MIT's OpenCourseWare Program

Kent Simon writes "Many people may not know that MIT has initiated OpenCourseWare, an initiative to share all of their educational resources with the public. This generous act is intended (in classical MIT style) to make knowledge free, open, and available. It's a great resource for people looking to improve their knowledge of our world. OpenCourseWare should prove exceptionally beneficial to those who may not be able to afford the quality of education offered at a school like MIT. Here's a link to all currently available courses. It is expected that by the end of the year every course offered at MIT will be available on the OpenCourseWare site, including lecture notes, homework assignments, and exams. OpenCourseWare is not offered to replace collegiate education, but rather to spread knowledge freely."

Other Free Courses/courseware?

[lecithin (745575)]

Here is a link for HP's free classes:

http://h30187.www3.hp.com/ [hp.com]

Who has more?

Strang's linear algebra

[2.7182 (819680)]

The most amazing thing is Gilbert Strang's linear algebra course. He is a genius lecturer

Re:

[lordofthechia (598872)]

Aye his video lectures really came in useful last semester when I was actually taking Linear Algebra and I needed more exposure to the material. Definitely good stuff and I now make it a point to look up the equivalent MIT OpenCourseware page to the class(es) I'm taking.

On the note of online math tools, professor Paul Dawkins [lamar.edu]from Lamar University also has his notes ranging from Calc I to Differential Equations and Linear Algebra online, not video lectures but much easier to read and follow than the DFQ'

HP != MIT

[by Anonymous Coward]

The following analogy is apt.

HP:MIT :: fat-penguin:F-22

That MIT is providing essentially free knowledge is excellent news. Many intelligent people engage in self-study on various topics and need challenging homework assignments with solutions. Doing exercise problems without solutions means that you could, possibly, learn the material incorrectly and never actually realize your misunderstanding. After all, quantum mechanics is not intuitive.

Your misunderstanding could lead to a malfunctioning

Re:HP != MIT

[heroofhyr (777687)]

More important, I think, than homework assignments is having the textbooks. And a large number of MIT's "open" courses lack the texts. It's rather useless if you're going there because you want to learn Subject X only to find that the only materials you have access to are some lecture videos and a few notes here and there. I understand that classes use books written by other people who have no intention of ever making that book free, but using MIT's OCW as a means of learning is far from a replacement for buying a book or going to a real course. Sometimes even a Wikipedia article provides more useful information about a given subject than all the materials about that subject offered for download by MIT combined. It might have changed since the last time I visited the site, but at the time it wasn't all that impressive except maybe as a refresher for stuff I already knew but hadn't used for ages.

Re:

[Martin Blank (154261)]

While it does mean spending money, there's nothing stopping you from buying the books, though the prices on them can be... significant. For Single Variable Calculus [mit.edu] (the first math course listed), the book used is Calculus with Analytic Geometry [ecampus.com], which seems to go for about $150 new no matter where you look. The book is also used in Multivariable Calculus [mit.edu] and Principles of Aeronautic Control [mit.edu], so at least it can be spread out a bit.

Ow.

Re:

[amazon10x (737466)]

Local libraries often don't carry newer items such as textbooks.

Re:

[EvanED (569694)]

Even university libraries often don't carry them, and when they do, they're often on reserve so you can't take them out, and have to stay in the library. (Or have a very short loan period of a couple hours or so.) At least from my experience.

However, for some topics, old editions can be great. For the calc book mentioned, the previous edition can be had from half.com for as little as $5; $15 supposedly new. For something like calc, this should work pretty well unless the assignments are saying "do this prob

Re:HP != MIT

[geminidomino (614729)]

I'm not so sure. It depends a lot on the lecture notes available and the instructor (if applicable). Now that my job has a tuition reimbursement program, I've gone back to school in Florida State's online B.S. in Software Engineering program. I'm only on my second semester now, but to be honest with you, the only reason I've cracked one of the obscenely overpriced textbooks in my C++ and Discrete Math courses is when graded "homework" was assigned out of them. My prof's lecture notes are almost like a textbook in themselves. (My Comp Org class is another story. The lecture notes are all in powerpoint, so that book actually gets read.)

If the lecture notes distributed in OCW are any good, they may be able to make up for the obscene text prices. If not, two words will help: "Previous Edition."

