Slashdot Log In
Major New TiVo Service Offerings
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Fri Jan 09, 2004 06:17 AM
from the good-things-getting-better dept.
from the good-things-getting-better dept.
Jeff The Riffer writes "At the Consumer Electronics Show today, Mike Ramsay of TiVo announced three major new product offerings to come in the next year. First off there's the DVD Recorders, HD DVR, and Home Networked Enabled Products. TiVo/DVD Recorder boxes have been out for a bit now but looks like the offerings will continue and there's going to be new units by Pioneer. Second we have TivoToGo, where TiVo users with Home Media Option will be able to transfer files off their TiVo onto their PC and either play them locally or burn them to DVD. And finally there's XM Radio for TiVo."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Major New TiVo Service Offerings
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 309 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I may be ignorant (Score:4, Interesting)
Is there a Tivo like device for normal FM or AM radio? I enjoy a few programmes on radio but not too many, and it would be a benefit to record these simply.
I guess I could use my PC for it but it would be more convenient to have a Tivo like option
mac desktops, dare to be nude [scrounger.ath.cx]
Just What I Need (Score:2, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday December 09 2004, @08:15AM)
Early Take (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Saturday April 15 2006, @06:56AM)
I am forecasting a little bit. I can promise these vendor's are downplaying DRM as much as possible. While
promoting interoperability.
Re:Early Take (Score:5, Informative)
(http://pemdasi.net/ | Last Journal: Monday November 08 2004, @10:51AM)
HD signal (Score:5, Interesting)
So, when they say HD-PVR, what kind of compression are we talking about?
Re:HD signal (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Aiieeee!
No, you're quite thoroughly confused. But that's because the ATSC standard is confusing.
ATSC (Advanced Television Systems Committee) replaces the current NTSC (National
All of that said, how much they can fit into a single "channel" depends on how much compression is used. Thus far nobody has really tried the multiple channels on one station gambit, although it is allowed. Even if it is done, odds are that you'll have a much better picture than what you get off cable (digital or analog) or either of the sat systems (although DirecTV is allegedly going to change this -- with their new sats going up later this year they'll have tons of bandwidth, and there are rumors that they'll bump picture quality back up to mid-90s levels). Realistically, both cable and sat systems broadcast their SD (standard def) programs at sub VCR quality nowadays -- roughly 240i. Yes, it really is that piss poor. On small sets you generally don't notice. On big ones you do. The digital broadcasts are cleaner (less static, no ghosting, etc) than the analog ones, but are prone to macro blocking if the bitrate is too low.
Broadcasting in 480i or 480p is generally considered "DTV" (digital TV). Broadcasting in 720p or 1080i is considered HDTV (High Def TV). True HDTV is considerably more detailed and clear than anything you'll get out of current generation DVD players (the next generation HD DVD will be another story of course).
So, when they say HD-PVR, what kind of compression are we talking about?
Whatever the broadcaster has done. The HD DirecTiVo will do no compression of its own -- it simply writes the bitstreams directly to disk.
Interesting (Score:2, Interesting)
However, the announcements at CES should help to distinguish TiVo from rivals while also planting the company in the middle of another new trend: creating a hub for home entertainment. Earlier at CES, start-up Moxi Digital announced its software platform that will enable set-top boxes to become a hub of this sort. And software giant Microsoft announced similar plans Monday.
TiVo's plans are not as ambitious because they don't include making content available throughout the home. But that's partly by design. The company's new idea involves a push toward a more comprehensive product, something analysts have said TiVo lacked.
XM Radio stream ripping (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://pemdasi.net/ | Last Journal: Monday November 08 2004, @10:51AM)
If it rips the songs from the stream with correct tags and the appropriate filenames, I can see how some people would find feature desirable. But, you'd have to pay the Tivo initial hardware costs, plus the montly charges for both tivo and XM radio... and considering I can do the same thing for free with a shoutcast server and streamripper, I don't think this is going to sway me over to buying a tivo...
Re:XM Radio stream ripping (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.joshuajohnston.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 03 2002, @06:34PM)
However, the stream is a compressed one from orbit, so you might wind up with a not-so-pure recording when you encode it again for playback on a device.
It's perfectly legal (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem is that the media companies want to 1) put barriers up to prevent this fair use and 2) create an atmosphere where people actually believe it is illegal and that there is no fair use right.
It looks like they are succeeding for the average user. For the rest of us, the media companies can go screw themselves. I will copy my DVDs for backup, strip the encryption off so I can watch them under non-authorized media players and refuse to purchase any medium where these things aren't possible.
