big step forward and it clearly had a significant impact on millions of others as Star Wars was a massive merchandising success (my sister still has piles and boxes of original stuff, clearly it impacted her more than myself.)

      Video games would suddenly take on certain similarities to Tie Fighters, X-Wings, R2D2 and Darth Vader was the epitome of cool.

      Star Wars rocked the world and gave George Lucas the finances and clout, which have carried him these 27 years, to do a great many things other producer/directors could only dream of.

      It really is pretty awful that he can't be happy with this original artifact and, like some old silver coin with a patina, feels he has to polish it with some course cloth until it's bright, shiny and utterly unattractive to those who appreciate it for what it was.

      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Thus far by Ossadagowah (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:02AM
    • Re:Thus far by eingram (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:13PM
  • by ajservo (708572) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:03AM (#10200815)
    Begun, this flame war has...
  • Hans and Greedo will post at the same time! by ARRRLovin (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:03AM
  • Special special editions by yellowjacket03 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:04AM
  • same time! by shutyourface (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:05AM
  • X-mas Special (Score:5, Funny)

    by dr_dank (472072) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:06AM (#10200863)
    (http://www.chemicalwonderland.net/ | Last Journal: Monday September 03, @10:34PM)
    The Holiday Special is said to have been altered too. In the new edition, Jefferson Starship shoots first.
  • Shooting (Score:5, Funny)

    by Mateito (746185) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:06AM (#10200869)
    (http://www.jwz.org/images/omgwtf.jpg)
    Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!

    How tantric.. err..

    So now we have Star Wars, Episode IV, designed by a committee edition. I may yet end up with the box set (we have a house full of furniture and need smaller things to put on our wedding "wannas" list.. yeah.. I hate the concept too, but practicality is winning on this one).

    • Re:Shooting by dr_dank (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:28AM
    • Re:Shooting by Decaff (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:55AM
      • Re:Shooting by UserGoogol (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:03PM
        • Re:Shooting by Decaff (Score:2) Friday September 10 2004, @05:58AM
    • Don't worry about it... by cLive ;-) (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @03:06PM
    • Re:Shooting by MouseR (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @04:25PM
    • Re:Shooting by Snowdog668 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:38AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by j1bb3rj4bb3r (808677) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:06AM (#10200870)
    as all guns are now replaced with walkie talkies.
  • han/greedo (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pyros (61399) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:06AM (#10200871)
    (Last Journal: Thursday May 13 2004, @07:26PM)
    well at least he seems to have made a partial concession on such a controversial edit. Show's he has at least one tiny spec of respect.
    • Re:han/greedo by LnxRocks (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:10AM
      • Re:han/greedo by fucksl4shd0t (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:40AM
        • Re:han/greedo by Xcruciate (Score:1) Friday September 10 2004, @09:34AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:han/greedo by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:12AM
    • Re:han/greedo by drinkypoo (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:27AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Respect not likely (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ebuck (585470) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:21AM (#10201821)
      Let's see.

      I could respect a director who makes a controversial film decision (Han shoots first) provided that the film is made well, and it doesn't look like a mistake (see my film because it's controversial trash)

      I could respect a director who admits to making a mistake in a film (or believes that his greater vision was compromised at first release) and rereleases the film with corrections (Greedo shoots first) provided that the film is remade well, and it doesn't look like he's just caving into a compromised version of his vision.

      But I can't respect this. Either Lucas is stating that his vision was for Han to be a chior boy in bad boy clothing, or that his vision wasn't important enough to stand by, or that he has no vision, he's just doing whatever the polls say.

      After watching Kirosawa's "The Hidden Fortress", I am fully convinced that the success of Star Wars was part plagarisim and part mistake. Lucas's disneyland inspired lightening up of the film in it's theatrical re-relase was touted as being closer to his true "vision". Every improvement detracted from the story and lightened the tone of the film. I mean, Luke's family was just killed, and we're supposed to be laughing at visual gags when it's time to go find Han. "Empire Strikes Back" probably was saved due to the extra help he brought aboard. Help which he now eschews in the episode 1-3 films.

