Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

"Decasia": The Beauty of Film Decay

Posted by michael on Tue Dec 31, 2002 03:55 PM
from the ad-te-omnis-caro-veniet dept.
tregoweth writes "The New York Times has a story about 'Decasia,' a film created entirely from deteriorating nitrate film footage. Ya can't beat analog for interesting disintegration."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @03:57PM (#4990486)
    How are they benefiting from the usage of their material!?
    • by kfg (145172) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:56PM (#4990787)
      I suppose it "benefits" them by continuing to allow them to rest peacefully in their graves.

      If you are about the average age for a Slashdot reader I may well be older than your parents. Much of the material used had already passed into the public domain before *my* parents were born.

      The film is *old.* There are no copyright holders.

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Ha.... at least its still viewable. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by purduephotog (218304) <hirsch AT inorbit DOT com> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @03:57PM (#4990487) Homepage Journal
    Because if it was my digital VCR tapes from 8 years ago, the only thing they are good for is imitating sparklers when tossed in a fire.

    Analog fails gracefully, digital fails catastrophically.
  • Decasia? (Score:2)

    by Adolatra (557735) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @03:58PM (#4990491) Homepage
    More like Cel -da!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I don't know... (Score:1)

    by drfishy (634081) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:00PM (#4990499)
    I'm not sure I agree, I kinda like watching those biodegradable packing peanuts disintegrate in water.
  • Digital too (Score:5, Funny)

    by Dolly_Llama (267016) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:00PM (#4990500) Homepage
    Ya can't beat analog for interesting disintegr098Asjoijoasnlks^K^K^K^Kank109Fj

    NO CARRIER

  • deteriorating analog footage (Score:5, Funny)

    by nakaduct (43954) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:00PM (#4990504)
    ... created entirely from deteriorating nitrate film footage. Ya can't beat analog for interesting disintegration."

    Of course, that's not to say you can't make a film entirely from deteriorating digital footage [imdb.com].

    --
  • Cool and all, but (Score:3, Interesting)

    by prichardson (603676) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:01PM (#4990507) Journal
    This seems really, but would it be enjoyable to watch? A lot of art is just "hey, cool!" and then is put on a shelf. This really cool idea is only really cool because it's so original, it will never be cool again.
  • All they offer is a VHS copy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Quazi (3460) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:02PM (#4990510) Journal
    I know it would defeat the whole point of the video, but I'd like it in DVD format. You don't want your own copy of this film to end up like all the ones it's portraying, do you?
  • What about AOTC? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:02PM (#4990511)

    Ya can't beat analog for interesting disintegration.

    Oh, I don't know. This year's all-digitial Attack of the Clones provided for an interesting example of the distintegration of George Lucas' writing, directing and overall creativity...

  • Just further proof (Score:2)

    by flewp (458359) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:04PM (#4990522)
    that the NASA moon landings were fake. I mean, afterall, wouldn't the film have decayed already?
  • The text (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:05PM (#4990529)
    In case it gets slashdotted. Not trying to karma whore here, just being helpful:
    Welcome to The New York Times on the Web! For full access to our site, please complete this simple registration form. As a member, you'll enjoy: In-depth coverage and analysis of news events from The New York Times FREE Up-to-the-minute breaking news and developing stories FREE Exclusive Web-only features, classifieds, tools, multimedia and much, much more FREE Please enter your Member ID: Please enter your password: Remember my Member ID and password on this computer. Forgot your password? Choose a Member ID: Choose a password: (Five character minimum) Re-enter your password for verification: E-Mail Address: Remember my Member ID and password on this computer Today's Headlines The day's top headlines delivered every day in a customized newsletter (see sample). Looking for the perfect escape? Let us help you plan your next trip and save you money. Discover the very best in luxury travel deals from premium nytimes.com advertisers. @Times - Inside NYTimes.com Receive monthly updates about new features and enhancements on NYTimes.com, plus exclusive offers for NYTimes.com premium products and services. Be the first to know about selective sales, in-store promotions, new product launches and style must-haves. Sign up for The Sophisticated Shopper -- a premier advertiser e-mail from NYTimes.com. Special Offers and Announcements Special Offers and Announcements sent by NYTimes.com on behalf of select advertisers. An insider e-mail offering discounted tickets to the hottest shows on Broadway and more -- only available to TicketWatch subscribers. Preferred E-Mail format: HTML Text PROGRAMS FROM OUR PARTNERS Free $47 e-Book on Internet Business: How to generate Net Profits from Active Marketplace + get a special offer from OPEN: The Small Business Network. YesMail Receive offers from merchants brought to you by YesMail. Please select the categories below that interest you: Business Computer Hardware Entertainment Health Shopping Travel & Leisure Internet Music Computer Software
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Viking Coder (102287) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:08PM (#4990543)
  • I don't get it... (Score:1)

