Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

IBM Offers Computer Recycling

Posted by timothy on Tue Nov 14, 2000 02:39 PM
from the nice-to-mom-earth dept.
rjh3 writes: "IBM is offering to recycle old PC's (monitor included) for $29.99. They've made a deal with Envirocycle to do the recycling and UPS for discount shipping. The old computers are assessed and either refurbished and donated, or stripped for usable parts, recyclable content, and the remnants sent to disposal. Envirocycle has found a way to recycle the highly leaded glass in CRTs and removes much of the toxic lead content in the electronics." Read on for more information on why you might want to take them up on the offer.

"Many readers are probably unaware that used electronics, including TVs and monitors, are already categorized as a hazardous waste by the US EPA. Unsafe disposal by any business can lead to some staggering costs. The EPA does not inspect your trash. But if they find your monitor at an unsafe waste site, you are 100% responsible for cleaning up that entire site. They go after everyone who contributed to the site and just keep going until everyone is bankrupt or the site is cleaned. There is no proportional allocation. One PC is enough to be charged the entire site cleanup cost.

Consumers not exempt, but there is no point in prosecuting them. They don't have enough money and the political cost to the EPA is too high.

If you do not already have a suitable electronics disposal plan in place, this may be of interest. Most Massachusetts towns have a recycling plan in place because Massachusetts already prohibits consumer disposal of electronics in the regular trash. There are also a variety of donation programs for usable electronics, although many charities have become rather restrictive. They have been burned by people donating broken useless equipment and forcing the charity to pay the recycling disposal fees."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
IBM Offers Computer Recycling | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 197 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3
  • Dime for a Quarter... by BrK (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:54AM
  • trash by knurr (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:55AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by ecloud (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:07AM
  • What about the Tron people living in the computer? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:55AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by ecloud (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:09AM
  • Re:muahahah! by Walker Evans (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:21AM
  • Re:Apply the concept of cans on it. by Walker Evans (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:24AM
  • Re:Odd by FyreFiend (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:18PM
  • Re:Recycling by sinnergy (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:19PM
  • Re...cy...cling...? by Kohath (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:21PM
  • Re:Simple by Eccles (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:24PM
  • by AnarchySoftware (2926) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:48AM (#624244) Homepage Journal

    I'm a volunteer at FreeGeek. We actually exchange volunteer hours for the refurbished computers, as opposed to giving them away outright.

    The project is new. Our "grand opening" isn't even until this Saturday. (Originally timed for *after the election*, so we could get political officials interested enought to come, ironically.)

    We're pulling in a variety of systems, from 8086's on up to dual Pentium Pros. The entire internal network for the organization has been pulled from the trash heap (with a few donations and maybe a couple hundred dollars spent on a DSL router and a few necessary cables.)

    We're getting interest from a number of local high tech companies, and we've gotten 501(c)(3) status (that is, the IRS allows donations to us to be tax deductable).

    If we can make a go of this, it may be reproduceable in other communities.

  • Re:Good program, but ... by LordNimon (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:48AM
  • Re:Whatever by fatphil (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:28PM
  • by John Jorsett (171560) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:52AM (#624247)
    The EPA does not inspect your trash. But if they find your monitor at an unsafe waste site, you are 100% responsible for cleaning up that entire site. More than that, if the EPA finds any connection, however tenuous, between a business 'dumping' at a Superfund site and a successor business, they'll come after you. One guy got dragged into a Superfund site cleanup because he bought some used trucks from the going-out-of-business dumper (before anyone knew about the toxic site situation). Kafka couldn't have written a better law than Superfund.
  • liar, liar, pants on fire! by SethJohnson (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:31PM
  • Re:Here's a link by Rexxxy (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:56AM
  • Re:Odd by bitMonster (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:57AM
  • by Meatloaf (176702) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:55AM (#624251) Homepage
    In Portland, Oregon, I believe we have something better going. A local charity, called FreeGeek [freegeek.org] will take any old technology off your hands free of charge.