      Let's face it. We'll never have a good Star Wars until the Master stops driving his Empire into the ground in the name of Profit.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:han/greedo by Sloppy (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:22AM
    • Re:han/greedo by Vinnie_333 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:37AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Maybe a bit unwanted.... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Aceto3for5 (806224) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:07AM (#10200877)
    Call me a purist, but I think the akward "Kiss Goodbye" between Jar Jar Binks and Chewbacca in the cantina is unappreciated at best.

    Also, I heard thanks to product placement, the death star now has the AT&T Logo slightly superimposed.
  • and in the next version... (Score:5, Funny)

    by WormholeFiend (674934) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:07AM (#10200878)
    Lucas, tired of people still complaining that Han shoots first, and not at the same time as Greedo, will tweak the scene so that, even though the shots look simultaneous, it will be possible to demonstrate that Han's shot fired milliseconds before Greedo's.

    However, I predict this will fail to silence the critics that still complain about Han stepping over Jabba's tail.
  • Shoot at the same time? by hode (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:07AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by scoser (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:19AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by tuffy (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:20AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by remin8 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:21AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by Fishstick (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:25AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by pyros (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:26AM
    • The controvers is... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Iowaguy (621828) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:27AM (#10201167)
      In the original movie, Han Solo and Greedo are in the Cantina sitting at a table together. Greedo informs Han there is a bounty on his head, and threatens his life. Han in a casual sort of way shoots Greedo before he can get a shot off. In the re-release, Lucas changed this so that mean, evil Greedo shots first, but misses, and the more honorable Solo takes him down after that.

      The reason this upsets so many people is that this scene established Han Solo as an anti-hero in the movie. He was a rogue and a pragmatist. The core appeal of this character was that he was not so damn foolish as to take his chances and let someone get the first hit in, if he knew a fight was coming. Han was street smart. He would strike first to survive.

      Although many on slashdot are loathe to admitt it, this was part of the charm and good writing in the first movie that created its appeal. You had classic heroes,like skywalker. Who were good, but naive and ultimately had super powers to help them do the right thing. You also had heroes like Han who would do the right thing, but get dirty doing it. Characters like Leia were somewhere in between. She was "good" but willing to lie and sacrafice others for her cause. Reality tends to reflect this, which is why the movie spoke to so many so strongly. The changing of the Greedo scene cheapened the movie and its core complexities. Hence, the hatred on these fair forums.

      my two cents,
      -Iowa
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:The controvers is... by stratjakt (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:12AM
      • Re:The controvers is... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by sootman (158191) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:13AM (#10201731)
        (Last Journal: Thursday July 12, @12:30PM)
        Also, if possible, imagine you're seeing the movie for the first time. You haven't seen the trilogy. You didn't dress up like Han four Halloweens in a row. Hell, you haven't even seen an Indiana Jones movie yet, and as a 10-year-old, you surely didn't watch American Graffiti a few years earlier. You don't know Harrison Ford from a hole in the wall and you don't know Han is a great guy. He ices some ugly green dude minutes before he agrees to take Ben & Luke on a ride. We know something they don't. We worry for their safety in this lunatics hand's. Etc etc etc.

        Jesus, I'm posting to SW:EP4 threads. Anything to take my mind off Ivan [wftv.com], I guess.
        [ Parent ]
      • The Emperor's Court (Score:5, Interesting)

        by The Angry Mick (632931) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:39AM (#10202069)

        Here's a online comic [club-internet.fr]that pokes a little fun at the "Han/Greedo shoots first" argument.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:The controvers is... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @07:51PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:40AM
    • Re:Shoot at the same time? by cmpalmer (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:00AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Other Changes... (Score:5, Funny)

    by HogynCymraeg (624823) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:08AM (#10200895)
    1. Han cries "Nice one kid, that was one in a million" BEFORE luke fires
    2. The wookie DOESNT win and C3P0 gets an unexpected "backdoor suprise"
    3. Han is now Luke's father (See change 1)
    4. The final scene in ROTJ has yoda wearing a ninja headband

    • Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:32AM
    • Re:Other Changes... by dave420 (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:50AM
      • Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:24PM
      • Re:Other Changes... (Score:4, Funny)

        by Vinnie_333 (575483) on Thursday September 09 2004, @04:09PM (#10206025)
        9.Ben Konobi parties with Sand People, drinks too much and passes out in desert.
        10.R2-D2 enrages C-3P0's by bringing another robot into their "relationship"
        11.The part of Yoda will be played by Gary Coleman. "What you talkin' bout, Luke!"
        12.At the battle of Hoth, all the guns are removed and replaced with snow balls.
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:02PM
  • More changes (Score:4, Interesting)

    by JayBlalock (635935) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:08AM (#10200906)
    I'm not even going to bother bitching about the Anakin thing. There's no point. But, I have found this page, which purports to show most of the changes in the DVD. (although, oddly, it DOESN'T show the new Anakin)

    http://perso.club-internet.fr/willow/Index.html [club-internet.fr]

    I wasn't sure how seriously to take it, but it seems to be corroborated by the article. (talking about having a better CG Jabba in ANH)

  • That's it. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Dirtside (91468) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:09AM (#10200912)
    (http://matt.waggoner.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday February 17 2004, @02:03PM)
    The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously."
    Okay, that's it, I've had it.

    *rolls up a newspaper and goes to Skywalker Ranch, finds George Lucas, and smacks him over the head four times*

    NO! BAD GEORGE! GREEDO DOESN'T GET TO SHOOT *AT ALL*! BAD DIRECTOR! NO COOKIE!

    • Re:That's it. by TaintedPastry (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:14AM
  • How many are there? by TheKubrix (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:10AM
    • Re:How many are there? (Score:5, Funny)

      by WormholeFiend (674934) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:16AM (#10201029)
      people complain because Lucas seems to have the Michael Jackson syndrome with the original SW trilogy.

      He can't stop altering it, to the point where it will soon all start falling apart.

      And both men live on so-called "ranches", so it gives one pause to wonder...
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:How many are there? by Goo.cc (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:12AM
  • Stream splitting (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Zorilla (791636) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:10AM (#10200928)
    One thing that was done on the Terminator 2 DVD was provide the original, plus the extended version with the deleted scenes. Both can be played all the way through as a movie even though the extended version is merely the original with deleted scenes spliced in, thanks to the wonders of random access media. My question is why Lucas hasn't taken advantage of that to allow certain scenes to be added/remove/changed to look like the original or enhanced version?
    • Re:Stream splitting by menor (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:19AM
      • Re:Stream splitting (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Zorilla (791636) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:26AM (#10201154)
        Other than restoring the quality of the picture, I'm trying to think of what enhancements were made. Let's see, there's the Greedo shoots first scene, plastic Jabba the Hutt scene, Death Star w/shockwave scene, changed music in ending of RotJ..there's got to be more. Post a link if you got it. It's gotta all fit on one disc.

        Even if branching wouldn't work, there's always DVD-18 (Don't worry, DVD writer users, it's only double sided dual layer). I believe T2 used that kind, and Terminator 1 used DVD-14.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Stream splitting by greed (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:55AM
    • Re:Stream splitting by gkelman (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:21AM
    • Branching... by antdude (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:27AM
    • Re:Stream splitting by Mateito (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:51AM
    • Re:Stream splitting by wolverine1999 (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:07PM
    • Re:Stream splitting by 16K Ram Pack (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @08:28PM
    • Re:Stream splitting by cfuse (Score:2) Friday September 10 2004, @04:01AM
    • Re:Stream splitting by zenwaves (Score:1) Friday September 17 2004, @02:33PM
  • erratum (Score:5, Funny)

    by chegosaurus (98703) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:10AM (#10200933)
    (http://www.thecatflap.co.uk/)
    > The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'"

    Surely he means "the first episode"?
    • Re:erratum by mgs1000 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:13AM
  • Greedo (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:11AM (#10200948)
    Most annoying part about the Greedo change: the original version was a justifiable shooting in any state in the Union! Somebody's holding a gun on you and threatens your life - that's clear-cut case of self-defense, and you're entirely within your rights to shoot the bastard.
    • Re:Greedo by Slurpee (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @05:03PM
  • To buy or not to buy... by TeaQuaffer (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:12AM
  • Review at Digital Bits (Score:4, Informative)

    by spagiola (234461) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:12AM (#10200965)
    There's an in-depth review at Digital Bits [thedigitalbits.com], including some screen shots [thedigitalbits.com] of the major changes.
  • WTF is Greedo? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Placido (209939) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:14AM (#10200988)
    For all of you who, like me, didn't get the Greedo reference, (probably less than 1% of /.) here's a link which explains the whole Greedo and Han thingamy bob.