    by Drunken_Jackass (325938) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:09PM (#4990551) Homepage
    Sure, i mean if the point of this whole project is to turn it into a Winamp plugin so that i can get baked, listen to Radiohead and watch guys walking camels across some dunes, fine.

    But isn't this just spliced old film? i mean, don't get me wrong, or anything, i just don't see the art in this.

    If it was just the defects, then i could see it - that would be something, "did i just see a ship, or was that the way the film degenerated?"

    Oh well, back to staring at fractals in the dark.
  • by dagg (153577) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:10PM (#4990552) Journal
    You don't have permission to access / on this server.

    +1 Redundant

  • eeewwww (Score:2, Funny)

    by The_Obfuscator (542644) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:12PM (#4990558)
    The clip has footage of a cessarian delivery. And I WAS going to eat my eggs...
    • Re:eeewwww by Tackhead (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:33PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by toupsie (88295) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:16PM (#4990576) Homepage
    It appears that their site is powered by deteriorating web servers. Either that, or Decasia figured I would say not nice things about deterioration and sent my browser a "Forbidden". Who still reads "The Times" anymore for art? Passe.
  • Hey cool! (Score:5, Funny)

    by CaffeineAddict2001 (518485) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:18PM (#4990589)
    The latest NIN video is out!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Weird, but oddly appealing (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Zerbey (15536) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:19PM (#4990591) Homepage Journal
    This Morrison guy is clearly bonkers. Who would make a film out of disintegrating film stock? It's like filming a compost heap.

    On the other hand, in the same way everyone (go on, admit it) slows down to take a look at a major road accident you just can't resist seeing how bad it really is.

    I, for one will be tuning into Sundance when it airs - just for the pure morbid curiousity.
  • by SHEENmaster (581283) <travis@nOSpam.utk.edu> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:22PM (#4990608) Homepage Journal
    My younger brother(13) has 6 or so DVDs. Not one of them can be watched do to a few scratches. The only benifit of this is that "The Fast and the Furious" is now only 20 minutes long.

    I seriously doubt that a lasting disc will be adopted so long as the MPAA controls the standard, and they do "0\/\/N$ j0."
  • by Anonvmous Coward (589068) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:26PM (#4990630)
    ... Robert Downey Jr.?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • So the question is.. (Score:4, Funny)

    by tezzery (549213) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:28PM (#4990635)
    Will someone be looking at crappy bad quality divx cam rips in 100 years appreciating them artistically?
  • 'analog', bleh... (Score:2)

    by autopr0n (534291) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:31PM (#4990649) Homepage Journal
    Does it irritate anyone else when anything with a digital counterpart is called 'analog'? In this case, shouldn't the film be called 'chemical', after all, it was created by a chemical process, and undergoing chemical degradation. Not some form of analog interference.

    To me, analog means something like a non-discrete signal, like in a VCR or radio or electric guitar. Not anything non-computerized
  • The music is amazing too (Score:3, Informative)

    by van der Rohe (460708) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:32PM (#4990658)
    Glad to see this film get some props on Slashdot.

    The composer of the score, Michael Gordon, is one of my favorite living American composers, and this film is the perfect vehicle for his fascinating, gritty music.

    For more info on him and his new music organization Bang On A Can, see their site here [bangonacan.com].