    If said technology is still usable, they will give it, along with training, to a needy individual, in the hopes that this person will be able to use this training to start a career, and get a better life for him/herself.

    If the technology you donate has outlived its usefulness, FreeGeek will pick it apart and recycle the basic components or elements. All of this is free of charge, but if you are giving them recyclables, they will ask for a small cash donation (not required).

    But of course, Oregon is a pretty green state. Gore barely defeated Ralph Nader for the presidency here, 46% to 6%.

    I'm assuming there are other programs like this around the country, but I don't know. What's your city doing?

  • I dont care how old a PC is... by piku (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:55AM
  • I've always found it easy... by Ron Harwood (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:56AM
  • Re:Really Neat! by optize (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @12:20PM
  • Re:Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal by optize (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @12:31PM
  • ARRRGH! by cr0sh (Score:2) Wednesday November 15 2000, @02:27PM
  • by Eccles (932) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:56AM (#624257) Journal
    This [techreview.com] site disagrees, and claims various bits of supporting evidence from DOE, municipal governments, and other sources.

    Don't just dogmatize your beliefs, investigate them!
  • We pay them? by TheAngryArmadillo (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:57AM
  • Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by Rorschach1 (Score:1) Monday November 20 2000, @08:56AM
  • Here's a link by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:58AM
  • Right... Lets dump it all on YOUR lawn then... by crovira (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:58AM
  • Re:Odd by Jeremi (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:41PM
  • Use of recycled materials in new computer parts? by karzan (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:44PM
  • Re:-exactly-. by Slynkie'sEvilTwin (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:44PM
  • Re:trash afterthought by Shiva Lingham (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:57AM
  • Re:huge problems with your justification by xmurf (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:57AM
  • Re:I dont care how old a PC is... by piku (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:02PM
  • Re:Here's a link by Maryck (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:59AM
  • recycling is big business by ddent (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:08PM
  • Hey /. editors... by Derwen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:42AM
  • Re:Not only that... by Krimsen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:00AM
  • Recycling wastes even more by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:43AM
  • Re:Good program, but ... by Meatloaf (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:01AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by Ralph Wiggam (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:58AM
  • Re:This is great! by xmlmaster (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:59AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by Derwen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:00AM
  • I recycle Pentium class and better for FREE by Lumpy (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:00AM
  • Sounds like the EPA rules need to change. by Taufiq (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:00AM
  • I'm gonna undercut IBM, by brad3378 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM
  • The true motive behind IBM's generosity divined by embobo (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM
  • by LHOOQtius_ov_Borg (73817) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM (#624281)
    This argument is not based on fact. A good friend of mine was involved in the management of a sizable recycling company in the Bay Area for many years, and they not only helped keep many tons of electronic and metal scrap out of landfill, but they did it at a profit. Yes, that's right, a profit on recycling.

    In fact, IBM will likely make a profit on this deal. You PAY them $29.99 for recycling AND they get to sell or reuse the parts? Hey, I'll give you THAT deal! First of all, most solid state parts don't go bad very easily, so there is plenty for them to recover. Secondly, reselling used computers in third world countries can be fairly lucrative.

    The company my friend helped run did both of these things, plus metal recovery (which was actually their first business - recovery of gold from electronics assemblies to make jewelry). As with junked cars, the parts value can exceed the value of the assembled system once a certain age is past. However, if the system still works, it may be cheaper to just sell it used rather than expend the energy and time to disassemble it. Thus, this company, and presumably IBM, would dismantle the broken systems for parts or to recover precious metals, and sell the working ones overseas.

    My friend's company did this in, if I recall correctly, Indonesia and the Phillipines. Regarding environmental issues. For second-hand resale, the energy and pollution in transport did NOT outweigh the manufacture and transport of new systems (the transport expenditure is basically the same, but you're manufacturing new stuff as well, so how could new be cheaper costwise or environmentally?) For scrapping, the way that the components parts business is set-up, there is already a lot of transport going on, so this was also actually cheaper on both counts. As for metal recovery: not digging new mines, or, worse for an over-mined commodity like gold, lots of test mines and horrible things like sifter mines, gave quite a financial and environmental benefit.

