Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Been Robbed Recently? Check Ebay

Posted by kdawson on Mon Jan 08, 2007 09:02 PM
from the pawn-shop-of-the-new-century dept.
fistfullast33l writes "A man from Great Neck, Long Island has been arrested on charges of stealing electronic equipment and selling it on Ebay. The police were tipped off when one of his alleged victims was searching for a replacement GPS device and found a perfect match on eBay — almost too perfect. A quick check of the serial number (note to cyber-criminals: don't post those) showed that it was the exact device that had been stolen." From the article: "Police and prosecutors were hesitant to provide details of how they determined all the devices had been stolen, but at least two of the laptops were stamped 'Property of St. John's University.' Detective Ray Cote noted that the GPS devices specifically had the addresses of the legitimate owners programmed in and police were now contacting those victims to eventually return the items."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Eventually? (Score:5, Funny)

    by hahafaha (844574) * <lgrinberg@gmail.com> on Monday January 08 2007, @09:04PM (#17517806)
    ...police were now contacting those victims to eventually return the items.

    Just a minute, sir. I'm almost done downloading this pr0n.

    • No, you see one of the perks of being a policeman is getting to use stolen property for a while before it's returned.
  • well (Score:5, Funny)

    by User 956 (568564) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:07PM (#17517828) Homepage
    A man from Great Neck, Long Island has been arrested on charges of stealing electronic equipment and selling it on Ebay.

    A++++ WOULD DEFINITELY STEAL FROM AGAIN
  • by carterhawk001 (681941) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:09PM (#17517856) Journal
    Ive been wondering, what will happen to the people who bought from him? Will they be required to return what they bought to the original owners? Will they be tracked down by the police for recieving stolen goods?
    • by hahafaha (844574) * <lgrinberg@gmail.com> on Monday January 08 2007, @09:11PM (#17517866)

      Very good question. My guess is that they will be tracked down and required to return the items, but will be compensated at the expense of the thief.

      They will certainly not get into trouble for the purchase of stolen goods, and if they do, any reasonable judge would automatically acquit them.

      • by Vellmont (569020) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:37PM (#17518062)

        Very good question. My guess is that they will be tracked down and required to return the items, but will be compensated at the expense of the thief.

        I seriously doubt the police are going to bother with this, or even have the resources to do so. Most of these buyers aren't going to be from NYC, so there's a jurisdiction problem. Also who's to say EVERYTHING he sold is stolen? It probbably is, but that's not proof.

        The best that could be accomplished is to contact each buyer and tell them the seller sold stolen items on ebay, and the item they bought might be stolen. Then ask them to look for information on the items that might identify the owner.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        They will certainly not get into trouble for the purchase of stolen goods, and if they do, any reasonable judge would automatically acquit them.

        Unless eBay was being used to launder them...

      • Disclaimer: IANAL The legal doctrine here is one of "Reasonable Expectation". For example if I bought a GPS device from a stranger on the street for $20, would a reasonable human assume that the deal is too good to be true and that it was probably stolen? Generally the judges would say yes. If said reasonable expectation were established, yes I'd be required to return the item and no I won't necessarily get compensated for it. However, if I bought a GPS Device for $600 at Best Buy, and woah mamma! Best Buy picks a wrong supplier and it was stolen property. Nobody would have suspected it was stolen. The liability here shifts entirely to the thief and most likely I'm keeping my GPS device. Now reasonable expectation that something selling on auction at Ebay like was said? Tough call, ask your local judge what he thinks of reasonable expectation...
        • by foreverdisillusioned (763799) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:51PM (#17518964) Journal
          IANAL, either, but I was always under the impression that you're never allowed to keep stolen property, full stop. The fact that you made (what you thought was) a legitimate purchase doesn't change the fact that the seller did not have the right to sell the item in question.

          For example, there have been a couple cases of people being conned into "buying" public property (most famously the Brooklyn Bridge.) Yes, these people were EXTREMELY gullible, so it probably wouldn't pass your "reasonable expectation" test, but let's take a step back for a moment and imagine a scenario where the person was not extraordinarily gullible, but rather was duped through nigh-superhuman effort on the part of the con artist. Let's say that the fraudster knew that the target would have a keen interested in buying the Brooklyn Bridge, if it was ever actually for sale, so he cooked up a scheme involving buying off the subject's friends and acquaintances, slipping him fake newspapers, hiring actors to play all the appropriate officials, figured out a halfway plausible reason for the sale (they're building a replacement, perhaps) etc. and in the end, he actually succeeds in convincing his target that the Brooklyn Bridge was, indeed, for sale, and the target "buys" it from the criminal. Does that now mean that the target legally owns the Brooklyn Bridge? Of course, the only sane answer is a resounding "NO!" The government did not agree to sell him anything.

