Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Lego to Stop Producing Mindstorms

Posted by CowboyNeal on Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:37 AM
from the good-thing-not-always-popular dept.
nick58b writes "Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced they will stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products. This would include Mindstorms, one of the greatest educational toys ever produced." It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits. If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

Related Stories

[+] Hardware: Fan-Designed Mindstorms Release Next Tuesday 73 comments
EaglesNest writes "The Washington Post has a story describing Lego's new Mindstorms. Two years ago, Lego formed their own 'star chamber' to decide what the next iteration of Mindstorms would look like. Eventually reaching 14 people, the Mindstorm users panel had a huge impact on what will be released commercially next week." From the article: "One member was even able to pressure the company into building a part that makes its debut in the new Mindstorms set -- a rare event at Lego, which treats every individual piece with reverence. The new part is a connector that allows two long pieces to be joined at a 90-degree angle. The resulting toy has much more up-to-date technology than the original set, including a USB 2.0 port for fast downloads and Bluetooth for wireless connections. With the right parts and programming, a Mindstorms robot can dance in response to sounds or follow the beam of a flashlight."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Lego to Stop Producing Mindstorms | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 615 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • What happened? by iantri (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:38AM
    • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Oculus Habent (562837) * <oculus.habentNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:44AM (#7937520)
      (Last Journal: Tuesday May 15 2007, @07:52PM)
      Price.

      Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

      TC Logo and Dacta were also great toys (one of my teachers wrote some of the documentation), but there just wasn't a big market.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:What happened? (Score:4, Funny)

        by saunabad (664414) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:44AM (#7937837)
        Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

        Every parent who is an engineer? At least I will when I have my own kids.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by A55M0NKEY (554964) on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:20PM (#7938406)
        (http://127.0.0.1/ | Last Journal: Wednesday December 15 2004, @06:58PM)
        Yes. Price. Legos are really cool, but they have always been way overpriced. They are lil' plastic blocks. They should be like 10 bucks for a five gallon pail of them, not 40 bucks for three handfuls.
        [ Parent ]
        • Overpriced is unfortunately right. (Score:4, Insightful)

          by LiberalApplication (570878) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:47PM (#7939010)
          ...and that may be why the majority of Lego-set-purchasers I know (myself included) are over the age of 21 and purchasing them for themselves. With most of the sets that kids would actually be able to squeeze a decent amount of fun out of [lego.com] being over $40.00, and most of the affordable [lego.com] sets being so rinky-dink, a child given the choice would probably ask their parent for a comparably priced video game [ebgames.com] instead of a $50 Lego set.

          I had (and dearly loved) piles of Legos when I was little, but most of those came as hand-me-downs in buckets. Maybe we can convince the folks at Lego to stop spending as much effort in producing new, specialized blocks for new, specialized sets with fancy graphics on their boxes and start selling things in buckets.

          On another note, I bet that if someone were to set up a PayPal account to donate to the Lego corporation, that the mobs [cside.com] of Lego [fbtb.net] maniacs [ikros.net] out [thereverend.com] there [foundrydx.com] would be able to generate a significant amount of money for them.

          [ Parent ]
          • by mabhatter654 (561290) on Saturday January 10 2004, @03:29PM (#7939381)
            I'd agree, what's needed are more simle parts and less flashy stuff. You know how hard [and expensive] it is to get enough parts to build a decent sized castle nowdays! They need more buckets of 2x4 colored blocks...in more useful colors. That said, Lego needs to adapt it's piece size to make it more friendly to robot builders...The current technic pieces are too small and poorly joining for anything except matchbox sized toys. Building anything moving that exceeds 12" in any direction is extremely flaky.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by geekoid (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @09:38PM
          • Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by rocca (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:19PM
        • Re:What happened? by RedWizzard (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:56PM
          • Re:What happened? by lambadomy (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:07PM
          • Re:What happened? by Afrosheen (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:22PM
            • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Informative)

              by lahi (316099) on Saturday January 10 2004, @05:54PM (#7940555)
              If this was a chinese company they'd sell 5lb buckets of assorted pieces for $5.

              And each brick would have a lifetime of less than one year, developing cracks and warp. Of the 5 lb, at least 4 lb would be out-of-spec, either fit too loosely or too tight, and they would have sharp, annoying warts where they were carelessly ripped from the molding sprue. The color would vary extremely from batch to batch, be rather dull, and fade rapidly when exposed to the sun.

              The problem with LEGO bricks is not that they are overpriced, but that they are overengineered. They are just too good. And quality is just not generally appreciated these days, especially when we're talking toys.

              As a child, I had quite a few Matchbox, Corgi and Dinky cars, very accurate models, well made, often in England. Sure, you can still get those brands today, if you want to pay collector prices. The toy stores, at least here, abound with lousy chinese produced stuff, that breaks when you look too hard at it.

              Mind you, many of my toys I had inherited from my older brothers. And many of my toys are still in such a good shape, that my son now continues to play with them. That's good for the customer, but it's just not good for sales: either kids inherit a toy (= no sale) or parents don't care about long life, and therefore buy cheaper toys.

              I build plastic models (aircraft, military vehicles etc), and I can tell you that precisely molded plastic parts, even when they come in just one color and still attached to the sprue, as plastic model kits do, are *quite* expensive. *Even* when produced in China.