Service Model ascention (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.wikindex.com/)
Certainly-- if the loss of advertising revenue because of TiVo didn`t scare the cable companies, this new angle should: it is aimed directly at their throats (providing end-services to the customer). If TiVo succeeds, then cable will be relegated to a simple provider of digital feed-- a commodity that may come via cable, dish, or TVoIP. If I worked at TimeWarnerAOLComcast, I would be worried.
Re:Service Model ascention (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://home.earthlink.net/~byoder/)
Because people could copy/pirate the feed? No. If somoene wants to seriously pirate a movie they can go down to the store, buy a DVD and they are home free. If they want to pirate a TV signal they can just pump it into an A/D converter and out it goes. All these stupid restrictions and DRM garbage do is keep regular folks from doing useful and legitimate things with their feeds, and it makes me pretty mad!
Because TV programmers like to control when people watch what? I know that the programmers love the idea of controlling what times people see programs, but it's not their call. I want to see thigns when I want to see them. It's not their call and it shouldn't be. They are making content, not running my life...are they?
If I were working for Comcast I would be giving away a TiVo with home networking to every customer right out of the box, and banish all DRM. A high value product like that means higher revenues. It just means looking at the market a little differently.
Change is good! Embrace it, don't fear it!
--Brian
How about a new anti-NBC feature (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/)
I'd love an update from Tivo that would allow me to side step this by setting a recording to start one minute late. Currently, you can have it start early and end late, but you can't make it start late, therefore it just won't record the program unless you do it manually.
Re:How about a new anti-NBC feature (Score:4, Informative)
(http://george.hotelling.net/ | Last Journal: Wednesday September 08 2004, @10:15AM)
Before the guide data was fixed, shows would get cut off because of NBC's screwy primetime timing. TiVo simply codifies the desired result: watching NBC because you (or your TiVo) started watching it.
NBC is an investor in TiVo (which is why you see so many "Thumbs Up To Record" widgets on ads for their shows) so it would seem dumb for them to try and fight it. Not that I would base my argument on the logic of the entertainment industry...
Leaving TiVo (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.mainecoon.plus.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday January 17 2007, @11:05AM)
The reason I'm migrating is because I suspect that MythTv and similar Open source projects may offer me the same functionality just for the cost of my net connection
Re:Leaving TiVo (Score:5, Informative)
MythTV is TiVo on steroids. It's not for newbies though so I won't even pretend to suggest your dear Aunt Ida can go install her own without spending 8 hours of your time setting it up. For those of us who like working on fun projects with Linux though it's a blast. This weekend I'll be building my new MythTV backend server with dual Hauppauge PVR 250 cards, a 3ware 8506-4lp SATA raid controller, and four 200GB Maxtor (quiet fluid dynamic bearings) SATA drives. I haven't decided whether to go with RAID-5 or RAID-0 yet so I'll have somewhere between 600GB and 800GB of space for recordings. At 2200bps and 480x480 resolution my testing with the PVR-250 has given me files about 1.2GB/hour. I may crank it up to 3300bps to get around 1.6GB/hour and deal with that for improved mpeg-2 quality.
Anyway, if you're not interesting in Linux projects stick with a TiVo. MythTV has a DVD player (and ripper) modules, MythMusic for playing mp3, ogg, flac, etc. as well as ripping CDs to ogg, mp3, or flac format, MythWeather gets weather channel maps for your area and displays the weather forecast, MythGame interfaces to MAME under Linux to play games, MythVideo provides a nice interface for playing DivX or other movie files and ties into IMDB to download cover art for movies it can recognize by title (i.e. if you have a waterboy divx file it'll search for it on IMDB and prompt you if what it found is correct, then from then on it'll associate cover art with that file and a summary and synopsis. It's quite nice. Oh yea, and remote real-time scheduling and control over your recordings (delete, browse, etc.) via mythweb. Don't take my word for it, just go to www.mythtv.org and check it out. It is by far the best open source PVR at the moment and is very mature.
TivoToGo? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://blog.xcski.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday December 24 2003, @02:40PM)
Perhaps a new method for advertisment supported TV (Score:5, Interesting)
A lot of TV programs are supported by advertisments (no brainer), the other option is a hideously high (relatively) subscription cost for an advert free video stream. With the latest developments with video recording it forces a change in the business model for the media industry.
If we assume that adverts are required to support our favourite programs (a necessary evil), is there a way to have our recording devices to select our prefered category of advertising?, eg: we prefer to see adds for tech gadgets over medical products over personal injury lawyers.
The selection of the order for the adverts could be done using a statistical method (show four random categories, ask the user to chose the most prefered and least prefered advert categories, repeat 20 times).
This will result in better product placement to people who are willing to consider your product. Hence a 25 year old will never see a Fixodent (denture glue) advert because his recorder will steer away from those adverts, the current alternative is the advert is simply totally ignored by the viewer and does nothing but increase the resentment of adverts.