Berkley online classes/lectures

[lecithin (745575)]

http://webcast.berkeley.edu/courses/index.php [berkeley.edu]

Re:

[Slashdot Don (967094)]

Britney's Guide to Semiconductor Physics [britneyspears.ac]

Don't miss the best part: remixing

[chriss (26574)]

Don't get me wrong: Having the material available for free is great, even though a large part of the courses are incomplete in that they refer you to the standard literature for reference like most regular university courses will. But this is basically a logistic solution, a lot of knowledge is available today to anybody who can get hold of a library card at the local university and a lot of basic knowledge is no further away than the wikipedia.

But you will find that the number of people studying advanced calculus or Sino-Tibetian languages outside of university courses is small, even though a lot of material is available for free. Learning complex subjects is a process, not just a question of getting the information, and the process (with tutorials and working with other students and asking questions and assignments and so on) is what MIT is still selling, the content of OCW is only a small part of that.

Fortunately OCW is not simply free, but (at least partly) licensed under a Creative Commons license allowing non commercial sharing and remixing (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 [creativecommons.org]). While you may not be able to replicate the experience of studying at MIT, someone may take the content and add e.g. a technical communications layer.

You are into advanced web 3.0 elearning platform development, but have no way to create the content? Take OCW, reuse what they have and give the world a new learning experience? You always wanted to write a shoot-'em up game based on and explaining the principles on quantum physics? You solve the DirectX/OpenGL/game engine magic and compensate your lack of talent as a physics tutor by using parts of 8.04 Quantum Physics I, Spring 2006 [mit.edu].

These are primitive ideas, but I think about OCW more as a basis on which people can experiment than a library. Libraries have been around for a long time, unfortunately the majority of people don't use them. To reach the masses, you have to somehow turn the content of OCW into something compatible to a game console. Give it a shot!

Re:

[cloricus (691063)]

As some one currently doing a Comp Sci course at a Uni in Australia I welcome this sort of thing. Any information that you can trust is good information; structured information is so much better. I'll be taking full advantage of this sort of thing to supplement my current learning and for extra things I find interesting.
 
Kudos to MIT and others doing similar!

Re:

[zotz (3951)]

"Fortunately OCW is not simply free, but (at least partly) licensed under a Creative Commons license allowing non commercial sharing and remixing (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 [creativecommons.org])."

And the NonCommercial option makes this gratis but not libre and introduces a large can or worms.

Does anyone know why the institution that has the MIT License named after it felt the need to use a NonCommercial license?

For instance, if I understand what I have read over at the creative commons maili

Thanks, best reply I have read ....

[OldHawk777 (19923)]

I consider MIT OCW as a professor/teacher class instruction resource/content. I don't think the OCW project ever intended to replace academic book publishers or provide multimedia video sessions of a class day. OCW provides other professors/teachers around the world a new resource for course/class instruction/content development for conversion to other cultures, languages, and countries.

Institutions like MIT, CalTech, Stanford, and Berkeley have never appeared (or proved, as best I know) to be as egotistica

Re:Don't miss the best part: remixing

[chriss (26574)]

So your point is that going to university forces you to learn the material and that is why it's better?

Somewhat simplified, but basically: yes.

Get some self discipline.

Great idea, why did I never think of that? Or why didn't billions of other people not simply get some self discipline? Not only would it solve all the problems of our educational systems, it would also rid us of smokers and obese people in no time. I'm actually in the educational business and the big problem is motivation, not access to information. Ever bought a language course on books and CDs? They are flying of the shelves, yet almost nobody (besides the people that already have hardcore self discipline) learns a language with these.

Should you actually have a solution how (or even where) someone can "Get some self discipline", patent it and get rich within seconds. A large part of human kind has been looking for a working solution for centuries. And as a hint: Just do it, Stop whining, Turn on your brain or You only have to really want to are no the solution.

What really helps: study groups. Who's in?

[KWTm (808824)]

In addition to imposing self-discipline, a university class also puts you in touch with like-minded people who are also taking the class, so that classmates can benefit from each other's insight. There's a lot more motivation to learn when there is peer pressure just to be there physically in the classroom, if not actually contribute to the discussion --not to mention the non-peer pressure aspects such as actually learning from classmates' questions and the answers to them.

