Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Last Great Internet Bubble Auction

Posted by timothy on Wed Feb 25, 2004 02:44 PM
from the aerons-are-comfy dept.
jlouderb writes "At least that's what they are calling it. Cowan Alexander is getting ready to auction off the assets of MP3.com (now owned by CNet) on March 10th and 11th. The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular, along with servers and notebooks that are probably hopelessly out of date. The best part, though -- a 1997 yellow hummer and a 1994 "Fat Boy" Harley. Plus, they've got pictures!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Last Great Internet Bubble Auction | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 432 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • the MP3.COM database.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Joceyln Parfitt (756037) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:44PM (#8389835)
    Too bad they aren't selling the mp3 database itself! All those songs, lost.. there should be a law or something.

    Although that Axis Systems (now part of Verisity Design) machine [cowanalexander.com] looks pretty nice. Hm, $1M initial price.. I wonder for how much it'll go now. We could use one at work for various things.
  • Those Dumb Chairs (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ackthpt (218170) * on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:44PM (#8389838)
    (http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
    Internet Bubble

    It seemed to me that MP3 went due to the lawsuits and harrassment from RIAA, not because they had a particularly flawed business model (aside from the music sharing thing), though a Hummer, Harley, Pool table and other junk does suggest an overeagerness to burn through capital.

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs

    I'd still like to get one of those, but with the price of shipping and gas being what it is, I'm better off looking for one around where I live. I could certainly use a new laptop, but there's piles of those around for cheep.

    I've tried the Aeron chair out and it seemed like a decent chair, are they not all they appear?

    I had one of those swedish (or whatever they were) chairs you kneel in and found my upper back became very sore, so that didn't last.

    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs (Score:5, Interesting)

      Aerons are quite nice, especially if you get the "fully featured" ones. I used one for about a year at one job, and now even 4 years later, I still long for an Aeron. It's not like they're going to massage you while you sit there, but they are quite comfortable, and since the "fabric" has lots of holes in it, they keep you cooler than a standard chair does.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Those Dumb Chairs (Score:5, Insightful)

        by raygundan (16760) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:00PM (#8390019)
        (http://slashdot.org/)
        I got one the way everybody else who has one at home did-- I waited for an auction, and bought one for 1/4 price. Check ebay, too.

        Well worth it-- but you *have* to spend the time to adjust it to make it work for you. They don't feel much different when you're just sitting in it-- you notice the difference at the end of the day when you're not sore from sitting in a chair. But everybody's different, and I'm sure as many people dislike them as like them, even after adjustment and extended use.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by ThrasherTT (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:04PM
        • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by winse (Score:3) Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:06PM
          • dot-com theft fun!!!! (Score:5, Funny)

            by raygundan (16760) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @05:11PM (#8391585)
            (http://slashdot.org/)
            I knew it was coming, and just kept putting the theft off. I wish now I hadn't procrastinated so much on stealing the chair-- but when the day came and they kicked us all out and changed the codes, it was too late. I know a couple of them disappeared, and I even had a no-security-cameras route picked out that made use of the fact that our roof door was unlocked and that it lined up with the fourth floor of the adjacent parking garage. There was a 6' chainlink fence in the way, but i'm sure I could have climbed it and pulled the chair over with me. If only I had gotten around to it. *sigh*

            So (much like the later simpsons episode) I made off with as much ethernet wire as I could.

            One well-prepared bastard had the foresight to lock the super-expensive pro video camera in a filing cabinet and mark it with a distinctive scratch. He bought a lot of 25 beat-up file cabinets later at the auction for about $100, pried the drawer open, and took the camera home after selling the other cabinets for a few bucks to one of the furniture dealers.
            [ Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • That's not how I got one of Those Dumb Chairs by rodgster (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @07:12PM
        • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Wakko Warner (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @08:09PM
      • Re:Those Dumb Chairs (Score:5, Funny)

        by mbadolato (105588) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:03PM (#8390053)
        (Last Journal: Tuesday September 27 2005, @12:14AM)
        and since the "fabric" has lots of holes in it, they keep you cooler than a standard chair does.

        They also dissipate farts quite nicely! What fun are they if you can't share them with your coworkers ? :)
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by SuperQ (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @06:42PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Here I Stand (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:58PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Bilestoad (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:00PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by justMichael (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:02PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs (Score:5, Interesting)

      by kfg (145172) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:07PM (#8390111)
      The kneeling chairs take a bit of getting used to. You have to adjust your position to the desk a bit, they aren't just a "drop in" replacement for a standard chair.