          I believe that the "reasonable expectation" concept you speak of pertains more to criminal culpability--the buyer be held criminally responsible, for example, if he buys the Mona Lisa (a few months after it was stolen) because it's not reasonable for him to claim that he didn't know it was stolen.

          I'm not 100% sure on this, but it just makes sense--if ownership of the stolen property was actually legally transfered to the buyer, it would be utter chaos. You could steal the hope diamond, trade it to your friend for a candy bar (technically, this is a valid transaction) telling him it's worthless glass, and as long as you could prove that your friend really did think it was fake, it would become his legal property and the original owners would be SOL. Somehow, I really doubt that it works that way...
        • by dr_d_19 (206418) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @03:31AM (#17520188)
          In Sweden, up until just recently, you could buy something in "good faith", which matches your description. This is, however, not the case anymore. If you buy stolen goods you will need to return it to the previous owner no matter what, and hope to get your money back from whoever you bought it from.
            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              I would rather think that using good faith as an excuse is good in theory but not in practice. The problem is that there are too many gray areas, and people wouldn't mind buying stolen goods when cheaper even though they suspect (or know) that they are dealing with stolen goods.
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            I can get Microsoft Office for $20. I work for a very large group that uses Microsoft. In return for selling out to Microsoft, all the employees get the offer to buy a licensed copy of Office for $20. Of course, 8 years ago, we were allowed to take the disks to install on our home computer for free. 8 years ago, I had Office on my home computer. Now, OpenOffice, also free.
        • by aussie_a (778472) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @01:55AM (#17519682) Journal
          Wow you must have some pretty clever thieves to be able to steal entire houses.

          Husband: Will you be glad to be home after visiting the in-laws honey?
          Wife: Yeah.
          Husband: Well here we... hmmm... the house isn't there.
          Wife: *sigh* Have you checked your pockets?
          Husband: Now why would it be in my pockets? Someone must have stolen it.
          Wife: Check your pockets. You're always leaving stuff there.
        • by CmdrGravy (645153) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @04:52AM (#17520540) Homepage
          In the UK you have to return the goods and there is no compensation. A lot of people buying second hand cars get stung when the police turn up and tell them the car was stolen.

          The car is the returned to it's orginal owner or sold by the insurance comany and the buyer gets nothing. This is why it's a good idea to check whether a car is stolen before you buy it because not even your insurance will cover you for this. I would guess its the same with any stolen goods in the UK.
  • by biocute (936687) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:11PM (#17517868) Homepage
    Would you rather be able to 'buy back' a hard-to-find stolen part from eBay, or have to either source this part from a supplier (more expensively) or abandon the device altogether?
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)


      I'd rather find out who your new roommate is and toss him a few bucks to give you the jailhouse welcome.

    • Well, there's another option; you notify the police, and then go through with the sale, in hopes of getting some information that would let the authorities catch the crook. In the worst case, you've bought back your part, and in the best case you'll get your part, plus restitution, plus you'll have sweet, sweet revenge.

      A friend of mine got his cellphone and wallet stolen when his car was burglarized, and by monitoring the numbers that the thief called from it, and then calling up the various numbers and pretending to be different people (which is an amusing social engineering story in itself), got the name and home phone number of the criminal. The police, who weren't very much help otherwise, went out and picked the guy up (he was apparently well known to them). My friend got his phone back, plus restitution for the money in his wallet. If he had just waited for the police to do something, he would have been out a phone and a substantial amount of cash.

      Sometimes you just need to do some detective work yourself.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Dude you got some issues. This is your second post advocating violence to deal with lost property. You really should get some counseling.
  • irony (Score:4, Funny)

    by silverkniveshotmail. (713965) <everettpf3 AT gmail DOT com> on Monday January 08 2007, @09:12PM (#17517876) Journal
    On his most recent sale the GPS unit has an anti-theft feature. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =320065453054 [ebay.com]
  • by EmbeddedJanitor (597831) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:13PM (#17517886)
    Please do post serial numbers. Please also post name/address of previous owner so we can verify that the item is in a good state of repair. Please also get a sworn statement from a police officer that the facts have been verified and are correct.
  • Hmmm...Aiding and abetting are we? :-)
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        There are lots of reasons why you'd want at least partial serial numbers; wireless cards and routers are two examples. I'd never buy one at least I knew the H/W revision or had the serial number to determine it by. There are totally different devices sold under the same 'model' number; unless you have the version or serial (which is sometimes the only / easiest way to determine hardware version), you don't know what you're buying.