              -Lasse
              [ Parent ]
        • Re:What happened? by polarbrowser (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:30PM
      • Re:What happened? by MrMr (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:48PM
      • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by zaffir (546764) on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:54PM (#7938664)
        Also, there are no good, cool sets to buy anymore. It's all Bionicle or sets that are 90% "unique" pieces. Every time i go to the toy store i hope to find something along the lines of Space Police or Ice Station or any of the other good sets, and they just don't exist. Therefore, Lego doesn't get my money.
        [ Parent ]
      • production moving to china by acomj (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @05:24PM
      • Re:What happened? by 88NoSoup4U88 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @08:15PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:What happened? by Davak (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:45AM
      • Re:What happened? (Score:4, Interesting)

        by RealityMogul (663835) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:34AM (#7937788)
        I got my son a couple lego sets for Christmas and one of the Mega Block sets. The Mega Block set was a pain in the ass to assemble and all the pieces just kept popping apart. I think there is still an issue with quality even though the pieces look the same.

        Of course one of the Lego sets was missing several pieces, so they aren't without their problems.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:What happened? by iocat (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:16PM
        • Re:What happened? by filledwithloathing (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:23PM
          • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by fenix down (206580) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:32PM (#7938911)
            Honestly, I don't see how that's a bad thing. I always thought the Star Wars sets were a bad idea, no matter how neat it is to have a little Lego Emperor. You get the kid a model kit if he wants a model Millenium Falcon. Lego's for building stuff without instructions. Sure, sell the sets, it keeps the kids busy for the rest of Christmas day, but at least pretend you can take it apart and turn it into something else. What's your kid supposed to do when he takes the thing apart the next day and all he has are irregular slanty bricks with Rebel Alliance logos printed on them and Millenium Falcon hull sections? You can't very well go and build castle turrets out of R2D2's head.
            [ Parent ]
        • You are sure it was lego? by Snaller (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:24PM
        • Re:What happened? by zeugma-amp (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:37PM
        • Re:What happened? by AchmedHabib (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:05PM
        • Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:53PM
        • Re:What happened? by Cowboy Bunny (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @08:15PM
        • Re:What happened? by Neb Okla (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:35AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:What happened? by BigHungryJoe (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM
    • Never, ever upgraded the platform (Score:5, Interesting)

      by luge (4808) <slashdot@tieguy. o r g> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM (#7937536)
      (http://tieguy.org/)
      The mindstorms were cool toys, for a little while. But Lego never upgraded them- realistically, they had not released a significant upgrade of any type in the now 6 years since they released the product. They could have made them either more powerful (and hence more appealing to the adults who bought tons of them early on, but got frustrated by HW limitations quickly) or they could have made them simpler (and hence more appealing to the kids who they normally try to target.) They did neither, and let the product stagnate. And that's why they have to kill it now. Shame, really- they could have been really, really great. [I used to maintain legOS, so I fall into the category of 'adults frustrated by the limitations.]
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Drakin (415182) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:54AM (#7937591)
      Not low sales. Low profit margins. They're cutting the electronic, and licensed sets primarly. Which are the more expensive ones to make, electronic ones due to the cost of componates, and licensed sets for the costs of licensing.

      One could only wish that they would license out the mindstorm excluseive items to be built and sold by someone else.
      [ Parent ]
    • Vid Games (Score:5, Insightful)

      by millahtime (710421) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:13AM (#7937678)
      (http://millahtime.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 15 2005, @01:00PM)
      Could the less use of legos be due to video games???? I think so. Why use your imaginagtion when someone else can do it for you.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Vid Games by Valen1260 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:18PM
        • Re:Vid Games by mark_lybarger (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:57PM
      • Re:Vid Games by Peeet (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:41PM
        • Re:Vid Games by orkysoft (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:39PM
        • Re:Vid Games by EinarH (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:29PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Vid Games by jpnews (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:19PM
        • Re:Vid Games by King_TJ (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:25PM
      • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:What happened? by hh1000 (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:58AM
    • What I love about mindstorms is its hackability. sure, the default programming "language" it comes with is limited and annoying to use, but reflash it with something like BrickOS [slashdot.org] and you can program it in C. very cool stuff, sorry to see it go.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:What happened? by bechthros (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:28PM
    • Re:What happened? by cowbrain_jimbo_ox (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:43PM
    • Re:What happened? by dmccunney (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @07:54PM
    • Lego was never really a true geek's toy by stoneystoney (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @06:45AM
    • Re:What happened? by Tellalian (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:01PM
    • Re:Not insightful! by DrunkenTerror (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:06AM
    • Re:Not insightful! by Mod Me God (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:53AM
    • Hey now, let's watch it with the Linus remarks... by ErnstKompressor (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:56PM
    • Re:Not insightful! by cybpunks3 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:06PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Mindstorm no more! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nsxdavid (254126) * <dw@[ ]y.net ['pla' in gap]> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:39AM (#7937489)
    (http://www.play.net/)
    Okay, I could not care one tad bit less if I never see another lego Harry Potter set. But the loss of Mindstorm is nearly unbearable! The things people have done with this simple but effective robotics set eclips even more ambitious sets like the ER1. This is a sad day.

    SCO must be behind this somehow!
    • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by BoldAC (735721) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:50AM (#7937566)
      It is not SCO's fault.

      Since it reported its first loss of $47.8 million in 1998, Lego has been hit hard by increasing competition from the makers of electronic toys.

      It is GBA fault. It is the fault of the game consoles, the computers, and the leap-pad-ish products.

      Plastic legos and tinker-toys and cabin logs rocked when I was a child. This year Christmas for my two year old required more batteries than gifts for the rest of my family.

      Pure electronic gifts are winning...

      All of our kids are going to grow to be bigger geeks than we are. :)

      AC
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:4, Insightful)

        by DAldredge (2353) <SlashdotEmail@GMail.Com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:54AM (#7937596)
        (Last Journal: Sunday October 14, @10:49PM)
        No.