      They also take a bit of time to build up the necessary muscular structure. People who sit in standard chairs have woefully underdeveloped trunk muscles, since the chair is explicitly designed to use as few muscles as possible, as seldom as possible.

      It becomes a feedback cycle. The more you use a standard chair, the more you need one.

      If you're willing to adapt your desk to the chair, rather than the other way around, a simple and common Japanese meditation bench will replace the sort of kneeling chair you are talking about. The trick for comfort with these is to place the bench on a zabuton, not directly on a hard floor.

      What I like to use though is a simple platform, about 30"x36" on which one can sit crosslegged, move around, change postion constantly, etc. These can be built at normal chair hight for use with a standard desk.

      Once you get used to these and build up a certain amount of supporting musculature you'll be loath to every go back to a standard chair. No matter how "ergonomic" a chair is it just isn't designed to hold a person in a position for which human body was designed. The old Greek and Roman benches on which one relined were far more suitable for human use.

      Good luck getting one into your office though.

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by drmike0099 (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:21PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fm6 (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:38PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by bl8n8r (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:14PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by spoonyfork (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:33PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by TomServo (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:54PM
    • I long for an Aeron chair again by spoco2 (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @05:21PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by mixmasterjake (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @06:26PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by datasetgo (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @07:39PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fermion (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @08:27PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by MickLinux (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @10:13PM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Awptimus Prime (Score:2) Thursday February 26 2004, @02:54AM
    • Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Rich Klein (Score:1) Friday February 27 2004, @08:11PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Heh. (Score:5, Funny)

    by SandSpider (60727) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:45PM (#8389845)
    (http://www.thefoodgeek.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 26 2004, @02:34AM)
    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    Very clever, trying to convince everyone not to bid on the Aeron chairs in order to keep the costs down.

    =Brian
    • Re:Heh. by nycsubway (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:59PM
      • Re:Heh. by fafaforza (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @06:13PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Heh. by uberdave (Score:3) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:06PM
      • Re:Heh. by geoffspear (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:28PM
      • Re:Heh. by MadAhab (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:29PM
        • Re:Heh. by Dr Caleb (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:59PM
          • Re:Heh. by Fulcrum of Evil (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @05:22PM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Heh. by Dun Malg (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @07:01PM
      • Re:Heh. by peragrin (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:42PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by koreth (409849) * on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:47PM (#8389870)
    The prices might have been ridiculously high, but those Aeron chairs are pretty comfortable. I got one as a gift way back when they first came out, before they were hot items -- benefits of having relatives in the interior design biz -- and I still use it every day. I can stay comfortably seated for marathon coding or gaming sessions with no backache or sore muscles afterwards, which isn't true of most other chairs I've had over the years. (Yes, I do take breaks ordinarily, but on occasion I'll be deep into something and not notice how much time has gone by, a feeling I'm sure is familiar to many Slashdotters.)

    So by all means knock the fad surrounding it, but it's pretty silly to knock a perfectly good piece of furniture just because it became fashionable for a brief time.

  • Who the hell is "Pootie" [cowanalexander.com]?

    What the hell is This Thing [cowanalexander.com]?

    Does all This Stuff [cowanalexander.com] come with the hat and the giant Pez?

    Inquiring minds want to know!

    Oh, and dibs on the Rocket Ship [cowanalexander.com]. ;)
  • Extra stuff (Score:3, Interesting)

    by savagedome (742194) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:48PM (#8389879)
    servers and notebooks that are probably hopelessly out of date

    But if these machines have hard drivers still hooked up, then there might be lots of interesting stuff lying around on those (maybe mp3s too!)
  • Video games... (Score:3, Informative)

    by iiioxx (610652) <iiioxx@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:49PM (#8389892)
    According to the photos, auction items also include a few full-size arcade cabinets (no big surprise, they're pretty much a dot-com staple).
  • Aeron Chairs... (Score:5, Insightful)