    Recycling of many items, especially complex machines, is not only environmentally sound, but can be quite lucrative. IBM is really quite brilliant for doing this, especially since, being IBM, they can do it with minimal additional transport costs?

    Why? Most recycling moves through recycling centers. If IBM puts these at their distribution centers, to move the recycled equipment, you're mostly moving it in trucks which otherwise would be returning empty from distribution centers. In terms of home users shipping back via UPS, the financial cost is a little greater, but not really the environmental: again, you're primarily using empty space. Most UPS (and FedEx, and whatever) trucks return mostly empty to their depots. Someone else I knew well wrote the truck routing software for a major "less than truckload" shipper: their business is to resell the empty space on trucks. By making use of "waste" services to move waste goods, you're so far doing quite well financially and environmentally.

    The disassembly process is also almost never more expensive or environmentally damaging than manufacturing, and certainly resale of used systems is pretty obviously without any added environmental cost.

    If you know anything about the businesses of recycling and shipping, you realize that IBM has made a really smart move: if they know how to manage all this stuff properly (or if they partnered with folks who do), they'll make a profit AND get the PR bonus of being an "environmentally friendly" company.

    Kudos to IBM...
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by jekk (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM
  • Re:Reuse is pretty unlikely. by LHOOQtius_ov_Borg (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:09PM
  • Big [Blue | Green]? by Derwen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:16PM
  • Re:huge problems with your justification by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:01AM
  • GREAT DEAL... by SUWAIN (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:18PM
  • hey Anne! found this on trolltalk! by MOMOCROME (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:02AM
  • Computer recycling (Score:5)

    by Hugh D. Hyatt (94194) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:02AM (#624288) Homepage

    Here are a few facts I dug up:

    • Something like 150 computers become obsolete every minute.
    • A typical 60-pound computer contains 35 pounds of currently unrecyclable substances of varying toxicity.
    • More than a tenth of those 35 pounds are typically of lead.
    • Lead attacks the nervous system, blood system and kidneys in humans. It has a well-documented and deleterious effect on children's brain development.

    I've collected some information on computer recycling [crosswinds.net] (the link to documentation of lead's effect on children's brains is bad; here [cdc.gov] is a better one).

  • incinerators are not all that. by websensei (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:51PM
  • Re:Astonishingly cruel! by Ralph Wiggam (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:08AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by beckett (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:09AM
  • Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by SecurityGuy (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @01:53PM
  • Other Disposal by OctaneZ (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:09AM
  • by Junks Jerzey (54586) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:14AM (#624294)
    I can see this as primarily a benefit to businesses...for individuals, why not just donate to Freeboxen? (www.freeboxen.com) Then you don't even need to pay the shipping...

    One of the great delusions of the consumer era is that donating is better than throwing out. It's true, to some extent, but you're making the assumption that people want your old crap. At the one extreme, you have mattress retailers who make you feel good by offering to donate your old mattress to charity. The result in many cases is that you have charities getting flooded with smelly, stained mattresses that they don't know what to do with and have to pay to have hauled away. A 286 may be of value, yes, but really what are most people going to do with it? You'd have to really dig to find software, and then you'd be out in the cold without manuals or support or anyone to turn to. Is it worth getting yourself reliant on software that's ten or more years old? Unfortunately, using old software and hardware is not so easy.
  • I Second That, But . . . by tyronefine (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM
  • Wait a minute.... by fataugie (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:01AM
  • Finding local computer recyclers... by greg_barton (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:02AM
  • Re:This is great! by Electric Angst (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:02AM
  • RE: This is an IBM plot to ruin Linux by l33t j03 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:03AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by knurr (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:03AM
  • Re:Odd by Lxy (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:05AM
  • Re:Why not Freeboxen? by pruss (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @02:00PM
  • Don't forget the cost of parts by WarSpiteX (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @02:03PM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by aufecht (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @02:06PM
  • Re:Above is a goatse.cx link AM TOO! by bitMonster (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:15AM
  • Why Pay Money? by NatePWIII (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:16AM
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by BrK (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:18AM
  • Any recyclers in Los Angeles area? by antdude (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:24AM
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by BrK (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:26AM
  • Re:Corporate "green" or "greed"? by slashdoter (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:27AM
  • Re:Uhm, you mean I have to pay? by Mathieu Lutfy (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:07AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by truthsearch (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:08AM
  • -exactly-. by Slynkie'sEvilTwin (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:08AM
  • Good idea, But.... (Score:4)

