Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

ICQ Starts Blocking Alternative Clients

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Jul 02, 2008 09:58 AM
from the well-that's-not-how-friends-play-nice dept.
An anonymous reader writes "It appears that since yesterday ICQ has blocked access to the ICQ network to alternative clients. Users of QIP, Adium, and other clients are getting a 'The client version you are using is too old. Please upgrade'. No comment yet from ICQ or AOL."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • IC what? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 02 2008, @09:59AM (#24030737)

    In other news... people still use ICQ?

    • Re:IC what? (Score:5, Informative)

      by urbanriot (924981) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:01AM (#24030789)
      Yes, ICQ is still big in China (Oicq) and Russia. Consider that the IM to first and fully support a character set will probably get the widest use, not to mention Oicq was fully integrated into cell phones long ago.
    • Re:IC what? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:05AM (#24030879)

      Seriously. The last time I used ICQ, I remember my geeky friend named Devin inviting me over to his house. We were talking about the hot new character on the current Star Trek show named Seven of Nine.

      So, for what it's worth, if ICQ reminds me of Jeri Ryan... it can't be that bad, right?

    • Re:IC what? (Score:5, Informative)

      by yincrash (854885) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:20AM (#24031251)
      This is also a nonstory. The fix is just incrementing the version number on what is reported to OSCAR.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I still have my client connect to my ICQ account out of habit. I miss the good old days of ICQ when you could leave the "talk to a random person" feature on.
        • 99501, please report to central for re-education.

            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              Well, if you go to passport.com, the first option is to create a hotmail address. Most users won't go past that. It seems to be a lot easier to get a passport for a non-hotmail address than it used to be. I rememer when I signed up for msn messenger, that it was very difficult to sign up under a different address. Either way, it's still tied to a specific email address. Which seems to be a bad thing if you ever want to change your email address.
  • by urbanriot (924981) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @09:59AM (#24030745)
    No problems here using Miranda IM. (http://www.miranda-im.org/)
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:51AM (#24031891)

      The summary is wrong. They don't block alternative clients but an old version of the protocol. Alternative clients that emulate the current version are fine.

  • by multipart/mixed (163409) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @09:59AM (#24030751)

    That said, the forum thread is interesting. Looks like the ICQ admins are censoring posts.

    • by distr0 (1161389) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:02AM (#24030819)
      not for long, they just lost 12 of their 14 users!
      • by Ilgaz (86384) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:33AM (#24031531) Homepage

        Once upon a time ICQ was de-facto standard in Turkey. You know what they did? (AOL shareholders, listen)
        They banned the TURKISH CABLE IP BLOCK, the _country_ from reaching their servers. They actually banned Cable ISP monopoly but it was like banning all active, high profile users.
        People looked to alternatives, tried proxies (yes,pathetic but needed) and they stared at something which is already installed to their system. Windows (MSN) Messenger. The outcome will amaze you. Microsoft execs are at absolute shock because Turkish MSN _active_ users exceeds 25 million. That is 1/4 of country using a single service.
        Hope the idiots banning a country because of couple lamers read this message. Yes, MSN has 25 million users... Thanks to you!

        • by multipart/mixed (163409) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:36AM (#24031589)

          Is that Turk-Telecom that got banned?

          Because, I gotta say, wow, that netblock generates a LOT of spam. Seriously. Like 25% of my spam comes from there.

          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            No, cable ISP. They didn't ban Turk Telecom. Turk Telecom seems to care for spam reports lately (their mail spam rate going lower along with Poland) but they banned the Cable ISP. Imagine there is only Comcast in USA for Cable ISP and rest are 56K running people. You are banning entire Comcast from your network, they did something similar to it.
            I still suspect some racial profiling etc. since it is really possible to hunt the individual spammers and if you are at a point of banning an entire ISP block, it i

  • AOL (Score:5, Funny)

    by clang_jangle (975789) * on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:03AM (#24030829)
    The one thing AOL has always excelled at is cutting off its nose to spite its face. Though I am rather grateful for all those nice, metal disc boxes which I spray-painted in solid colors (for more worthy discs). They really look great.
    • Re:AOL (Score:4, Insightful)

      by gehrehmee (16338) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:23AM (#24031305) Homepage
      Didn't we just a few months back hear about AOL Adopting Jabber (XMPP)? [slashdot.org] If AOL is seriously looking towards joining the non-legacy IM network, maybe this is just the latest in a long line of effort to de-emphasize and eventually scuttle ICQ in favor of something a little more modern. Or maybe not. One can dream though.
    • Though I am rather grateful for all those nice, metal disc boxes which I spray-painted in solid colors (for more worthy discs). They really look great.

      I always thought they always made good alternatives for clay pidgeons when you have nothing else to shot.

  • Wrong title! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Tester (591) <.tester. .at. .tester.ca.> on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:03AM (#24030843) Homepage

    Actually, they're forcing windows users to upgrade.. It has nothing to do with blocking alternative clients.

    In other news, GnomeICU [sf.net] still works and pidgin has just made a new release with sends a newer version number.

    • by Moraelin (679338) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:54AM (#24031943) Journal

      Well, on the topic of forcing people to upgrade... maybe if the newer software wasn't so retarded, more people would upgrade. Just a thought.

      Admittedly my anecdote isn't comprehensive marketing data and isn't that new either, but just to illustrate a point. So at one point I wanted to communicate with someone who supposedly had only ICQ.

