Slashdot Log In
Microsoft Uses WGA To Obtain Record Jail Sentences
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Thu Jan 01, 2009 08:51 AM
from the zomg-i-can-ping-my-router dept.
from the zomg-i-can-ping-my-router dept.
theodp writes "According to Microsoft, 'No information is collected during the [Genuine Advantage Program] validation process that can be used to identify or contact a user.' That's little comfort to the software counterfeiters who were just handed jail sentences ranging from 1.5-6.5 years by the Futian People's Court in China, especially since Microsoft contends that much of the estimated $2B in bogus software was detected by its Windows Genuine Advantage program. 'Software piracy negatively impacts local economic growth,' explained Microsoft VP Fengming Liu in a celebratory New Year's Eve press release. But then again, so does transferring $16B of assets and $9B in annual profit to an Irish tax haven, doesn't it?"
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
GOOD! (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, There is a persisting writeup from a japanese LUG years ago talking about how pirated copies of windows cannibalize the linux userbase and dev base.
Pirated windows is the bane of linux, and I applaud microsoft for slitting their own throat by pursuing windows counterfeiters.
Yea but ... (Score:3, Informative)
Didn't Ballmer get the memo?
Re:GOOD! (Score:5, Informative)
Could you provide the link?
I have thought about this for a while, 'free' software here doesn't make much sense as windows vista cost less than 1$, and 98%+ software here are pirated.
Our government is switching to FLOSS software, and I think stopping piracy in my country will be a good thing to FLOSS.
It seems the original was finally taken down in leu of more recent entries, but it has been mirrored verbatim elsewhere [autotelic.com] if you wish to take a look
Parent
Re:GOOD! (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry, but the writer of that article lost me in the first section.
Mr Kingsley-Hughes gives five essential points to explain what is so bad about Linux that it can't even succeed for free
What he means is "Five things that Microsoft does to hinder Linux's success, and that I personally dislike because I've got no fuckin' clue."
His main point being in the headline "Windows is free" (eg. via torrent). This is nothing Linux has done wrong, is it? Yet he writes it in that way in the whole large section.
Too many different versions of Linux.
Again one of those retards who still think in terms of "software product versions", despite calling themselves "experts".
There are no "versions". There are packagers. Companies, and other groups. A living, breathing, healthy concurrency. Each group with their own philosophy.
There is not even a "product" "Linux". It's like he would say that there are too many different versions of candy bars, so he rather wants ice cream, despite there only being 3 versions of two products from one single company.
This is a giant major advantage of Linux. Him not being used to it does not make it wrong. It means he's even too lazy to try to understand this, despite calling himself an "expert".
I see GNU/Linux as a kind of meta-OS. You create your very own OS out of it. Some people have done this for you to some extend.
People want certainty that hardware and software will work.
Well. Linux does this better than any new Windows version. Install Linux, and all supported hardware is there. Install Windows, and then go hunt for drivers. Signed drivers.
I bet he drags the drivers of those companies into the spotlight, that refuse to create a Linux driver, partially because MS told them to do so, and partially because they have something shady to hide (like their most expensive product and their cheapest product only differing in the driver code).
As far as most people are concerned, the command line has gone the way of the dinosaur.
This guy really calls himself anything?? How incompetent can you be?
The whole point of having a computer, is to be able to automate things.
This is mostly done trough writing programs. But then you have programs, and the OS, and you want them to work together in a specific way.
A comforting little automation there... an quick rename of just those files, while replacing a word inside them... let two tools work together for more comfort...
All this glue in between is filled with shell scripting, or as he calls it "the command line".
If you can't do that, you're not really using the computer. If there would be a computer license, this would be the major thing you would have to be able to do.
When you're only being able to eat pre-chewed food, you're dead, every time the pre-chewer has a problem.
When I came from Windows, this "glue" scripts, and the little automation of repetitive tasks, including the use of DBUS, and even Greasemonkey, were the first thing that made me say "Wow, I love Linux". All this shit that I had to work countless hours on on Windows... and all this comfort that I previously could not even imagine... dissolved into some small shell scripts. Everything was so easy. And most importantly: Everything suddenly was possible.