        Geeks can think and imagine. You are turning you 2 year old into a person that has to have flashly lights to be entertained.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by GreyWolf3000 (468618) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM (#7937815)
        (Last Journal: Thursday October 11, @12:31AM)
        No, lego has gotten into the business of dumbing down their products by making huge specialized pieces and now real lego enthusiasts are buying both themselves and their children bulk used sets off of ebay.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Mindstorm no more! by nsxdavid (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:02PM
        • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by wayward_son (146338) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:20PM (#7938029)
          Exactly.

          In the heyday of Lego, (late 1980's-early 1990's IMHO) you had a few specialized parts and mostly rather generic parts. You could build many different things out of a kit, sometimes even coming up with things better that what the kit was intended for. For example, I was able to build a church for my Lego town out of leftover castle parts.

          Now it's all specialized crap. You can only build one thing that looks halfway decent. What's the fun in that?

          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Mindstorm no more! by InSpiteOf (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:29PM
        • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:5, Informative)

          by Blondie-Wan (559212) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:37PM (#7938111)
          (http://www.clanmacgaming.com/)
          But they also make general parts assortments. In some ways, one can find more "open," "nonspecialized" LEGO now than back in the '70s. You can directly order bags of just one kind of basic brick from them, for example, and many of the LEGO stores have bins of parts so one can just fill a cup or a bag with parts, as in a candy store.

          Tellingly, the Make and Create sets are apparently a bright spot for the company; reportedly they're among the few things they do really well, which seems to indicate their customers do indeed want general, nonspecialized sets that encourage imaginative, free-form building and unguided play as much as possible (though I do know one of the Harry Potter sets was apparently their biggest seller last year, but I guess that's an aberration). If nothing else, those sets also have some of the better price/piece ratios among all their current offerings...

          [ Parent ]
      • Re:Mindstorm no more! by ElectricRook (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM
      • Re:Mindstorm no more! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:48PM
    • License LegOS by bomblaster (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:20PM
    • Re:Mindstorm no more! (Score:5, Informative)

      by homer_ca (144738) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:58PM (#7939128)
      Very sad, to lose Mindstorms, although I never tried it myself. However, one maker of similar toys is Fischertechnik [fischertechnik.com]. They come from Germany, and they don't have much distribution here, but I had a set as a kid, and it's the absolute best quality I've seen for any mechanical tinkering. Imagine the best of Legos and Erector sets combined.

      I've never tried their robotics kits, but it may be just what you're looking for. Eight digital inputs, two analog inputs, and four motor outputs. Also the quality of the gears, motors and structural pieces blows Legos away. Price is expensive, but not outrageously so. In the same ballpark as Mindstorms.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Mindstorm no more! by mabhatter654 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:32PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • sad... by pineapples10 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:40AM
  • I've been a Lego fan most of my life too, but I have to say that I'm not surprised or terribly upset about the way this has turned out. Lego sets have become so ungodly expensive over the years (many $100+ sets having nothing to offer for their high price points other than "collector's series" or some other buzzword), it's no wonder more people aren't buying them.
  • Mindstorms was awesome by ObviousGuy (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:40AM
  • Don't forget... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:41AM (#7937502)
    The plural of Lego is Lego, not Legos.


    Plus Lego is Danish for "play well"


    Just a few Lego facts.

  • by smooge (3938) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:41AM (#7937503)
    (http://www.smoogespace.com/)
    I would say that it might send a message if you buy as direct as possible from them.. but I would make sure that they are all bought up by the end of the month. Even if Lego cant keep the product.. it might inspire some other company to do so.
  • Inspiration by Vic (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:41AM
    • Re:Inspiration by AmigaAvenger (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:51AM
    • Re:Inspiration (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Richthofen80 (412488) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:08AM (#7937652)
      (http://www.edgiardina.com/)
      I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

      Actually, the main point of the lego mindstorms was to change the way kids learned... to make learning and playing the same.

      The prototype for the mindstorms toy was built at the MIT media lab by roboticist Fred Martin [uml.edu]. (who teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell at a budding robotics lab). Fred really wanted to know about how to use computing to educate kids, and lego offered a sum of money to the media lab in order to foster a new type of marketable toy that had "engaging computing" potential. So he built a lego brick with a computer inside, which was the base of the toy.

      Interesting enough, Fred Martin also built the handyboard, which is a great way to get into amateur robotics. As shameless self-promotion, the work I did in Fred Martin's class can be found here [edgiardina.com].
      [ Parent ]
      • Handyboard by DesertFalcon (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:56PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Inspiration by 2short (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:56PM
      • Re:Inspiration by Richthofen80 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:33PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Inspiration by stfvon007 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:13AM
  • MindStorms by e r i k 0 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:42AM
    • Cost by luge (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:50AM
      • Re:Cost by jandrese (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:17AM
        • Re:Cost by luge (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:28AM
          • Re:Cost by The Wicked Armadillo (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:11PM
            • Re:Cost by luge (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:21PM
    • No (Score:4, Insightful)

      by imsabbel (611519) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:56AM (#7937604)
      Sorry, but for 100$ you get a a64 3000+. You know, 1024KiB high speed cache, 6.4GB/s HT io, ect.
      Those little microcontrollers cost you 5$ at most if you buy a few 1000.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:No by aceh0 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:44PM
        • Re:No by imsabbel (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:54PM
    • Re:MindStorms (Score:5, Insightful)

      by alienw (585907) <alienw.slashdot@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:17AM (#7937695)
      Add that to the cost of making the plastic blocks themselves.