    Yeah, sure, these chairs [cowanalexander.com] came to symbolise the greed of the Dotom Bubble, and they may be "dumb and popular", but there's no denying one thing: they are comfortable. Ask anyone who's ever sat in one, and they will agree. Definitely not worth the $750 per chair that my company paid for them at the time, but they are very comfortable.
  • This explain alot (Score:3, Funny)

    by El (94934) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:51PM (#8389911)
    What in their business model suggested to them "You know, we could make a LOT more money delivering music online if me spend company funds to buy a Harley and a Hummer!"
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Correction by ThousandStars (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:51PM
  • A Hummer? (Score:3, Funny)

    by vijayiyer (728590) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:52PM (#8389918)
    Maybe if companies like MP3.com used their VC to build their businesses rather than buy Hummers, so many wouldn't have gone under. I bet you can't even listen to MP3s over the roar of the diesel in that thing...
    • Re:A Hummer? by ackthpt (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:01PM
    • Re:A Hummer? by tedtimmons (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:04PM
    • Re:A Hummer? (Score:5, Funny)

      by myg (705374) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:09PM (#8390137)
      Ahhh how I miss the good old days when corrupt business men purchased a different kind of hummer with corporate money.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:A Hummer? by myg (Score:1) Thursday February 26 2004, @02:17PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:A Hummer? by first.last (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:12PM
    • Re:A Hummer? by AxelTorvalds (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:22PM
    • Re:A Hummer? by Anne_Nonymous (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:22PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Aerons "Dumb"? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TPIRman (142895) * on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:52PM (#8389919)
    The pricey Herman Miller Aeron chair may have become a symbol of dot-com excesses, but to call it "dumb" is going overboard -- it's a great chair. It's gotten somewhat of a bum rap because many people never take the five minutes to adjust the chair to their body shape. Once you make the proper adjustments, it's heaven [egrindstone.co.uk]. I never understood why you wouldn't properly calibrate a "peripheral" that you use 100% of the time while you're working. Treat your ass with respect!
  • why pick on the Aeron? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:53PM (#8389934)

    lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    You got something against the Aeron? I'm sitting in one right now, I've been using it everyday for years, it is hands-down the best chair I've ever plopped my ass down in.

    I used to have back pains every morning after sitting a lot, and discomfort after long coding sessions, even with an alarm that I set to tell me to stand up every 30 minutes. But all that went away with the Aeron, it is a "life changer".

    It got popular during the boom, like every expensive luxary item. How come you don't say "big dumb Hummer trucks", it seems like every dotcom CEO had one.

    Just sticking up for a good product. I have several other Herman Miller products, including a *very* nice Eames lounge chair, they are worth the money.

    • worth whose money? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by rbird76 (688731) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:05PM (#8390787)
      I can understand that you like the chairs. I spend more than I should on fancy pens, and one can reasonably argue that they're not the smartest thing for me to spend my money on. On the other hand, it is MY MONEY (at least until it goes for taxes, my gf, etc.)

      The problem isn't that any of these items such as the Herman Miller chairs, the Hummers (although I could be convinced on that one...) or the Harleys aren't good, but that they're bought with someone else's money. Like the Tyco and Enron folks now, the dot-com people spent their investors' money as if it was given for their personal enjoyment rather than to fund a business intended to succeed. Items such as the above are good products, but their costs to individuals are not in most cases worth the benefits to the individuals. On the other hand, things like this are good if the money is someone else's; then the only comparison required is whether you could buy something else with which you would be happier with the money.

      Bottom line - if these items are worth your money, buying them makes sense. If it isn't worth your own money to buy them, however, than it certainly isn't the job of your investors or companies to buy them for you, and they are ultimately counterproductive to the missions those people intended to achieve (because the money could almost certainly be used for things more likely to achieve their ends). When companies buy these things, someone else almost certain got ripped off to buy them - whether it is their customers, investors, or others in the company. Their presence says that the people running the show treat other people's money as their own personal piggy bank, and such people aren't to be trusted (at least not with my money).
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:why pick on the Aeron? by retinaburn (Score:1) Thursday February 26 2004, @10:35AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • same old story? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nil5 (538942) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:54PM (#8389942)
    (http://www.sco.com/)
    I participated in the Enron auction, and let me tell you it was utterly a waste of time. The prices really were hardly less than retail value, and considering that the equipment was used (i was mostly interested in computers and lcd's) it was overpriced. What you had were lots of dumb folks out there that jacked up the prices so that nothing was really all that good of a deal or anything to be surprised about. I swear there were used 15" LCD's going for $4-500. You could buy one from BestBuy for that price last year.