The day where shell scripting dies, is the day where the computer dies, is a day where I will long be dead and gone.
Linux is still too geeky.
Translation: "I don't like you. I've never learned to know you. I've not worked with you. But, hell, I don't like you!"
I bet he has not even tried Ubuntu.
I'm sorry, but with this EPIC FAIL of an article introduction, I will not throw away my time to read this, but use it to save others from going down that dirty pipe with him.
Parent
Re:Not good! (Score:5, Insightful)
I am now certain to exterminate WGA from any and all computers I come into contact with.
Parent
Re:Not good! (Score:5, Informative)
I call them up every time I reinstall. "Hello, how can I help you." "I reinstalled windows because of a virus." "Ok, enter this key:"
It only takes a couple minutes.
Parent
Re:Not good! (Score:5, Insightful)
What you're basically saying is that just one raid justifies MS annoying all of us legitimate users and treating us like criminals.
Nothing justifies it, but sticking with a company that treats you like a thief is pretty much acceptance of the charge. You are guilty until proven possibly innocent this time... And Microsoft reserves the right to alter how you are allowed to use their product at any time. An extra check here, a stricter enforcement of the reactivation policy there, and you will move to the next version, or buy a new copy for as long as it is available. Don't like it, you are free to go elsewhere. The WGA software was enough to give me the final push to move to Linux, and I had a fully legit copy of XP. For many, this isn't a big enough problem, and for others, it is something they don't even know about. Basically, Microsoft can do what they like, and until it is tested in court, you are stuck with whatever conditions Microsoft choose to apply.
Parent
Re:Not good! (Score:4, Insightful)
What's the problem?
The problem is that the world is not as black and white as you make it out to be. Because of their job requirements, their lack of technical ability or many other possible reasons, many people cannot leave the Windows world. If I refuse to ever use Windows again I would be out of a job and it would be very difficult to find a new one (unless I was willing to leave the IT field and work construction or as a dishwasher or something).
Windows is the big player in the desktop OS world. Leaving it is simply not a viable option for many of us.
Parent
WGA forum (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm betting that a good amount of the information used in this case came from posters on the WGA forum [microsoft.com], where people can post if they're having issues with WGA. One of the tools available in that forum is a WGA diagnostic tool [microsoft.com] which will generate a sanitized text dump of a user's windows validation information. Most cases on that forum are people whose brother, cousin, or sketchy PC shop installed a common warez release of Windows on their systems, but several there are people who bought apparently legitimate software from resellers which failed validation and later turned out to be counterfeit. Microsoft got in touch with these users, identified the resellers, and I'm betting that this news story is the result.
Er, did WGA really do much there? (Score:2, Interesting)
Sounds to me like they were just bragging that WGA actually noticed when a user had a counterfeit copy, not that it had any effect on the sentence.
Re:Er, did WGA really do much there? (Score:5, Insightful)
Right. If the submitter had actually read the article, this would have jumped out at him:
"The counterfeits were also discovered through customs seizures"
The fact that *after* they had seized the software, WGA was capable of detecting it when installed is just pr for WGA and not an indication that WGA is sending personal information to MS. It may or may not being doing that, but you couldn't prove it by this article.
If you really want to see what WGA is sending to Microsoft, just capture the packets on their way to the internet and see what's being sent. Has anyone done that and found anything of real interest?
Parent
Tenuous Summary (Score:2)
WGA exists to bug users that have stolen the software and so Microsoft has an overall clue about how many people have stolen the software, not go after specifics.
I remember seeing a report from Microsoft saying they knew for a fact that 1 in 3 corporate machines were stolen. If they wanted to target for the purposes of bringing them to court it wouldn't exactly be difficult; they just want to irritate thieves and have an idea how many rogue copies there are.
Re:Tenuous Summary (Score:5, Informative)
In this case it sounds like we're talking about commercially-pirated-and-passed-off-as-genuine software, rather than end-user-pirated software.
FTA: The counterfeit software was found in 36 countries and 11 different languages. It was so sophisticated that it contained legitimate computer code written by Microsoft for programs such as Windows XP and Vista and Microsoft Office, but also had touches of the criminals' own coding as well. That was allegedly added to mimic security programs and fool users into believing the product was authentic.