    by tarsi210 (70325) <nathan@nathanHOR ... minus herbivore> on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:09AM (#624314) Homepage Journal
    From the: Make-your-neighbor-child-giddy dept.

    Good idea if your parts are broken. However, if they're not, consider donating or selling them to someone who wants them. There are TONS of computer collectors out there that would LOVE to take computers off your hands for the cost of shipping, provided they work. The older, the better. There's several Computer Shelters [1] [computershelter.org] [2] [jmug.org] and other "low end" computer sites [3] [lowendmac.net] that have hobbyists just searching for parts and machines. There are listservs, Vintage Computer Organizations [vintage.org] and, of course, the effervescent Obsolete Computer Museum [obsoleteco...museum.com] site.

    If nothing else, please forward messages of machines available for pickup or shipping to: computershelter@computershelter.org [mailto] and I'll be happy to pass them on to hobbyists who would love to take them off your hands. Some of use the computers for our collections and to learn about older technologies, some of us clean them up and give them to children and impovershed families in our area to give them a piece of technology.

    If it's broken, dispose of properly. But if it isn't, please donate and keep them in use!
  • What a waste by Derwen (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:22AM
  • Re:Good use for lead by SquadBoy (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:09AM
  • Re:Not only that... by plover (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:23AM
  • Re:trash afterthought by knurr (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:09AM
  • Re:Odd by Derwen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:10AM
  • Re:This is great! by Rude Turnip (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:23AM
  • How? by Senior Frac (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:23AM
  • Re:GOLD! by HiyaPower (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:23AM
  • by Anne Marie (239347) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:24AM (#624323)
    It's good that someone is doing something to help keep our planet clean, but you also have to understand the economics behind IBM's move here. Companies like Micro Metallics [micrometallics.com] have been extracting gold and other precious metals from discarded computers for many years now: with yields of as much as 20oz/ton, compared to 1oz/ton of ore from a typical gold mine. For $20, you're basically purchasing the "right" to have IBM make money off your valuable commodities. It's one thing to make a cash-for-service exchange, but it's an entirely different thing to make a cash-for-service-which-makes-cash exchange.

    And don't forget Envirocycle's [enviroinc.com] role in this operation. Besides being on their way to a solid monopoly in the computers-recycling industry, they pose a serious unrecognized risk of corporate espionage. As this Science News article [sciencenews.org] pointed out as far back as 1995, in the course of recycling proprietary circuit boards and chips, Envirocycle is being given privileged access to industry leaders' intellectual property. Usually, Envirocycle is instructed to destroy those chips, but just think how little it would cost for a competitor to buy (or even just steal) those chips out from under their own competitors' noses.