    The soundtrack to the film is available from Cantaloupe [cantaloupemusic.com], a very interesting label for contemporary music.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Beetjebrak (545819) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:48PM (#4990726) Homepage
    ..in some art class I took. Don't know if it was this film, but the lecture was about how nitrate films autocombust after some time in storage and the reason why celluloid is so much better. I don't remember much of the class, but the professor showed us a video of deteriorating nitrate film similar to what's on that site. Could it be the same, or has it actually been done before and Slashdot just never picked up on it?
  • Decomposing nitrates (Score:4, Funny)

    by psyconaut (228947) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @05:18PM (#4990935)
    Gives a whole new meaning to "the premiere went off with a real bang!" ;)

    -psy
  • haiku (Score:1)

    by bobtheprophet (587843) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @05:24PM (#4990970) Journal
    Beautiful decay
    One of analog's biggest
    advantages: No!
  • Motive... (Score:1)

    by qat (637648) <admin.pleaseeat@us> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @05:42PM (#4991081) Homepage
    I fail to see what this movie is trying to prove. Many of the younger age people around don't really care about older movies, especially ones that are in black and white, or even worse, silent films. I'm sure there are plenty of men and women in their 40's or later who wish to preserve this, but they make up such a small amount of our countries population and I myself don't think people feal like spending their hard earned money on preserving these films. Sure, they are an important part of our countries history. They helped us through the wars, they informed us, and most importantly they comforted us. Not only that, but unless this movie gets some main-stream attention (such as a commercial on Fox or HBO), I doubt this movie will impact anybody. However, it could possibly have been cheap to produce, and they're hoping to make a large profit off it. Who knows? It's a lost cause if you ask me...
  • I have some of that stuff :) (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dbCooper0 (398528) <[ten.notirt] [ta] [cbd]> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @06:05PM (#4991224) Journal
    Circa 1935-1940. Hand rolled 35mm loads have taken the warmest, least grainy photos I've been able to produce with my 2 OM2s and a Leica M3.

    I think I have about 100 feet of it left. It's safely (?) stored in my Michigan basement (no, not a dirt floor) which is ~68 deg.F. 24/7/365.

    My father was a professional photographer; it's left over from his days of filming Generals and Celebrities in the LA area in the 40s. I was in a band when I found it - it provided the best promo shots we ever got when used with proper flash and a remote shutter switch with a winder.

    With the dangers involved, it's not stored near anything flammable, and I will put some back into service soon (new darkroom in the next six months) - it beats the crap outta the Kodak offerings for B/W, IMHO.

    Caveat: I'd guess it's fastest (pushed) speed is ASA 20 :(

  • Wait a moment... (Score:1)

    by sryx (34524) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @06:26PM (#4991330) Homepage
    Maybe this is what they found in that politicians garbage! [slashdot.org]
    -Jason
  • by The Analog Kid (565327) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @06:26PM (#4991332)
    I killed The Digital Man, and now they are praising my victory with this.
  • Ignorance of copyright (Score:3, Interesting)

    by captaineo (87164) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @06:47PM (#4991430)
    I was shocked that the New York Times Mangzine article about this film neglected to mention any of the copyright issues. Very few (no?) motion pictures have yet entered the public domain. Therefore, Mr. Morrison is likely in blatant violation of the copyrights on various pieces of his film.

    I find it offensive how casual industry "insiders" tend to be about copyright violations, while they simultaneously condemn audience members for time- or space-shifting their own works.

    Hopefully reality will catch up to them soon enough - the only available subject for the next "Decasia" will be the white noise of encrypted video streams, their keys long lost in obsolete trusted playback hardware...
  • by Qender (318699) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @07:13PM (#4991550) Homepage Journal
    Bill Morrison showed decasia in one of my classes at calarts (http://www.calarts.edu)

    For what it's worth, here's what I wrote about it:

    Film Today
    Decasia

    Decay to many people is a sad thing. Bill Morrison's film shows it as more of a thing of beauty. It is kind of an odd viewpoint, mixing the horror of films lost with the beauty of the method that destroys them. In the past I've heard stories of people opening film canisters to find nothing but dust, or of films being harvested for the silver. It's almost painful to think of. But Morrison was on a hunt to find these decayed films. It must be an odd conflict to feel the loss of the old imagery but to be happier because of that that destroyed it. There is certainly a beauty in decay, similar to that which is demonstrated in fractals and other "chaos theory" art. Decasia simply more related to film itself.
    Some of the images carried strange moods. The near introductory footage of the machines processing the film was very much like someone telling the story of film. And it was followed closely by the most decayed footage in Decasia, as previously mentioned in class; the scene with the nuns was most unsettling. Aside from the mood created by the music, the rotation of the contrast and the flashing of the light made the whole scene look like nuns chasing children through an apocalyptic war zone. I think also that anytime you have a nun moving in slow motion that you can scare people.
    I think Decasia was an unusual film in that Morrison intended to create a hypnotic state. A state that isn't entirely uncommon in experimental films, but often unwanted. I did like the way he made the "story" rather ambiguous, as many artistic films use rather vague methods to convey a more specific storyline, and then usually fail to do so. Decasia is able to succeed without doing anything specific.
  • You might also like Koyaanisqatsi [imdb.com], which is pretty damn cool.