      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

      I mean, a microcontroller with three inputs and outputs, 32 kB RAM, and some ROM (512 kiB IIRC) has to cost at least $100

      If you think that a microcontroller with 32kB RAM and 512 KB ROM costs >$100 you have never priced one. A microcontroller such as a PICmicro, an Atmel, a Zilog, and so on costs at most $10 for a "deluxe" version with about 30 I/O pins and Flash memory. What Lego is using is most likely a pre-programmed chip w/o Flash, which are about 1/3 of the price. A 512 KB FlashROM chip costs about $6. These are RETAIL prices, what you can get one single chip for. Lego probably gets them for a fraction of the price since they need quite a few of the things.

      I am willing to bet that most of the money from the cost of a Mindstorms kit goes towards marketing and product development. Not towards manufacturing. I'm sure the software inside (and outside) the mindstorms thing cost much more to develop than the hardware.
      [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • lets be fair not subjective now by tetrahedrassface (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:42AM
  • Great stuff, but... (Score:4, Informative)

    by BillFarber (641417) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:42AM (#7937513)
    they charge twice as much for the same stuff you can get from other brands. Of course, the high value of the Euro isn't helping. Those are the reasons why the company is having financial problems.
  • Get back to ordinary bricks! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jolyonr (560227) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:43AM (#7937514)
    (http://www.mways.co.uk/)
    Too many of the new lego products have so few generic bricks and too many specialist bricks that can't easily be used for other things, eg, you can build a lego buggy into, um, a slightly different buggy, but not a lot else.

    Get back to providing big bags of ordinary bricks, and encourage creativity!

    Jolyon
  • Such a shame :-( (Score:4, Insightful)

    This is horrible. I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms [lego.com] stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?

    I'm not sure the price of these toys is the problem. Toys in general aren't exactly cheap these days. Neither are video games, and video games seem to be what is the most appealing to children these days. So what we might need to look into is why expensive video games are more interesting than expensive toys where children have to actually think to use them. Or did I just answer my own question?

  • Sadly.. by illusioned (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM
    • Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:00AM
      • Re:Sadly.. (Score:4, Insightful)

        by illusioned (733320) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:13AM (#7937680)
        (http://www.rsaisp.com/)
        I think that society today is more interested in quick results then in long term effects. When a child is restless, parents seem to just want them to quiet down and look for the easiest ways out. When a parent is too busy with their own lives, the TV should not become a baby sitter. Why? There is no independent thought going on, the child is simply entertained. The child is not forced to think about what is happening in most cases because the answer is inevitably answered later on in the show, if there even is a question to ponder. Parents should never be too busy for their child, if that is the case, they shouldn't have had one at all. I am no sociologist, but one thing that makes me believe that sticking children in front of a TV does a-lot more bad then good is watching my father getting older. Last year all he did was watch TV, even educational things like the discovery channel. I noticed that gradually his mind became a little duller, you could tell by the way that he spoke. He couldn't take it anymore, he even noticed that he was slowing down. Now he works for my sister's school doing odd computer jobs, and he is back to a sort of "normal".
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:21PM
        • Do you have a child? by OgreFade (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:43PM
        • Re:Sadly.. by stephanruby (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:57PM
          • Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:21PM
            • Re:Sadly.. by stephanruby (Score:2) Sunday January 11 2004, @04:47AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by cflorio (604840) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM (#7937532)
    (http://www.floriopics.com/)
    Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money if they didn't pay people to play with Legos! [slashdot.org]

    At the very least, they could outsource the playing with Legos to India!

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Henry V .009 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM
  • Mixed feelings by Fiveeight (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:47AM
  • What Lego should do by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:48AM
  • Do you know why LEGO is having trouble? by DAldredge (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:48AM
  • specialization (Score:5, Insightful)

    by frizz (91565) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:48AM (#7937555)
    The problem with Lego sets in recent years has been the fact that they are very specialized. You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos. Now, all I see is "Star Wars: Episode I" or other such sets that don't inspire the imagination in the slightest.
    • Youngsters... (Score:4, Funny)

      by NineNine (235196) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:24AM (#7937738)
      (http://ninenine.com/)
      You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos.

      When I was a kid, I bought Lego sets that just came with x number of assorted blocks with no theme whatsoever. That took REAL creativity. I don't even know if you can buy just plain ol' regular blocks anymore.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:specialization by wayward_son (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:30PM
    • don't abandon the core product line! by snooo53 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:34PM
  • NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Keebler71 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:49AM
  • What happens to FLL? by trickfish (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:49AM
  • Stick to the blocks by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:50AM
  • Lego is dead, long live Lego (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Traa (158207) * on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:50AM (#7937571)
    (http://www.yellowcatdesign.com/ | Last Journal: Monday June 23 2003, @01:55AM)
    I for one am happy to see that Lego is making some serious changes. I disagree that it is the youth that is to blame. I have several young cousins that love to play with Lego but I see them less and less impressed with the "put these 4 custom pieces together and you have a Star-Jedi-Saurus-O-Tron-Laser-Car-Thingy". In my opinion Lego took to much to the 'build it once' toys and todays youth, just like in the good old days gets its real pleasure from the huge collection of small blocks with which you can build a House, a Plane, a Car or even a Spaceship.

    Just before christmass I walked into a newly found Lego store at Valley Fair Mall (popular luxury mall in San Jose) and was discusted by the choices offered. Crappy replica's of crappy movies and stories that would not add anything of value to a kid's Lego collection other then a bunch of unusable custom pieces. Let alone the rediculous prices.

