Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Bill Gates Founds New "Think Tank" Company

Posted by kdawson on Fri Oct 24, 2008 01:13 PM
from the short-drive-from-the-house-on-the-lake dept.
Homncruse sends in news of Bill Gates's new adventure, adding "I was working just one or two floors under this new office when it was all coming together. I even unknowingly shared an elevator with him at one time on his way up to the office." The article notes that the name "bgC3" derives from Bill Gates, catalyst, and the "third thing," neither Microsoft or the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. "Just months after his Microsoft farewell, Bill Gates is quietly creating a new company — complete with high-tech office space, a cryptic name and even its own trademark. Public documents describe the new Gates entity — bgC3 LLC — as a 'think tank.' It's housed within a Kirkland office that the Microsoft co-founder established on his own after leaving his day-to-day executive role at the company this summer ... However, bgC3 will also oversee Gates' personal pursuit of breakthrough ideas in science and technology. [An] insider said the goal isn't necessarily to create new companies, although ideas could be passed along to Microsoft, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — or others — as it makes sense ..."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Borg Cubed? (Score:5, Funny)

    by mr_stinky_britches (926212) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:16PM (#25500937) Homepage Journal

    Did the name 'bgc3' make anyone else think "Borg Cubed"?

  • Corbis? (Score:4, Informative)

    by isaac (2852) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:23PM (#25501019)

    Corbis is Bill Gates' second company, not the Foundation.

    -Isaac

  • Rich PPL (Score:5, Funny)

    by Wiarumas (919682) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:28PM (#25501081)
    GAWD! First Google with jet fighters... now Bill Gates with think TANKS. What's next?
  • by peter303 (12292) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:39PM (#25501257)
    Like his VP who left MicroSoft some years ago.
  • by joeflies (529536) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:41PM (#25501273)

    Costco sells offices now?

  • Seems sensible (Score:5, Insightful)

    by symes (835608) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:47PM (#25501359) Journal
    To be honest, it sounds like a nice retirement project... sit around, drink coffee, come up with a few whacky ideas, shoot the breeze with a few interesting people. If I had his money I'd probably do something similar. Except I'd have it located somewhere a little more interesting. Like Paris, Berlin, Singapore... or all three!
  • by rimcrazy (146022) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:59PM (#25501505)

    They are going to make crappy commercials staring Bill with has-been comedians.

  • I hear Ballmer has already thrown in some chairs for his new office.
  • and the B&MGF just spends profits from MSFT and even has been said to require Microsoft-only software in computer donations. So no wonder Bill Gates is trying to get others to come up with an idea he can profit from. With Microsoft having been a one-trick pony for all these years, just maybe Bill can find someone else who can come up with a hit.

    Knowing the history of Microsoft and Windows, it was not really the product which made the business, it was the business behind the product and that faithful dea

    • Take a look at the most recent MSFT earnings report (which came out yesterday I believe). You can find it on www.microsoft.com the Investor Relations section. Basically, in terms of income (not revenue): Client (aka Windows) made $3.2 billion, Server and Tools made $1.1 billion, MSFT Business Division (I'm assuming this includes Office) made $3.3 billion, and Entertainment (includes Xbox360) made $178 million. Online Services lost $480 million.
    • To be fair, it is most likely just the way any true computer nerd/geek will express themselves, when they can afford to do so. What better than their own private lab, to explore their own ideas, as well as investigate new ones. So a self indulgence, likely but, it is still far better than spending it of private jets and mega yachts or on other ostentatious extravagances.

      Who knows perhaps they might even explore new ideas in free open source software.

    • I'm impressed. Numerologically you user id adds up to 3.
      It must be frustrating for Bill personally. Imagine having billions of dollars at your disposal with every toy you want and realise that it's not enough, that you want to sit down with a clean sheet of paper on a new desk with a sharpened pencil and start thinking creatively.
      He's had a few years to do this and decided in the end that it's best to 'outsource' the creative aspect by forming a company and hiring creative people for his own personal thinkt

  • I wonder if the employment contract BG signed with Microsoft had the usual clause of "everything you've previously thought of, are currently thinking of, or will think of belongs to us" ?