    Recycling is ultimately a good thing, but there need to be strong industry-ethics standards in place to assure that in saving the environment, we don't give up important rights and privileges. I'm wary that this industry (like so many others) cannot be expected to regulate its own behavior, but the solution is left as an exercise to the reader.
  • Yes Yes Yes by Pru (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:25AM
  • Re:Why not Freeboxen? by Peale (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:25AM
  • Re:This seems most useful for borken old hardware. by garcia (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @02:44PM
  • Another incentive for businesses. by Isomer (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @02:57PM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by Saan (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:31AM
  • Re:Here's a link by mjfgates (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:31AM
  • Re:Astonishingly cruel! by MsGeek (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @03:02PM
  • Re:Simple by yetisalmon (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @03:03PM
  • Other ideas by afinlay (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:31AM
  • I think I can undercut them.. by sid_vicious (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:32AM
  • Re:Recycling by tsangc (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @03:26PM
  • $30 for _old_ computers?! by Jose (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:32AM
  • Re:Why not Freeboxen? by istartedi (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @03:26PM
  • Reuse is pretty unlikely. by Tau Zero (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:34AM
  • Re:Good program, but ... by lw54 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:36AM
  • Re:liar, liar, pants on fire! by naasking (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @03:42PM
  • Tycoons by gibbonboy (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:36AM
  • Re:Computer recycling by Aqualung (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:40AM
  • give me $10 and I will take your old computer by jbischof (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:10AM
  • by poot_rootbeer (188613) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:10AM (#624343)
    I've got an HP fixed-frequency display attached to my Win98 box at home, that the degaussing circuitry is finally going bad on. (Considering that the display was built 8 years ago and that for the past year I've been driving it at a frequency it technically doesn't support, I think I've been pretty lucky.)

    So now I have 70 lbs of useless lead, glass, and plastic sitting there. What should I do with it?

    1) Keep it on the floor in my apartment forever
    2) Break out the soldering iron and sci.electronics.repair FAQ's, and hope I don't end up with glass shards sticking out of me
    3) For $30, IBM will take care of everything.

    Maybe I'm crazy, but option number 3 looks pretty appealing...
  • Not only that... (Score:3)

    by Krimsen (26685) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:11AM (#624344) Homepage
    Not only that, but basically IBM gets to clean up some hazardous waste (which I possibly gets them some sort of tax break) and on top of that, they get to dontate your old hardware and I am pretty sure they get a tax break for that. Sorry to sound cynical... They are still getting something good done, but I just don't believe their reasons are totally noble.
  • Re:Been done by rkent (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:25AM
  • Re:This is great! by Rude Turnip (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:25AM
  • Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:13AM
  • Re:Good idea, But.... by tarsi210 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:15AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by nycdewd (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:26AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by daveboy2099 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:27AM
  • Re:Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:15AM
  • OK... by toxic cock (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:27AM
  • Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Hairy_Potter (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:30AM
  • Re:Not only that... by Derwen (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:31AM
  • Apply the concept of cans on it. by segmond (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:31AM
  • Re:Recycling wastes even more by Mike1024 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:31AM
  • In a Related Story... by gvonk (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:45AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by Rocketboy (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @04:02PM
  • Price of disposal should by Camel Pilot (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @04:14PM
  • Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by SlashDotIDOne (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @04:25PM
  • by AArthur (6230) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @04:29PM (#624361) Homepage
    Actually, LinuxPPC was based off of MkLinux. MkLinux was orginally sponsered by Apple, and was the first Linux to be ported to PowerMacs. If you are interested in running monolithic (standard) Linux on your Nubus PowerMac, you will be happy to know there is some support for these machines in 2.4. More can be found at <a href="http://nubus-pmac.sourceforge.net/">nubus-pm ac.sourceforge.net</a>
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by HiyaPower (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:42AM
  • Re:incinerators are not all that. by ddent (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @05:52PM
  • Re:Simple by Eccles (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @05:54PM
  • Whatever by JurriAlt137n (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:47AM
  • Re:Hey /. editors... by l33t j03 (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:47AM
  • Re:Not only that... by ichimunki (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:45AM
  • Re:Why not Freeboxen? by jorbettis (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @06:35PM
  • In general this is a Good Thing, but...... by gunslngr (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:45AM
  • Recycling batteries in Albuquerque, Europe, Brasil by ma2oliveira (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @07:03PM
  • Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by erinlee (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:48AM
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by irksome (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:49AM
  • Simple by yetisalmon (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:53AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by substrate (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:16AM
  • It's kind of disturbing actually... by macx666 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:16AM
  • The semi-official word from IBM (You pay them) by ka9dgx (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:16AM
  • Re:Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:16AM
  • Re:Odd by Maryck (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:18AM
  • If IBM thinks... by ellem (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:19AM
  • Re:Dime for a Quarter... by HiyaPower (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:32AM
  • Re:Batteries need recycling too... --Belkin does by OmegaDan (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:19AM
  • IBM's new product by arcmay (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:35AM
  • Been done by rkent (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:20AM
  • Didnt Packard Bell used to do this by ellingtp (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:36AM
  • Another good program. by FreeMath (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:36AM
  • I've got no blood left from fixing 486s by TheBahxMan (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:37AM
  • Recycling by TheGeek (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:37AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by canning (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:38AM
  • Ring out the old Ring in the New by antonio_danger1 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @07:16PM
  • Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Throw Away Account (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @07:20PM
  • by Rorschach1 (174480) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:48AM (#624391) Homepage
    Cool... maybe I'll finally be able to park in my garage! The 6GB of hard drive space I could use, except for the fact that the storage array draws about 20 amps and sounds like a 747 taking off.
  • by BiggestPOS (139071) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:49AM (#624392) Homepage
    Dear GOD Why? I think I've yet to throw away anything sort of computer hardware no matter how old or worthless, there is a mouse (works actually) hangiing from my rearview mirror, I have a closet full of worthless 386's and a drawer of token ring nics. Old monitors make great fish tanks, and I've never found a whole computer that didn't have some use. I'm not going to pay IBM $30 to haul off my machine, considering the possibility they might donate it to some charitable organization, and then THEY get the tax-break. Heh, I'd hate that. Umm, something else, I love my computer parts and wouldn't part with them, unless of course you paid ME.