    Who is Greedo and what did he and Han shoot and WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ALL ABOUT?! [fecundity.com]
  • Star Wars Milking by a3217055 (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:14AM
  • Seriously, dude (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Dirtside (91468) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:14AM (#10201001)
    (http://matt.waggoner.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday February 17 2004, @02:03PM)
    I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals.
    As others have noted, it's more likely that Duke Nukem Forever will come out first. Personally, this is my position: I will not buy any version of the original Star Wars trilogy unless Lucas releases the original theatrical cut. I've already got four VHS copies of the entire trilogy (the *true* original in pan-n-scan and widescreen, and SE on pan-n-scan and widescreen), from way back before Lucas started really fucking things up with the prequels. (I'm also not going to get around it by getting someone to buy it for my birthday or for Christmas. I will not *own* these DVDs for any reason.)

    I don't care if Lucas thinks this is the way the movies were intended; as a customer, I'm not buying it from him unless he gives me what I want. Yeah, I know millions of people will buy the DVDs anyway, but that doesn't change my position.

  • Also reported by Prince Vegeta SSJ4 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:15AM
  • Holding out. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:15AM (#10201019)
    I'm still holding out for the version where Han and Greedo hug eachother.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Excellent review at The Digital Bits... by pspmikek (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:17AM
    • Yahh!! by SuperKendall (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:28PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Make it a DVD option? (Score:5, Funny)

    by daveewart (66895) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:17AM (#10201047)
    Perhaps it should be an option in the DVD menus:
    1. Greedo shoots first
    2. Han shoots first
    3. They shoot simultaneously
    4. They don't shoot each other, they have a nice chat instead
  • Not that guy!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Meostro (788797) * on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:19AM (#10201075)
    (http://www.dullsville.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday December 22 2004, @11:41AM)
    The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga.

    Did anyone else mis-read that as Ken Burns [wikipedia.org] and think Only 2.5 hours? That must be one of his short films!
  • Dear Mr. Lucas by thelenm (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:19AM
  • MOD ALL POSTS DOWN! (Score:5, Funny)

    by ajservo (708572) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:25AM (#10201141)
    You people aren't being hateful enough...

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • They talked about this at Dragon*Con by JLSigman (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:27AM
  • A lesson from David Lean... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by eamacnaghten (695001) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:27AM (#10201180)
    (http://eddy.me.uk/ | Last Journal: Thursday July 08 2004, @01:59AM)
    I remember once David Lean saying in an interview that once a picture of his was finished, then it was finished! It was a work of creation and no-one should change it retrospectively, not even him.

    There is a scene in Lawrence of Arabia where you see a camel riding slowly towards O'Toole taking time to do it. This was the entrance of Omar Sherif. Afterwards David Lean said he got it wrong, and that that particular buildup ended too quickly, however, he did NOT change it for the reasons given.

    Although George Lucas's modifications to the original Star Wars Trilogy may be making it more cinematically pleasing, and maybe even more to how he would have liked it to originally turn out, what he is doing could be interpreted as defacing. The original Star Wars Trilogy are works of art in themselves.

    Everyone would have thought it ridiculous if Picasso took some of his earlier work back, and touched it up to make it more realistic, or in fashion. I think the same way about the Star Wars Films.

  • Stop it. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by juuri (7678) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:29AM (#10201208)
    (http://www.nsa.org/)
    Seriously people stop supporting this nonsense. Even if you don't plan on buying all these hacks, this constant deluge of information about changes, edits and new editions of this crap is still supporting this garbage by keeping up the visible mindshare capital of this franchise.

    I don't believe any of these pictures are classics or sacred treasures but these films are not like Director's Cuts where the original vision was changed to get the movie to market, no matter what Georgie says. He is 'Robin Williamsing' these things because of his change in character after become a parent. That is, some famous actors, directors, etc... at some point feel everything they've done should some how be compatible with things their kids could watch.