        In general you don't need to know the whole serial, only part of it, but I don
        • Re:Cellular Phones (Score:4, Interesting)

          by networkBoy (774728) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @01:55AM (#17519690) Homepage Journal
          Funny story.
          We were carrying Sprint cell phones right when they started rolling out their CDMA service. We had a live demo phone to show off the clarity. My (now wife) GF was helping these two retards from the next door Hometown Buffet (who had stolen the phone from the demo kiosk). They were asking about car chargers and she said: "I'll be happy to help you once you give me my phone back". Well, they bolted (nevermind the Hometown Buffet polo shirts or the name tags), and my GF called the sprint store. These fools went to make a call, where upon a security officer from sprint (pretexting as a customer service rep) said: "Oh, the store must have accidently sold you a demo unit. Bring it into the Sprint store on Fulton for a free replacement and activation." Like all crooks who've been caught, these guys were morons and went into the store. While the replacement phone was "activating" the cops were on the way :-)

          Nevermind that my GF was also in the Buffet chewing out the manager about these two. She successfully recovered the value of the demo kiosk (which they damaged when they stole the phone) from their final paychecks, leaving them with (IIRC) under a buck each for the "you're fired" pay check.

          -nB
  • Don't make any more difficult to get our shit back...
  • by HerrEkberg (971000) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:23PM (#17517974) Homepage
    From TFA:

    "Unbelievable as it seems, he was in the bidding to buy his own stolen GPS,'' Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice said.
    From ebay.com:

    Shill bidding is when a seller - or someone associated with a seller - bids on that seller's own item. These bids artificially increase the price or desirability of the item, and damage buyers' faith in the integrity and fairness of the marketplace. Shill Bidding is not allowed on eBay.
  • Idiots (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PinkyGigglebrain (730753) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:29PM (#17518006)
    I've always said that the prisons are full of stupid criminals. And no, I am not counting those who are wrongfully convicted or getting unfairly prosicuted. Only the ones who did a crime and then did something that made it easy to catch them, like putting stuff up on eBay, looking right at the camera, or sending a letter to the FBI taunting them about how they will never catch you, only to have them pull DNA from the back of the stamp linking you to more crimes you didn't mention and giving them a starting point to search thanks to the postmark.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      I think it was Ambrose Bierce who said that the reasons prison populations have so many morons is that morons are so stupid that even a detective can catch them.
  • Ahhh (Score:5, Funny)

    by umbrellasd (876984) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:54PM (#17518178)
    This is one of those rare situations where the general stupidity of human beings is reassuring.
  • by textstring (924171) on Monday January 08 2007, @09:58PM (#17518214)
    To find out people sell stolen things on ebay! *gasp*
  • by newscloud (1037538) on Monday January 08 2007, @10:25PM (#17518404) Homepage
    When my house was robbed, I found my $2,000 LCD monitor on ebay complete with picture of serial number on the back which matched (except for one number slightly too fuzzy to verify a match). This was the week after the robbery. When I called the detective assigned to my case, he did nothing with the information. He said finding my monitor in the hands of a fence would do nothing to catch the people who robbed me. Yeah, but investigating the case might have helped... I learned from this experience that the insurance industry subsidizes the majority of property crime in this country because we're certainly not funding the police well enough to do much about it.
    • by LoRdTAW (99712) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:00PM (#17518642)
      Thats exactly what happened to me. The police don't really care. Just last week on jan 2nd someone broke into my car by my friends house. It was because I had forgot my ipod in the center console in plain sight. The thief also helped himself to my stereo too, thankfully I bought it used from a friend for 50 bucks so no real loss. But now I have to replace my $250 ipod, new radio(haven't bought it yet) and my window cost me $150 to fix. The cops answer? Go report it to insurance and have them pay for it. They didn't even bother to lift prints as they said they didn't have a print kit. I understand they cant do everything but it is annoying.
        • by Rich0 (548339) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @12:53PM (#17524822) Homepage
          It is all about escalation and quality of life. When I was in school somebody spray-painted the outside wall of the school. The next morning the principal delivered a long sermon, and within about 24 hours the pain was sandblasted off - probably at a cost of $10k or more. However, the move was effective - no more sparypainting for as long as I was there. If the paint were left up I'm sure somebody would have added to it within a week. Sure, the paint doesn't cost anything, but it makes th school look like a ghetto and probably would tend to result in the students acting more like they lived in one.