So it may actually be the case that some of the end users actually thought they had authentic products, and were alerted by WGA. I doubt this happens often, but Microsoft is bound to mention it if it does happen.
Parent
Re:Tenuous Summary (Score:4, Interesting)
People call my store all the time accusing us of giving them stolen software. I explain that they have an OEM sticker on their PC and we'd never do that, but heck, Microsoft might get them to buy a second or third copy- so maybe that was their plan.
Parent
Just wait till a Chinese Co breaks the GPL (Score:5, Interesting)
And a lot of you guys will be screaming murder. Have you realized that GPL enforcement and Windows license enforcement comes from the same thing as Copyright law?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Have you realized that GPL enforcement and Windows license enforcement comes from the same thing as Copyright law?
There is one big difference though: Microsoft often comes after end users of its software, while GPL enforcement never concerns use. GPL enforcement is only directed at companies and organizations that distribute the code further without fulfilling the license obligations, specifically the requirement of source code availability.
Who are you talking too? (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Micro$oft lie? (Score:2)
(RTFA)
Maybe not. Oh well, so much for a massive class action.
Ratting on suppliers (Score:3, Informative)
So did MS lie when they assured me that no personal information was collected when I installed WGA?
As I understand it, WGA includes a tool to submit an anonymous tip against your supplier. So it collects no personal information about you but instead about your supplier.
Theft (Score:5, Insightful)
"But then again, so does transferring $16B of assets and $9B in annual profit to an Irish tax haven, doesn't it?"
What's the point of adding that statement? So it's OK to steal from someone who is "rich" or who has a shrewd accountant?
I don't like Microsoft any more than the next guy, but winking at large scale theft of their product because they somehow "deserve it" is just plain wrong.
Cheers,
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Redundant but necessary reply: (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft says pirating software takes money from local economies! (read: pirates are stealin' America's money!!1one)
Microsoft uses an Irish tax haven to keep billions of their dollars out of reach of the American tax man.
If you don't see the hypocrisy in that, please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy [wikipedia.org]
Parent
Re:Redundant but necessary reply: (Score:5, Funny)
Well, it's doing wonders for the local (Irish) economy.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The purpose of the statement was to expose as hypocritical MS claims about the effects of software piracy on local economies. Please do try and keep up at the back of the class.
So you're saying paying taxes is the same as putting money into the local economy? I must have missed that lesson...
Local economic impact (Score:5, Insightful)
'Software piracy negatively impacts local economic growth,'
And buying Microsoft software takes money out of local economies and sends it to Redmond. (And buying Apple software does the same thing, but to Cupertino).
I say that using non-free software can also negatively impact local economies, but people do it anyway.
Really, answering my own post here, it's not just as black and white as that. Companies using open source would help energize their local economy by using local companies/consultants, but often they don't. And companies using MS software, while spending for it, may use local companies/consultants as well, keeping some of the money local.
However, in the case of real large scale piracy, it's the worst of both worlds, because money has left the local economy, and not gone to the rightful owners (in this case, Microsoft).
Re: (Score:2)
I'm also curious to know how MS invests in the local economy. To me, local means city or town. So maybe they sell professional services through local reps but to me this is really a profit center that can't practically be served by Redmond because of language or cultural barriers.
It would be interesting to see a ratio between local investments by MS and "piracy" rates based on WGA data.
Re:Local economic impact (Score:4, Insightful)
OT, I know, but God I hate manager speak.
Why do they say "negatively impacts" when "harms" is a better word?
Software piracy harms local economic growth.
Parent
Re:Local economic impact (Score:5, Funny)
"OT, I know, but God I hate manager speak."
Me too. It's time we pushed beyond it to embrace a new paradigm.
Parent
Biased summary (or: business as usual on Slashdot) (Score:4, Insightful)
The summary appears to suggest that Microsoft was lying about WGA not collecting personal information, otherwise I just can't see why that statement appeared in the summary at all.
Unfortunately, the facts don't support that accusation. All we know is that WGA was used to count how many users had a particular counterfeit copy of Windows; this does not require any identifying information, just a license key. Microsoft then determined through other means that this particular copy originated with a particular pirate group (and yes, piracy is the correct term here).