    Rethink your strategy Lego. What worked in the past will really work in the future, there is still time since there is still no competition!
  • More of a sociologist? How about less myopic? by swb (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:51AM
  • Of course they lost money... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by teknikl (539522) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:51AM (#7937575)
    have you seen their product line lately? Congratualtions to the board on finally figuring out they have lousy execs who were driving the line away from what people wanted. You can hardly buy a decent set (lego builder sets are the exclusion) that doesn't have half of its pieces as special components, non-lego coloring or exclusive stickering. The result is a bunch of pieces you can only use if you are building a particular set - counter intuitive to the whole lego concept. The whole Jack Stone thing - the guys are twice the size of the old 'mini-fig' guys. What, is Jack Stone a giant? Are the old mini-figs halflings? Are old my old mini-figs obsolete now? How is jack stone suppoed to drive the car with the tiny steering wheel - from the old set. Its most irritating because, if you are like me you already have a good sized pile of these and its like Lego moved the ball on you. It will be sad if they quit mindstorms - hopefully it will be picked up by an educational company on licence. What I really miss is the set that had all the gears and socketed I-beams. That was a great mechanical engineering kit. This will not destroy Lego - they will endure. As any 5 year old (mine included) what his favorite thing to do at school.
  • A good friend of mine, Russ, has a great and interesting and THOROUGH page detailing everything you could ever want to know about Mindstorms.

    His page, at http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics/ [crynwr.com], discusses the internals in great detail. You really won't believe how ADVANCED his knowledge is, so you've gotta check it out for yourself.

    The page contains EVERYTHING about these amazing toys. I can't believe they're being discontinued. It's probably due to kids having too many activities (to beef-up their resumes) and videogames/television/radio taking up their time. No one sits down anymore to spend quality time with their family and build toys like these Mindstorms. We all have our own schedules and stuff, and it's probably NOT good for America in the long term.

    Anyway, sorry to jade off a bit there, but here are some other links from my friend's page:
    1) Create a Spider Robot [homepage.dk]
    2) LEGO MINDSTORMS Group official SDK [lego.com]

    Enjoy these links and much more on Russ's page! I helped him with the HTML code ;-)
  • Mechano, anyone? by vorwerk (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:55AM
  • No wonder (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Apreche (239272) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:56AM (#7937605)
    (http://www.apreche.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 08 2005, @11:17PM)
    It's no wonder that lego is losing money. They seem to be putting a heck of a lot of their resources into stuff like Bionicle. Have you seen those things? There are like 10 pieces, they are not standard brick, and you can only make one thing out of them.

    Bring back castle lego at a reasonable price and we'll talk. I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle. The big black square one. Now all they make is bionicle, harry potter, and some star wars. It's not the same as it was.

    It used to be a toy of building. Now it's just a toy you build.
    • Re:No wonder by nucal (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:24AM
    • Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:38AM
    • Re:No wonder by gnu-generation-one (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:43AM
      • Re:No wonder by madpierre (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:32PM
      • Re:No wonder by sprag (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @09:54PM
    • Re:No wonder by agedman (Score:3) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:04PM
      • Re:No wonder by mabhatter654 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:59PM
    • Re:No wonder by Pez69 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:46PM
    • Re:No wonder by Mr Smidge (Score:2) Sunday January 11 2004, @11:00AM
    • Bionicles Review by Vagary (Score:3) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:54PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Too specialized (Score:5, Interesting)

    I have to cast my lot with the folks who are complaining about too many special-purpose blocks. Lego has to make molds for all of those, no wonder the damn things are so expensive.

    When I was a kid, there were very few specialized blocks. Even the railroad kit didn't have any except for the lego motor modules (I have always had a soft heart for the 70's-era motor modules) and the railroad tracks. Even the railroad track ties were standard 8x2 thin blocks.

    In those days the vast majority of legos were sold in generic kits. You could even get small boxes of 50 or 100 generic blocks, up through the large 400 and 600 and 1000 block kits. All generic. They'd come with a little booklet of suggestions but the possibilities were endless.

    The 70's-era house kits had doors, windows, and roof blocks all of which tied in with standard blocks. You could build a wall of doors or use an architectural door in your Moon Rover. You could use your roof blocks to make an Aztec pyramid.

    Now you buy a little kit for, say, a TIE fighter and it costs $20 and there's not much you can build with it except things that look a hell of a lot like TIE fighters. The big generic kits aren't even sold any more; if they were they'd probably cost $1,000 and nobody would buy them.

    Lego should go back to making the generic kits, price them reasonably, and let the kids think of stuff to build themselves again.

  • showing their age (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tobes (302057) * <tobypadilla@nospAm.mac.com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:58AM (#7937615)
    (http://www.musicmobs.com/)
    I think that it was time to retire the current incarnation of Mindstorms anyway. It would be nice if the next gen. robot toy featured:
    wireless (802.11x or cell)
    a linux based os (of course)
    more sophisticated moving parts
    cooler ai modules...

    I definitely think that there is a market out there for such a product.
    • Re:showing their age by way2trivial (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:07AM
    • Re:showing their age (Score:4, Interesting)

      by gnu-generation-one (717590) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:49AM (#7937864)
      (http://konspire.sourceforge.net/)
      "I think that it was time to retire the current incarnation of Mindstorms anyway. It would be nice if the next gen. robot toy featured:
      * wireless (802.11x or cell)
      * a linux based os (of course)
      * more sophisticated moving parts
      * cooler ai modules..."


      Or more specifically:
      * Lots more outputs, lots more motors (solenoids, electromagnets, lights, LEDs) in the box.
      * Li-ion rechargeable batteries
      * Radio-control, possibly from your PC.
      * Webcam (after all, who will buy it if it can't be used to make a climbing or flying spy-device?)

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:showing their age by rossz (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:56PM
  • Play methods (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Waffle Iron (339739) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:03AM (#7937634)
    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I don't know about 20 years ago, but 35 years ago I used to play with plain rectangular Lego blocks and generic wheels. I had to use my own mind and imagination to assemble these general-purpose blocks into the wide variety of things I wanted to build.