    I'm just really skeptical about these auctions. I found that it really wasn't worth the effort of getting registered, calling in, etc.
  • I hope its just not me (Score:5, Funny)

    by bigjnsa500 (575392) <bigjnsa500NO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:55PM (#8389961)
    (http://www.p0wn3d.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday March 09 2004, @09:43AM)
    but I am having a hard time dealing with that name

    cowanalexander

    Something is just plain wrong with it.

  • MP3.com timeline (Score:5, Informative)

    by dtio (134278) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:55PM (#8389964)
    Here's a quick, brief MP3.com timeline:

    July 1999 - MP3.com floats, raising $344 million.

    August 2000 - MP3.com pays Sony $20m in damages for copyright infringement

    September 2000 - MP3.com pays Universal $250m in damages for copyright infringement

    May 2001 - Vivendi Universal announces intention to purchase MP3.com

    Vivendi-Universal's former chief executive Jean-Marie Messier bought MP3.com for $372m in 2001 and integrated it into Vivendi Universal Net. The rise of file-sharing, the dot.com crash and perceptions of MP3.com as a 'sell-out' resulted in the investment failing to meet its potential.

    November 14, 2003

    MP3.com to close

    CNET has acquired MP3.com and will be shutting down the downloading service. According to an email sent to MP3.com subscribers, the site will no longer be available as of December 2nd. According to the same email, CNET is planning to launch a service in the future.

    Feb 25, 2004

    Complete Liquidation of 100,000 sq ft facility - 100s of Servers (Sun, Compaq, HP, & Dell) Clarion EMC Storage - 100s of PCs, Notebooks, Printers - 100s of Herman Miller Aeron Chairs - 10,000 sq ft health club - Pool Table, Foosball, Video Arcade Games, Ping Pong. Artwork, Collectable Musical instruments, Contemporary Furniture & more...
  • There Can Be... Only One! by SeinJunkie (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:55PM
  • Exactly why.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BWJones (18351) * on Wednesday February 25 2004, @02:55PM (#8389969)
    (http://prometheus.med.utah.edu/~bwjones/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 28, @05:15PM)
    This is exactly why these companies went belly up. You barely have a product in an ill defined niche with no real defined revenue stream. Yet, the company is able to build all sorts of cool little baubles, model rocket ships, framed guitars, high end ass buckets, Hummer automobiles, work out equipment etc...etc...etc... from start up capital.

    This is exactly why I want to see first hand any startup company that I am interested in investing in. Field trips aren't just for grade schoolers.

    • Re:Exactly why.... by Shakrai (Score:3) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:03PM
      • Re:Exactly why.... by stratjakt (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:15PM
        • Re:Exactly why.... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Shakrai (717556) * on Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:22PM (#8390261)
          (Last Journal: Monday November 26, @06:13PM)
          If you wanted the best and brightest in a tight labor market, you aren't going to get it with rows of grey cubicles and Office Depot task chairs.

          Yeah but there are better ways to get it then Hummers. I'd rather have flex-time then a chance to take the company Hummer out for a spin once a month or so. I'm sure 95% of the /. readership would agree.

          That's just common sense.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Exactly why.... by stratjakt (Score:2) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:42PM
          • Re:Exactly why.... by haystor (Score:1) Wednesday February 25 2004, @03:46PM
          • Why choose? (Score:5, Informative)

            by mdfst13 (664665) on Wednesday February 25 2004, @04:09PM (#8390834)
            "Yeah but there are better ways to get it then Hummers. I'd rather have flex-time then a chance to take the company Hummer out for a spin once a month or so. I'm sure 95% of the /. readership would agree."

            Sure, but why choose? They could provide *both* flex time *and* loads of goodies. Plus, stock options and high salaries. The biggest thing about the dotcoms was that they really didn't have much in the way of expenses other than bandwidth and labor. It's also worth noting that by buying these things as corporate expenses, they save the programmers buying them themselves. The company can expense these; people can't. Plus, once they IPOed, how do they *keep* the people who just became millionaires: by treating them like millionaires.

            Stock options are a nice perk in stable situations, but they are really volatile in start-ups. The problem is that if the company takes off, now all your employees have enough money that they don't need you anymore. The rational thing might be to hire new employees with regular salaries; the problem was that those people would rather work for another start up and get rich.

            The worst part is that people who recognized that stock prices were unrealistic were pushed aside in favor of those who were willing to ride the bubble. I remember a mutual fund m