ZombieEngineer
Tivo + P2P (Score:1)
(http://www.vpscolo.com/)
Wake up Tivo (Score:5, Insightful)
Digital Cable (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/)
What pisses me off ... (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://savewizwar.com/)
Why Pay for TiVO or wait? (Score:2, Informative)
When there are lots of free [sourceforge.net] alternatives out there which use Linux and bring you all the features of your PC such as DVD burners and internet access and RAID arrays of 120GB HDs for plenty of recording. (Damn Discovery Science Channel and History International and...)
I personally feel TiVO is a dead company as it's idea was great but can be offered with nearly as many options and more if you are Code/Script inclined. [mythtv.org] So look for cheap 400Mhz system to start on [ebay.com] and enjoy personalized TV in most countries.
Translation for the Technically Challenged(MBA): Liquidate TIVO from your portfolio.
Re:Why Pay for oil changes? (Score:5, Insightful)
I mean, really. An oil change. Anyone can do one, for 1/4 to 1/2 the price that a Jiffy Lube or a gas station will charge you. How can those places stay in business with a model like that? It's unheard of.
Confident in my intellectual superiority, I drove to work, only to pass plenty of oil change places still doing a fine business. I was saddened and dismayed to find out that such thinking is, in fact, totally wrong. Shocking as it is, it seems people are willing to pay for convenience.
great....... (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/)
You're in "luck." (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/)
DirecTV is PARANOID that opening up their tivos like all the rest of them is going to result in rampant digital copying, and networks packing up and leaving.
So you're not missing out on anything-- DirecTV won't have it anyway. Just the standalone tivos.
DirecTiVo (Score:5, Informative)
The TiVo intergrated with DirecTV receivers cannot be used in a HMO confguration. I didn't find this out until after I signed a contract.
Fucking USB port isn't even powered.
Fun technology but (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://www.security-forums.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 12 2004, @04:53PM)
I'll just stick to my home cinema and dvd collection for now.
TiVo viability? (Score:5, Interesting)
There are two clear (and in my opinion superior) alternatives to TiVo currently creeping into TiVo's market share:
1. In the less-features-but-easier-to-use department, cable companies (such as mine) are offering a service they're calling "TV On Demand." With my digital cable remote (and no phone connection, and no extra service charge) I can play many shows from the recent lineup at will. And pause them, rewind them, fast forward, etc. And of course my digital cable comes with a much faster, cleaner program guide user interface. Now the downside is that the guide is somewhat lacking in features, as compared to TiVo's offering. I can't search it and it doesn't have any intelligence for making suggestions or auto-scheduling.
2. Which brings me to the second alternative. I also have an ATI AIW 9600 Pro TV tuner card in a PC. This PC is hooked to my TV. I run myHTPC [myhtpc.net] for the guide/scheduling/recording features, an ATI's new Easylook UI for actual TV viewing. The two work together seemlessly. This gives me *all* the features of TiVo (except season passes, big whoop), plus a whole lot more. And I don't pay a monthly service charge.
Which brings me to my question: isn't TiVo just a niche product that really should only be used by folks with an antenna feed or analog cable feed who don't have the savvy to set up a PC next to their TV? Isn't its current success due largely to clever marketing and a small window of market opportunity that they've now artificially prolonged? That is, I think there was an argument for TiVo back when it was introduced, but isn't that argument substantially weaker today?
Re:TiVo viability? (Score:4, Insightful)
Then why didn't you read the dozens of other posts in any given TiVo article where someone asks the same questions/makes the same point?
But, whatever:
#1: Cable PVR. Sure. If you have cable, and your cable company offers this (Comcast in Chicago doesn't, for instance). And, if it's actually streaming on demand, then it's likely you can't see any given show that may have just been broadcast -- it's probably limited to the popular ones. No saving stuff for later, no odd shows.
Finally, on the note of cable, it's gotten a wee bit expensive. I pay less now for DirecTV than I did for Comcast, and that's including the TiVo subscription rate and more pay channels.
#2: Computer. Sure. Let's say the computer cost $500. (You could, of course, use a less powerful computer, but then you need a video card that does hardware encoding, and those are more expensive. So.) TiVo costs $250. You could say, "But the computer can have a bigger HD", but the TiVo could too -- if you're the kind of person who wouldn't blink at setting up a computer as a PVR, then installing a hard drive shouldn't be a problem either.
And, of course, there's the computer setup time. Now, personally, I think playing around with MythTV and the like is fun. But I don't confuse fun with popular or cost effective. I don't mind spending a day configuring MythTV to do what I want, but I think I'm in a small subset of the population on that one.