          If somebody steals a $250 stereo the police should spend $40k tracking the guy down. Then fine and/or imprison the criminal for the full cost of the investigation - if they're underage put a lean on the parent's house. A town with a theft problem probably has only 10 thieves in it, and if you got rid of them the quality of life would probably skyrocket. A few thieves go a long way, and inspire the next generation to do the same.

          And today's thief is tomorrow's mugger or murderer. Throw the book at them before somebody gets killed or hurt.

          This whole philosophy is what made Guiliani popular in NYC - he cleaned the place up by spending money on petty crimes, and got rid of many of the big expensive crimes in the process.

          Now, the war on drugs is a different story...
      • by Grishnakh (216268) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @01:20AM (#17519506)
        If he tries something, defend yourself. If I were on a jury, I'd most certainly acquit or vote for a verdict of not guilty by self defense...

        I'm all for vigilante justice, but unfortunately, I believe the reality is that in a situation like this, a jury is much more likely to convict because this guy scared or hurt the "poor" burglar. Juries in this country are always filled with losers and morons who side with criminals.

        Here in Arizona, one of the most gun-friendly (and weapon-friendly: we can carry switchblades legally) states, we had an incident recently where a retired schoolteacher was hiking in the forest and was attacked by some dogs. He took out his 10mm and fired into the ground, scaring them off, but then the crazy owner ran for him to attack him (apparently ignoring the fact that the guy was armed), so the guy shot him rather than be hurt or killed by the larger and much younger man. During the trial, it came out that the dog-owner was mentally unstable, lived in his car in the woods, had a huge anger management problem, etc., but all that testimony was disallowed. The older man (60+) was convicted and sentenced to 10 years. One interesting point made by the prosecutor was that the guy was using hollow-point "killer" rounds in his 10mm, and also that his gun was a 10mm which is quite powerful. This apparently had the effect of turning many of the stupid jurors' opinions against him. But any moron knows that if you're going to defend yourself, you want hollow-point bullets (after all, that's what police use), and 10mm guns are sometimes used by police as well. Not to mention, the guy was carrying this gun to protect himself from mountain lions and bears which are common in that area, not from crazy dog owners, and with bears and the like, bigger is better. Anyway, my point after all this rambling is that even here in a very pro-gun "red" state, and in one of the smaller towns (not more liberal Tucson or Phoenix), the jury was full of the same "poor criminal" mentality jurors that you'd expect in Massachusetts.
        • I wrote a nice scathing reply to your post, however my verification word was "gentler" so I offer this instead.

          BOO!

  • by Rooked_One (591287) on Monday January 08 2007, @10:43PM (#17518528) Journal
    A quick check of the serial number (note to cyber-criminals: don't post those) showed that it was the exact device that had been stolen."

    Because /. is full of criminals???
  • by aslvrstn (1047588) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:03PM (#17518670)
    My P-P-P-Powerbook was just stolen and I found the thief reselling it on ebay! Call the cops!
  • by beadfulthings (975812) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:06PM (#17518690) Journal
    My Aged Mum, who was then 80 years of age, lived in an apartment residence for the elderly. Two years ago (on Christmas Eve, no less) she was the victim of a ruthless home invasion. The thief had worked very hard to gain the trust of the elderly residents, and on the night she struck (yep, it was a woman), my mother admitted her to the apartment.

    Mom's phone wires were cut her call bell was de-commissioned, and she was savagely beaten--actually unimaginably beaten, and left for dead on the floor in her living room. One of the items taken was an antique doll, quite distinctive and large, and also very valuable. It dated back to approximately the 1820's and had been handed down through the generations from mother to daughter for all that time.