I also fail to see what Microsoft's accounting practices have to do with this story. Is the submitter trying to suggest that a wrong committed by Microsoft somehow negates its right to seek justice in court? That's not how it works.
Obligatory disclaimer: I'm no more of a Microsoft fan than anyone here, but biased, sensationalist story-telling pisses me off.
WTF? (Score:4, Informative)
Short version for those who can't be bothered to RTFA: WGA doesn't send personally identifiable data, and the people sentenced were not end users but pirates (yeah, I said pirates. Suck it bitches.) who sold on illegal copies.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"According to researchers, 'there is no link between the MMR vaccine and autism.' That's little comfort to Joe and Mary Blogs whose son has been diagnosed with autism."
Why mention the MMR vaccine at all unless you want to suggest a link? Same with the reference to personally identifiable data in the summary.
Taxes (Score:5, Insightful)
It's hard to blame Microsoft for moving money offshore to avoid taxes, we're the idiots that tax the hell out of our populace and our companies and think no bad could ever come from it. Perhaps if we were a bit more supportive of success rather than spending $700B - $1,700B rewarding failure ...
ridiculous (Score:3, Interesting)
Microsoft is a convicted criminal enterprise. It beats the hell out of the rest of us why Americans remain so unconcerned about the vast scale of their theft, not to mention the tax evasion - and continue to let them get away with it and even defend them... No wonder your house of cards is collapsing...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
When was Microsoft convicted of tax evasion?
Local growth (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, it does. So, the natural solution to this is to give corporations incentives to keep their money local instead of sending it to tax havens. America used to be a tax haven for foreign investors. If we want to pull out of the recession quickly, we should restructure our taxes and spending accordingly, to encourage people to squirrel their assets away on our soil, rather than Ireland, Switzerland, the Caribbean or Indonesia.
This is just basic, good sense, especially if you are one of those people who believes that the rich can buy influence. If you believe that, then what makes you think that they won't be able to get their assets overseas while the middle class and lower end of the upper class get taxed into oblivion?
don't be .... (Score:2)
....human.
You are born and you will die and in your human lfe time you have to fit it in to the ideologies others have created. But why if there is a better way than teh way being used?
If anyone is looking for to use MS windows pirating as an excuse for the bad economy or in any way contributing to it... Wake up.
The economy is not what it is because of the knowledge, natural resources and man power we have, as what we have here calculates to a far better result.
But it is what it is because of how badly it h
Right thing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Despite the hatred against Microsoft, commercial or large-scale cloning of MS-products is not ok.
The right thing to do, is to destroy Microsoft completely, burn Bill and his EEE (extend, ...) and marketing team in hell and nuke everything from orbit, just to be sure. ;)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
No. "Ireland's low corporate tax rate of 12.5% on trading profits has been a magnet for multinational companies..."
The moral of the story is "Lower your taxes, and they shall come."
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:5, Insightful)
We can't all be tax-havens. It is only useful to small countries that can exist on the small transfer fees of enormous corporations from other countries.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
We can't all be tax-havens. It is only useful to small countries that can exist on the small transfer fees of enormous corporations from other countries.
*And* that are financed by huge subsidies by their rich neighbours so that they can be brought kicking and screaming in the century of the fruitbat. Although the whole tax-haven thing isn't so popular lately.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm in college right now. My dad makes about $27k a year supporting his wife and my brother. He makes just enough that I don't get shit from the government via FAFSA. I'm working as many hours as I can pick up in a worker-saturated college town that exists around the college, and only going to school at about 3/4 time.
Where is my advantage again?
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't think that striving is beneath you. You think that giving up a little pleasure now for a hugely improved life tomorrow is pretty damned smart. You don't think that having to skip a few nights out at the bar is a violation of your human rights. You don't think that some dude shooting his load inside your mother somehow entitles you to a life of luxury and idleness. You aren't so full of false pride that you have to be the center of attention and importance in everything you do. You don't reject every piece of advice because you know that you don't know everything. You aren't a lazy whiner who thinks that even the slightest bit of effort is too much. You don't insist that everyone blindly and baselessly treat you with the respect and deference given to people who've spent decades proving their capability and knowledge.