  • And we must NOT forget... by Burz (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:49PM
  • Re:Finding local computer recyclers... by ricegeek (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:21PM
  • Odd (Score:3)

    by Auckerman (223266) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:49AM (#624395)
    I'm not sure if I understand. Will IBM pay you $30 or do you play IBM $30 to recycle your computer? It's actually unclear in the press release.

    Also, what advantages does recycling a computer have over just giving it to a needy person (or something like Goodwill)? I actually own a Color Classic (its a collector's item) that is hooked up to my LAN (OS X PB running natd routing to ppp) and functions wonderfully for my kid to do email and web browsing. Seems like a waste to just dismantle a computer that still works.

  • This is great! by Electric Angst (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:50AM
  • Re:Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal by ryancooley (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:15PM
  • Re:Tycoons by ekfinn (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:39PM
  • Really Neat! by matth (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:50AM
  • Don't recycle, repurpose ! by corvi42 (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @02:49AM
  • Why not Freeboxen? (Score:3)

    by shik0me (235948) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:50AM (#624401)
    I can see this as primarily a benefit to businesses...for individuals, why not just donate to Freeboxen? (www.freeboxen.com) Then you don't even need to pay the shipping...
  • GOLD! by superdk (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:51AM
  • They are not reposting, silly,... by Pac (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:51AM
  • Re:trash afterthought by knurr (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @03:24AM
  • Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by kc7cfk (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @06:11AM
  • Re: Repair-ers in 3rd wld. by techwatcher (Score:2) Wednesday November 15 2000, @06:16AM
  • Re:Astonishingly cruel! by technos (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @11:59AM
  • Re:give me $10 and I will take your old computer by travisd (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:39AM
  • Re:Uhm, you mean I have to pay? by t3df13dl3r (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:40AM
  • Re:Why not Freeboxen? by tarsi210 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:03PM
  • muahahah! by ebbv (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:40AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by mOdQuArK! (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:03PM
  • Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Auckerman (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:41AM
  • Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by gregbaker (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:11PM
  • Washington Has it Right! by scandalous (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @12:13PM
  • Re:Not only that... by Krimsen (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:41AM
  • by phossie (118421) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:42AM (#624417)
    from the linked article (which is only an appendix to a massive journalistic project)- bold type is my emphasis:

    "We're a wicked throwaway society." Plastic packaging and fast-food containers may seem wasteful, but they actually save resources and reduce trash. The typical household in Mexico City buys fewer packaged goods than an American household, but it produces one-third more garbage, chiefly because Mexicans buy fresh foods in bulk and throw away large portions that are unused, spoiled or stale. Those apples in Dittersdorf's slide, protected by plastic wrap and foam, are less likely to spoil. The lightweight plastic packaging requires much less energy to manufacture and transport than traditional alternatives like cardboard or paper. Food companies have switched to plastic packaging because they make money by using resources efficiently. A typical McDonald's discards less than two ounces of garbage for each customer served -- less than what's generated by a typical meal at home.