    • Re:Stop it. by advocate_one (Score:3) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:57PM
    • Re:Stop it. by Bendebecker (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @04:34PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Give me 12, er, 18 films by davidwr (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:30AM
  • untouched originals? by SSR (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:33AM
  • Biggest irony... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by NaugaHunter (639364) on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:33AM (#10201236)
    Lucas on colorizing the three stooges. [cnn.com]

    "Star Wars" creator George Lucas, who testified with Steven Spielberg before Congress in the 1980s against colorization and other forms of alteration, said the process yanks such slapstick performers as the Stooges out of the black-and-white universe they belong in.

    "Would color distract from their comedy and make it not as funny anymore?" Lucas said. "Maybe just the fact that they're in black and white makes it funny, because their humor is dated. But by putting it in black and white, it puts it in a context where you can appreciate it for what it was.

    "But you try to make it in full living color and try to compare it to a Jim Carrey movie, then it's hard for young people to understand. Because you're then thinking you're comparing apples to apples, when you're not. You're comparing apples to oranges. I'm saying it's not fair to the artist."


    Part of Star Wars' charm was that while the special effects were advanced for the time, they were NOT excessive to any degree beyond being how they directly supported the plot. The extra things running around Mos Eisley, windows in Bespin... it just started being more distractive than immersive. The only two I absolutely agreed with were putting in the Jabba scene (yeah, it wasn't done well, but it did actually help establish Han a little more) and fixing the Hoth shots so you couldn't see AT-ATs through the actual instrument panel. (I'd never noticed before on small TV's, but almost a must for a high-quality DVD on large TVs.)

    Don't get me started on Guido shooting first, that completely changed Han's daring go-for-it attitude as a lawless smuggler out only for himself. Having them shoot at the same time I can accept logically. Han decides to shoot, Guido sees it in his eyes and shoots as well. Of course, Guido missing makes little sense at 3 feet, but if he had hit him it would have been a pretty short movie. What really bugs me about this change was that it was never "I wanted to do this, but I couldn't", it was "I've changed my mind about how much of a lawless guy Han was at the beginning, thus weakening his story arc as he progressed to a caring person."

    Huh, guess I got myself going. Anyway, I guess I'll go hit the local antique and pawn shops to see if anyone's ignorant mothers have turned in the laserdiscs of the originals...
  • The Solo Rodian trials by fahrvergnugen (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:37AM
  • *sigh* by jpellino (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:39AM
    • Re:*sigh* by Bendebecker (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @04:40PM
  • Come on... (Score:3, Funny)

    by grasshoppa (657393) <skennedyNO@SPAMtpno-co.org> on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:39AM (#10201311)
    (http://tpno-co.org/)
    Given the angle of the blast, we can deduce that Han did not, in fact, shoot guedo. There must have been a second gunner!

    On the grassy knoll, of course.
    • Re:Come on... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Colonel Cholling (715787) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:00AM (#10201548)
      However, Six Seconds in Tattooine provides testimonies from witnesses that were never called before the Palpatine Commission, and these indicate that there were no less than three separate shots fired. Also, don't you find it suspicious that Han Solo, a known Wookie sympathizer, would be fingered as the lone gunman? Why do we never hear mention of his Hutt gang connections, going back several years? His checkered history with Lando Calrissian, the very man who would one day encase him in carbonite? And who, as we well know, was the second Death Star shooter?

      But of course the most valuable piece of evidence is the original, unedited Lucas film. If we play the scene repeatedly in excruciatingly slow motion, you can clearly see Greedo's head moves back... and to the left. Back... and to the left. Back... and to the left. Back... and to the left.
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • you're lucky you don't taste so good. by drew (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:40AM
  • Unmitigated disaster by NitroWolf (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:40AM
  • OMG by Geek Boy (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:40AM
  • I am so disappointed in you geeks - with a picture like Leia and her stunt double sunbathing in *the* outfit (at the Time magazine link), you guys are worried about who shot who first. Shouldn't we all be talking about whether or not that footage is included in the special edition?