    Don't go for the sequels or the DVD interview w/ the director, though -- you've been warned.

  • by ScubaS (600042) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @07:35PM (#4991645)
    what was the purpose of this? Couldn't they have just used digital imaging to make it look like it was deteriorating? I know that they were just trying to test the laws of nature, trying to see if decaying film actually decays!
  • by CommieLib (468883) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:46PM (#4992086) Homepage
    Seven days after you watch this, you die.
  • by bsletten (20271) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:38PM (#4994032)
    I recorded this off the Sundance Channel last night and watched it today. If anyone is interested in seeing it, they are showing it again several times in the coming months.

    One of the main responses from the /. crowd is to question the point of the effort. I think that may say as much about the crowd as anything, but it is important to remember that your own response to the art is often as important as the intended "meaning". You'll also note in the credits, however, that the film version was made to accompany the pre-existing music, not the other way around.

    My own response was that this was a love affair with a medium. It was perhaps a little self-indulgent and a larger effort than the kernel of inspiration afforded, but one worth experiencing nonetheless. I found the soundtrack to only complement the images about half the time; otherwise, it was a little oppressive and took attention away from the images. This is most likely a result of film following music.

    While the execution of the vision may have been a little repetitive, the breadth of the source material saves the concept. Many of the images are of what we would consider mundane activities from our highly-stimulated postmodern sensibilities, but I think that was in part, "the point".

    When film was new, people took record of everyday things because the whole process was fascinating and those everyday images were all people knew at the time. They hadn't had their perspectives bombarded with excessive post-processing yet; they hadn't lost the specialness of the moment. Amidst the quotidian scenes, we have birth, illness, death and other bigger events. Life can be comprised by the occasional exciting events, but there is a lot of mundanity in-between.

    So, with "images as life" as a possible theme, the decay of image is a useful visual metaphor for the inevitable decay of life. You can almost see the people in the scenes as trying to reach out from the past, from the midst of their loss with a message. Call it "Carpe Diem", call it "Appreciate the Now". Implicit in the choice of medium (and I believe the marketing decision to provide only VHS copies backs this up) is the final reminder that how you view things (read life) has consequences.
  • Some facts for a change... (Score:3, Informative)

    by tobyvoss (584427) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:32PM (#4994234)
    I happen to have worked for "Decasia" as one of three projectionists at the event here in Basel, Switzerland.
    • It's a piece of Art, folks! Painstakingly selected sequences pitting decay and the fight against each other.
    • As best I know, the film was made exclusively with rights-free material.
    • The three identical films we simultaneously projected were of course all brand-new 16-mm copies of the old decaying material. No celluloid, no nitrate, no fire - although we did have one projector lock up at the end and melt exactly one frame out...
  • Last Post! (Score:1)

    by alpg (613466) on Monday January 13 2003, @11:27PM (#5078323) Homepage
    WARNING!!!
    This machine is subject to breakdowns during periods of critical need.

    A special circuit in the machine called "critical detector" senses the
    operator's emotional state in terms of how desperate he/she is to use the
    machine. The "critical detector" then creates a malfunction proportional
    to the desperation of the operator. Threatening the machine with violence
    only aggravates the situation. Likewise, attempts to use another machine
    may cause it to malfunction. They belong to the same union. Keep cool
    and say nice things to the machine. Nothing else seems to work.

    See also: flog(1), tm(1)

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
  • by EvilBudMan (588716) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @04:54PM (#4990776) Journal
    This is funny. Funny is this. Funny this is.
    [ Parent ]
  • Fight Entropy!!! Fight Entropy!!! Figth Etnropy! !
    iFgth Etnrop!y ! giFth tErno!py ! giFt htrEno!p y!

    --- Well maybe not...

    (my karma-whore hacker method of modding up a funny AC post)

    [ Parent ]
  • 22 replies beneath your current threshold.