    Plastic packaging is routinely criticized because it doesn't decay in landfills, but neither does most other packaging, as William Rathje, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona, has discovered from his excavations of landfills. Rathje found that paper, cardboard and other organic materials -- while technically biodegradable -- tend to remain intact in the airless confines of a landfill. These mummified materials actually use much more landfill space than plastic packaging, which has steadily been getting smaller as manufacturers develop stronger, thinner materials. Juice cartons take up half the landfill space occupied by the glass bottles they replaced; 12 plastic grocery bags fit in the space occupied by one paper bag.

    so, uh, yeah - some Mexican families produce a greater initial bulk of garbage, but it's made up of mostly fresh, unprocessed organic food products. which biodegrade extremely quickly, unlike other "organic" products like paper (or worse packaging materials), which has been processed and condensed so that you're basically waiting for a hyperdense portion of a tree to biodegrade. it also lacks othe natural factors (various critters) that will help the process. that will, of course, take longer than a mostly-eaten apple.

    comparing easily compostable waste mass to plastic and other petroleum waste that will take (at least) many hundreds of years to biodegrade is an absolute farce - it's comparing apples and plastic wrap, and they're just not the same thing.

    similar quality journalism pervades the rest of that article. the plastic waste might be lighter day by day, but it doesn't go away, either. when was the last time anybody saw plastic detritus?

    i'd also like to point out that a large part of McDonald's waste is carried out of the store by customers, and thus is probably not accounted for with those numbers.

  • Beowulf Cluster! by scott1853 (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:43AM
  • Re:Really Neat! by Denial of Service (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @10:44AM
  • Good use for lead by bmongar (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:52AM
  • Paying them to avoid pollution they designed? by Medievalist (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @06:26AM
  • by cluening (6626) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:52AM (#624422) Homepage
    One thing I rarely see mentioned is the need for battery recycling. Those little things are full of lead, mercury, various acids, and all kinds of other nasty stuff (depending on the flavor of battery). Battery rechargers are a good way to keep them out of the environment, but remembering not to just throw them away is the best thing in the end. There are normally places in most cities (I think, at least here in the US) to take dead batteries. Use them!
  • Re:Batteries need recycling too... by mrdogi (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @07:40AM
  • by spellcheckur (253528) on Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:53AM (#624424)
    Home Stereo lacking DTS?
    Do you still have a Tube TV?
    Is there a "windows" key on your keyboard?!

    DON'T JUST SIT THERE! Call Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal for all your Disposal Needs!

    We'll take all your unused computer equiment, VCRs, DVD Players and home stereos (working order only, please) for the low, LOW price of $14.99 (shipping not included, taxes may apply).

    We'll get rid of that out-of-date P3-500 so you don't have to!

    *Uncle Vinny takes no knowledge of what open-source operating system or pr0nographic DVDs may be used on your disposed of junk, but don't you worry! it won't be traceable to you! Call 1-800-COMP-U-GON and wait for the black van at the end of your block!

  • This is an IBM plot to ruin Linux by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:53AM
  • Re:Don't recycle, repurpose ! by Walker Evans (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @08:46AM
  • Above is a goatse.cx link AM TOO! by arete (Score:1) Tuesday November 14 2000, @09:53AM
  • Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by ecloud (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:01AM
  • UPS and empty truck space by mccabem (Score:1) Wednesday November 15 2000, @09:05AM
(1) | 2 | 3