    *I hang my head in shame.*
  • Kevin Burns? Any relation to Ken Burns? by jeblucas (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:48AM
  • Finally a good reason to RTFA by freqres (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:53AM
  • These films were being changed from Day One by PonyHome (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:55AM
  • Referral ID in link (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 09 2004, @10:59AM (#10201540)
    Way to go, Reducer2001, by slipping that referral ID into the link for the box set. On a Star Wars thread, too boot; it's sure to generate a lot of cash.
  • Static/Dynamic Art by Lemming Mutiny (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:00AM
  • The Originals by syntap (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:01AM
  • OMG....Go outside! by MortisUmbra (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:05AM
  • No Surprise by Master of Transhuman (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:07AM
    • Re:No Surprise by Hassman (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:11AM
    • Re:No Surprise by Master of Transhuman (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @08:20PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • THX version by Hassman (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:08AM
  • Full List of DVD Changes (Score:5, Informative)

    by diver8 (810336) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:12AM (#10201716)
    (Last Journal: Thursday September 16 2004, @05:18PM)

    From theforce.net (http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002 /16704309/?596 [theforce.net])

    ---LIST OF DVD CHANGES---

    A NEW HOPE

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - The lettering on various Death Star panels will be written in Aurebesh rather than English.
    - An improved version of Jabba inserted into his scenes.
    - Greedo still shoots first...however, Han's reaction is 'much more realistic'.
    - R2's panels will be consistantly blue in all of the space shots, instead of just a few of them.
    - The Dianoga now appears more lifelike and not so obviously Stop-Motion.
    - The matte-painted hall in the detention block has been fixed rather than just having a bright white light at one end.

    Rumoured :

    - Stormtrooper voices redubbed by Temura Morrison (Jango Fett).
    - The Emperor may possibly make an appearence to address the Senate in a new scene.
    - The Imperial March may be inserted into the score in certain parts to maintain continuity with the other films.
    - The 'Binary Sunset' shot outside the Homestead could have clouds to match Luke's later POV shot.
    - Rumours of work on Obi-Wan's death scene with CGI.
    - Door closings/openings could be smoothed out without the frame jumps.
    - Rumour that the aliens and other creatures blink now to make them look non-mask like.
    - Vader and Obi-Wan's fight scene may be upgraded with CGI work.
    - Battle of Yavin shots cleaned up and recomped.

    Denied rumours:

    - Bail Organa will not be in ANH, for when Alderaan blows up.

    THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - Ian McDiarmid is now in place for Emperor Palpatine's scene, rather than the monkey-eyed old woman. There are also a couple of new lines in this scene.

    Rumoured :

    - The Tauntauns could be re-done with CGI.
    - Rumour that the missing Wampa Attack sequence may be back into the beginning of the film .
    - 'Grander escape sequence' between Lando, Leia, Chewie, C3PO and R2 in Cloud City.
    - Possible additional deleted scene(s) with Yoda on Dagobah.
    - Boba Fett's voice redubbed by Temura Morrison (Jango Fett).

    RETURN OF THE JEDI

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - Hayden Christensen appears at the end of the film in place of Sebastian Shaw as 'Ghost Anakin'.
    - The Rancor's matte-lines have been removed.
    - Naboo now appears in the end celebration sequence.
    - In Vader's death scene, Shaw's eyes have been recoloured (to match Hayden's) and his eyebrows removed (as they would never have survived).

    Rumoured :

    - Palpatine's Force Lightning may have been re-done.
    - Rumour that the Jedi Temple now appears in the background of Coruscant during the end celebration sequence.
    - Work done on background matte-paintings.
    - Rumour that the Ewoks have had CGI work done to animate their facial features.
    - Rumour that Watto appears during the Tatooine celebration sequence at the end.

    Denied rumours:

    - Padme does not appear at the end alongside the ghosts of Anakin, Ben, and Yoda.

    MISC INFO

    Audio Quality

    - "I spoke with Ben Burtt recently. He mentioned the upcoming Star Wars DVDs. It seems that they were able