    From the look of today's Lego sets, children play today by using the custom single-purpose pieces to assemble a verbatim copy of the picture on the box.

  • They Don't Care About Customers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by snookerdoodle (123851) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:04AM (#7937639)
    (http://www.dev-null.cc/)
    As the father of 7 and 8 year old boys, the elder of which has quite a collection of Bionicles, I've observed one little tidbit about Lego: if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it (No Bionicle Pun Intended ;).

    What does this have to do with their financial success? A lot, IMHO. It certainly has affected our brand loyalty. As Kewl as Bionicles are, we have tried to steer our boyz towards products made by more consumer friendly companies, such as K'nex.

    I know there's more to running a company, but this to me says they still Just Don't Get It.

    Mark
  • Why in my day... (Score:3, Interesting)

    Boy I'm feeling old, I never got a chance to play with Mindstorm Legos. We had regular Legos, but Erector Sets were still going strong when I was a kid. When you built something with an Erector Set you felt you'd really constructed something. In fact I once worked later in life for a mom and pop business where the owner had constructed a motorized ticket dispenser constructed mostly from Erector Set pieces and Roller Skate wheels. I also recall seeing several High School science experiments held together by Erector Set, and I'm talking the teachers semi-permanent devices, not Rube-Goldberg science fair projects (though they were there also).

    I'm sure Mindstorm Lego people must have some similar tails to tell, and await a few replies.

  • Indicative of a trend? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tjcoyle (539228) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:11AM (#7937666)
    (http://www.thomascoyle.net/)

    Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?

    When I was younger (here we go....), toy stores always had a great selection of the classic Technics kits. The large, complicated kits seemed to be the hottest items, because they were *challenging* and *interesting*.

    Today, most of the sets I see are low-piece count, over-simplifed, plug-the-head-into-the-pelvic-chassis Bionicle garbage, which seems only to make the statement that kids today aren't interested in anything unless it's presented as a completely non-cerebral AARRRGGGHHH-type of monster package.

    This really is a shame. I'll never stop appreciating the endless hours I spent creating machines of every type imaginable, and can't help but to think that my exposure to Lego helped to form a little bit of who I am today.

    I don't know what a childhood of building Bionicles might do to kid, expect possibly make them wish their parents were cool enough to buy them a toy that doesn't require assembly, like the kid next door.

    And that's a sad thing

  • Legos - Too Expensive by thelizman (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:11AM
    • Amen. by porkchop_d_clown (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:38AM
      • Re:Amen. by thelizman (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:36PM
  • Dont Get It by N8F8 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:17AM
  • Err, mindstorms 20 years ago? by jonadab (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:18AM
  • Star Wars did it by Zyrmfxl (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:18AM
  • Dacta was cool by Bohemoth2 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:18AM
  • Unholy deals with corporations (Score:3, Informative)

    by CrazyJim0 (324487) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:20AM (#7937713)
    From what I hear, Lego made money, but it just had to pay so much to Lucas, Disney, and whoever makes Harry Potter, that it had the loss.

    Corps overvalue their own IP, while everyone else's IP is theirs to exploit.
  • Do they mean the whole Bionicle debacle? by Thag (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:25AM
  • Attic Treasure by Caseyscrib (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:30AM
  • Three words that will save Lego... by Crolis (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:34AM
  • Lego going downhill by aldjiblah (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:35AM
  • Price and Pieces by MarkoNo5 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:35AM
  • Mindstorms for 401K (Score:3, Funny)

    by mikewas (119762) <mikewas@comcast.net> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:36AM (#7937799)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I've been looking for something to put my retirement saings in. The Mindstorm kits are showing their age, but I still love them & I think they'll be around for some time to come.
  • They will stick with their core business... by garethwi (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM
  • While I never tried out mindstorms because of $$$, by Txiasaeia (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM
  • huh? by nomadic (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM
  • Mindstorm gone before I got them by AceJohnny (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM
  • 'open' toys? by davi_bock (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:41AM
  • 3 things (Score:5, Interesting)

    That have prevented me from buying Legos:

    1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest. Which leads me to...

    2. The kits themselves. I got Technics as a kid and made *everything* with them. The manuals were thick, had many different things you could make with them. Now - the kits are one project. There's no imagination to them. My 60 dollar kit was a red dump truck. It had the frame of a windshield - imagination filled in the rest. Now the windshield comes with the set. Who needs to stretch their thinking? I liked it when *I* made the choice of what the pieces were for.

    3. Bionicles. Ironically, that brought legos to my attention (free toy at Burger World), but when I investigated, it was lousy. Hey look, I put this part here and *nowhere* else. Isn't the reason behind legos being able to place a piece wherever you want it? Gahh.

    Put all these together, and what do you have? Someone who would like to buy legos, but the kits I want aren't around. I'd love to use legos in a more industrial manner (say building a case for something) but the basic sets are few and far between.

    Three things that keep me from busting out my legos:

    1. Cats.

    2. Cat hair. (I can just imagine it sticking out of the seams and it makes me freak :)

    3. Not enough room/time to mess with them. House is too small after the holidays and time is always short. Not like the halcyon days of my youth.

    LEGO! Go back to the basics! Give us the old Technic sets, the massive 'generic' kits. Fire the Bionicle guy. You are digging your own grave. The more specialized you make your toys, the more people will just buy toys that are already 'done'. And that was never the point in the first place.

    BTW - No. I won't sell any of my extensive collection of Technics or my wonderful zillion piece basic set. If ever there was something to be buried with, its my legos. You can try and pry them out of my cold, dead hands, but look out for the transforming watchdog I just made. His mouth moves and he's looking at you.