If I had to name one particular c

Re:Don't miss the best part: remixing

[chriss (26574)]

It seems humans at a certain level are inherently lazy.

Don't think of is as lazy. Think of it as more economic in the short term.

Pleasure and avoiding unpleasant situations are major forces of motivation, and this actually makes sense evolutionary. Having sex not only is fun, but also prevents extinction, eating makes you feel good and prevents starving. Heating and air conditioning keep your environment in a temperature range not only comfortable, but also minimize the chance of freezing or endangering overstressing your heart. Watching TV gives more immediate pleasure than studying quantum physics. Small children usually act based on these economics.

But "learning quantum physics is more rewarding in the long run", so shouldn't you do it anyway? And one of the things that happens during socialization/growing up is learning to postpone pleasure. One nifty trick is to project your pleasure onto something else. A lot of people get kicks of doing a good jobs. If you play video games you are rewarded by points, which completely lack any positive physical feedback, but you have learned to feel good about them.

Now all this happens unconsciously. Someone who is very self disciplined has somehow found ways to gain his/her rewards in the process, so s/he can keep up motivation even through boring tasks. Unfortunately these peoples are often not aware that they are basically tricking themselves and so they flood everybody else with useless tips (the "just do it" kind), usually making it worse, because they cannot really explain what they do to stay motivated, make something difficult look very easy and thereby frustrate the other ones who fail because they believed the simplified version.

The problem is ways more complex and one of the big failures of our educational system is that it assumes that people act based mainly on logic, not that logic only works if it is synced with the basically hormonally run brain. To know is not necessarily to act. I have no short answer to how to change that and only an incomplete long answer. But a start is to forget about lazy and acknowledge that you choose anything for a reason, even if that reason is not what you would superficially consider logical. If you want your brain to do something, you have to offer it some reward now, not in two years. Lots of possible tricks, e.g. visualize your goal in the brightest colors for 20 minutes everyday before you start working. Might work for some people.

I believe that understanding how we learn and are motivated would lead to a leap in human evolution, but we are at the very beginnings. Add some decades for advancing neurology research here.

awesome.

[User 956 (568564)]

This generous act is intended (in classical MIT style) to make knowledge free, open, and available. It's a great resource for people looking to improve their knowledge of our world.

I'm going to combine this with my OpenGrading program. I predict a 4.0 this semester.

Better than the other method.

[twitter (104583)]

I'm going to combine this with my OpenGrading program. I predict a 4.0 this semester.

That does not work very well [slashdot.org]. It's funny how the world takes care of silly tricks like that.

It would be better for you to spend time reading the coursework and apply it to something you do. In engineering, school and grades are a start, achievements are king. You can learn anywhere you are.

Classical MIT style is not free

[MLopat (848735)]

This generous act is intended (in classical MIT style) to make knowledge free

My tuition there was in the tens of thousands of dollars a few years ago. Not complaining. I loved course VI. But free, is not typical MIT style, because as we all know, you get what you pay for.

The Motherload

[Dr. Eggman (932300)]

I must say, they have a very extensive listing, I'm really impressed. But is it wise to post all the exams, including the final? I can only assume that they give the actual students different ones which would relegate the online versions to mere practice. Tons of interesting materials, though. I think I shall enjoy picking through it.

Re:

[monoqlith (610041)]

From what I've seen, at least in Physics, the courses are only posted to OpenCourseWare after completion of the semester in which the course is offered at MIT.

Re:

[bsharitt (580506)]

I've actually been using this for a while, just something to read when bored, and a lot of the coures are quite nice, especially the ones that have full course notes and video.

Re:The Motherload

[Hawkxor (693408)]

Almost all MIT classes write new problem sets and exams each year. However, previous years' exams are some of the best resources for studying, and a large selection of these are usually provided as reference material.

Re:

[CastrTroy (595695)]

I think the reusing exams thing is on a professor by professor basis. I had a physics professor who didn't reuse entire tests, but had a pool of questions that he would answer. And he wouldn't even change the numbers, just use the same questions over and over again. Oh, and the exams were open book, and he let you bring in whatever materials you wanted to. So, a lot of students, rather than study, took their time tracking down old exams. By the end, they had just about every question with them during th

Real /. readers have been aware since 2002... ;-)

[Lord Satri (609291)]

"Many people may not know that MIT has initiated OpenCourseWare [...]"