    Aged Mum survived, though with traumatic brain injuries that left her mental capacities greatly diminished. She grieved over that doll; perhaps it was irrational, but I grieved, too. While the police worked on finding the perpetrator, I began to haunt eBay. Each morning as I started work, and each night before I went to bed, I ran search after search, using every term I could think of. Three weeks after the crime, I hit paydirt; the doll was there. Because I had been so connected to it over my lifetime, I was able to supply an exhaustive description. (Unaccountably we had no photograph.) The police contacted eBay, the auction was stopped, they got a warrant, and next morning they served it on the seller.

    As it turns out, he was legitimate; he had purchased the doll at a well known local flea market the week before. He had been on eBay for several years, selling vintage stuff and assorted items he found at local sales. He provided as much information as he could, and the doll was returned to us within 24 hours of my first locating it at eBay. The doll's porcelain head was undamaged, but her arms (which are kidskin leather) were in bad shape.

    Stories like this really don't have good outcomes. In our case we've had to see an intelligent, lively old lady suffer the loss of her intellect in what should be a comfortable old age. The police have not located the criminal after two years, and additional violence has taken place at that facility where my mother lived. Aged Mum is in a much better facility now, and the doll is here with me--and has been photographed and appraised for insurance purposes.

    I guess the lessons learned are these: (1) Ebay does cooperate with police, and the police know how to secure their cooperation--probably best to leave the interaction to the cops. (2) I had some kind of underlying certainty, which might have been irrational, that the doll would eventually show up on eBay, one way or the other. I searched diligently and regularly. (3) Document your valuables. (4) It may take a while for your items to turn up, and they may pass through several hands. It all depends on whether the scum who has robbed you is versed in eBay or has to use the traditional fences, flea markets, and crooked pawnbrokers.
     
  • Serial #s (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LordLucless (582312) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:11PM (#17518726)
    Actually, it would be quite beneficial if listing the serial # of items on eBay became a de facto SOP. If legitimate traders started including identifying information, such as serial #s, as a way of verifying that the goods were not stolen, other merchants would be pressured into doing the same. Listings without a serial number would be regarded as suspicious, so people wouldn't get burnt dealing with crooks.
  • Stolen PC (Score:3, Funny)

    by flyingfsck (986395) on Tuesday January 09 2007, @12:36AM (#17519228)
    The wife's PC was stolen a few days ago - I'm waiting for the asshat to plug it into the internet. Come-on buddy, plug it in, plug it in.

    Grumble, grumble...
  • and living in Chicago and got robbed, all I had to do was get my ass down to Maxwell Street on Sunday morning to buy back my stuff.

    ah the good old days, when I used to live next door to a 10 acre Fencing operation..er...Flea Market.

  • by toby (759) * on Tuesday January 09 2007, @01:38AM (#17519606) Homepage Journal
    A couple of semi-obvious tips on spotting a stolen computer: 1. very careless packaging; 2. personal data intact.

    In both cases we contacted police. In one case, apparently little was done by police, despite serial number check immediately revealing that the machine had been recently stolen from a school. In the 2nd case, the stolen laptop - full of personal data, mostly irreplaceable - was the only lead in solving a major house burglary. Laptop returned to owner, thief arrested, eventually had to pay restitution to ebay purchaser. In the second case, the ebay seller's transaction history looked very suspicious. If you have any suspicions - random tips: comb feedback logs in detail; if machine has personal data, contact previous owner (in our case, they confirmed the robbery and were very grateful); Try to get as much identifying detail from seller as possible in case it must be given to police; Don't meet them in person; Get serial numbers and check with police before concluding the sale; contact police and ask for advice.
    • by mosch (204) on Monday January 08 2007, @10:58PM (#17518634) Homepage
      It was only after I bid that I noticed the "No pick-up, postage only" clause in the description. It made me wonder why a seller that was apparently less than 10 km away wasn't prepared to let me know what they look like or where they are, yet they wanted my address.

      I can think of a few possibilities:

      1) Seller cares about his time, and doesn't feel like trying to match schedules with random strangers who may or may not be timely.

      2) Seller cares about his safety and privacy, and doesn't want some stranger scoping out his place to rob it.

      3) Seller wants to charge $30 for shipping when item costs $20 to ship, netting an extra $10.

      4) Seller is afraid that buyer might be a paranoid slashtastic moron, who thinks that every single fucking thing in life is a trap.

      I'm not a crook, but there isn't a chance in hell I would agree to in-person pickups.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        5) Seller has been burned by negative feedback for "item never received" (or is just paranoid) and wants to ship with tracking to prove the item got sent.