It's very simple. Time IS money. (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday December 20 2004, @01:32PM)
Yet I still bought a DirecTivo. I also have one of the first ReplayTV units. Why make more work for myself? Why go through the bother? The box was $149. Monthly fee? Who cares? I make a lot of money, and can deal with $5 a month. If it buys me a noccasional software upgrade and semi-well managed guide information, then fine. And season passes ARE a big whoop. They are very convenient.
Also, the DirecTivo records the original digital stream from the satellite and has dual tuners and a very nice interface. I just can't see the point to reinventing the wheel. I could probably build my own mountain bike. I have the tools. I know how to weld. But why? I'd rather do something no one has done before.
At work, if I need an amplifier in a design, I buy a prepackaged component. My job performance would be seriously questioned if I spent $4000 in man hours designing an RF amplifer when one with identical specs can be bought off the shelf for $20.
My time is worth something to me. If I have to spend more than 1 hour a month dicking around with a PC based DVR, then I've "spent" more than $5 for that month. If it took me more than 24 hours of plugging things together and debugging, well, my time spent already covers the typical lifetime of one of these gadgets before the next one with new features and more integration comes along.
And you seem to be forgetting that 98% of the population is NOT as savvy as a typical /. user. There is an enormous market for these things, as large as the VCR market. I think the integrated products like DirecTivo and now Tivo DVD recorders are going to be what really starts to light a fire.
Another TiVo service offering... (Score:3, Funny)
We can already copy files, as well as stream them. (Score:4, Interesting)
With 802.11G, you can watch the stuff anywhere now. Pretty sweet.
Tivo starting to catch up with ReplayTV (Score:2)
"TiVo also unveiled TiVo-to-Go, which lets users who also subscribe to an additional TiVo home networking service to transfer shows they have recorded on the set-top box to a home computer. The system is kept secure by a unique key-sized memory device that must be plugged into the computer when the recorded content is watched or copied."
ReplayTV's have been able to do that for years, for free, without buying extra software, without extra monthly fees, and without Big Brother watching over what you watch and making you use "key-sized devices" to watch you shows.
What a joke.
In addition to that, my ReplayTV 5040 auto-skips commercials, lets me share programs online, lets me skip 30-seconds ahead at a time, lets me schedule OVER THE INTERNET what programs I want to watch, all for FREE without buying extra hardware and software. AND the monthly and lifetime fees are LESS than Tivo's.
But, I'm sure the people who have only ever tried a Tivo will tell me their over-priced under-performing box RULEZX0RS.
TiVo is a dying business (Score:2)
As soon as my cable company offers PVR which should cost about $10 a month, my TiVo is going on Ebay. Then I'll build a MythTV from one of my computers.
TiVo has no chance in the long run especially once the cable companies will offer the same ability at a low cost. TiVo is just way too expensive. $300 for the unit and $400 for a lifetime subscription fee.
Tivo Technology (Score:1, Interesting)
(http://www.cgff.net/)
Another company Just Says No to customers (Score:2)
(http://www.exodusattack.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday January 03 2004, @03:13AM)
(And it doesn't have anything to do with piracy. It is perfectly normal for users to want to use all their usual standard apps to work with multimedia (to snip clips, burn to playback media, etc) instead of having to buy special tools.)
Writing your software to serve the interest of people other than the users, is a good way to guarantee that eventually, an open source/free software alternative will crush you. Tivo's product announcements bode well for the Freevo and MythTV teams.
What I'd Like to See (Score:1)
So, why not a combo VCR and TiVO ? After all, the TiVO is basically a VCR replacment, but people still have tapes, and it saves an input jack to the TV. And given how cheap VHS parts are now, it wouldn't cost much more than a TiVO. Add a DVD recorder and then you've got a way to convert tapes as well.
DirectTV (Score:2)
IS there anything on TV worth recording? (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Monday May 24 2004, @11:15AM)
Mac support? (Score:1)
Home Media Option Crippled! (Score:2)
Not sure if the DVD Tivo allows you to burn is a 'normal' dvd you can play on any player or is similarly crippled.
tivo - dvd allow video editing? (commercials) (Score:2)
(http://electricrain.com/greg/)
if not, that makes the dvd burner functionality useless as you'll still have to skip commercials (and most dvd players are much worse at ffw & skip-ahead than a tivo)
Re:What is TiVo? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Linux and Tivo at the CES (Score:1)
(http://www.enterprisemission.com/)
True that. I don't know about the rest of this post, but this part isn't a troll, just fact.
Want to make the listings really slow? Hit the enter button to change your listing options and choose the grid layout. It takes 5 seconds to draw the grid.
Re:Linux and Tivo at the CES (Score:1)
(http://www.elmarko.org/)
Re:Linux and Tivo at the CES (explanation) (Score:1, Troll)
Re:What is TiVo? (Score:2)
I am getting pretty tired of hearing about how great it is, since they won't sell them here [tivo.com].