MIT OpenCourseWare Now Online [slashdot.org]
On September 30th, 2002 with 179 comments

And more much other older stories [slashdot.org].

Re:Real /. readers have been aware since 2002... ;

[psykocrime (61037)]

No doubt. OCW has been discussed many times [google.com] here on Slashdot.

This is new...?

[Zontar The Mindless (9002)]

I seem to recall downloading some of the OpenCourseWare stuff a year or two ago.

And now...

[davecrusoe (861547)]

Ok, so the content is (and has been) open... mostly (if you can get access to the journal articles and books). Now what some feisty OCW-fanatics should do is to start an OCW-compliant online course discussion / collaboration site, so that people who are interested in working through specific course material can all work together, and discuss, rather than operate, read, etc -- in isolation. After all, learning is a social enterprise... call it an open university...

This is what colleges should be about

[starseeker (141897)]

How effective these resources will be depends largely on the learning style of those who plan to study, but what a great resource to have available. So many people could use it:

a) High school students not challenged by their current materials have somewhere to go.
b) Students at other universities who need additional resources can look here.
c) Those simply looking to learn about the world around them have a low/no cost place to start.

I'm sure there are many, many more. But this, in my opinion, is what c

Free courses from Berkeley...

[tcopeland (32225)]

....including "Operating Systems and Systems Programming" and "Machine Structures" are here [berkeley.edu]. Hopefully these are a good listen.

I've also gotten through most of the Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs [blogs.com] lectures and although there's a lot of chalk-on-blackboard noises that you're not able to see, you can still pick up quite a bit of good info.

Coursework isnt the point of college

[jorghis (1000092)]

The course itself is not the point of going to college. If you did this instead of taking a course you would be missing out on the interaction with the professor as well as the connections/letters of recommendation you would get if you were actually attending MIT.

On top of that you could take those open courses and understand the material better than anyone, but who do you think an employer is going to hire/grad school is going to admit? The guy who said he went through the open courses on MITs website or

Re:

[ScrewMaster (602015)]

In other words, it's not what you know but which instructors you slept with. I get it.

Re:

[firstian (810484)]

Having spent a few years at MIT doing a PhD, I agree with that. The most valuable things I got out of it (even though I didn't finish the degree) was able to live with the pressure of being surrounded by people much smarter than you. I spent pretty much all my waking hours working, playing, arguing with my peers in the lab. I was constantly exposed to new ways of thinking about problems, constantly lived in fear of not able to measure up. And then there are those dreaded oral exams. Ever since I was "tormen

curriki.org

[bcrowell (177657)]

Another interesting project, albeit with a very low profile so far and just getting started, is Sun's curriki.org [curriki.org]. AFAICT it's intended to be a more corporate version of wikibooks (which has been a dismal failure, BTW) -- a wiki for making free textbooks. They prefer to use a the BSD-style CC-BY license, they're focusing on K-12, and it looks like they're not going to let people edit unless they're approved by Sun. (Being at least 18 is a hard requirement.) I guess my expectations for curriki.org are low,

Knowledge

[JoshJ (1009085)]

This is a great way to have knowledge at your fingertips, but unfortunately even if you learned everything on the page, you would have exactly zero credibility, as you wouldn't have gone through the 4-5 years of actual schooling. It'd be great if there were a way to actually get credit for reading and studying this without paying MIT approximately $40,000 a year.

I've used it regularly

[miyako (632510)]

I've used open courseware for a while now to do a few different courses. My University degree was informative, but there were certainly bits of information I missed out on. More importantly, since I graduated from school several months ago, it's been easy to get into the habbit of not thinking too much outside of work, so going through some of the material on OCW has been good for keeping me sharp and learning new things.
The biggest problem that I've found is that the quality varies wildly. Some courses, like the intro to algorithms course, have videos of all lectures, as well as MP3 versions, course notes, etc. I find these really helpful since I'm more of an audio learner than a video learner and do better with a lecture to watch.
Other courses are well fleshed out with PDFs and slideshows, which are still a great way to get information.
The problem is some courses have only one or two lectures out of the entire course available, or are missing key lectures.
I think that the OCW initiative is a great idea, and has been well implemented for some courses. I hope to see them get all of the courses up to par with the top quality ones.