  • Spaceballs by Go Aptran (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:18AM
  • Obiwan dies in this one for real? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:19AM
  • Why is this opinion so common... by Jugalator (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:25AM
  • one good thing by glsunder (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:27AM
  • First cut is not the released cut. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Performer Guy (69820) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:34AM (#10201999)
    From the article the first cut was never released, it was re-edited in a completely different form. From my recollection the original theatrical release actually won an Oscar for Best Film Editing in 1977.
  • Stop the Second Guessing (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Nom du Keyboard (633989) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:35AM (#10202019)
    Please don't turn this release into an E.T. Anniversary Edition where, among other things, the guns are replaced by flashlights. Mr. Lucas, stop the second guessing of yourself and minimize the political correctness. Just give us the film we remember!
  • Has to be said... by TiggertheMad (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:41AM
  • 2 things stand out in the article.. (Score:5, Informative)

    by gosand (234100) on Thursday September 09 2004, @11:42AM (#10202103)
    (http://knoppixquake.webhop.net/)
    1. "Universal and United Artists passed on it, but Ladd said yes, famously giving Lucas the merchandising rights that made the filmmaker's fortune."

    And so began down the path to the Dark side.

    2. The shot of Carrie Fisher and her stunt double? [timeinc.net] Whoa.

  • What do you call the smartest Star Trek fan? by pentium69 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:45AM
  • The Greedo Conspiracy by OSeXy (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:56AM
  • Whiny Ani in RoTJ? (Score:3, Funny)

    by dafz1 (604262) on Thursday September 09 2004, @12:02PM (#10202348)
    Why do we see whiny bitch Ani(Christensen) in the final scene of RoTJ? Wouldn't it make sense to see Ewan as well, for continuity? I would like to say that wouldn't happen, as leaving out Sir Alec would piss off too many fans, but George doesn't seem to care about that with all of his other changes.

    Then again, seeing Sebastian Shaw standing(rumor is Ani loses legs in/after the "great" battle) doesn't make a lot of sense either. Then again, I wouldn't want to see a stumpy Anakin. Maybe he has "magic legs" like Lt. Dan?
  • This might be old news... by OSeXy (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:07PM
  • by endus (698588) on Thursday September 09 2004, @12:12PM (#10202457)
    Why does everyone feel the need to go and revisit everything and tweak it and make it different? Anyone ever watched the Redux version of apocalypse now? It's not as good....it was one of the greatest movies of all time AS IS so leave it ALONE. The reasons for cutting scenes or doing things a certain way DO NOT MATTER. Are we going to start painting over Picassos because he ran out of green that day and he WOULD have made that part green if he only had the right paint? Who cares??? Art is a culmination of all the factors which go into making it. You made it, you put it out there. It's done. Leave it ALONE.

    I am a Star Wars fan, but not hardcore in any sense of the word. I have never seen the 1997 redone versions, mostly because redoing that movie sounded like the most retarded thing I had ever heard of.

    I didn't even know about the Cantina shootout thing until this post, but it might be one of the gayest moves a filmmaker has ever made. The thing is, it is NOT a "Star Wars Nerd" thing....it's a film thing. If what I have read here is true, that is a MAJOR change to a subtle but important incident in the movie. If people don't understand why that change makes a difference, then they don't understand the movie or the character of Han Solo. It's not about whether the movie agrees with all the times you've reenacted the scene with action figures in your bedroom, it's about a movie that was good because of the story it told and the characters it developed being hacked by a director who used to know what he was doing but has now fallen off into a pit of mediocrity.

    I can't believe the other changes he made either. Fuck continuity...who CARES for chrissakes? Who would complain about the lack of coninuity? No one. Who would complain about fucking up a masterpiece? Apparently quite a few people. Isn't this movie being made for the audience to enjoy? Apparently not because now the artist is rehashing his work, to the displeasure of the fans, on some kind of ego trip that's supposed to make up for the fact that he will NEVER make a movie that good again.

    What is it with people? You go out and make one of the better scifi movies ever made and then shit all over it when it's released to DVD to support continuity with movies that NO ONE thinks are as good as the originals. Dumb Dumb Dumb.

    Sorry, this turned into something closely approximating nerd-rage, but it's about ART...and if it's one thing I hate to see it's artists who sell out and forget what they used to be about.

  • Better Jabba in ANH by Merle Corey (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:24PM
  • I'M NOT GONNA BUY REVISIONIST HISTORY!!!! by Trolling4Dollars (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:41PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Time -1, Flamebait by dswensen (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @12:57PM
  • remake mix mistakes by circusboy (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:12PM
  • The SPECIAL Special Edition! (Score:3, Funny)

    by LittleGuy (267282) * on Thursday September 09 2004, @01:25PM (#10203588)
    Yes, they are the SEs with even more differences (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!).