    • Re:3 things by boomgopher (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:20PM
    • The fall of Legos by 0x0d0a (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:46PM
    • Re:3 things by coaxial (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @06:29PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Double standards? by Andy Smith (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:44AM
  • Finally ... by rbolkey (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:44AM
  • oh no by mr.mas (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:45AM
  • Yeah by chunkwhite86 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:46AM
  • Licenses, Specialty Parts, and Color Changes by mankey wanker (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:50AM
  • Lego needs to stop the Bionicle and Sports sets... by nutrock69 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:52AM
  • Mindstorm alternatives...? by Ian Bicking (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:54AM
    • Check out the Parallax line. (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Dr. Mu (603661) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:36PM (#7938109)
      Parallax [parallax.com] (the BASIC Stamp folks) have numerous robotics kits, including their very successful Boe-Bot [parallax.com]. Plus, their selection of sensors and other accessories is truly awesome -- all at reasonable prices.

      I've worked with a number of their products and have found them to be well-designed and accompanied by clear, easy-to-comprehend instructions. And if you do get into a bind, their tech support is both informed and responsive. All-in-all, they're a top-notch company!

      [ Parent ]
  • What about Bionicle? by EvilStein (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:57AM
  • The death of Lego? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kekoap (37035) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:00PM (#7937924)

    The article confirms that Lego has been hurting badly. The writing has been on the wall for a while now though. Just look at Lego's product lines over the past 5-10 years. Added: Harry Potter, Star Wars, video games, Bionicle, Sports, Mindstorms. Lost: classic space, castle, pirates. Plus the saddest thing for me, a lack of focus on good Technic sets.

    Why so many problems? I think kids expect more from today's toys than just bricks. That's kind of a sad fact that says something about our culture I think. Second, since the expiration of Lego's stud-and-tube patent, there's been competition from Mega Bloks, which are inferior but cheaper. In today's world though, I think it makes sense that many parents choose cheaper rather than better. Another sad fact.

    In any event, while I'm unhappy about Mindstorms, I'm happy they're abandoning Harry Potter and the like. They have totally lost their identity by branching out, and I think they really do need to get back to their core business as they're doing now. I wonder though, is it too late already?

    There use to be a steady stream of great Technic sets worth getting, but recently good sets have slowed to a trickle, with just one catching my eye recently... 8455 Backhoe [lego.com]. Check it out, it might be one of your last few chances to grab a great Lego set.

  • Official Word From LEGO (Score:5, Interesting)

    by skippy1 (78646) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:01PM (#7937931)
    Check this out: http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pres s See the Jan 8 post. Nothing there about Mindstorms being cancelled. I just read something on LugNet as well that was an interview at one of the Lego shows, and one of the Lego reps said that Mindstorms 3 was in development. Here's hoping!
  • Great Introduction to Robotics in Education by DaedalusLogic (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:02PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • There still are generic block sets by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:11PM
  • Cunning plan by madpierre (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:16PM
  • NOT too specialized (Score:3, Interesting)

    by 1000101 (584896) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:19PM (#7938027)
    I hear many people in here complaining that Lego has become too 'specialized' and they need to get back to simple blocks. This is absolutley rediculous. You can still buy [lego.com] simple bricks. They haven't stopped making them, they have just expanded their product line. You hear about the specialized sets more only because they bring in more cash for Lego.
  • Where does it say Mindstorms is gone? (Score:4, Informative)

    by SiW (10570) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:35PM (#7938102)
    (http://www.coolpowers.com/)
    I don't see anywhere where it explicitly says Mindstorms is gone, just a vaguely-worded mention of "electronics". They say their new mission is focusing on their own products, not the tie-ins, so that they have control over what they do - Mindstorms is owned by them, no? I took it to mean they were dropping the Star Wars line (which was cool, admittedly), the Harry Potter line, etc. and would stop making the video games (where presumably they are not responsible for making them, but license out the Lego name or contract other companies, either way they're not in control).

    So until someone explicitly tells me the Mindstorms line is done, I'm not going to hold out any hope for seeing it in the clearance aisle.
  • Price! by Grimster (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @12:36PM
    • Re:Price! by Grimster (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:38PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by PizzaFace (593587) on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:01PM (#7938270)
    I'm afraid that Lego is not returning to its roots (building blocks), but may just cut the licensed products (Star Wars, Harry Potter) and concentrate on its own Bionicles line.

    I was not thrilled to see that my second grader brought home a Bionicles novella from the Scholastic book fair (which is increasingly a toy fair), especially after I looked at it and saw a grammatical error in the book's very first sentence. Lego has a whole mythology about Bionicles, and that's attractive to kids. But my son lost a couple essential pieces of his Bionicle within days of getting it, and I'm not going to encourage this overpriced, intellectually shallow, proprietary product line as a hobby.