Re:

[SQL Error (16383)]

I've been listening to the Introductory Psychology lectures, and they're wonderful. But for the majority of courses, all that's available is lecture notes, and sometimes not even that.

It's a great thing that MIT are doing, but even so, the execution is a little disappointing.

The MIT's OCWP is great,but the OU is better IMHO

[adsl (595429)]

It's really quite something to be able to peruse the MIT's material and all credit to them. However, I think that many find it difficult to go through such material if at the end of the study one has nothing but inner satisfaction and some knowledge to show for it. In the UK they have the Open University with online University Degrees and Post Graduate study courses in a very wide range of subject matters. See http://www3.open.ac.uk/about/ [open.ac.uk] Now this is NO Free but is extremely cost effective compared to ANY

Open Source Testing ?

[LM741N (258038)]

I would love to have MIT's course material available to study, but I know that if my feet aren't held to the fire, I tend to slack off. It would be cool for groups of people to get together to test one another as well on the material. Kind of Open Source Testing for lack of a better set of words. I also know that I get more self confidence and more of a sense of accomplishment when I do well on tests.

Re:Open Source Testing ?

[John Miles (108215)]

That would rock, all right... it'd be great to see a popular community site for self-study participants. It'd be more like a natural extension of the OSS developer-support process. Instead of explaining how to use API function X or feature Y, you'd see people answering questions about lecture points and even swapping exams for grading. (The idea of being accountable to someone else, even an anonymous study partner 2,000 miles away, would be a great motivator for many people.)

Re:

[Nasarius (593729)]

As someone else said, an Open University would be very cool, both for current students around the world who want extra information/help, and those who just want to learn. All it really needs is a name and some minimal infrastructure. Wikiversity [wikiversity.org] seems like a half-assed attempt; I'm sure someone can do better.

Re:Open Source Testing ?

[JoshJ (1009085)]

What it needs is accreditation and for colleges to accept its courses as transfer credit.

Hmm

[Nutty_Irishman (729030)]

This generous act is intended (in classical MIT style) to make knowledge free, open, and available

For a university that is "classical for making knowledge free, open and available", they seem to be putting up a lot of barriers by falling into the #2 spot for number of academic patents filled per year http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/06-2 4.htm [uspto.gov]

Paper

[crossmr (957846)]

As most of us know, knowledge is useless in the "real" world without the piece of paper behind it to back it up. Most employers don't want to do their own testing. I guess if you wanted to study your ass off and challenge a bunch of courses you could save that way.

More useful for leaders than followers

[dstone (191334)]

As most of us know, knowledge is useless in the "real" world without the piece of paper behind it to back it up.

If you need someone's permission or resources to apply knowledge then, sure, you might need paper credentials. The classic example is those looking to be hired for their first job.

But if you need knowledge and you're already in a position to apply it (e.g. self-employed, already employed with seniority, or a hobbyist/independent/artist/mad-scientist)... then this OpenCourse concept is fantastic.

If you're worried about textbooks...

[cursorx (954743)]

...and couldn't care less about copyright law, head over to a private e-learning torrent tracker (just Google...getting invites is harder, but persevere), or connect to the ed2k network. You can easily complement these MIT course outlines with the recommended textbooks, in nice .pdf, ready-to-print format. If you don't find what you need, request it and someone might be able to help you. Or just go to a library.

I appreciate MIT's initiative, but they should disclose a bit more about these courses than what amounts to, basically, extended syllabi. Lecture notes, from the samples I've examined, are predictably useless. Some of the courses have videos of lectures, and that's a big plus compared to most of what the OpenCourseWare program usually offers. But that's not really enough. It's somewhat useful, but they're only distributing breadcrumbs, pretending they're giving out the whole bread (or half a loaf).

Doesn't meet the hype

[homotopy (766889)]

As a physicist, I took a serious interest in the physics and math courses. A few are outstanding, providing lecture notes, worked examples, etc., but the majority have very little material. Frequently just a list of textbooks and a schedule - the sort of thing every college instructor posts for every course anyway.

Re:

[JoshJ (1009085)]

A Creative Commons license, but I'm fairly sure the noncommercial clause alone will make it noncompatible with GNU's FDL.