      The last version I had used before was, IIRC, 2002a. Or something. At any rate, it was a relatively clean interface, with just the two text-fields needed, and the minimum of buttons that one might need. All in the Windows configured colours, and with sensible icons that are there, but don't scream for attention and don't look like someone flew an airplane into a clown makeup factory. I'm not necessarily a fan of ICQ or AOL, but I could respect that interface.

      Well, I figured, wth, let's get the newest version. You know, what with potential security holes and whatnot in older versions. I think the version at the moment was ICQ 4. "With Xtraz!" The l33t (ok, SMS-speak) spelling in a product name should have been warning enough. It was everything that the old version wasn't: retarded and annoying and looking like a desperate scream for attention. IIRC with an ad banner thrown in for good measure too.

      I actually went "oh, fuck the security holes, that's why I have an anti-virus and data execution check turned on." I actually uninstalled it and dug through old backup CD-R's to find my trusted old version.

      Well, I uninstalled it completely after a few days and never looked back. So I wouldn't know if the even newer versions fixed that or continued down that slope towards software-Alzheimer's.

      But just saying... if you find that you have to _force_ people to give up their old versions and use the newer one, even when it's for free (as in beer;)... there may be some subtle hint in there.

      And yeah, I know there are other programs one can use instead of the official client. They're just kinda irrelevant for the point I was trying to make, which is about AOL making the users of its official client upgrade.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:04AM (#24030855)

    And working just fine at this very moment.

  • Adium already fixed (Score:5, Informative)

    by Per Wigren (5315) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:04AM (#24030859) Homepage

    I got the "your client is too old" message today, did a manual "check for updates" and found that a new version of Adium (1.2.6) was released and after upgrading ICQ works again.

  • Kopete works (Score:5, Informative)

    by HappySmileMan (1088123) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:05AM (#24030887)
    Kopete fixed this [wordpress.com], well, you have to edit a config file, but once you do that it works fine on Kopete.
  • by Achra (846023) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:06AM (#24030903) Journal
    I was getting this earlier, but the latest seems to connect just fine.
  • Adium 1.2.6 fixes it (Score:4, Informative)

    by McDutchie (151611) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:08AM (#24030947) Homepage
    Adium 1.2.6 is now out which fixes ICQ connectivity [adiumx.com].
  • ICQ = EVIL ? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Roskolnikov (68772) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:15AM (#24031143)

    What I like is if you go to the tech forum on ICQ referred to in initial post you'll see that most if not all workarounds have been edited out by ICQ....nice.

  • by Joe the Lesser (533425) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:23AM (#24031303) Homepage Journal

    And nothing of value was lost

  • Kinda sad (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Just Some Guy (3352) <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Wednesday July 02 2008, @11:25AM (#24032499) Homepage Journal

    I'll miss ICQ when they shut it down. I haven't gotten a real message from it in years (I think - I don't really pay attention to which service in Kopete I'm getting messages from), but I can't bring myself to stop connecting.

    I have a very low 7-digit ID from right after it came out. It was pretty cool to be able to randomly chat with friends without having to log into an IRC channel and wait for them to remember to come online. One time I even bought a girl a computer for Valentine's Day just so I could talk to her while I was at my ISP tech support job; we ended up getting married.

    ICQ sucks and it's spammy and doesn't do anything cool, but there's a lot of nostalgia in that crusty old system. I'll be sad the day when my login stops working for the last time.

  • by HalAtWork (926717) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @01:19PM (#24034257)
    ICQ, the one IM app that doesn't send you a message every time someone hits enter, it promotes that they should finish their idea first before clicking the Send button, so the recipient doesn't have to read the same line over and over because they keep seeing blinking or hearing "message received" noises. The only blinking you see with this program is a tiny icon in the system tray instead of multiple taskbar panes blinking in a very distracting un-synchronized way.

    Yes, you can configure your clients differently, but I'm talking about the default behavior. And even if you are courteous enough to not set it to send your message every time you press enter, your friends won't, and you'll still be getting one-liners that could have waited until they were finished typing their whole idea.
  • Oh come on (Score:4, Informative)

    by Trogre (513942) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @07:15PM (#24038303) Homepage

    This is just an incremental version update. For the licq client at least, it's a one-byte fix in /usr/bin/licq [licq.org]

    • Re:ICQ? (Score:4, Informative)

      by ari_j (90255) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:20AM (#24031245)

      My recent usage, on only one machine but my main workstation for the past 2-1/2 years, gives the following reports from du for my Adium log folder:

      • AIM: 86MB
      • MSN: 37MB
      • Yahoo: 50MB
      • ICQ: 0
      • GTalk: 4.2MB

      Note that I only used MSN and Yahoo for a long time, and added AIM just a few years ago when I moved to a state where apparently everyone is on AIM. I think that there are regional trends for one network to be more popular than others. This probably has to do with the first few people in a particular high school or college starting with one IM network and nobody in that school bothering with the others since they all told their friends "Get X!"

    • I thought ICQ died years ago. Apart from MSN, which I use very rarely, what other IM clients are in common use?

      Depending your geography and demographics, then you will find the popular IM network is not the same. For example ICQ still has a certain popularity in Eastern Europe, QQ in China and South Africa. Avoid basing global statistics on your own usage habits.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I stopped using ICQ earlier this year when my low-seven digit account number was hijacked. ICQ provides ZERO methods of getting hijacked accounts back.

          • by ari_j (90255) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @10:22AM (#24031299)
            Oh crap. Between my Slashdot ID and my ICQ number, now even I realize how old I'm getting! I bet you kids don't even remember Napster itself!
    • Probably worse than torture. They normally don't make you look at popout adds while needles are pushed under your nails.