    Unfortunately, I could not find more generic Lego blocks in my Christmas shopping. There were some overpriced ($30-$40) Star Wars kits, and a space shuttle for $100, but nothing I wanted to buy. I'm beginning to associate Lego with brands like Scholastic and Disney, that have turned their once-respected product lines into brands of dumb, overpriced junk.
  • Another company succumbs to "Focus Group" idiocy by pjkundert (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:15PM
  • Legos were fun when I got to decide what to build by JohnnyGTO (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:23PM
  • Mindstorms by another name: Psitco Dacta by saarbruck (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:30PM
  • lego a little older than 20 years. by sparkes (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:34PM
  • Does this also mean? by lithiumfox (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:44PM
  • I can't imagine by jeffkjo1 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:46PM
  • Too Expensive by ORg2000 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:48PM
  • CAD/Game Editors by Cannelbrae (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:53PM
  • Google Megabloks... by Blic (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:53PM
  • Reality Check by davew2040 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:15PM
  • Oh, grow up (Score:3, Funny)

    by Animats (122034) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:36PM (#7938936)
    (http://www.animats.com)
    If you want to make stuff, get a milling machine like everybody else. Legos are for kids.
  • ER1 Alternative by Yoda2 (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:41PM
  • too expensive by digid (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @02:59PM
  • The problem is innovation by mi_nielsenl (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:01PM
  • Any alternatives? by Whatsmynickname (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:02PM
  • here's why by austad (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:05PM
  • Proprietary (LEG)OS by SteveAstro (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:41PM
  • Sky Rocket by forbesnation1 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @03:59PM
  • Pointing to Lego this Slashdot story. by deragon (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:01PM
  • Legoland and the technic lego car (Score:3, Interesting)

    by chiller2 (35804) on Saturday January 10 2004, @04:08PM (#7939672)
    (http://www.kelv.net/)
    When I first got into Lego, their primary focus was Legoland and Lego Technic. I remember staring in awe at a friend's Legoland set up in his parent's garage, the entire floor of which was covered in baseplates with every kind of building, and even the Legoland train running around it.

    In addition to that, another friend had the Technic lego car, with big wheels, cylinders, rack & pinion steering, suspension, etc. It ruled!

    Where are those kits now? Relegated in favour of crappy Bionicles and Harry Potter themed kits. What can a child build with them? Bugger all, that's what!

    Perhaps if they want their fortunes to improve, Lego should bring back the originals.
    • They tried by HanClinto (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @06:15PM
  • Its the EGO by JCMoney (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:11PM
  • The Problem with Legos by Techiegeeks (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @04:29PM
  • ... and return to its core mission by xyr0 (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @05:41PM
  • Overspecialization? That's NOT the problem... by Jon_Sy (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @08:11PM
  • More Specialization Required by Hoarse Whisperer (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @09:32PM
  • Ahh...lego memories from the 70s/80s by Sabalon (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @09:57PM
  • I predict that... by JRHelgeson (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:15PM
  • I don't know if this has been mentioned... by cr0sh (Score:2) Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46PM
  • Lego shouldn't go back to just bricks! by apliman y (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:14AM
  • wouldn't a mars rover minstorm kit have kicked a?? by bstoneaz (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:45AM
  • An easy way to fix this problem... by Neb Okla (Score:1) Sunday January 11 2004, @01:51AM
  • Oh, boo-hoo. by SubtleNuance (Score:2) Sunday January 11 2004, @02:21AM
  • by Karora (214807) on Sunday January 11 2004, @04:00AM (#7943482)
    (http://andrew.mcmillan.net.nz/)


    When I grew up, I had meccano to burn. Well, being metal it wouldn't burn, of course. When I was in my teens, I was the friendly neighbourhood babysitter, and by then ('70s) Lego was all the rage. I used to build large constructions from the sets at some of my charges houses that they wouldn't pull apart until next time I came to babysit them.

    When I saw the rise of sets like "Star Wars" and "Harry Potter" and so on I thought "Oh, yeah. Boring. No creativity need be applied here.".

    Now, though, I have my own children. I have bought them basic boxes of blocks, and that's fine, and I've bought them specialised sets like Harry Potter (Hogwart's Castle) and SpiderMan (my wife is a spiderman nut, so my kids are too).

    The interesting thing is, is that they sat right down and built it "like on the box" then immediately pulled it all apart and made amazingly creative stuff out of them. We now have pyramids, temples in the jungle (complete with mazes) secret laboratories (with traps, computers and mad scientists). We have Spiderman rescuing X, Y, or Z from some scenario that never happened in any comic. We have marble races, and endless things that fly and drive.

    Most of the parts that allow all this wierd stuff to happen are actually the special ones. All of the neat secret panels and traps in Harry Potter are wonderfully repurposed in making a "Temple of Doom" (with a few Orient Expedition pieces, and a quick pyramid out of basic blocks...).

    Creativity is pretty hard to hide, really. If you give a creative kid some toys to play with then he will be creative with it.

    It is a shame to see MindStorms discontinued. I'm halfway tempted to go out and get one for my sons before they disappear. On the other hand the oldest (and most creative) one has just turned six, and I won't trust him not to destroy it for a couple of years yet. In those couple of years the landscape will change enough that I full expect something better will be available.

  • Good news for the universities! by davi_slashdot (Score:1) Thursday January 15 2004, @12:08PM
  • Mindstorms not dead by NewZero (Score:1) Thursday January 15 2004, @11:30PM
  • Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Greventls (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:14AM
  • Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mark-t (151149) <.ac.cb.xnyl. .ta. .tkram.> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:30AM (#7937772)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday September 12 2006, @03:31PM)
    LEGO never had a copyright on its blocks.

    It did, however, have a patent.

    And yes, LEGO's patent has expired... at least with regards to the building brick. The patents on the Technic parts are still alive and well afaik.

    Megabloks, a company that makes a building brick that is essentially compatible with LEGO, opened up shop almost to the day that LEGO's patent expired on the brick and has been slowly and steadily improving the quality of their own product ever since. They aren't half bad right now.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:How kids play by smacktits (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @11:52AM
  • Re:How kids play by smallfeet (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @01:15PM
  • Re:But with mindstorm gone... by sopwath (Score:1) Saturday January 10 2004, @06:57PM
  • Re:But with mindstorm gone... by cavac (Score:1) Monday January 12 2004, @12:33PM
  • 39 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2