  • I used to be pretty good with a BFG3000.

    I wonder if Bill likes to frag.

  • I looked at the source code of his new webpage [bgc3.com] and he ISN'T using Frontpage.

  • what vision? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Tom (822) on Saturday October 25 2008, @05:26AM (#25508381) Homepage Journal

    Gates' personal pursuit of breakthrough ideas in science and technology.

    Good that he finally gets started on some. Seriously, the guy is great in stealing and rebranding other ideas as his own, but that's it. I've yet to hear of even one original idea by Bill Gates.

      • by Zero__Kelvin (151819) on Friday October 24 2008, @02:00PM (#25501513) Homepage
        Yeah, um, about that ... you really need to read this book [amazon.com], paying special attention to who was at war with whom, and for how long. Also of note, is that Bill Gates does not claim that the Internet is just a fad, and never has claimed that the Internet is just a fad. Pay no attention to the fact that Gates said exactly that; so long as he denies it, it never happened!

        Anyone who thinks Gates is a "visionary" clearly hasn't read Gates' The Road Behind [amazon.com].

        On a side note, Amazon says:
        The Road Ahead (Penguin Readers, Level 3) (Paperback)

        ROTFLMAO ... They said Penguin in a M$ context; those kidders!
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Just a quick question, what would the man have to do in order for you to accept that he is a visionary? Now don't for a second think that I'm calling him one, what I'm saying is that one should not have to invent every useful program/concept in order to qualify as a visionary.

          So he missed the internet, big deal, it's not like he was the only one.

          • I've read his book. I've heard him on TV. I've read interviews with him. I know exactly how he stole^H^H^H^H^H created innovative products like Windows. His one claim to fame is he thought people would pay for software when everybody else thought it should free with the hardware. WOW!!!! I don't call that innovative so much as greedy. Pretty much every other word out of his mouth is revisionist history based horse$hit. If he said "when Microsoft popularized the Computer Virus ..." at least he would b
        • At the time MS was trying to sell its MSN service as a walled garden as opposed to going straight to the internet. This was an attempt to compete with AOL, prodigy, etc. I wouldnt be surprised if Bill knew that the real fad was these walled garden services, but as always, business first. MSN now is just a website.

      • Get me a link to his denial from sometime before 1983. Having him deny saying something stupid almost a decade after it became painfully obvious that what he said was stupid isn't really good evidence is it?
        • Is it really that "painfully obvious"? So far my one like beats your zero links. Where did he say that? Why did he say that? Quite frankly I have never seen evidence to support that quote.
        • How about showing a link that he did? I mean actual proof, not just an "everyone knows" message board or wiki posting. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, and so far I haven't anyone produce one scrap of evidence backing this claim. In absence of evidence, Bill Gates' words are all we have to go on.
        • by Warll (1211492) on Friday October 24 2008, @01:58PM (#25501497)
          And what if the Space shuttle was as reliable as your car? Yeah its apples to oranges, integrated firmware is not the same as a full OS.
          • by olddotter (638430) on Friday October 24 2008, @02:03PM (#25501545) Homepage

            Only because you have come to accept poor quality. If people didn't spend 20 years with PC's that were unreliable, they wouldn't accept poor quality in other areas. Now I have to deal with a cell phone that reboots daily, because its "good enough."

            There is no fundamental reason why a desk top PC is going to be unreliable. Poor design and quality control of the OS is the cause.

            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              Blaming poor quality software written by other developers on Microsoft is pure blind hatred. Would you blame a defect in a pair of shoes on a competitor?

              Bottom line, companies choose their own quality levels. Some are exceptional, some aren't and the median level is set from that. Your cell phone's company made its own choices about quality. There are plenty of phones out there that work just fine (mine included) - don't shift blame.

    • I have about a million items
      wrong with microsoft software products
      that could use some design review.

      Not sure why it didn't happen the
      first time, but maybe Bill has some
      time on his hands now.

      Burma Shave.