Parent
Re:You have no right for disadvantage compensation (Score:5, Insightful)
You contradict your own premise.
There are three tiers to a successful nation:
Extreme right view points ignore the need for a healthy and skilled labor force and its impact on the other two. You protest that no one person has "the right" to be compensated for a disadvantage. However, the entire notion of society is built upon just this right. The right for a collaborative of individuals to work toward a common end despite relatively minor inconveniences to an individual.
So you ask, why should I have to pay out of pocket to send some poor kid to school who could not otherwise afford it? Why should I spend money to improve education and decrease negative social pressures in low income neighborhoods when I live in a nice suburb seemingly unconnected?
The response is simple, it costs more to imprison a man then to educate him. . . and the education also benefits society by producing a skilled member of the worked force. Society receives a net gain when it assists an out of work man in finding employment then if it ignores his plight.
If you don't like the system, then so be it. Walden it up if you wish, but be a man of principle and shirk all the social welfare you enjoy on a daily basis such as socalized military, socialized police, socialized road and transport, subsidized agriculture, subsidized economies. And when you take off to the hills for a life of solitude unburdened by the unfair demands for good health, equal opportunities, and pursuit of a decent life of your fellow man please don't drive on our roads, our airways, or purchase any of our subsidized foods on your way out.
Parent
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:4, Insightful)
Every US taxpayer should be outraged. If it weren't for practices such as these, the individual tax payer wouldn't have the burden it suffers today. If companies like these were to pay their taxes rather than hide from them with schemes like these, you would be a lot more free to enjoy the money you earn. And this isn't even about "Hate Microsoft." This is about what I suspect all large companies do.
Parent
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:4, Insightful)
Wouldn't a better paradigm be to have low corporate taxes to get more corporations to move into your local economy and supply more jobs?
Also, I'd rather have taxpayers know more exactly what their true tax burden is. It is not in the citizen's best interest to have a corporation pay a tax and then have the consumer reimburse the corporation for the tax by paying higher prices for goods and services. How can you make an informed decision about a government's budget if you don't know what the true tax burden is?
Parent
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:4, Informative)
"Wouldn't a better paradigm be..."
Oh yes, because that works so well for us now!
You realize that notion has been tried and continually tried only to see abused by corporations. Some months ago there was a story where Houston gave incentives to a company to move into their location. In the end, that company ended up sending the job-creating part of its business outside of the US because the labor was cheaper. Houston then sought to recover its incentives offering and as I recall, the fight is still ongoing.
Giving to business in hopes that things will "trickle down to benefit the community" is a dream that has never been shown to work. It has been tried and has failed in every example I am aware of.
A previous responder says something to the effect of not blaming businesses for finding legal ways to shelter themselves from taxes while absorbing benefits of the communities they exist within. This is showing a LOT of taking and nearly no giving back. This is standard operating procedure for the bean-counter-run businesses who seek short term gains on investments. The same person said "...at least they are legal!" Yes, they are legal, but they are immoral. They lobbied and "contributed" heavily to legislators to create these holes in the system to allow them to "legally" do the things they do. I should hope that people begin to see there is no connection between legal and moral. There are many laws that serve immoral ends and tax shelters for big business are among them.
Parent
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:5, Informative)
Whatever you are, you are no socialist.
Parent
Re:The moral of the story... (Score:5, Insightful)
No the moral of the story is if Microsoft's actions are even potentially open to not being condemned (i.e. preventing the loss of billions of dollars of revenue), then tack on a completely separate story just in case.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I keep telling people we should drop the tax rate on corporations in the US to about 2-4%. That would make it one of the lowest tax rates in the world. Of course, I recommend that they do that and change the tax system to gross receipts basis. Nobody seems to like that part.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Thats an economic fallacy called the Window Broken Fallacy.
The gist is that a kid breaks a window,therefore stimulates the economy to "create hundreds of dollars" of potential wealth in services and such.
The fallacypart is that would have happened any number of different ways. Instead, the person with the broken window is out that much money.