    ...using walkie-talkies!
  • Gredo and Han switcheroo (Score:3, Funny)

    (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!)

    Also, Lucas digitally changed the scene so that Han misses and Gredo kills Han instead. Later, Gredo assasinates Jabba the Hutt and takes over his crime ring, and falls in love with Princess Leia and tehy get married and have a child who turns out to be Tiger Woods.
  • So, George, is FOUR enough? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by feloneous cat (564318) on Thursday September 09 2004, @01:28PM (#10203643)
    1. Initial release.
    2. Videotape (dropped a scene - which I can't freakin' remember NOW)
    3. Added some scenes (with some really BADLY done CG at times)
    4. YET another Edit...

    Hell, Thomas Dolby is about the only artist I can think of who has re-worked the same material only to come up with essentially the same thing.

    And the first one STILL is better...
  • AND SO THIS IS WHAT P2P IS FOR by neuraloverload (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:49PM
  • Hmm.. by ilumits (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @01:54PM
    • Re:Hmm.. by {tele}machus_*1 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @03:11PM
  • So what? by sharkey (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:25PM
    • Re:So what? by mink (Score:1) Friday September 10 2004, @01:30PM
  • After reading that article I just have one request by d_jedi (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @02:39PM
  • Mostly cosmetic changes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by inkswamp (233692) on Thursday September 09 2004, @03:07PM (#10205111)
    As if anything could stop all the whining at this point, the article states that most of the changes are minor and cosmetic in nature. And this:

    Overall, the expected changes on the DVDs aren't as dramatic as those for the Special Editions in 1997, says Scott Chitwood, one of the co-founders of TheForce.Net, a Star Wars fan/news site. "I think a few of the changes will only make sense after Episode III," he says.

    Hopefully this is true, but not because I'm one of those purist Star Wars fans, but rather I'd love to hear an end to the incessant whining sound coming from some of you.

    BTW, I think Hayden Christensen at the end of Jedi makes a ton of sense and is an excellent decision on the part of Lucas. It will really wrap up the continuity of the entire series of films in a simple and effective way.

    Disagree with me? Probably. Do I care? Probably not.

  • Shooting at the same time (Score:3, Interesting)

    by {tele}machus_*1 (117577) * on Thursday September 09 2004, @03:07PM (#10205118)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday April 11 2006, @09:37AM)
    I've always been in favor of Han shooting first, but I can live with simultaneous shooting. It always bothered me that Greedo was like a James-Bond-movie-villain: too much talking before killing the guy he was after ended up in his own demise. Simultaneous shots makes Greedo seem more like a serious bounty hunter who just gets beat because Han is better.
  • by inkswamp (233692) on Thursday September 09 2004, @03:27PM (#10205430)
    Instead of complaining about the few things that Lucas changes that apparently ruined your childhood, why not check out some of the subtle things Lucas cleaned up or altered that will be a massive improvement over the original releases? [hostdepartment.com]

    Bear in mind, people, that directors (even Lucas) get pressure to alter their films, change things, remove things, cut corners, etc. At least give Lucas's new versions a chance before denouncing them outright. It appears to me that lots of things have been changed just to improve what he originally intended and only a few changes to tweak the films to make them line up with the prequels. I see lots worth being excited about, little worth whining about.

    I'm especially thrilled that they took the time to color correct the damn Rancor scene in Jedi. It never looked right that Luke's shading was a noticeable lighter value than the Rancor's. It looked like an actor moving around in front of a movie screen. Judging from the stills on the site above, it looks perfect.

  • Oh nooooooo! by teknurd (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @05:30PM
  • DVD Screen Captures by diver8 (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @07:12PM
  • The biggest cut.... by clickety6 (Score:2) Friday September 10 2004, @04:10AM
  • Orginal on VHS was a "one time offer"... by Mortimer82 (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:07AM
  • Re:Formats by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:08AM
    • Re:Formats by Big Nothing (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @10:34AM
  • Re:I think it's obvious what we need to do by Goo.cc (Score:2) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:27AM
  • Re:Has it been played out? by Rick Genter (Score:1) Thursday September 09 2004, @11:31AM
  • 32 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2